- This topic has 50 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by Limbo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 14, 2009 at 12:06 PM #366342March 14, 2009 at 1:12 PM #366398SD RealtorParticipant
Mark your original post is something that a lot of people wrestle with. My concern is that there is an almost…ambiguous quality to your post. It sounds like your decision to purchase is a cross between not being able to generate a good return on your 250k nut, being tired of renting, and thinking you can get a posotive cash flow on a home that you will buy. I guess that blend is okay yet it doesn’t feel right to me, I cannot describe why. For no other reason then a gut instinct I think you would be well served to try to push things out awhile. Also if you are considering a cash purchase why don’t you investigate learning about trustee sales and purchasing a foreclosure? You could save a lot of money BUT it takes a lot of legwork and learning. It just seems to me that plunking a lot of cash down for a home you really love and will live in for a long time is one thing but to plunk a big wad of cash down on a home that you are buying simply because it is a substitute for you to live in rather then renting a home, and that you will convert to a rental in the near future anyways… It just doesn’t seem like a good fit to me. If you hold off I think you will be glad you did.
March 14, 2009 at 1:12 PM #366362SD RealtorParticipantMark your original post is something that a lot of people wrestle with. My concern is that there is an almost…ambiguous quality to your post. It sounds like your decision to purchase is a cross between not being able to generate a good return on your 250k nut, being tired of renting, and thinking you can get a posotive cash flow on a home that you will buy. I guess that blend is okay yet it doesn’t feel right to me, I cannot describe why. For no other reason then a gut instinct I think you would be well served to try to push things out awhile. Also if you are considering a cash purchase why don’t you investigate learning about trustee sales and purchasing a foreclosure? You could save a lot of money BUT it takes a lot of legwork and learning. It just seems to me that plunking a lot of cash down for a home you really love and will live in for a long time is one thing but to plunk a big wad of cash down on a home that you are buying simply because it is a substitute for you to live in rather then renting a home, and that you will convert to a rental in the near future anyways… It just doesn’t seem like a good fit to me. If you hold off I think you will be glad you did.
March 14, 2009 at 1:12 PM #366511SD RealtorParticipantMark your original post is something that a lot of people wrestle with. My concern is that there is an almost…ambiguous quality to your post. It sounds like your decision to purchase is a cross between not being able to generate a good return on your 250k nut, being tired of renting, and thinking you can get a posotive cash flow on a home that you will buy. I guess that blend is okay yet it doesn’t feel right to me, I cannot describe why. For no other reason then a gut instinct I think you would be well served to try to push things out awhile. Also if you are considering a cash purchase why don’t you investigate learning about trustee sales and purchasing a foreclosure? You could save a lot of money BUT it takes a lot of legwork and learning. It just seems to me that plunking a lot of cash down for a home you really love and will live in for a long time is one thing but to plunk a big wad of cash down on a home that you are buying simply because it is a substitute for you to live in rather then renting a home, and that you will convert to a rental in the near future anyways… It just doesn’t seem like a good fit to me. If you hold off I think you will be glad you did.
March 14, 2009 at 1:12 PM #365910SD RealtorParticipantMark your original post is something that a lot of people wrestle with. My concern is that there is an almost…ambiguous quality to your post. It sounds like your decision to purchase is a cross between not being able to generate a good return on your 250k nut, being tired of renting, and thinking you can get a posotive cash flow on a home that you will buy. I guess that blend is okay yet it doesn’t feel right to me, I cannot describe why. For no other reason then a gut instinct I think you would be well served to try to push things out awhile. Also if you are considering a cash purchase why don’t you investigate learning about trustee sales and purchasing a foreclosure? You could save a lot of money BUT it takes a lot of legwork and learning. It just seems to me that plunking a lot of cash down for a home you really love and will live in for a long time is one thing but to plunk a big wad of cash down on a home that you are buying simply because it is a substitute for you to live in rather then renting a home, and that you will convert to a rental in the near future anyways… It just doesn’t seem like a good fit to me. If you hold off I think you will be glad you did.
March 14, 2009 at 1:12 PM #366200SD RealtorParticipantMark your original post is something that a lot of people wrestle with. My concern is that there is an almost…ambiguous quality to your post. It sounds like your decision to purchase is a cross between not being able to generate a good return on your 250k nut, being tired of renting, and thinking you can get a posotive cash flow on a home that you will buy. I guess that blend is okay yet it doesn’t feel right to me, I cannot describe why. For no other reason then a gut instinct I think you would be well served to try to push things out awhile. Also if you are considering a cash purchase why don’t you investigate learning about trustee sales and purchasing a foreclosure? You could save a lot of money BUT it takes a lot of legwork and learning. It just seems to me that plunking a lot of cash down for a home you really love and will live in for a long time is one thing but to plunk a big wad of cash down on a home that you are buying simply because it is a substitute for you to live in rather then renting a home, and that you will convert to a rental in the near future anyways… It just doesn’t seem like a good fit to me. If you hold off I think you will be glad you did.
