Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › The Real Great Depression (Panic of 1873)
- This topic has 145 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 6, 2009 at 6:42 PM #325696January 6, 2009 at 7:34 PM #325218Allan from FallbrookParticipant
EconProf: Excellent book on LTCM out there called “When Genius Failed” by Daniel Lowenstein. It not only chronicles the how and why of LTCM’s implosion, but the ensuing “rescue” attempt by the Fed and several investment banks. That rescue attempt is nearly as interesting as the failure itself.
January 6, 2009 at 7:34 PM #325552Allan from FallbrookParticipantEconProf: Excellent book on LTCM out there called “When Genius Failed” by Daniel Lowenstein. It not only chronicles the how and why of LTCM’s implosion, but the ensuing “rescue” attempt by the Fed and several investment banks. That rescue attempt is nearly as interesting as the failure itself.
January 6, 2009 at 7:34 PM #325623Allan from FallbrookParticipantEconProf: Excellent book on LTCM out there called “When Genius Failed” by Daniel Lowenstein. It not only chronicles the how and why of LTCM’s implosion, but the ensuing “rescue” attempt by the Fed and several investment banks. That rescue attempt is nearly as interesting as the failure itself.
January 6, 2009 at 7:34 PM #325639Allan from FallbrookParticipantEconProf: Excellent book on LTCM out there called “When Genius Failed” by Daniel Lowenstein. It not only chronicles the how and why of LTCM’s implosion, but the ensuing “rescue” attempt by the Fed and several investment banks. That rescue attempt is nearly as interesting as the failure itself.
January 6, 2009 at 7:34 PM #325721Allan from FallbrookParticipantEconProf: Excellent book on LTCM out there called “When Genius Failed” by Daniel Lowenstein. It not only chronicles the how and why of LTCM’s implosion, but the ensuing “rescue” attempt by the Fed and several investment banks. That rescue attempt is nearly as interesting as the failure itself.
January 6, 2009 at 8:33 PM #325239carlsbadworkerParticipantDec 23 (Reuters) – John Meriwether’s JWM Partners LLC hedge fund will lose four of its seven active partners and cut 10 of 35 staff after the weak performance of its flagship fund this year, the Wall Street Journal reported.
The Greenwich, Connecticut firm expects to lose four partners next year, including Lawrence Hilibrand and John Tsai, the paper said, citing a letter sent to investors on December 17.
According to the paper, the letter said Arjun Krishnamachar is expected to leave by March 31 and Chief Financial Officer Andrew Geisert after March 31.
JWM’s flagship fund, the Relative Value Opportunity Portfolio, fell 42.78 percent in the first 11 months of this year, the paper said.
Meriwether’s previous hedge fund, Long-Term Capital Management, had to accept a $3.6 billion bailout by U.S. banks in 1998 after it ran aground with leveraged trading strategies.
JWM could not immediately be reached for comment. (Reporting by Eric Yep in Bangalore; editing by John Stonestreet)
January 6, 2009 at 8:33 PM #325573carlsbadworkerParticipantDec 23 (Reuters) – John Meriwether’s JWM Partners LLC hedge fund will lose four of its seven active partners and cut 10 of 35 staff after the weak performance of its flagship fund this year, the Wall Street Journal reported.
The Greenwich, Connecticut firm expects to lose four partners next year, including Lawrence Hilibrand and John Tsai, the paper said, citing a letter sent to investors on December 17.
According to the paper, the letter said Arjun Krishnamachar is expected to leave by March 31 and Chief Financial Officer Andrew Geisert after March 31.
JWM’s flagship fund, the Relative Value Opportunity Portfolio, fell 42.78 percent in the first 11 months of this year, the paper said.
Meriwether’s previous hedge fund, Long-Term Capital Management, had to accept a $3.6 billion bailout by U.S. banks in 1998 after it ran aground with leveraged trading strategies.
JWM could not immediately be reached for comment. (Reporting by Eric Yep in Bangalore; editing by John Stonestreet)
January 6, 2009 at 8:33 PM #325643carlsbadworkerParticipantDec 23 (Reuters) – John Meriwether’s JWM Partners LLC hedge fund will lose four of its seven active partners and cut 10 of 35 staff after the weak performance of its flagship fund this year, the Wall Street Journal reported.
The Greenwich, Connecticut firm expects to lose four partners next year, including Lawrence Hilibrand and John Tsai, the paper said, citing a letter sent to investors on December 17.
According to the paper, the letter said Arjun Krishnamachar is expected to leave by March 31 and Chief Financial Officer Andrew Geisert after March 31.
JWM’s flagship fund, the Relative Value Opportunity Portfolio, fell 42.78 percent in the first 11 months of this year, the paper said.
Meriwether’s previous hedge fund, Long-Term Capital Management, had to accept a $3.6 billion bailout by U.S. banks in 1998 after it ran aground with leveraged trading strategies.
JWM could not immediately be reached for comment. (Reporting by Eric Yep in Bangalore; editing by John Stonestreet)
January 6, 2009 at 8:33 PM #325659carlsbadworkerParticipantDec 23 (Reuters) – John Meriwether’s JWM Partners LLC hedge fund will lose four of its seven active partners and cut 10 of 35 staff after the weak performance of its flagship fund this year, the Wall Street Journal reported.
