- This topic has 905 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by CricketOnTheHearth.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 1, 2009 at 7:09 AM #463329October 1, 2009 at 8:41 AM #462524Rt.66Participant
So a house in default that sells through short-sale for a 50% bank haircut is somehow not part of the REO disaster? It’s REO disaster 2.0, as in a disaster on top of a disaster.
Nothing has changed since 2008; we are in a reset of the entire bubble. How many REOs will there be? For CA that’s easy; any house with a bubble era mortgage balance is going to go jingle mail or short sale or something. Who is going to keep paying a $500k mortgage on a house worth $300k, then $200k? Not many, and as this correction in prices drags on more people will lose the fallacy of a re-inflation of the bubble and realize RE ain’t coming back anytime soon, then they will capitulate.
The only twist was the shadow inventory, that’s the only thing we can debate. Housing is crumbling but we can keep ourselves busy wondering about all those empty homes that are not for sale.
However, banks selling homes at 50% off through short-sale is just more inevitable bad news for housing, not some argument against calamity.
Those with Option ARMS are still holding on because the teaser rate, interest only payment is still a cheap payment, that’s going to start changing soon and payments on those $200k underwater mortgages are going to shoot up.
Like any crash you have the knife catchers to consider as well. Those who bought REOs in 2008 and those who out bid the other guy for an REO in 2009 are going to end up underwater as well (many 2008 REO buyers already are), especially in areas of SD where prices are still stupid. Many of these folks will be really underwater, some will end in default as well. A small 40 year old house in Poway that was $160k ten or twelve years ago is somehow viewed as a deal at $400k today? The pain train has lots of cars.
Sure the Gov. is trying to prevent deflation but it can’t work. They will get many people to overpay along the way, but prices will keep falling. Japan tried everything to keep deflation at bay, didn’t work. 18 years of falling RE prices and counting. For CA this crash is very different, you can’t look at the tiny blips that were the CA RE crashes before. You need a long timeframe. A lost decade and a decade of knife catchers.
October 1, 2009 at 8:41 AM #462717Rt.66ParticipantSo a house in default that sells through short-sale for a 50% bank haircut is somehow not part of the REO disaster? It’s REO disaster 2.0, as in a disaster on top of a disaster.
Nothing has changed since 2008; we are in a reset of the entire bubble. How many REOs will there be? For CA that’s easy; any house with a bubble era mortgage balance is going to go jingle mail or short sale or something. Who is going to keep paying a $500k mortgage on a house worth $300k, then $200k? Not many, and as this correction in prices drags on more people will lose the fallacy of a re-inflation of the bubble and realize RE ain’t coming back anytime soon, then they will capitulate.
The only twist was the shadow inventory, that’s the only thing we can debate. Housing is crumbling but we can keep ourselves busy wondering about all those empty homes that are not for sale.
However, banks selling homes at 50% off through short-sale is just more inevitable bad news for housing, not some argument against calamity.
Those with Option ARMS are still holding on because the teaser rate, interest only payment is still a cheap payment, that’s going to start changing soon and payments on those $200k underwater mortgages are going to shoot up.
Like any crash you have the knife catchers to consider as well. Those who bought REOs in 2008 and those who out bid the other guy for an REO in 2009 are going to end up underwater as well (many 2008 REO buyers already are), especially in areas of SD where prices are still stupid. Many of these folks will be really underwater, some will end in default as well. A small 40 year old house in Poway that was $160k ten or twelve years ago is somehow viewed as a deal at $400k today? The pain train has lots of cars.
Sure the Gov. is trying to prevent deflation but it can’t work. They will get many people to overpay along the way, but prices will keep falling. Japan tried everything to keep deflation at bay, didn’t work. 18 years of falling RE prices and counting. For CA this crash is very different, you can’t look at the tiny blips that were the CA RE crashes before. You need a long timeframe. A lost decade and a decade of knife catchers.
October 1, 2009 at 8:41 AM #463062Rt.66ParticipantSo a house in default that sells through short-sale for a 50% bank haircut is somehow not part of the REO disaster? It’s REO disaster 2.0, as in a disaster on top of a disaster.
