- This topic has 107 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 1, 2007 at 4:30 PM #94407November 1, 2007 at 4:59 PM #94379kewpParticipant
what is the discrepancy in salaries/incomes.
Courtesy of:
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/medincsizeandstate.html
Arkansas Estimate Margin of Error
Total: 45,093 +/-813
2-person families 40,604 +/-821
3-person families 47,588 +/-1,487
4-person families 52,185 +/-1,486
5-person families 50,500 +/-1,924
6-person families 51,971 +/-6,247
7-or-more-person families 49,272 +/-4,514California Estimate Margin of Error
Total: 64,563 +/-413
2-person families 60,032 +/-524
3-person families 64,766 +/-854
4-person families 74,801 +/-868
5-person families 64,132 +/-1,356
6-person families 61,348 +/-1,096
7-or-more-person families 68,030 +/-2,050By your logic, all things being equal, CA homes should be 30% more than AK homes.
Apparently this is not the case.
November 1, 2007 at 4:59 PM #94416kewpParticipantwhat is the discrepancy in salaries/incomes.
Courtesy of:
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/medincsizeandstate.html
Arkansas Estimate Margin of Error
Total: 45,093 +/-813
2-person families 40,604 +/-821
3-person families 47,588 +/-1,487
4-person families 52,185 +/-1,486
5-person families 50,500 +/-1,924
6-person families 51,971 +/-6,247
7-or-more-person families 49,272 +/-4,514California Estimate Margin of Error
Total: 64,563 +/-413
2-person families 60,032 +/-524
3-person families 64,766 +/-854
4-person families 74,801 +/-868
5-person families 64,132 +/-1,356
6-person families 61,348 +/-1,096
7-or-more-person families 68,030 +/-2,050By your logic, all things being equal, CA homes should be 30% more than AK homes.
Apparently this is not the case.
November 1, 2007 at 4:59 PM #94425kewpParticipantwhat is the discrepancy in salaries/incomes.
Courtesy of:
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/medincsizeandstate.html
Arkansas Estimate Margin of Error
Total: 45,093 +/-813
2-person families 40,604 +/-821
3-person families 47,588 +/-1,487
4-person families 52,185 +/-1,486
5-person families 50,500 +/-1,924
6-person families 51,971 +/-6,247
7-or-more-person families 49,272 +/-4,514California Estimate Margin of Error
Total: 64,563 +/-413
2-person families 60,032 +/-524
3-person families 64,766 +/-854
4-person families 74,801 +/-868
5-person families 64,132 +/-1,356
6-person families 61,348 +/-1,096
7-or-more-person families 68,030 +/-2,050By your logic, all things being equal, CA homes should be 30% more than AK homes.
Apparently this is not the case.
November 1, 2007 at 5:12 PM #94382Ex-SDParticipantkewp: You beat me to it:
South Carolina……….Estimate…Margin of Error
Total: 50,334 +/-657
2-person families……45,233 +/-752
3-person families…….51,525 +/-1,739
4-person families…….59,663 +/-1,819
5-person families…….55,134 +/-2,696
6-person families…….60,783 +/-6,321
7-or-more-people…….47,140 +/-4,554As you can see, things are way out of wack in SD and the rest of CA.
What’s selling for $475k in SD should be priced at around $215-$220k in SD.November 1, 2007 at 5:12 PM #94418Ex-SDParticipantkewp: You beat me to it:
South Carolina……….Estimate…Margin of Error
Total: 50,334 +/-657
2-person families……45,233 +/-752
3-person families…….51,525 +/-1,739
4-person families…….59,663 +/-1,819
5-person families…….55,134 +/-2,696
6-person families…….60,783 +/-6,321
7-or-more-people…….47,140 +/-4,554As you can see, things are way out of wack in SD and the rest of CA.
What’s selling for $475k in SD should be priced at around $215-$220k in SD.November 1, 2007 at 5:12 PM #94427Ex-SDParticipantkewp: You beat me to it:
South Carolina……….Estimate…Margin of Error
Total: 50,334 +/-657
2-person families……45,233 +/-752
3-person families…….51,525 +/-1,739
4-person families…….59,663 +/-1,819
5-person families…….55,134 +/-2,696
6-person families…….60,783 +/-6,321
7-or-more-people…….47,140 +/-4,554As you can see, things are way out of wack in SD and the rest of CA.
What’s selling for $475k in SD should be priced at around $215-$220k in SD.November 1, 2007 at 5:18 PM #94391garysearsParticipantI think this is an incredible loan. I wouldn’t mind taking advantage of such an ill conceived program designed to get unqualified people into the peak of the mania.
Why overpay now to do it?
It will be a double bonus later on to buy a house at a reasonable price plus get better than market financing. No one should feel pressured to buy immediately due to any such program. Price matters more than financing terms or monthly payment.
Anyone really think these programs are going anywhere soon? My guess is more government intervention and not less as this plays out.
It doesn’t seem likely wages will dramatically inflate to stabilize prices. Isn’t it normal for wage inflation to lag real inflation? The claim that a 4% wage increase is outpacing inflation would be hotly contested by many.
My personal real estate bet is I can pick a more reasonable entry point into the market before wages show any substantial increase.
