Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Tell me what to do
- This topic has 130 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by
(former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 9, 2009 at 12:05 PM #15011February 9, 2009 at 1:07 PM #343251
Coronita
ParticipantIs this a forced relo?
February 9, 2009 at 1:07 PM #343573Coronita
ParticipantIs this a forced relo?
February 9, 2009 at 1:07 PM #343681Coronita
ParticipantIs this a forced relo?
February 9, 2009 at 1:07 PM #343710Coronita
ParticipantIs this a forced relo?
February 9, 2009 at 1:07 PM #343807Coronita
ParticipantIs this a forced relo?
February 9, 2009 at 1:09 PM #343256Anonymous
GuestYou asked for some advice, so here’s my attempt at some wisdom:
It seems like you are being more objective than most folks these days. The thing that you have to accept is that the decline in value and cash put into upgrades are all a sunk cost. This money is gone and you have to make your decisions based upon what the market price is now. Your investment lost $100K – there is no changing that.
Since you are leaving the house and it will no longer be your home, don’t be sentimental about it. Now the house is just an asset with a market value, nothing more. Your decision should be based upon objective facts and financial goals, such as risk levels, liquidity needs, tax consequences, diversification, etc. Don’t just hold on to it because you like it.
Your $100K loss over 6 years averages to about $17K per year. I’m sure this stings, but it sounds like you have a good career, so it isn’t much in the long run.
February 9, 2009 at 1:09 PM #343578Anonymous
GuestYou asked for some advice, so here’s my attempt at some wisdom:
It seems like you are being more objective than most folks these days. The thing that you have to accept is that the decline in value and cash put into upgrades are all a sunk cost. This money is gone and you have to make your decisions based upon what the market price is now. Your investment lost $100K – there is no changing that.
Since you are leaving the house and it will no longer be your home, don’t be sentimental about it. Now the house is just an asset with a market value, nothing more. Your decision should be based upon objective facts and financial goals, such as risk levels, liquidity needs, tax consequences, diversification, etc. Don’t just hold on to it because you like it.
Your $100K loss over 6 years averages to about $17K per year. I’m sure this stings, but it sounds like you have a good career, so it isn’t much in the long run.
February 9, 2009 at 1:09 PM #343686Anonymous
GuestYou asked for some advice, so here’s my attempt at some wisdom:
It seems like you are being more objective than most folks these days. The thing that you have to accept is that the decline in value and cash put into upgrades are all a sunk cost. This money is gone and you have to make your decisions based upon what the market price is now. Your investment lost $100K – there is no changing that.
Since you are leaving the house and it will no longer be your home, don’t be sentimental about it. Now the house is just an asset with a market value, nothing more. Your decision should be based upon objective facts and financial goals, such as risk levels, liquidity needs, tax consequences, diversification, etc. Don’t just hold on to it because you like it.
Your $100K loss over 6 years averages to about $17K per year. I’m sure this stings, but it sounds like you have a good career, so it isn’t much in the long run.
February 9, 2009 at 1:09 PM #343715Anonymous
GuestYou asked for some advice, so here’s my attempt at some wisdom:
It seems like you are being more objective than most folks these days. The thing that you have to accept is that the decline in value and cash put into upgrades are all a sunk cost. This money is gone and you have to make your decisions based upon what the market price is now. Your investment lost $100K – there is no changing that.
Since you are leaving the house and it will no longer be your home, don’t be sentimental about it. Now the house is just an asset with a market value, nothing more. Your decision should be based upon objective facts and financial goals, such as risk levels, liquidity needs, tax consequences, diversification, etc. Don’t just hold on to it because you like it.
Your $100K loss over 6 years averages to about $17K per year. I’m sure this stings, but it sounds like you have a good career, so it isn’t much in the long run.
February 9, 2009 at 1:09 PM #343812Anonymous
GuestYou asked for some advice, so here’s my attempt at some wisdom:
It seems like you are being more objective than most folks these days. The thing that you have to accept is that the decline in value and cash put into upgrades are all a sunk cost. This money is gone and you have to make your decisions based upon what the market price is now. Your investment lost $100K – there is no changing that.
Since you are leaving the house and it will no longer be your home, don’t be sentimental about it. Now the house is just an asset with a market value, nothing more. Your decision should be based upon objective facts and financial goals, such as risk levels, liquidity needs, tax consequences, diversification, etc. Don’t just hold on to it because you like it.
Your $100K loss over 6 years averages to about $17K per year. I’m sure this stings, but it sounds like you have a good career, so it isn’t much in the long run.
February 9, 2009 at 1:18 PM #343272sc_alum
ParticipantNot a forced relo, but a very desirable one that we’re excited about. Executive level position in a major global company.
I ran the numbers, and could certainly make the argument to myself that we basically “rented” for 6 years, plus a tax write off benefit… that takes out some of the sting. And got to live in a house that we loved and that we had fun in, etc etc.
But now that it’s time to make the financial decision, I’m stuck as to whether to rent or to sell.
Sell pros: Don’t have to manage a rental property from 3k miles away, get SOME equity out of the deal, have no mortgage debt to count against us if we want to buy over there.
Sell cons: Lock in the “loss”, lose out on any re-appreciation of the market since it seems like we’re selling into the absolute worst market in my lifetime.
February 9, 2009 at 1:18 PM #343593sc_alum
ParticipantNot a forced relo, but a very desirable one that we’re excited about. Executive level position in a major global company.
I ran the numbers, and could certainly make the argument to myself that we basically “rented” for 6 years, plus a tax write off benefit… that takes out some of the sting. And got to live in a house that we loved and that we had fun in, etc etc.
But now that it’s time to make the financial decision, I’m stuck as to whether to rent or to sell.
Sell pros: Don’t have to manage a rental property from 3k miles away, get SOME equity out of the deal, have no mortgage debt to count against us if we want to buy over there.
Sell cons: Lock in the “loss”, lose out on any re-appreciation of the market since it seems like we’re selling into the absolute worst market in my lifetime.
February 9, 2009 at 1:18 PM #343701sc_alum
ParticipantNot a forced relo, but a very desirable one that we’re excited about. Executive level position in a major global company.
I ran the numbers, and could certainly make the argument to myself that we basically “rented” for 6 years, plus a tax write off benefit… that takes out some of the sting. And got to live in a house that we loved and that we had fun in, etc etc.
But now that it’s time to make the financial decision, I’m stuck as to whether to rent or to sell.
Sell pros: Don’t have to manage a rental property from 3k miles away, get SOME equity out of the deal, have no mortgage debt to count against us if we want to buy over there.
Sell cons: Lock in the “loss”, lose out on any re-appreciation of the market since it seems like we’re selling into the absolute worst market in my lifetime.
February 9, 2009 at 1:18 PM #343730sc_alum
ParticipantNot a forced relo, but a very desirable one that we’re excited about. Executive level position in a major global company.
I ran the numbers, and could certainly make the argument to myself that we basically “rented” for 6 years, plus a tax write off benefit… that takes out some of the sting. And got to live in a house that we loved and that we had fun in, etc etc.
But now that it’s time to make the financial decision, I’m stuck as to whether to rent or to sell.
Sell pros: Don’t have to manage a rental property from 3k miles away, get SOME equity out of the deal, have no mortgage debt to count against us if we want to buy over there.
Sell cons: Lock in the “loss”, lose out on any re-appreciation of the market since it seems like we’re selling into the absolute worst market in my lifetime.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.