Nothing has changed since 2008; we are in a reset of the entire bubble. How many REOs will there be? For CA that’s easy; any house with a bubble era mortgage balance is going to go jingle mail or short sale or something. Who is going to keep paying a $500k mortgage on a house worth $300k, then $200k? Not many, and as this correction in prices drags on more people will lose the fallacy of a re-inflation of the bubble and realize RE ain’t coming back anytime soon, then they will capitulate.
The only twist was the shadow inventory, that’s the only thing we can debate. Housing is crumbling but we can keep ourselves busy wondering about all those empty homes that are not for sale.
However, banks selling homes at 50% off through short-sale is just more inevitable bad news for housing, not some argument against calamity.
Those with Option ARMS are still holding on because the teaser rate, interest only payment is still a cheap payment, that’s going to start changing soon and payments on those $200k underwater mortgages are going to shoot up.
Like any crash you have the knife catchers to consider as well. Those who bought REOs in 2008 and those who out bid the other guy for an REO in 2009 are going to end up underwater as well (many 2008 REO buyers already are), especially in areas of SD where prices are still stupid. Many of these folks will be really underwater, some will end in default as well. A small 40 year old house in Poway that was $160k ten or twelve years ago is somehow viewed as a deal at $400k today? The pain train has lots of cars.
Sure the Gov. is trying to prevent deflation but it can’t work. They will get many people to overpay along the way, but prices will keep falling. Japan tried everything to keep deflation at bay, didn’t work. 18 years of falling RE prices and counting. For CA this crash is very different, you can’t look at the tiny blips that were the CA RE crashes before. You need a long timeframe. A lost decade and a decade of knife catchers.
October 1, 2009 at 8:41 AM #463134Rt.66ParticipantSo a house in default that sells through short-sale for a 50% bank haircut is somehow not part of the REO disaster? It’s REO disaster 2.0, as in a disaster on top of a disaster.
Nothing has changed since 2008; we are in a reset of the entire bubble. How many REOs will there be? For CA that’s easy; any house with a bubble era mortgage balance is going to go jingle mail or short sale or something. Who is going to keep paying a $500k mortgage on a house worth $300k, then $200k? Not many, and as this correction in prices drags on more people will lose the fallacy of a re-inflation of the bubble and realize RE ain’t coming back anytime soon, then they will capitulate.
The only twist was the shadow inventory, that’s the only thing we can debate. Housing is crumbling but we can keep ourselves busy wondering about all those empty homes that are not for sale.
However, banks selling homes at 50% off through short-sale is just more inevitable bad news for housing, not some argument against calamity.
Those with Option ARMS are still holding on because the teaser rate, interest only payment is still a cheap payment, that’s going to start changing soon and payments on those $200k underwater mortgages are going to shoot up.
Like any crash you have the knife catchers to consider as well. Those who bought REOs in 2008 and those who out bid the other guy for an REO in 2009 are going to end up underwater as well (many 2008 REO buyers already are), especially in areas of SD where prices are still stupid. Many of these folks will be really underwater, some will end in default as well. A small 40 year old house in Poway that was $160k ten or twelve years ago is somehow viewed as a deal at $400k today? The pain train has lots of cars.
Sure the Gov. is trying to prevent deflation but it can’t work. They will get many people to overpay along the way, but prices will keep falling. Japan tried everything to keep deflation at bay, didn’t work. 18 years of falling RE prices and counting. For CA this crash is very different, you can’t look at the tiny blips that were the CA RE crashes before. You need a long timeframe. A lost decade and a decade of knife catchers.
October 1, 2009 at 8:41 AM #463339Rt.66ParticipantSo a house in default that sells through short-sale for a 50% bank haircut is somehow not part of the REO disaster? It’s REO disaster 2.0, as in a disaster on top of a disaster.
