Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › The Tea Party downgrade
- This topic has 590 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by Jazzman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 8, 2011 at 8:53 PM #717602August 8, 2011 at 8:58 PM #716410AnonymousGuest
Don’t dodge the fact that you are wrong. There was no supermajority you LIAR.
You’ve been exposed, you’re another Fox idiot, rethug, and a liar.
August 8, 2011 at 8:58 PM #716501AnonymousGuestDon’t dodge the fact that you are wrong. There was no supermajority you LIAR.
You’ve been exposed, you’re another Fox idiot, rethug, and a liar.
August 8, 2011 at 8:58 PM #717098AnonymousGuestDon’t dodge the fact that you are wrong. There was no supermajority you LIAR.
You’ve been exposed, you’re another Fox idiot, rethug, and a liar.
August 8, 2011 at 8:58 PM #717248AnonymousGuestDon’t dodge the fact that you are wrong. There was no supermajority you LIAR.
You’ve been exposed, you’re another Fox idiot, rethug, and a liar.
August 8, 2011 at 8:58 PM #717607AnonymousGuestDon’t dodge the fact that you are wrong. There was no supermajority you LIAR.
You’ve been exposed, you’re another Fox idiot, rethug, and a liar.
August 8, 2011 at 8:59 PM #716415Paul0373ParticipantTurn off fox and turn on…. Msnbc? Liberalism IS a mental disorder. Liberalism/progressivism is the school of thought that actually believes spending more money will help get you out of debt. Ask a 3rd grader and you’ll get better economic solutions. There is no negotiating or compromising with these people; they all need to be voted out.
August 8, 2011 at 8:59 PM #716505Paul0373ParticipantTurn off fox and turn on…. Msnbc? Liberalism IS a mental disorder. Liberalism/progressivism is the school of thought that actually believes spending more money will help get you out of debt. Ask a 3rd grader and you’ll get better economic solutions. There is no negotiating or compromising with these people; they all need to be voted out.
August 8, 2011 at 8:59 PM #717103Paul0373ParticipantTurn off fox and turn on…. Msnbc? Liberalism IS a mental disorder. Liberalism/progressivism is the school of thought that actually believes spending more money will help get you out of debt. Ask a 3rd grader and you’ll get better economic solutions. There is no negotiating or compromising with these people; they all need to be voted out.
August 8, 2011 at 8:59 PM #717253Paul0373ParticipantTurn off fox and turn on…. Msnbc? Liberalism IS a mental disorder. Liberalism/progressivism is the school of thought that actually believes spending more money will help get you out of debt. Ask a 3rd grader and you’ll get better economic solutions. There is no negotiating or compromising with these people; they all need to be voted out.
August 8, 2011 at 8:59 PM #717612Paul0373ParticipantTurn off fox and turn on…. Msnbc? Liberalism IS a mental disorder. Liberalism/progressivism is the school of thought that actually believes spending more money will help get you out of debt. Ask a 3rd grader and you’ll get better economic solutions. There is no negotiating or compromising with these people; they all need to be voted out.
August 8, 2011 at 9:04 PM #716420SD RealtorParticipantYou may want to take some lessons about from debate from Brian, at least he keeps it civil.
I’ll stop repeating myself when you care to post an answer.
Did the dems really really really think the republicans were going to not be total assholes about this? Sorry if I am taking a devils advocate point of view that perhaps sometime prior to the November elections one of Obamas cabinet guys could have or now SHOULD have whispered in his ear and said, ya know we could be really f’d next year if we lose the house….
All I am saying is both parties are at fault here but I guess that gets you pretty darn upset.
Oh and I was wrong there was not a supermajority. Thank you for the correction and my mistake for the incorrect implication. Now just lemme know when you want to address the other points.
August 8, 2011 at 9:04 PM #716510SD RealtorParticipantYou may want to take some lessons about from debate from Brian, at least he keeps it civil.
I’ll stop repeating myself when you care to post an answer.
Did the dems really really really think the republicans were going to not be total assholes about this? Sorry if I am taking a devils advocate point of view that perhaps sometime prior to the November elections one of Obamas cabinet guys could have or now SHOULD have whispered in his ear and said, ya know we could be really f’d next year if we lose the house….
All I am saying is both parties are at fault here but I guess that gets you pretty darn upset.
Oh and I was wrong there was not a supermajority. Thank you for the correction and my mistake for the incorrect implication. Now just lemme know when you want to address the other points.
August 8, 2011 at 9:04 PM #717108SD RealtorParticipantYou may want to take some lessons about from debate from Brian, at least he keeps it civil.
I’ll stop repeating myself when you care to post an answer.
Did the dems really really really think the republicans were going to not be total assholes about this? Sorry if I am taking a devils advocate point of view that perhaps sometime prior to the November elections one of Obamas cabinet guys could have or now SHOULD have whispered in his ear and said, ya know we could be really f’d next year if we lose the house….
All I am saying is both parties are at fault here but I guess that gets you pretty darn upset.
Oh and I was wrong there was not a supermajority. Thank you for the correction and my mistake for the incorrect implication. Now just lemme know when you want to address the other points.
August 8, 2011 at 9:04 PM #717258SD RealtorParticipantYou may want to take some lessons about from debate from Brian, at least he keeps it civil.
I’ll stop repeating myself when you care to post an answer.
Did the dems really really really think the republicans were going to not be total assholes about this? Sorry if I am taking a devils advocate point of view that perhaps sometime prior to the November elections one of Obamas cabinet guys could have or now SHOULD have whispered in his ear and said, ya know we could be really f’d next year if we lose the house….
All I am saying is both parties are at fault here but I guess that gets you pretty darn upset.
Oh and I was wrong there was not a supermajority. Thank you for the correction and my mistake for the incorrect implication. Now just lemme know when you want to address the other points.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.