- This topic has 26 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 18 years ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 7, 2006 at 9:31 PM #39474November 7, 2006 at 9:43 PM #39476sdrealtorParticipant
PS,
Sometimes I wonder whether you believe everything you write, are simply ignorant of the reality of things or are just simply trying to get a reaction from other Piggintons.I own my home. The bank has a lien against it not an ownership interest. I can make them go away by writing a check whether they want to or not, they cant do the same to me. Taxes are a cost of ownership not an ownership interest.
If you mistreat your children, child services could take them away. Do you think the government owns your children?
November 7, 2006 at 9:46 PM #39477surveyorParticipantRaybyrnes:
If your father is going to borrow money at 5% to make money,you need to make sure your investment makes a guaranteed return of at least 9% or more (5% for the loan plus 4% inflation). Do a wiki search for “cash on cash”. Not a lot of people in the stock market are guaranteeing 9% returns nowadays. I really don’t recommend taking equity out of a house in order to invest in the stock market. Way too much risk.
November 8, 2006 at 6:08 AM #39486BikeRiderParticipantsddreaming, I live in Central Virginia. We have our nice (small) Blue Ridge mountains to the West and the Chesapeake Bay to the East. A little too much humidity for a couple of months a year, but hey, it is just a couple of months. I love to mountain bike and for serious riding I drive to the George Washington National Forest often (40 minutes from my house). Other hobbies include SCUBA, Rock Climbing (at Seneca Rocks WVa mostly), shooting, antique truck restoration. We own our home, which we bought new in 1997 for $155K (~2800 sq. ft. on 5 acres) after selling a smaller cape and upgrading. We don’t owe anybody anything, which gives us great piece of mind.
Raybyrnes, As to drawing the equity out of my home and investing it, no thanks. Too risky for my tastes. The county just assessed our property at $330K, so there is some equity there. I want to know that I have a place to lay my head. The fact that we don’t make payments to anyone leaves us with lots of income to use towards investing. And this crap about having a mortgage for a tax write off….it makes sense to pay a bank $10,000 in interest so that I don’t have to pay the IRS ~$3,000 in taxes??? Now, let’s see, if I didn’t pay that interest, I have to pay the IRS taxes on that additional $10K, but wait, that means I have $7,000 IN MY POCKET. Hmmm, I’ll take the money in my pocket. You can get the same tax write off by donating $10,000 to your church. You never hear any bank tell you to donate $10K to the church so you don’t have to pay the IRS $3K now do you? But it is the same amount of money off of your taxable income, it just didn’t go to a bank. But people keep thinking they have to keep buying a bigger and bigger house so that they can keep their tax deduction. And I guess they figure that the house will be worth more. But it isn’t any income until you SELL IT. And you have to live some place. So either you downgrade, move to some cheaper area or do something so that the sale price leaves you with cash in your pocket. Our plan has been to just stay in the home we love and grow wealth some other way. Actually, more Americans could have piece of mind if they worked towards paying off their house and then they have a big chunk of money to use for investments each month, instead of being a slave to the lenders with a mortgage payment.
November 8, 2006 at 9:59 AM #39501VCJIMParticipantBikerider, I love your post and could not agree more.
November 8, 2006 at 10:56 AM #39505surveyorParticipantI was in somewhat similar situation a while ago – I had a house, appreciated a lot in value, but to me it was useless because I couldn’t do anything with that equity unless I sold or refi’d it out.
After a lot of research I decided to put it into real estate, where the expected rate of return on your investment was a great deal higher than the interest rate to borrow was (cash on cash). Also, I made sure that the properties cash flowed and that it was a high enough cash flow so that it would eventually replace my salary.
Now, yes, I acknowledge this was risky. But it was a way of spreading my investments beyond the stock market, of which I was already maximizing. I’ve done my research and made some informed decisions. I’ve certainly tried to minimize risk several ways, such as not buying SFRs/condos, not buying in California, and by setting out a 15 year time frame for these investments.