Nothing has changed since 2008; we are in a reset of the entire bubble. How many REOs will there be? For CA that’s easy; any house with a bubble era mortgage balance is going to go jingle mail or short sale or something. Who is going to keep paying a $500k mortgage on a house worth $300k, then $200k? Not many, and as this correction in prices drags on more people will lose the fallacy of a re-inflation of the bubble and realize RE ain’t coming back anytime soon, then they will capitulate.
The only twist was the shadow inventory, that’s the only thing we can debate. Housing is crumbling but we can keep ourselves busy wondering about all those empty homes that are not for sale.
However, banks selling homes at 50% off through short-sale is just more inevitable bad news for housing, not some argument against calamity.
Those with Option ARMS are still holding on because the teaser rate, interest only payment is still a cheap payment, that’s going to start changing soon and payments on those $200k underwater mortgages are going to shoot up.
Like any crash you have the knife catchers to consider as well. Those who bought REOs in 2008 and those who out bid the other guy for an REO in 2009 are going to end up underwater as well (many 2008 REO buyers already are), especially in areas of SD where prices are still stupid. Many of these folks will be really underwater, some will end in default as well. A small 40 year old house in Poway that was $160k ten or twelve years ago is somehow viewed as a deal at $400k today? The pain train has lots of cars.
Sure the Gov. is trying to prevent deflation but it can’t work. They will get many people to overpay along the way, but prices will keep falling. Japan tried everything to keep deflation at bay, didn’t work. 18 years of falling RE prices and counting. For CA this crash is very different, you can’t look at the tiny blips that were the CA RE crashes before. You need a long timeframe. A lost decade and a decade of knife catchers.
October 1, 2009 at 8:57 AM #462529sdrealtorParticipantSorry Charlie you missed the point. Alot of this so called shadow inventory/REO pipeline is in process via short sales (i.e. already on the market) or undergoing loan modifications.
There are also a ton of people who stopped paying on their 2nds but kept their 1st current. The 2nds wont foreclose cause they will get nothing but they show up in those stats of folks who havent paid in 3+ months. Those are defacto prinicipal reductions that arent ever talked about. Those folks will keep paying the 1st on their $500K 100% financed home now worth $350K cause they are only paying a $400K mortgage that they will get modified down to 3% for the next 5 years or so. At some point the market will come back and they will have to deal with the 2nd unless they come to a settlement earlier but you wont see those shadow homes on the amrket anytime soon either. You try to make this far more simple than it is. More than anything it shows you dont have an understanding of the inner workings of the housing market. Nothing is as simple as it appears to be.
October 1, 2009 at 8:57 AM #462722sdrealtorParticipantSorry Charlie you missed the point. Alot of this so called shadow inventory/REO pipeline is in process via short sales (i.e. already on the market) or undergoing loan modifications.
There are also a ton of people who stopped paying on their 2nds but kept their 1st current. The 2nds wont foreclose cause they will get nothing but they show up in those stats of folks who havent paid in 3+ months. Those are defacto prinicipal reductions that arent ever talked about. Those folks will keep paying the 1st on their $500K 100% financed home now worth $350K cause they are only paying a $400K mortgage that they will get modified down to 3% for the next 5 years or so. At some point the market will come back and they will have to deal with the 2nd unless they come to a settlement earlier but you wont see those shadow homes on the amrket anytime soon either. You try to make this far more simple than it is. More than anything it shows you dont have an understanding of the inner workings of the housing market. Nothing is as simple as it appears to be.
October 1, 2009 at 8:57 AM #463067sdrealtorParticipantSorry Charlie you missed the point. Alot of this so called shadow inventory/REO pipeline is in process via short sales (i.e. already on the market) or undergoing loan modifications.
There are also a ton of people who stopped paying on their 2nds but kept their 1st current. The 2nds wont foreclose cause they will get nothing but they show up in those stats of folks who havent paid in 3+ months. Those are defacto prinicipal reductions that arent ever talked about. Those folks will keep paying the 1st on their $500K 100% financed home now worth $350K cause they are only paying a $400K mortgage that they will get modified down to 3% for the next 5 years or so. At some point the market will come back and they will have to deal with the 2nd unless they come to a settlement earlier but you wont see those shadow homes on the amrket anytime soon either. You try to make this far more simple than it is. More than anything it shows you dont have an understanding of the inner workings of the housing market. Nothing is as simple as it appears to be.
