- This topic has 207 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by The OC Scam.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 6, 2007 at 12:48 AM #110196December 6, 2007 at 4:45 AM #110054blackboxParticipant
Look, some type of bailout was going to happen as this thing started going into a death spiral. I’m not happy about it, but at least this is not a cross the board freeze. Plenty of ifs and whats typical of a govt plan. It is also on a volunteer basis. These means some foot dragging is called for by the lenders. If there was going to be a bailout, I’d rather have a republican one. The democrats want to give the people losing there homes back to them outright and across the board. These proposal will bleed the bailout into an inefective drip drip. This is the best case bailout, as far as bailouts go. By Jan 09 when the socialist can get into office, it will be too little to late to do anything about this housing bust. I don’t like it, but its the best bailout we guys could wish for, considering that one was coming. The less people it helps the better!
December 6, 2007 at 4:45 AM #110171blackboxParticipantLook, some type of bailout was going to happen as this thing started going into a death spiral. I’m not happy about it, but at least this is not a cross the board freeze. Plenty of ifs and whats typical of a govt plan. It is also on a volunteer basis. These means some foot dragging is called for by the lenders. If there was going to be a bailout, I’d rather have a republican one. The democrats want to give the people losing there homes back to them outright and across the board. These proposal will bleed the bailout into an inefective drip drip. This is the best case bailout, as far as bailouts go. By Jan 09 when the socialist can get into office, it will be too little to late to do anything about this housing bust. I don’t like it, but its the best bailout we guys could wish for, considering that one was coming. The less people it helps the better!
December 6, 2007 at 4:45 AM #110199blackboxParticipantLook, some type of bailout was going to happen as this thing started going into a death spiral. I’m not happy about it, but at least this is not a cross the board freeze. Plenty of ifs and whats typical of a govt plan. It is also on a volunteer basis. These means some foot dragging is called for by the lenders. If there was going to be a bailout, I’d rather have a republican one. The democrats want to give the people losing there homes back to them outright and across the board. These proposal will bleed the bailout into an inefective drip drip. This is the best case bailout, as far as bailouts go. By Jan 09 when the socialist can get into office, it will be too little to late to do anything about this housing bust. I don’t like it, but its the best bailout we guys could wish for, considering that one was coming. The less people it helps the better!
December 6, 2007 at 4:45 AM #110200blackboxParticipantLook, some type of bailout was going to happen as this thing started going into a death spiral. I’m not happy about it, but at least this is not a cross the board freeze. Plenty of ifs and whats typical of a govt plan. It is also on a volunteer basis. These means some foot dragging is called for by the lenders. If there was going to be a bailout, I’d rather have a republican one. The democrats want to give the people losing there homes back to them outright and across the board. These proposal will bleed the bailout into an inefective drip drip. This is the best case bailout, as far as bailouts go. By Jan 09 when the socialist can get into office, it will be too little to late to do anything about this housing bust. I don’t like it, but its the best bailout we guys could wish for, considering that one was coming. The less people it helps the better!
December 6, 2007 at 4:45 AM #110217blackboxParticipantLook, some type of bailout was going to happen as this thing started going into a death spiral. I’m not happy about it, but at least this is not a cross the board freeze. Plenty of ifs and whats typical of a govt plan. It is also on a volunteer basis. These means some foot dragging is called for by the lenders. If there was going to be a bailout, I’d rather have a republican one. The democrats want to give the people losing there homes back to them outright and across the board. These proposal will bleed the bailout into an inefective drip drip. This is the best case bailout, as far as bailouts go. By Jan 09 when the socialist can get into office, it will be too little to late to do anything about this housing bust. I don’t like it, but its the best bailout we guys could wish for, considering that one was coming. The less people it helps the better!
December 6, 2007 at 4:45 AM #110220blackboxParticipantLook, some type of bailout was going to happen as this thing started going into a death spiral. I’m not happy about it, but at least this is not a cross the board freeze. Plenty of ifs and whats typical of a govt plan. It is also on a volunteer basis. These means some foot dragging is called for by the lenders. If there was going to be a bailout, I’d rather have a republican one. The democrats want to give the people losing there homes back to them outright and across the board. These proposal will bleed the bailout into an inefective drip drip. This is the best case bailout, as far as bailouts go. By Jan 09 when the socialist can get into office, it will be too little to late to do anything about this housing bust. I don’t like it, but its the best bailout we guys could wish for, considering that one was coming. The less people it helps the better!
December 6, 2007 at 4:53 AM #110059Omega PointParticipantAny chance that once all the details are hammered out, Congress passes it and the President signs it, several months will pass and by that time most of resets will have already happened so that this will have little affect other than making politicians “feel good” that they did something?
December 6, 2007 at 4:53 AM #110176Omega PointParticipantAny chance that once all the details are hammered out, Congress passes it and the President signs it, several months will pass and by that time most of resets will have already happened so that this will have little affect other than making politicians “feel good” that they did something?
December 6, 2007 at 4:53 AM #110204Omega PointParticipantAny chance that once all the details are hammered out, Congress passes it and the President signs it, several months will pass and by that time most of resets will have already happened so that this will have little affect other than making politicians “feel good” that they did something?
December 6, 2007 at 4:53 AM #110205Omega PointParticipantAny chance that once all the details are hammered out, Congress passes it and the President signs it, several months will pass and by that time most of resets will have already happened so that this will have little affect other than making politicians “feel good” that they did something?
December 6, 2007 at 4:53 AM #110222Omega PointParticipantAny chance that once all the details are hammered out, Congress passes it and the President signs it, several months will pass and by that time most of resets will have already happened so that this will have little affect other than making politicians “feel good” that they did something?
December 6, 2007 at 4:53 AM #110225Omega PointParticipantAny chance that once all the details are hammered out, Congress passes it and the President signs it, several months will pass and by that time most of resets will have already happened so that this will have little affect other than making politicians “feel good” that they did something?
December 6, 2007 at 9:08 AM #11022334f3f3fParticipantIs the bailout bucket going to be big enough to keep pace with the gash in the hull?
December 6, 2007 at 9:08 AM #11033934f3f3fParticipantIs the bailout bucket going to be big enough to keep pace with the gash in the hull?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.