So why am I working like a dog, “slave” to my mortgages, property taxes, and all that? Because my ultimate goal is to retire early and have financial security. The best analogy I can come up with is driving towards my retirement. The safe way is to drive 45 mph. It will take longer to get there, but it is safe. By making all my assets work for me (real estate, investments, my salary, taxes) in an efficient manner, I can push my speed up to 65 mph and get there faster.
Did I mention this is risky? Sure!
Do I recommend this for everybody? No! I thought it would be less work than it has proved to be.
Am I going to get slammed on by Powayseller and all the other real estate bears here? Sure!
(haha)
Still, America rewards hard work and sacrifice. America also rewards laziness but not as much. π
November 8, 2006 at 12:23 PM #39515RaybyrnesParticipantOnce again, I respectfully disagree with your analysis. There have been periods of time far worse than now when naysayers like you have come out and said the sky is falling. Let’s see, WW1, WW2, Vietnam, Black Monday, 9/11. If one takes a look at any 10 year period of time the probabilty of losing is next to 0. If on the other hand one elected to solely stay in a cash position you can guarantee the deteriation of your money due to inflation. Perhaps a more insightful hedge might be to take 250 K and rather than making investment over a month one might choose to take a positon of investing over a 3 year period. That could eliminate some of the noise of market timing. Hopefully we can agree to disagree
November 8, 2006 at 12:32 PM #39519RaybyrnesParticipantYou might read my passage more clearly and see that taxes are only one factor to consider. A more careful examination of nborrowing focuses on the opportunity cost of capital. The tax write off simply creates a greater margin of safety. If you believe that not having payment is so great I encourage you to go buy a powerplant so that you don’t have to worry about your electric biis. or a ca ble network to avoid the canble bills, while your at it you might consider buying farms for food so you don’t ahve that sneaking up on you.
Regardless of how you cut it we hvae bills to pay on a monthly basis. The fact that you can borrow money on the cheap at a fixed rate is an incredible financial tool if you know how to use it. I recently traveled to Brazil where home loan rates are 50%. Credit cards are 100% and a good deal on a car is 35%. Let’s face it the Bnaking system in the US is a fairly incredible system and for those who are smart creates an incredible avenue to crete wealth.
With respect to my father he sleeps well at night knowing that a federal pension is going to provide 7000 a month until the day he dies and half of that u ntil my mom dies so a couple graand a month is not something he had to worry about.
November 8, 2006 at 12:38 PM #39521gold_dredger_phdParticipantWhat kind of house in Ann Arbor costs $700,000?
I’d sell it and live in the country.November 8, 2006 at 1:21 PM #39530powaysellerParticipantBikeRider, excellent points on the folly of the interest deduction, and the value of having a paid off home.
surveyor, if your properties provide cash, then you are in a good situation. I doubt rents will go down, so if you like owning real estate and the tenant is paying the mortgage, good for you. Another option is to sell that property and put that cash to use in 3-5 years when prices are lower. You may end up with twice as many cash-flow properties.
November 9, 2006 at 11:13 PM #39669powaysellerParticipantsdrealtor, the government does not own our children, and neither do we. People are not possessions.
Why do you say I am “ignorant” in describing the consequences of not making your mortgage or tax payments?
November 10, 2006 at 9:17 AM #39689sdrealtorParticipantPS we copuld get into a huge existentialistic discussion of whether we own anything. That would be a waste of time. Owning proeprty means you have control over it, you have the right to sell it, you have the right to convey it to your heirs etc. The bank has a lien on a property but not an ownership in my house. As I said, I can write a check and unilaterally make them go away. They cant make me go away inlaterally.
It seems you got my point about children. The fact that something can be taken away under a given set of circumstance doesnt necessarily convey ownership.
As for the “ignorance” comment, I didnt call you “ignorant” it was one of 3 possible explanations I put forth for explaining you behavior. Personally, I subscribe to option 3.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.