October 1, 2009 at 8:57 AM #463139sdrealtorParticipantSorry Charlie you missed the point. Alot of this so called shadow inventory/REO pipeline is in process via short sales (i.e. already on the market) or undergoing loan modifications.
There are also a ton of people who stopped paying on their 2nds but kept their 1st current. The 2nds wont foreclose cause they will get nothing but they show up in those stats of folks who havent paid in 3+ months. Those are defacto prinicipal reductions that arent ever talked about. Those folks will keep paying the 1st on their $500K 100% financed home now worth $350K cause they are only paying a $400K mortgage that they will get modified down to 3% for the next 5 years or so. At some point the market will come back and they will have to deal with the 2nd unless they come to a settlement earlier but you wont see those shadow homes on the amrket anytime soon either. You try to make this far more simple than it is. More than anything it shows you dont have an understanding of the inner workings of the housing market. Nothing is as simple as it appears to be.
October 1, 2009 at 8:57 AM #463344sdrealtorParticipantSorry Charlie you missed the point. Alot of this so called shadow inventory/REO pipeline is in process via short sales (i.e. already on the market) or undergoing loan modifications.
There are also a ton of people who stopped paying on their 2nds but kept their 1st current. The 2nds wont foreclose cause they will get nothing but they show up in those stats of folks who havent paid in 3+ months. Those are defacto prinicipal reductions that arent ever talked about. Those folks will keep paying the 1st on their $500K 100% financed home now worth $350K cause they are only paying a $400K mortgage that they will get modified down to 3% for the next 5 years or so. At some point the market will come back and they will have to deal with the 2nd unless they come to a settlement earlier but you wont see those shadow homes on the amrket anytime soon either. You try to make this far more simple than it is. More than anything it shows you dont have an understanding of the inner workings of the housing market. Nothing is as simple as it appears to be.
October 1, 2009 at 9:08 AM #462549Rt.66ParticipantYou missed the point (again). The point is there are many facets to this disaster (you point out some) and all are bad for RE values.
My point is we have a huge inventory of shadow homes AND a growing short-sale epidemic AND a looming Option ARM issue. Oh, and I did not post a time frame for shadow market homes to hit the market.
Did I try to make it sound too simple? I thought I made a case for the situation having many “cars” on the pain train, as in NOT simple, but rather convoluted, with many aspects that effect RE now and far into the future.
October 1, 2009 at 9:08 AM #462742Rt.66ParticipantYou missed the point (again). The point is there are many facets to this disaster (you point out some) and all are bad for RE values.
My point is we have a huge inventory of shadow homes AND a growing short-sale epidemic AND a looming Option ARM issue. Oh, and I did not post a time frame for shadow market homes to hit the market.
Did I try to make it sound too simple? I thought I made a case for the situation having many “cars” on the pain train, as in NOT simple, but rather convoluted, with many aspects that effect RE now and far into the future.
October 1, 2009 at 9:08 AM #463087Rt.66ParticipantYou missed the point (again). The point is there are many facets to this disaster (you point out some) and all are bad for RE values.
My point is we have a huge inventory of shadow homes AND a growing short-sale epidemic AND a looming Option ARM issue. Oh, and I did not post a time frame for shadow market homes to hit the market.
Did I try to make it sound too simple? I thought I made a case for the situation having many “cars” on the pain train, as in NOT simple, but rather convoluted, with many aspects that effect RE now and far into the future.
October 1, 2009 at 9:08 AM #463159Rt.66ParticipantYou missed the point (again). The point is there are many facets to this disaster (you point out some) and all are bad for RE values.
My point is we have a huge inventory of shadow homes AND a growing short-sale epidemic AND a looming Option ARM issue. Oh, and I did not post a time frame for shadow market homes to hit the market.
Did I try to make it sound too simple? I thought I made a case for the situation having many “cars” on the pain train, as in NOT simple, but rather convoluted, with many aspects that effect RE now and far into the future.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.