Don’t forget about financing in the face of obvious inflation. Even if incomes rise somewhat, financing is only likely to get more difficult. The net result will still be declining property values. I don’t see how devaluation of the dollar even matters. It is basic supply and demand.
Wage inflation is swimming upstream against both the financing and distressed inventory trends.
Stay patient.
November 1, 2007 at 5:18 PM #94428garysearsParticipantI think this is an incredible loan. I wouldn’t mind taking advantage of such an ill conceived program designed to get unqualified people into the peak of the mania.
Why overpay now to do it?
It will be a double bonus later on to buy a house at a reasonable price plus get better than market financing. No one should feel pressured to buy immediately due to any such program. Price matters more than financing terms or monthly payment.
Anyone really think these programs are going anywhere soon? My guess is more government intervention and not less as this plays out.
It doesn’t seem likely wages will dramatically inflate to stabilize prices. Isn’t it normal for wage inflation to lag real inflation? The claim that a 4% wage increase is outpacing inflation would be hotly contested by many.
My personal real estate bet is I can pick a more reasonable entry point into the market before wages show any substantial increase.
Don’t forget about financing in the face of obvious inflation. Even if incomes rise somewhat, financing is only likely to get more difficult. The net result will still be declining property values. I don’t see how devaluation of the dollar even matters. It is basic supply and demand.
Wage inflation is swimming upstream against both the financing and distressed inventory trends.
Stay patient.
November 1, 2007 at 5:18 PM #94437garysearsParticipantI think this is an incredible loan. I wouldn’t mind taking advantage of such an ill conceived program designed to get unqualified people into the peak of the mania.
Why overpay now to do it?
It will be a double bonus later on to buy a house at a reasonable price plus get better than market financing. No one should feel pressured to buy immediately due to any such program. Price matters more than financing terms or monthly payment.
Anyone really think these programs are going anywhere soon? My guess is more government intervention and not less as this plays out.
It doesn’t seem likely wages will dramatically inflate to stabilize prices. Isn’t it normal for wage inflation to lag real inflation? The claim that a 4% wage increase is outpacing inflation would be hotly contested by many.
My personal real estate bet is I can pick a more reasonable entry point into the market before wages show any substantial increase.
Don’t forget about financing in the face of obvious inflation. Even if incomes rise somewhat, financing is only likely to get more difficult. The net result will still be declining property values. I don’t see how devaluation of the dollar even matters. It is basic supply and demand.
Wage inflation is swimming upstream against both the financing and distressed inventory trends.
Stay patient.
November 1, 2007 at 5:22 PM #94394RaybyrnesParticipantpatientlywaiting
“But considering how much house prices will drop, those financing schemes don’t mean much. Buy a house at a price you can afford not because of financing schemes.”I will totally support this statement. I don’t think anyone should use any other financial instrament unless they can afford the 30 year fixed. Once the 30 year fixed is management the ability to use IO, neg am, ARMS etc become vialbale options becasue you can already mangement the payments. At this point it is just a matter of whether or not you can get a better rate of return investing the differnce.
Best scenario is to identify something you can afford and then use the affordable-income programs.
But be aware that if you do well, get married etc you can quickly exceed the income limits and all of a sudden you are trapped in the middle. It happend to me so I speak from experience.
November 1, 2007 at 5:22 PM #94431RaybyrnesParticipantpatientlywaiting
“But considering how much house prices will drop, those financing schemes don’t mean much. Buy a house at a price you can afford not because of financing schemes.”I will totally support this statement. I don’t think anyone should use any other financial instrament unless they can afford the 30 year fixed. Once the 30 year fixed is management the ability to use IO, neg am, ARMS etc become vialbale options becasue you can already mangement the payments. At this point it is just a matter of whether or not you can get a better rate of return investing the differnce.
Best scenario is to identify something you can afford and then use the affordable-income programs.
But be aware that if you do well, get married etc you can quickly exceed the income limits and all of a sudden you are trapped in the middle. It happend to me so I speak from experience.
November 1, 2007 at 5:22 PM #94441RaybyrnesParticipantpatientlywaiting
“But considering how much house prices will drop, those financing schemes don’t mean much. Buy a house at a price you can afford not because of financing schemes.”I will totally support this statement. I don’t think anyone should use any other financial instrament unless they can afford the 30 year fixed. Once the 30 year fixed is management the ability to use IO, neg am, ARMS etc become vialbale options becasue you can already mangement the payments. At this point it is just a matter of whether or not you can get a better rate of return investing the differnce.
Best scenario is to identify something you can afford and then use the affordable-income programs.
But be aware that if you do well, get married etc you can quickly exceed the income limits and all of a sudden you are trapped in the middle. It happend to me so I speak from experience.
November 1, 2007 at 5:43 PM #94397kev374Participanta 40 yr loan doesn’t make any sense. The difference in payments between a 30yr and a 40yr isn’t all that much but an additional 10 years is a loonnnnnng time to continue making those payments. And do you want to keep paying a mortgage into retirement? Geez!
November 1, 2007 at 5:43 PM #94435kev374Participanta 40 yr loan doesn’t make any sense. The difference in payments between a 30yr and a 40yr isn’t all that much but an additional 10 years is a loonnnnnng time to continue making those payments. And do you want to keep paying a mortgage into retirement? Geez!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.