- This topic has 530 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 20, 2010 at 8:24 AM #607806September 20, 2010 at 8:25 AM #606743briansd1Guest
[quote=CA renter][quote=briansd1]
Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.[/quote]
IMHO, the Democrats have been just as guilty of creating these “extremist” groups. They work together to serve their collective agenda. The sooner we all see that, the better.[/quote]
Give me some examples of “extremist” Democrats vs. “extremist” Republicans and their influence over party politics.
On the Democratic side, I’m sure that Jesse Jackson will be mentioned; but does he generate the fervor that Rush Limbaugh does? I don’t think so.
Ending the two-party, business-as-usual, political system is a slow process that will take generations. Voting for the Tea Party just plays into the hands of ignorant extremists.
September 20, 2010 at 8:25 AM #606831briansd1Guest[quote=CA renter][quote=briansd1]
Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.[/quote]
IMHO, the Democrats have been just as guilty of creating these “extremist” groups. They work together to serve their collective agenda. The sooner we all see that, the better.[/quote]
Give me some examples of “extremist” Democrats vs. “extremist” Republicans and their influence over party politics.
On the Democratic side, I’m sure that Jesse Jackson will be mentioned; but does he generate the fervor that Rush Limbaugh does? I don’t think so.
Ending the two-party, business-as-usual, political system is a slow process that will take generations. Voting for the Tea Party just plays into the hands of ignorant extremists.
September 20, 2010 at 8:25 AM #607386briansd1Guest[quote=CA renter][quote=briansd1]
Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.[/quote]
IMHO, the Democrats have been just as guilty of creating these “extremist” groups. They work together to serve their collective agenda. The sooner we all see that, the better.[/quote]
Give me some examples of “extremist” Democrats vs. “extremist” Republicans and their influence over party politics.
On the Democratic side, I’m sure that Jesse Jackson will be mentioned; but does he generate the fervor that Rush Limbaugh does? I don’t think so.
Ending the two-party, business-as-usual, political system is a slow process that will take generations. Voting for the Tea Party just plays into the hands of ignorant extremists.
September 20, 2010 at 8:25 AM #607493briansd1Guest[quote=CA renter][quote=briansd1]
Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.[/quote]
IMHO, the Democrats have been just as guilty of creating these “extremist” groups. They work together to serve their collective agenda. The sooner we all see that, the better.[/quote]
Give me some examples of “extremist” Democrats vs. “extremist” Republicans and their influence over party politics.
On the Democratic side, I’m sure that Jesse Jackson will be mentioned; but does he generate the fervor that Rush Limbaugh does? I don’t think so.
Ending the two-party, business-as-usual, political system is a slow process that will take generations. Voting for the Tea Party just plays into the hands of ignorant extremists.
September 20, 2010 at 8:25 AM #607811briansd1Guest[quote=CA renter][quote=briansd1]
Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.[/quote]
IMHO, the Democrats have been just as guilty of creating these “extremist” groups. They work together to serve their collective agenda. The sooner we all see that, the better.[/quote]
Give me some examples of “extremist” Democrats vs. “extremist” Republicans and their influence over party politics.
On the Democratic side, I’m sure that Jesse Jackson will be mentioned; but does he generate the fervor that Rush Limbaugh does? I don’t think so.
Ending the two-party, business-as-usual, political system is a slow process that will take generations. Voting for the Tea Party just plays into the hands of ignorant extremists.
September 20, 2010 at 8:30 AM #606753briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya]Tea With Frankenstein: Please, No Masturbation
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/18-2What’s worse, Obama’s stupidity is a gift that will keep on giving for a long time. By means of his actions in the White House so far, he has nearly guaranteed that he cannot recover in the coming years, no matter what. He has done one of the few things that more or less assures his presidency of being finished. The right will never let up on him, even if he were to adopt their agenda wholesale. And let’s be clear about this – he more or less already has. If you lay out the positions of the Obama administration on everything from civil liberties to gay rights to economic policy to national ‘defense’ and more, there’s hardly a damn shred of difference between his positions and George W. Bush’s. It’s a ludicrous lie to call this milquetoast regressive in a Democratic suit a liberal, let alone a socialist. And we’ve only just begun with Bad Barry, folks. After he gets his ass royally kicked in November, Obama will lurch even further to the right. But that will engender even greater scorn from the sickos living over there under their slime-infested rocks, as well as endless congressional investigations of bogus administration scandals, likely including an impeachment. Or did you miss the 1990s entirely, Barack?
snip
And now here is where it starts to get really scary. Imagine us in 2014, the same distance into a Republican government (on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue) that we are today into a Democratic one. Except that there are two big differences. The first is that the public has had four more years – four years! – of decline, demoralization and economic terrorism under their belts by this time, with no solutions remotely in sight. What is their likely disposition? They will be turning on Republicans and showing their canines in a way that makes 2010 look like a friendly game of Scrabble by comparison.
The second difference will be in the nature of those inhabiting a government which at that point will be firmly backed up against the wall. About the only positive thing I can say regarding Democrats is that they have some limitations on what they are willing to do out of self-interest. Not much, but some. Not so the animals of the GOP, least of all the tea party sociopathic freaks. These people are not going to go down lightly. These people will be faced with a choice between humiliation and destruction on the one hand, and generating a diversionary, and probably jingoistic feel-good, catastrophe on the other. They would not be the first failing government in history to choose the annihilation of others in order to sustain a bit longer the unsustainable. They would not even be the first to take out tens of millions in such a quest. Scary only begins to describe where this is all going.