The Greenwich, Connecticut firm expects to lose four partners next year, including Lawrence Hilibrand and John Tsai, the paper said, citing a letter sent to investors on December 17.
According to the paper, the letter said Arjun Krishnamachar is expected to leave by March 31 and Chief Financial Officer Andrew Geisert after March 31.
JWM’s flagship fund, the Relative Value Opportunity Portfolio, fell 42.78 percent in the first 11 months of this year, the paper said.
Meriwether’s previous hedge fund, Long-Term Capital Management, had to accept a $3.6 billion bailout by U.S. banks in 1998 after it ran aground with leveraged trading strategies.
JWM could not immediately be reached for comment. (Reporting by Eric Yep in Bangalore; editing by John Stonestreet)
January 6, 2009 at 8:33 PM #325742carlsbadworkerParticipantDec 23 (Reuters) – John Meriwether’s JWM Partners LLC hedge fund will lose four of its seven active partners and cut 10 of 35 staff after the weak performance of its flagship fund this year, the Wall Street Journal reported.
The Greenwich, Connecticut firm expects to lose four partners next year, including Lawrence Hilibrand and John Tsai, the paper said, citing a letter sent to investors on December 17.
According to the paper, the letter said Arjun Krishnamachar is expected to leave by March 31 and Chief Financial Officer Andrew Geisert after March 31.
JWM’s flagship fund, the Relative Value Opportunity Portfolio, fell 42.78 percent in the first 11 months of this year, the paper said.
Meriwether’s previous hedge fund, Long-Term Capital Management, had to accept a $3.6 billion bailout by U.S. banks in 1998 after it ran aground with leveraged trading strategies.
JWM could not immediately be reached for comment. (Reporting by Eric Yep in Bangalore; editing by John Stonestreet)
January 6, 2009 at 8:48 PM #325243carlsbadworkerParticipantI think it is unfair to criticize the fractional reserve system. The banking industry has turned into a commodity business and it is tough to make money in such kind of industry. As HLS points out recently, “I don’t know of any other business that sells something for $400,000 and only makes $1080 gross”. Without fractional reserve system, the banks will all die because they really have no profit margin at all.
I don’t think there is a solution to that. Risk takers in the banking industry will always get awarded for the short term. The government can regulate the hell out of it but there will always be loopholes.
The same will gradually apply to all businesses that turns into commodity business. They make up their margin by quantity… which is essentially excessive inventory that will kill them in times of economy trouble. The only way is for business and the country to innovate itself out of the poor industries (and let the Asian countries deal with it), but American has become too stupid and lazy to make steady innovations.January 6, 2009 at 8:48 PM #325578carlsbadworkerParticipantI think it is unfair to criticize the fractional reserve system. The banking industry has turned into a commodity business and it is tough to make money in such kind of industry. As HLS points out recently, “I don’t know of any other business that sells something for $400,000 and only makes $1080 gross”. Without fractional reserve system, the banks will all die because they really have no profit margin at all.
I don’t think there is a solution to that. Risk takers in the banking industry will always get awarded for the short term. The government can regulate the hell out of it but there will always be loopholes.
The same will gradually apply to all businesses that turns into commodity business. They make up their margin by quantity… which is essentially excessive inventory that will kill them in times of economy trouble. The only way is for business and the country to innovate itself out of the poor industries (and let the Asian countries deal with it), but American has become too stupid and lazy to make steady innovations.January 6, 2009 at 8:48 PM #325648carlsbadworkerParticipantI think it is unfair to criticize the fractional reserve system. The banking industry has turned into a commodity business and it is tough to make money in such kind of industry. As HLS points out recently, “I don’t know of any other business that sells something for $400,000 and only makes $1080 gross”. Without fractional reserve system, the banks will all die because they really have no profit margin at all.
I don’t think there is a solution to that. Risk takers in the banking industry will always get awarded for the short term. The government can regulate the hell out of it but there will always be loopholes.
The same will gradually apply to all businesses that turns into commodity business. They make up their margin by quantity… which is essentially excessive inventory that will kill them in times of economy trouble. The only way is for business and the country to innovate itself out of the poor industries (and let the Asian countries deal with it), but American has become too stupid and lazy to make steady innovations.January 6, 2009 at 8:48 PM #325664carlsbadworkerParticipantI think it is unfair to criticize the fractional reserve system. The banking industry has turned into a commodity business and it is tough to make money in such kind of industry. As HLS points out recently, “I don’t know of any other business that sells something for $400,000 and only makes $1080 gross”. Without fractional reserve system, the banks will all die because they really have no profit margin at all.
I don’t think there is a solution to that. Risk takers in the banking industry will always get awarded for the short term. The government can regulate the hell out of it but there will always be loopholes.
The same will gradually apply to all businesses that turns into commodity business. They make up their margin by quantity… which is essentially excessive inventory that will kill them in times of economy trouble. The only way is for business and the country to innovate itself out of the poor industries (and let the Asian countries deal with it), but American has become too stupid and lazy to make steady innovations. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.