- This topic has 125 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by lonestar2000.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 21, 2007 at 7:03 AM #122173December 21, 2007 at 7:30 AM #121931BugsParticipant
What I always try to remember is that during the past bust I was waaay to optimistic about when the market would turn. During the 90s I called the bottom 2 years early, and then I repeated that mistake by (privately) calling the subsequent peak 2 years early. I’m done with making that mistake.
The only reason I am confident it won’t turn prior to 2010 is because of the current overhang in inventory, the tightening of the credit markets, the resetting arm schedule, and the prevailing market psychology. From where we are right now, this boat is too big to turn around in less than 2 years.
December 21, 2007 at 7:30 AM #122076BugsParticipantWhat I always try to remember is that during the past bust I was waaay to optimistic about when the market would turn. During the 90s I called the bottom 2 years early, and then I repeated that mistake by (privately) calling the subsequent peak 2 years early. I’m done with making that mistake.
The only reason I am confident it won’t turn prior to 2010 is because of the current overhang in inventory, the tightening of the credit markets, the resetting arm schedule, and the prevailing market psychology. From where we are right now, this boat is too big to turn around in less than 2 years.
December 21, 2007 at 7:30 AM #122101BugsParticipantWhat I always try to remember is that during the past bust I was waaay to optimistic about when the market would turn. During the 90s I called the bottom 2 years early, and then I repeated that mistake by (privately) calling the subsequent peak 2 years early. I’m done with making that mistake.
The only reason I am confident it won’t turn prior to 2010 is because of the current overhang in inventory, the tightening of the credit markets, the resetting arm schedule, and the prevailing market psychology. From where we are right now, this boat is too big to turn around in less than 2 years.
December 21, 2007 at 7:30 AM #122154BugsParticipantWhat I always try to remember is that during the past bust I was waaay to optimistic about when the market would turn. During the 90s I called the bottom 2 years early, and then I repeated that mistake by (privately) calling the subsequent peak 2 years early. I’m done with making that mistake.
The only reason I am confident it won’t turn prior to 2010 is because of the current overhang in inventory, the tightening of the credit markets, the resetting arm schedule, and the prevailing market psychology. From where we are right now, this boat is too big to turn around in less than 2 years.
December 21, 2007 at 7:30 AM #122177BugsParticipantWhat I always try to remember is that during the past bust I was waaay to optimistic about when the market would turn. During the 90s I called the bottom 2 years early, and then I repeated that mistake by (privately) calling the subsequent peak 2 years early. I’m done with making that mistake.
The only reason I am confident it won’t turn prior to 2010 is because of the current overhang in inventory, the tightening of the credit markets, the resetting arm schedule, and the prevailing market psychology. From where we are right now, this boat is too big to turn around in less than 2 years.
December 21, 2007 at 8:18 AM #121973sdrealtorParticipantMaybe Bugs can confirm this but my recollection was that the majority of purchases between 2003 and 2005 in the coastal areas among prime buyers was 5/1 arm’s with rates in the 3 to 4% range. It should take a year or two for the pain to sink in as many of these folks have ample reserves. I believe 2011/2012 is the right call for a bottom.
December 21, 2007 at 8:18 AM #122115sdrealtorParticipantMaybe Bugs can confirm this but my recollection was that the majority of purchases between 2003 and 2005 in the coastal areas among prime buyers was 5/1 arm’s with rates in the 3 to 4% range. It should take a year or two for the pain to sink in as many of these folks have ample reserves. I believe 2011/2012 is the right call for a bottom.
December 21, 2007 at 8:18 AM #122142sdrealtorParticipantMaybe Bugs can confirm this but my recollection was that the majority of purchases between 2003 and 2005 in the coastal areas among prime buyers was 5/1 arm’s with rates in the 3 to 4% range. It should take a year or two for the pain to sink in as many of these folks have ample reserves. I believe 2011/2012 is the right call for a bottom.
