- This topic has 140 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
davelj.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 16, 2010 at 10:33 AM #514440February 16, 2010 at 9:56 PM #513794
GovernmentSachs
ParticipantWho gives a shit if Arraya is right on all the little details or not? We need to keep all the pressure we can on the government so that they don’t continue to give away the store to all the criminal bankers out there.
I personally could give a rat’s if Arraya or Zero Hedge or anyone that criticizes banks is ‘right’. Banks have done their best to destroy civilized society with massive amounts of intentional fraud for the last 30 years. We need people like Arraya and Zero Hedge to continue to put pressure on the banksters and the government.
The point is to keep pressure on the banksters and the government. If that Youtube video turns out to be 100% wrong, I could care less so long as it incited more people to email and call their representatives and let them know that they better stick it to the banks any way they can or risk getting voted out of office.
And it’s too bad about the bombing of the JP Morgan office in Greece today. It’s really the people at the top (Blankfein, Jamie Dimon) who deserve retribution.
February 16, 2010 at 9:56 PM #513942GovernmentSachs
ParticipantWho gives a shit if Arraya is right on all the little details or not? We need to keep all the pressure we can on the government so that they don’t continue to give away the store to all the criminal bankers out there.
I personally could give a rat’s if Arraya or Zero Hedge or anyone that criticizes banks is ‘right’. Banks have done their best to destroy civilized society with massive amounts of intentional fraud for the last 30 years. We need people like Arraya and Zero Hedge to continue to put pressure on the banksters and the government.
The point is to keep pressure on the banksters and the government. If that Youtube video turns out to be 100% wrong, I could care less so long as it incited more people to email and call their representatives and let them know that they better stick it to the banks any way they can or risk getting voted out of office.
And it’s too bad about the bombing of the JP Morgan office in Greece today. It’s really the people at the top (Blankfein, Jamie Dimon) who deserve retribution.
February 16, 2010 at 9:56 PM #514366GovernmentSachs
ParticipantWho gives a shit if Arraya is right on all the little details or not? We need to keep all the pressure we can on the government so that they don’t continue to give away the store to all the criminal bankers out there.
I personally could give a rat’s if Arraya or Zero Hedge or anyone that criticizes banks is ‘right’. Banks have done their best to destroy civilized society with massive amounts of intentional fraud for the last 30 years. We need people like Arraya and Zero Hedge to continue to put pressure on the banksters and the government.
The point is to keep pressure on the banksters and the government. If that Youtube video turns out to be 100% wrong, I could care less so long as it incited more people to email and call their representatives and let them know that they better stick it to the banks any way they can or risk getting voted out of office.
And it’s too bad about the bombing of the JP Morgan office in Greece today. It’s really the people at the top (Blankfein, Jamie Dimon) who deserve retribution.
February 16, 2010 at 9:56 PM #514457GovernmentSachs
ParticipantWho gives a shit if Arraya is right on all the little details or not? We need to keep all the pressure we can on the government so that they don’t continue to give away the store to all the criminal bankers out there.
I personally could give a rat’s if Arraya or Zero Hedge or anyone that criticizes banks is ‘right’. Banks have done their best to destroy civilized society with massive amounts of intentional fraud for the last 30 years. We need people like Arraya and Zero Hedge to continue to put pressure on the banksters and the government.
The point is to keep pressure on the banksters and the government. If that Youtube video turns out to be 100% wrong, I could care less so long as it incited more people to email and call their representatives and let them know that they better stick it to the banks any way they can or risk getting voted out of office.
And it’s too bad about the bombing of the JP Morgan office in Greece today. It’s really the people at the top (Blankfein, Jamie Dimon) who deserve retribution.
February 16, 2010 at 9:56 PM #514706GovernmentSachs
ParticipantWho gives a shit if Arraya is right on all the little details or not? We need to keep all the pressure we can on the government so that they don’t continue to give away the store to all the criminal bankers out there.
I personally could give a rat’s if Arraya or Zero Hedge or anyone that criticizes banks is ‘right’. Banks have done their best to destroy civilized society with massive amounts of intentional fraud for the last 30 years. We need people like Arraya and Zero Hedge to continue to put pressure on the banksters and the government.
The point is to keep pressure on the banksters and the government. If that Youtube video turns out to be 100% wrong, I could care less so long as it incited more people to email and call their representatives and let them know that they better stick it to the banks any way they can or risk getting voted out of office.
And it’s too bad about the bombing of the JP Morgan office in Greece today. It’s really the people at the top (Blankfein, Jamie Dimon) who deserve retribution.
February 16, 2010 at 10:08 PM #513799GovernmentSachs
Participant[quote=davelj]
Here are my questions:
(1) Why do you care about how OneWest deals with their (deadbeat) borrowers (as you have nothing to do with either)?