March 14, 2009 at 1:16 PM #366372temeculaguyParticipantTemecula currently pencils out for what you are looking for but the 250k range doesn’t have the rental return that the cheaper places do. It’s an inverted market as far as housing stock goes, condos and apartments are the minority, large houses are the majority. Large rentals don’t have the return that say, two smaller ones for the same money would. Murrieta and Temecula are probably the only places in the IE I would steer you towards unless you like the desert and want to go with palm springs.
In Temecula/Murrieta you can easily buy a 2000-3000 sq ft house for 250k depending on location and condition, but $100 a square is the average, they will rent easily for the $1500 to $1800 range. A townhouse can be had (something with a garage and nobody above or below) for about half but the rent isn’t half, it is closer to 25% less, probably $1300-$1500. When you evaluate a potential future rental, pretend you don’t have cash and run the numbers as if you had to borrow 100%, then see if it is rent nuetral, not just advertised rent of one or two but the going rent measured against nearby apartments as well.
I like zip code 92592 for rentals, something in the temecula parkway corridor. There is only one apartment complex and three condo complexes in an area with 40k people. It also has one of the largest employers in the county (pechanga, one if not the largest casino) and a very large hospital on the way. Rental demographic workers are commuting into the immediate area, not many live close, that always bodes well for an area’s future and South Temecula is almost built out with no future apartments coming.
The only problem is you are not the only one with a calculator, the well priced ones can yield a dozen offers in a week, if not a day. Being unfamiliar with the area you might have to act too hastily and end up getting screwed because you are in love with the numbers. There are good and bad choices, take time visiting before you buy. As time goes on this should slow down, other areas are coming down and we should stop seeing the influx of buyers at some point.
As a cash buyer, you may want to wait for rates to rise a little, then you will have the listings to yourself.
March 14, 2009 at 1:16 PM #366210temeculaguyParticipantTemecula currently pencils out for what you are looking for but the 250k range doesn’t have the rental return that the cheaper places do. It’s an inverted market as far as housing stock goes, condos and apartments are the minority, large houses are the majority. Large rentals don’t have the return that say, two smaller ones for the same money would. Murrieta and Temecula are probably the only places in the IE I would steer you towards unless you like the desert and want to go with palm springs.
In Temecula/Murrieta you can easily buy a 2000-3000 sq ft house for 250k depending on location and condition, but $100 a square is the average, they will rent easily for the $1500 to $1800 range. A townhouse can be had (something with a garage and nobody above or below) for about half but the rent isn’t half, it is closer to 25% less, probably $1300-$1500. When you evaluate a potential future rental, pretend you don’t have cash and run the numbers as if you had to borrow 100%, then see if it is rent nuetral, not just advertised rent of one or two but the going rent measured against nearby apartments as well.
I like zip code 92592 for rentals, something in the temecula parkway corridor. There is only one apartment complex and three condo complexes in an area with 40k people. It also has one of the largest employers in the county (pechanga, one if not the largest casino) and a very large hospital on the way. Rental demographic workers are commuting into the immediate area, not many live close, that always bodes well for an area’s future and South Temecula is almost built out with no future apartments coming.
The only problem is you are not the only one with a calculator, the well priced ones can yield a dozen offers in a week, if not a day. Being unfamiliar with the area you might have to act too hastily and end up getting screwed because you are in love with the numbers. There are good and bad choices, take time visiting before you buy. As time goes on this should slow down, other areas are coming down and we should stop seeing the influx of buyers at some point.
As a cash buyer, you may want to wait for rates to rise a little, then you will have the listings to yourself.
March 14, 2009 at 1:16 PM #366521temeculaguyParticipantTemecula currently pencils out for what you are looking for but the 250k range doesn’t have the rental return that the cheaper places do. It’s an inverted market as far as housing stock goes, condos and apartments are the minority, large houses are the majority. Large rentals don’t have the return that say, two smaller ones for the same money would. Murrieta and Temecula are probably the only places in the IE I would steer you towards unless you like the desert and want to go with palm springs.
In Temecula/Murrieta you can easily buy a 2000-3000 sq ft house for 250k depending on location and condition, but $100 a square is the average, they will rent easily for the $1500 to $1800 range. A townhouse can be had (something with a garage and nobody above or below) for about half but the rent isn’t half, it is closer to 25% less, probably $1300-$1500. When you evaluate a potential future rental, pretend you don’t have cash and run the numbers as if you had to borrow 100%, then see if it is rent nuetral, not just advertised rent of one or two but the going rent measured against nearby apartments as well.
I like zip code 92592 for rentals, something in the temecula parkway corridor. There is only one apartment complex and three condo complexes in an area with 40k people. It also has one of the largest employers in the county (pechanga, one if not the largest casino) and a very large hospital on the way. Rental demographic workers are commuting into the immediate area, not many live close, that always bodes well for an area’s future and South Temecula is almost built out with no future apartments coming.