December 21, 2007 at 8:18 AM #122197sdrealtorParticipantMaybe Bugs can confirm this but my recollection was that the majority of purchases between 2003 and 2005 in the coastal areas among prime buyers was 5/1 arm’s with rates in the 3 to 4% range. It should take a year or two for the pain to sink in as many of these folks have ample reserves. I believe 2011/2012 is the right call for a bottom.
December 21, 2007 at 8:18 AM #122217sdrealtorParticipantMaybe Bugs can confirm this but my recollection was that the majority of purchases between 2003 and 2005 in the coastal areas among prime buyers was 5/1 arm’s with rates in the 3 to 4% range. It should take a year or two for the pain to sink in as many of these folks have ample reserves. I believe 2011/2012 is the right call for a bottom.
December 21, 2007 at 9:25 AM #122012vizcayaParticipantParamount I used the same numbers/assumptions of when the bottom would be, while placing bids back in July
You said:Total Price Decline: I would say around 30% from the peak on average.
I used this percentage(30%) when I placed bids on a bank owned homes the wife and I liked.
The home we went with was sold at peak for $570k in 2005. I placed a bid on it for $420k(about 26% below peak). The bank accepted. Since the drop from peak was close to my assumptions of when the bottom would be, we bought now instead of waiting a couple of years till the bottom.
Looking at the market now, I still believe that my house will drop another 10% before it hits bottom. Which would be a 40% drop from Peak. Therfore It looks like my house which sold at peak for $570k in 2005, should be worth approx $350k by 2011.
Ouch!December 21, 2007 at 9:25 AM #122157vizcayaParticipantParamount I used the same numbers/assumptions of when the bottom would be, while placing bids back in July
You said:Total Price Decline: I would say around 30% from the peak on average.
I used this percentage(30%) when I placed bids on a bank owned homes the wife and I liked.
The home we went with was sold at peak for $570k in 2005. I placed a bid on it for $420k(about 26% below peak). The bank accepted. Since the drop from peak was close to my assumptions of when the bottom would be, we bought now instead of waiting a couple of years till the bottom.
Looking at the market now, I still believe that my house will drop another 10% before it hits bottom. Which would be a 40% drop from Peak. Therfore It looks like my house which sold at peak for $570k in 2005, should be worth approx $350k by 2011.
Ouch!December 21, 2007 at 9:25 AM #122181vizcayaParticipantParamount I used the same numbers/assumptions of when the bottom would be, while placing bids back in July
You said:Total Price Decline: I would say around 30% from the peak on average.
I used this percentage(30%) when I placed bids on a bank owned homes the wife and I liked.
The home we went with was sold at peak for $570k in 2005. I placed a bid on it for $420k(about 26% below peak). The bank accepted. Since the drop from peak was close to my assumptions of when the bottom would be, we bought now instead of waiting a couple of years till the bottom.
Looking at the market now, I still believe that my house will drop another 10% before it hits bottom. Which would be a 40% drop from Peak. Therfore It looks like my house which sold at peak for $570k in 2005, should be worth approx $350k by 2011.
Ouch!December 21, 2007 at 9:25 AM #122237vizcayaParticipantParamount I used the same numbers/assumptions of when the bottom would be, while placing bids back in July
You said:Total Price Decline: I would say around 30% from the peak on average.
I used this percentage(30%) when I placed bids on a bank owned homes the wife and I liked.
The home we went with was sold at peak for $570k in 2005. I placed a bid on it for $420k(about 26% below peak). The bank accepted. Since the drop from peak was close to my assumptions of when the bottom would be, we bought now instead of waiting a couple of years till the bottom.
Looking at the market now, I still believe that my house will drop another 10% before it hits bottom. Which would be a 40% drop from Peak. Therfore It looks like my house which sold at peak for $570k in 2005, should be worth approx $350k by 2011.
Ouch! -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.