(2) Why do you care about how an agreement between OneWest and the FDIC is administered (as you have nothing to do with either)?Frankly, I don’t care if OneWest makes $10 billion or not one red cent. And if ANYONE should care, it should be me, as I’m actually in the banking industry! After all, it’s banks that I either have an ownership stake in or consult with that will be paying for the net losses here. And I simply don’t care because life is too short.[/quote]
If the FDIC is involved, every taxpayer should care about what’s going on as it’s a government corporation which is backed up by the taxpayer.
If banksters could actually do their jobs without looting the taxpayers at every turn, people wouldn’t give a shit about them. Unfortunately, criminal banksters make it a habit to steal from the taxpayer at every opportunity.
The way I see it, banksters are experts at bankstering and Hitler was an expert at exterminating Jews. In both cases, it worked out best for society when outside parties got involved. The more heavy-handed the involvement, the better in my opinion.
February 16, 2010 at 10:08 PM #513947GovernmentSachs
Participant[quote=davelj]
Here are my questions:
(1) Why do you care about how OneWest deals with their (deadbeat) borrowers (as you have nothing to do with either)?
(2) Why do you care about how an agreement between OneWest and the FDIC is administered (as you have nothing to do with either)?Frankly, I don’t care if OneWest makes $10 billion or not one red cent. And if ANYONE should care, it should be me, as I’m actually in the banking industry! After all, it’s banks that I either have an ownership stake in or consult with that will be paying for the net losses here. And I simply don’t care because life is too short.[/quote]
If the FDIC is involved, every taxpayer should care about what’s going on as it’s a government corporation which is backed up by the taxpayer.
If banksters could actually do their jobs without looting the taxpayers at every turn, people wouldn’t give a shit about them. Unfortunately, criminal banksters make it a habit to steal from the taxpayer at every opportunity.
The way I see it, banksters are experts at bankstering and Hitler was an expert at exterminating Jews. In both cases, it worked out best for society when outside parties got involved. The more heavy-handed the involvement, the better in my opinion.
February 16, 2010 at 10:08 PM #514371GovernmentSachs
Participant[quote=davelj]
Here are my questions:
(1) Why do you care about how OneWest deals with their (deadbeat) borrowers (as you have nothing to do with either)?
(2) Why do you care about how an agreement between OneWest and the FDIC is administered (as you have nothing to do with either)?Frankly, I don’t care if OneWest makes $10 billion or not one red cent. And if ANYONE should care, it should be me, as I’m actually in the banking industry! After all, it’s banks that I either have an ownership stake in or consult with that will be paying for the net losses here. And I simply don’t care because life is too short.[/quote]
If the FDIC is involved, every taxpayer should care about what’s going on as it’s a government corporation which is backed up by the taxpayer.
If banksters could actually do their jobs without looting the taxpayers at every turn, people wouldn’t give a shit about them. Unfortunately, criminal banksters make it a habit to steal from the taxpayer at every opportunity.
The way I see it, banksters are experts at bankstering and Hitler was an expert at exterminating Jews. In both cases, it worked out best for society when outside parties got involved. The more heavy-handed the involvement, the better in my opinion.
February 16, 2010 at 10:08 PM #514462GovernmentSachs
Participant[quote=davelj]
Here are my questions:
(1) Why do you care about how OneWest deals with their (deadbeat) borrowers (as you have nothing to do with either)?
(2) Why do you care about how an agreement between OneWest and the FDIC is administered (as you have nothing to do with either)?Frankly, I don’t care if OneWest makes $10 billion or not one red cent. And if ANYONE should care, it should be me, as I’m actually in the banking industry! After all, it’s banks that I either have an ownership stake in or consult with that will be paying for the net losses here. And I simply don’t care because life is too short.[/quote]
If the FDIC is involved, every taxpayer should care about what’s going on as it’s a government corporation which is backed up by the taxpayer.
If banksters could actually do their jobs without looting the taxpayers at every turn, people wouldn’t give a shit about them. Unfortunately, criminal banksters make it a habit to steal from the taxpayer at every opportunity.
The way I see it, banksters are experts at bankstering and Hitler was an expert at exterminating Jews. In both cases, it worked out best for society when outside parties got involved. The more heavy-handed the involvement, the better in my opinion.
February 16, 2010 at 10:08 PM #514710GovernmentSachs
Participant[quote=davelj]
Here are my questions:
(1) Why do you care about how OneWest deals with their (deadbeat) borrowers (as you have nothing to do with either)?
(2) Why do you care about how an agreement between OneWest and the FDIC is administered (as you have nothing to do with either)?Frankly, I don’t care if OneWest makes $10 billion or not one red cent. And if ANYONE should care, it should be me, as I’m actually in the banking industry! After all, it’s banks that I either have an ownership stake in or consult with that will be paying for the net losses here. And I simply don’t care because life is too short.[/quote]
If the FDIC is involved, every taxpayer should care about what’s going on as it’s a government corporation which is backed up by the taxpayer.
