- This topic has 140 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 28, 2008 at 10:47 AM #212846May 28, 2008 at 11:03 AM #212710AnonymousGuest
Trojan –
I think your original post said $4k tax savings and $4k/mo mortgage. I rounded yearly mortgage to $50k and came up w/ 8%… 4k/50k=8%. …. whether your tax savings is 4k or 12k, you’re still not making up for the additional $32k outflow. the only way to justify the purchase, if you’re looking at it as an investment, is to expect some kind of appreciation. Many people don’t expect any appreciation in the SD RE market for years to come.
At some point, buying will make sense again for the common folk. I’m w/ the piggies in thinking that it is not yet the right time.
May 28, 2008 at 11:03 AM #212788AnonymousGuestTrojan –
I think your original post said $4k tax savings and $4k/mo mortgage. I rounded yearly mortgage to $50k and came up w/ 8%… 4k/50k=8%. …. whether your tax savings is 4k or 12k, you’re still not making up for the additional $32k outflow. the only way to justify the purchase, if you’re looking at it as an investment, is to expect some kind of appreciation. Many people don’t expect any appreciation in the SD RE market for years to come.
At some point, buying will make sense again for the common folk. I’m w/ the piggies in thinking that it is not yet the right time.
May 28, 2008 at 11:03 AM #212814AnonymousGuestTrojan –
I think your original post said $4k tax savings and $4k/mo mortgage. I rounded yearly mortgage to $50k and came up w/ 8%… 4k/50k=8%. …. whether your tax savings is 4k or 12k, you’re still not making up for the additional $32k outflow. the only way to justify the purchase, if you’re looking at it as an investment, is to expect some kind of appreciation. Many people don’t expect any appreciation in the SD RE market for years to come.
At some point, buying will make sense again for the common folk. I’m w/ the piggies in thinking that it is not yet the right time.
May 28, 2008 at 11:03 AM #212836AnonymousGuestTrojan –
I think your original post said $4k tax savings and $4k/mo mortgage. I rounded yearly mortgage to $50k and came up w/ 8%… 4k/50k=8%. …. whether your tax savings is 4k or 12k, you’re still not making up for the additional $32k outflow. the only way to justify the purchase, if you’re looking at it as an investment, is to expect some kind of appreciation. Many people don’t expect any appreciation in the SD RE market for years to come.
At some point, buying will make sense again for the common folk. I’m w/ the piggies in thinking that it is not yet the right time.
May 28, 2008 at 11:03 AM #212866AnonymousGuestTrojan –
I think your original post said $4k tax savings and $4k/mo mortgage. I rounded yearly mortgage to $50k and came up w/ 8%… 4k/50k=8%. …. whether your tax savings is 4k or 12k, you’re still not making up for the additional $32k outflow. the only way to justify the purchase, if you’re looking at it as an investment, is to expect some kind of appreciation. Many people don’t expect any appreciation in the SD RE market for years to come.
At some point, buying will make sense again for the common folk. I’m w/ the piggies in thinking that it is not yet the right time.
May 28, 2008 at 1:27 PM #212905AnonymousGuestI am a potential home buyer in North County, waiting to get in at a reasonable price. Instead of timing the bottom which I believe is quite difficult (else we would all be millionaires :-)), I thought lets go the other way and try to price the bottom. Here’s my simple model for it. Lets start with a base of year 2000 home prices, as I believe the irrarational exuberance commenced around then. For this I looked up a random 2000 sq.ft. 4b/3b home in San Marcos from zillow.com that was about $220,000 in 2000. Assuming a strong local economy home value appreciation should be about 5%-7% annually. So taking an average of 6% compounded growth rate, above home should be valued around $395,000 in 2008. That tells me that if I can get that price, or even lower for a foreclosure, by this year end it might be all right to buy. Same model can be extended for any size home in area you are interested in. I am interested in what other piggington readers think about my reasoning. BTW Rich you the man for coming up with this site. For disclosure, I have no finance or real estate background. I am a faculty in a business school in North County and I like examining such interesting conundrums.
