- This topic has 245 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 8 months ago by
equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 13, 2008 at 2:09 PM #169269March 13, 2008 at 3:12 PM #168853
sdduuuude
ParticipantI like your analysis – makes you think a bit – but not your conclusion.
In essesnce, you are saying that if the dollar stays where it is with respect to gold and the euro plummets, the bubble will be back on ? I’m fairly sure that isn’t how it works.
March 13, 2008 at 3:12 PM #169184sdduuuude
ParticipantI like your analysis – makes you think a bit – but not your conclusion.
In essesnce, you are saying that if the dollar stays where it is with respect to gold and the euro plummets, the bubble will be back on ? I’m fairly sure that isn’t how it works.
March 13, 2008 at 3:12 PM #169186sdduuuude
ParticipantI like your analysis – makes you think a bit – but not your conclusion.
In essesnce, you are saying that if the dollar stays where it is with respect to gold and the euro plummets, the bubble will be back on ? I’m fairly sure that isn’t how it works.
March 13, 2008 at 3:12 PM #169210sdduuuude
ParticipantI like your analysis – makes you think a bit – but not your conclusion.
In essesnce, you are saying that if the dollar stays where it is with respect to gold and the euro plummets, the bubble will be back on ? I’m fairly sure that isn’t how it works.
March 13, 2008 at 3:12 PM #169289sdduuuude
ParticipantI like your analysis – makes you think a bit – but not your conclusion.
In essesnce, you are saying that if the dollar stays where it is with respect to gold and the euro plummets, the bubble will be back on ? I’m fairly sure that isn’t how it works.
March 13, 2008 at 3:26 PM #168883bsrsharma
ParticipantYour analysis, while interesting in itself, has more meaning. One way the Fed is helping to solve our severe indebtedness is through inflation. By successively shrinking the value of US $, we actually have to pay less in real value to our Creditors, both public and private. Since most of the Debtors are American and Creditors are Foreign, this is politically very attractive. (Of couse, the world has wizened up now and is repudiating US $, causing precipitous drop now!).
It has another advantange – once oil reaches $200 or $300, Gas is $6 -$9, Gold is $2000, A box of cereals is $10, A loaf of bread/doz. Eggs are $5 etc., a $500K house may start looking cheap. That should help end the housing crisis.
March 13, 2008 at 3:26 PM #169213bsrsharma
ParticipantYour analysis, while interesting in itself, has more meaning. One way the Fed is helping to solve our severe indebtedness is through inflation. By successively shrinking the value of US $, we actually have to pay less in real value to our Creditors, both public and private. Since most of the Debtors are American and Creditors are Foreign, this is politically very attractive. (Of couse, the world has wizened up now and is repudiating US $, causing precipitous drop now!).
It has another advantange – once oil reaches $200 or $300, Gas is $6 -$9, Gold is $2000, A box of cereals is $10, A loaf of bread/doz. Eggs are $5 etc., a $500K house may start looking cheap. That should help end the housing crisis.
March 13, 2008 at 3:26 PM #169216bsrsharma
ParticipantYour analysis, while interesting in itself, has more meaning. One way the Fed is helping to solve our severe indebtedness is through inflation. By successively shrinking the value of US $, we actually have to pay less in real value to our Creditors, both public and private. Since most of the Debtors are American and Creditors are Foreign, this is politically very attractive. (Of couse, the world has wizened up now and is repudiating US $, causing precipitous drop now!).
It has another advantange – once oil reaches $200 or $300, Gas is $6 -$9, Gold is $2000, A box of cereals is $10, A loaf of bread/doz. Eggs are $5 etc., a $500K house may start looking cheap. That should help end the housing crisis.
March 13, 2008 at 3:26 PM #169240bsrsharma
ParticipantYour analysis, while interesting in itself, has more meaning. One way the Fed is helping to solve our severe indebtedness is through inflation. By successively shrinking the value of US $, we actually have to pay less in real value to our Creditors, both public and private. Since most of the Debtors are American and Creditors are Foreign, this is politically very attractive. (Of couse, the world has wizened up now and is repudiating US $, causing precipitous drop now!).
It has another advantange – once oil reaches $200 or $300, Gas is $6 -$9, Gold is $2000, A box of cereals is $10, A loaf of bread/doz. Eggs are $5 etc., a $500K house may start looking cheap. That should help end the housing crisis.
March 13, 2008 at 3:26 PM #169316bsrsharma
ParticipantYour analysis, while interesting in itself, has more meaning. One way the Fed is helping to solve our severe indebtedness is through inflation. By successively shrinking the value of US $, we actually have to pay less in real value to our Creditors, both public and private. Since most of the Debtors are American and Creditors are Foreign, this is politically very attractive. (Of couse, the world has wizened up now and is repudiating US $, causing precipitous drop now!).
It has another advantange – once oil reaches $200 or $300, Gas is $6 -$9, Gold is $2000, A box of cereals is $10, A loaf of bread/doz. Eggs are $5 etc., a $500K house may start looking cheap. That should help end the housing crisis.
March 13, 2008 at 3:27 PM #168888cr
ParticipantDiego Mamani-
I see your point and you present an interesting case but it’s conveniently lacking the single most important element of prices: incomes.
Late August 2001 (house price $407K)
Mid March 2008 (house price $700-725K)
172% appreciation in 7 years, roughly 24%/yr.I’d have to look for exact data, but I’m pretty confident in saying incomes didn’t go up by 172%.
March 13, 2008 at 3:27 PM #169217cr
ParticipantDiego Mamani-
I see your point and you present an interesting case but it’s conveniently lacking the single most important element of prices: incomes.
Late August 2001 (house price $407K)
Mid March 2008 (house price $700-725K)
172% appreciation in 7 years, roughly 24%/yr.I’d have to look for exact data, but I’m pretty confident in saying incomes didn’t go up by 172%.
March 13, 2008 at 3:27 PM #169223cr
ParticipantDiego Mamani-
I see your point and you present an interesting case but it’s conveniently lacking the single most important element of prices: incomes.
Late August 2001 (house price $407K)
Mid March 2008 (house price $700-725K)
172% appreciation in 7 years, roughly 24%/yr.I’d have to look for exact data, but I’m pretty confident in saying incomes didn’t go up by 172%.
March 13, 2008 at 3:27 PM #169245cr
ParticipantDiego Mamani-
I see your point and you present an interesting case but it’s conveniently lacking the single most important element of prices: incomes.
Late August 2001 (house price $407K)
Mid March 2008 (house price $700-725K)
172% appreciation in 7 years, roughly 24%/yr.I’d have to look for exact data, but I’m pretty confident in saying incomes didn’t go up by 172%.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