If banksters could actually do their jobs without looting the taxpayers at every turn, people wouldn’t give a shit about them. Unfortunately, criminal banksters make it a habit to steal from the taxpayer at every opportunity.
The way I see it, banksters are experts at bankstering and Hitler was an expert at exterminating Jews. In both cases, it worked out best for society when outside parties got involved. The more heavy-handed the involvement, the better in my opinion.
February 16, 2010 at 11:51 PM #513819outtamojo
Participant[quote=GovernmentSachs][quote=davelj]
Here are my questions:
(1) Why do you care about how OneWest deals with their (deadbeat) borrowers (as you have nothing to do with either)?
(2) Why do you care about how an agreement between OneWest and the FDIC is administered (as you have nothing to do with either)?Frankly, I don’t care if OneWest makes $10 billion or not one red cent. And if ANYONE should care, it should be me, as I’m actually in the banking industry! After all, it’s banks that I either have an ownership stake in or consult with that will be paying for the net losses here. And I simply don’t care because life is too short.[/quote]
If the FDIC is involved, every taxpayer should care about what’s going on as it’s a government corporation which is backed up by the taxpayer.
If banksters could actually do their jobs without looting the taxpayers at every turn, people wouldn’t give a shit about them. Unfortunately, criminal banksters make it a habit to steal from the taxpayer at every opportunity.
The way I see it, banksters are experts at bankstering and Hitler was an expert at exterminating Jews. In both cases, it worked out best for society when outside parties got involved. The more heavy-handed the involvement, the better in my opinion.[/quote]
February 16, 2010 at 11:51 PM #513967outtamojo
Participant[quote=GovernmentSachs][quote=davelj]
Here are my questions:
(1) Why do you care about how OneWest deals with their (deadbeat) borrowers (as you have nothing to do with either)?
(2) Why do you care about how an agreement between OneWest and the FDIC is administered (as you have nothing to do with either)?Frankly, I don’t care if OneWest makes $10 billion or not one red cent. And if ANYONE should care, it should be me, as I’m actually in the banking industry! After all, it’s banks that I either have an ownership stake in or consult with that will be paying for the net losses here. And I simply don’t care because life is too short.[/quote]
If the FDIC is involved, every taxpayer should care about what’s going on as it’s a government corporation which is backed up by the taxpayer.
If banksters could actually do their jobs without looting the taxpayers at every turn, people wouldn’t give a shit about them. Unfortunately, criminal banksters make it a habit to steal from the taxpayer at every opportunity.
The way I see it, banksters are experts at bankstering and Hitler was an expert at exterminating Jews. In both cases, it worked out best for society when outside parties got involved. The more heavy-handed the involvement, the better in my opinion.[/quote]
February 16, 2010 at 11:51 PM #514391outtamojo
Participant[quote=GovernmentSachs][quote=davelj]
Here are my questions:
(1) Why do you care about how OneWest deals with their (deadbeat) borrowers (as you have nothing to do with either)?
(2) Why do you care about how an agreement between OneWest and the FDIC is administered (as you have nothing to do with either)?Frankly, I don’t care if OneWest makes $10 billion or not one red cent. And if ANYONE should care, it should be me, as I’m actually in the banking industry! After all, it’s banks that I either have an ownership stake in or consult with that will be paying for the net losses here. And I simply don’t care because life is too short.[/quote]
If the FDIC is involved, every taxpayer should care about what’s going on as it’s a government corporation which is backed up by the taxpayer.
If banksters could actually do their jobs without looting the taxpayers at every turn, people wouldn’t give a shit about them. Unfortunately, criminal banksters make it a habit to steal from the taxpayer at every opportunity.
The way I see it, banksters are experts at bankstering and Hitler was an expert at exterminating Jews. In both cases, it worked out best for society when outside parties got involved. The more heavy-handed the involvement, the better in my opinion.[/quote]
February 16, 2010 at 11:51 PM #514483outtamojo
Participant[quote=GovernmentSachs][quote=davelj]
Here are my questions:
(1) Why do you care about how OneWest deals with their (deadbeat) borrowers (as you have nothing to do with either)?
(2) Why do you care about how an agreement between OneWest and the FDIC is administered (as you have nothing to do with either)?Frankly, I don’t care if OneWest makes $10 billion or not one red cent. And if ANYONE should care, it should be me, as I’m actually in the banking industry! After all, it’s banks that I either have an ownership stake in or consult with that will be paying for the net losses here. And I simply don’t care because life is too short.[/quote]
If the FDIC is involved, every taxpayer should care about what’s going on as it’s a government corporation which is backed up by the taxpayer.
If banksters could actually do their jobs without looting the taxpayers at every turn, people wouldn’t give a shit about them. Unfortunately, criminal banksters make it a habit to steal from the taxpayer at every opportunity.
The way I see it, banksters are experts at bankstering and Hitler was an expert at exterminating Jews. In both cases, it worked out best for society when outside parties got involved. The more heavy-handed the involvement, the better in my opinion.[/quote]
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