The only problem is you are not the only one with a calculator, the well priced ones can yield a dozen offers in a week, if not a day. Being unfamiliar with the area you might have to act too hastily and end up getting screwed because you are in love with the numbers. There are good and bad choices, take time visiting before you buy. As time goes on this should slow down, other areas are coming down and we should stop seeing the influx of buyers at some point.
As a cash buyer, you may want to wait for rates to rise a little, then you will have the listings to yourself.
March 14, 2009 at 1:16 PM #366408temeculaguyParticipantTemecula currently pencils out for what you are looking for but the 250k range doesn’t have the rental return that the cheaper places do. It’s an inverted market as far as housing stock goes, condos and apartments are the minority, large houses are the majority. Large rentals don’t have the return that say, two smaller ones for the same money would. Murrieta and Temecula are probably the only places in the IE I would steer you towards unless you like the desert and want to go with palm springs.
In Temecula/Murrieta you can easily buy a 2000-3000 sq ft house for 250k depending on location and condition, but $100 a square is the average, they will rent easily for the $1500 to $1800 range. A townhouse can be had (something with a garage and nobody above or below) for about half but the rent isn’t half, it is closer to 25% less, probably $1300-$1500. When you evaluate a potential future rental, pretend you don’t have cash and run the numbers as if you had to borrow 100%, then see if it is rent nuetral, not just advertised rent of one or two but the going rent measured against nearby apartments as well.
I like zip code 92592 for rentals, something in the temecula parkway corridor. There is only one apartment complex and three condo complexes in an area with 40k people. It also has one of the largest employers in the county (pechanga, one if not the largest casino) and a very large hospital on the way. Rental demographic workers are commuting into the immediate area, not many live close, that always bodes well for an area’s future and South Temecula is almost built out with no future apartments coming.
The only problem is you are not the only one with a calculator, the well priced ones can yield a dozen offers in a week, if not a day. Being unfamiliar with the area you might have to act too hastily and end up getting screwed because you are in love with the numbers. There are good and bad choices, take time visiting before you buy. As time goes on this should slow down, other areas are coming down and we should stop seeing the influx of buyers at some point.
As a cash buyer, you may want to wait for rates to rise a little, then you will have the listings to yourself.
March 14, 2009 at 1:16 PM #365920temeculaguyParticipantTemecula currently pencils out for what you are looking for but the 250k range doesn’t have the rental return that the cheaper places do. It’s an inverted market as far as housing stock goes, condos and apartments are the minority, large houses are the majority. Large rentals don’t have the return that say, two smaller ones for the same money would. Murrieta and Temecula are probably the only places in the IE I would steer you towards unless you like the desert and want to go with palm springs.
In Temecula/Murrieta you can easily buy a 2000-3000 sq ft house for 250k depending on location and condition, but $100 a square is the average, they will rent easily for the $1500 to $1800 range. A townhouse can be had (something with a garage and nobody above or below) for about half but the rent isn’t half, it is closer to 25% less, probably $1300-$1500. When you evaluate a potential future rental, pretend you don’t have cash and run the numbers as if you had to borrow 100%, then see if it is rent nuetral, not just advertised rent of one or two but the going rent measured against nearby apartments as well.
I like zip code 92592 for rentals, something in the temecula parkway corridor. There is only one apartment complex and three condo complexes in an area with 40k people. It also has one of the largest employers in the county (pechanga, one if not the largest casino) and a very large hospital on the way. Rental demographic workers are commuting into the immediate area, not many live close, that always bodes well for an area’s future and South Temecula is almost built out with no future apartments coming.
The only problem is you are not the only one with a calculator, the well priced ones can yield a dozen offers in a week, if not a day. Being unfamiliar with the area you might have to act too hastily and end up getting screwed because you are in love with the numbers. There are good and bad choices, take time visiting before you buy. As time goes on this should slow down, other areas are coming down and we should stop seeing the influx of buyers at some point.
As a cash buyer, you may want to wait for rates to rise a little, then you will have the listings to yourself.
March 14, 2009 at 2:42 PM #366244SD RealtorParticipantIf rates skyrocket like they SHOULD DO given the reckless spending, you will be well served to have not spent 250k for the property. TG makes a very good point.
March 14, 2009 at 2:42 PM #366556SD RealtorParticipantIf rates skyrocket like they SHOULD DO given the reckless spending, you will be well served to have not spent 250k for the property. TG makes a very good point.
March 14, 2009 at 2:42 PM #366443SD RealtorParticipantIf rates skyrocket like they SHOULD DO given the reckless spending, you will be well served to have not spent 250k for the property. TG makes a very good point.
March 14, 2009 at 2:42 PM #366407SD RealtorParticipantIf rates skyrocket like they SHOULD DO given the reckless spending, you will be well served to have not spent 250k for the property. TG makes a very good point.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.