May 28, 2008 at 1:27 PM #212984AnonymousGuestI am a potential home buyer in North County, waiting to get in at a reasonable price. Instead of timing the bottom which I believe is quite difficult (else we would all be millionaires :-)), I thought lets go the other way and try to price the bottom. Here’s my simple model for it. Lets start with a base of year 2000 home prices, as I believe the irrarational exuberance commenced around then. For this I looked up a random 2000 sq.ft. 4b/3b home in San Marcos from zillow.com that was about $220,000 in 2000. Assuming a strong local economy home value appreciation should be about 5%-7% annually. So taking an average of 6% compounded growth rate, above home should be valued around $395,000 in 2008. That tells me that if I can get that price, or even lower for a foreclosure, by this year end it might be all right to buy. Same model can be extended for any size home in area you are interested in. I am interested in what other piggington readers think about my reasoning. BTW Rich you the man for coming up with this site. For disclosure, I have no finance or real estate background. I am a faculty in a business school in North County and I like examining such interesting conundrums.
May 28, 2008 at 1:27 PM #213008AnonymousGuestI am a potential home buyer in North County, waiting to get in at a reasonable price. Instead of timing the bottom which I believe is quite difficult (else we would all be millionaires :-)), I thought lets go the other way and try to price the bottom. Here’s my simple model for it. Lets start with a base of year 2000 home prices, as I believe the irrarational exuberance commenced around then. For this I looked up a random 2000 sq.ft. 4b/3b home in San Marcos from zillow.com that was about $220,000 in 2000. Assuming a strong local economy home value appreciation should be about 5%-7% annually. So taking an average of 6% compounded growth rate, above home should be valued around $395,000 in 2008. That tells me that if I can get that price, or even lower for a foreclosure, by this year end it might be all right to buy. Same model can be extended for any size home in area you are interested in. I am interested in what other piggington readers think about my reasoning. BTW Rich you the man for coming up with this site. For disclosure, I have no finance or real estate background. I am a faculty in a business school in North County and I like examining such interesting conundrums.
May 28, 2008 at 1:27 PM #213031AnonymousGuestI am a potential home buyer in North County, waiting to get in at a reasonable price. Instead of timing the bottom which I believe is quite difficult (else we would all be millionaires :-)), I thought lets go the other way and try to price the bottom. Here’s my simple model for it. Lets start with a base of year 2000 home prices, as I believe the irrarational exuberance commenced around then. For this I looked up a random 2000 sq.ft. 4b/3b home in San Marcos from zillow.com that was about $220,000 in 2000. Assuming a strong local economy home value appreciation should be about 5%-7% annually. So taking an average of 6% compounded growth rate, above home should be valued around $395,000 in 2008. That tells me that if I can get that price, or even lower for a foreclosure, by this year end it might be all right to buy. Same model can be extended for any size home in area you are interested in. I am interested in what other piggington readers think about my reasoning. BTW Rich you the man for coming up with this site. For disclosure, I have no finance or real estate background. I am a faculty in a business school in North County and I like examining such interesting conundrums.
May 28, 2008 at 1:27 PM #213062AnonymousGuestI am a potential home buyer in North County, waiting to get in at a reasonable price. Instead of timing the bottom which I believe is quite difficult (else we would all be millionaires :-)), I thought lets go the other way and try to price the bottom. Here’s my simple model for it. Lets start with a base of year 2000 home prices, as I believe the irrarational exuberance commenced around then. For this I looked up a random 2000 sq.ft. 4b/3b home in San Marcos from zillow.com that was about $220,000 in 2000. Assuming a strong local economy home value appreciation should be about 5%-7% annually. So taking an average of 6% compounded growth rate, above home should be valued around $395,000 in 2008. That tells me that if I can get that price, or even lower for a foreclosure, by this year end it might be all right to buy. Same model can be extended for any size home in area you are interested in. I am interested in what other piggington readers think about my reasoning. BTW Rich you the man for coming up with this site. For disclosure, I have no finance or real estate background. I am a faculty in a business school in North County and I like examining such interesting conundrums.
May 28, 2008 at 1:42 PM #212926gbParticipantThe bottom is very close. Unless you can time perfectly it makes sense to buy now. See above link from the NY times.
May 28, 2008 at 1:42 PM #213004gbParticipantThe bottom is very close. Unless you can time perfectly it makes sense to buy now. See above link from the NY times.
May 28, 2008 at 1:42 PM #213028gbParticipantThe bottom is very close. Unless you can time perfectly it makes sense to buy now. See above link from the NY times.
May 28, 2008 at 1:42 PM #213054gbParticipantThe bottom is very close. Unless you can time perfectly it makes sense to buy now. See above link from the NY times.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.