People often scoff at me when I tell them that I think Sarah Palin is likely to be the next American president. Or they think I wax a bit apocalyptic when I start talking about outcomes that smell all too much like Germany in the 1930s. So let me review the bidding in summary form to explain why we should be very afraid. Jump in anywhere you see a chink in the chain of logic.
snip
Far, far more is at stake here than one failed president’s second term, or the careers of a bunch of party hacks and media retreads.
The truth is, we stand now on the edge of a precipice. And it is a very long way down to the bottom.
This is the latest liberal party line–“We suck ass, but we arent psychotic.”[/quote]
Arraya, based on your latest post, which party, Democratic or Republican is preferable, if you had to choose one of the two?
September 20, 2010 at 8:30 AM #606841briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya]Tea With Frankenstein: Please, No Masturbation
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/18-2What’s worse, Obama’s stupidity is a gift that will keep on giving for a long time. By means of his actions in the White House so far, he has nearly guaranteed that he cannot recover in the coming years, no matter what. He has done one of the few things that more or less assures his presidency of being finished. The right will never let up on him, even if he were to adopt their agenda wholesale. And let’s be clear about this – he more or less already has. If you lay out the positions of the Obama administration on everything from civil liberties to gay rights to economic policy to national ‘defense’ and more, there’s hardly a damn shred of difference between his positions and George W. Bush’s. It’s a ludicrous lie to call this milquetoast regressive in a Democratic suit a liberal, let alone a socialist. And we’ve only just begun with Bad Barry, folks. After he gets his ass royally kicked in November, Obama will lurch even further to the right. But that will engender even greater scorn from the sickos living over there under their slime-infested rocks, as well as endless congressional investigations of bogus administration scandals, likely including an impeachment. Or did you miss the 1990s entirely, Barack?
snip
And now here is where it starts to get really scary. Imagine us in 2014, the same distance into a Republican government (on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue) that we are today into a Democratic one. Except that there are two big differences. The first is that the public has had four more years – four years! – of decline, demoralization and economic terrorism under their belts by this time, with no solutions remotely in sight. What is their likely disposition? They will be turning on Republicans and showing their canines in a way that makes 2010 look like a friendly game of Scrabble by comparison.
The second difference will be in the nature of those inhabiting a government which at that point will be firmly backed up against the wall. About the only positive thing I can say regarding Democrats is that they have some limitations on what they are willing to do out of self-interest. Not much, but some. Not so the animals of the GOP, least of all the tea party sociopathic freaks. These people are not going to go down lightly. These people will be faced with a choice between humiliation and destruction on the one hand, and generating a diversionary, and probably jingoistic feel-good, catastrophe on the other. They would not be the first failing government in history to choose the annihilation of others in order to sustain a bit longer the unsustainable. They would not even be the first to take out tens of millions in such a quest. Scary only begins to describe where this is all going.
People often scoff at me when I tell them that I think Sarah Palin is likely to be the next American president. Or they think I wax a bit apocalyptic when I start talking about outcomes that smell all too much like Germany in the 1930s. So let me review the bidding in summary form to explain why we should be very afraid. Jump in anywhere you see a chink in the chain of logic.
snip
Far, far more is at stake here than one failed president’s second term, or the careers of a bunch of party hacks and media retreads.
The truth is, we stand now on the edge of a precipice. And it is a very long way down to the bottom.
This is the latest liberal party line–“We suck ass, but we arent psychotic.”[/quote]
Arraya, based on your latest post, which party, Democratic or Republican is preferable, if you had to choose one of the two?
September 20, 2010 at 8:30 AM #607396briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya]Tea With Frankenstein: Please, No Masturbation
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/18-2What’s worse, Obama’s stupidity is a gift that will keep on giving for a long time. By means of his actions in the White House so far, he has nearly guaranteed that he cannot recover in the coming years, no matter what. He has done one of the few things that more or less assures his presidency of being finished. The right will never let up on him, even if he were to adopt their agenda wholesale. And let’s be clear about this – he more or less already has. If you lay out the positions of the Obama administration on everything from civil liberties to gay rights to economic policy to national ‘defense’ and more, there’s hardly a damn shred of difference between his positions and George W. Bush’s. It’s a ludicrous lie to call this milquetoast regressive in a Democratic suit a liberal, let alone a socialist. And we’ve only just begun with Bad Barry, folks. After he gets his ass royally kicked in November, Obama will lurch even further to the right. But that will engender even greater scorn from the sickos living over there under their slime-infested rocks, as well as endless congressional investigations of bogus administration scandals, likely including an impeachment. Or did you miss the 1990s entirely, Barack?
snip
And now here is where it starts to get really scary. Imagine us in 2014, the same distance into a Republican government (on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue) that we are today into a Democratic one. Except that there are two big differences. The first is that the public has had four more years – four years! – of decline, demoralization and economic terrorism under their belts by this time, with no solutions remotely in sight. What is their likely disposition? They will be turning on Republicans and showing their canines in a way that makes 2010 look like a friendly game of Scrabble by comparison.
The second difference will be in the nature of those inhabiting a government which at that point will be firmly backed up against the wall. About the only positive thing I can say regarding Democrats is that they have some limitations on what they are willing to do out of self-interest. Not much, but some. Not so the animals of the GOP, least of all the tea party sociopathic freaks. These people are not going to go down lightly. These people will be faced with a choice between humiliation and destruction on the one hand, and generating a diversionary, and probably jingoistic feel-good, catastrophe on the other. They would not be the first failing government in history to choose the annihilation of others in order to sustain a bit longer the unsustainable. They would not even be the first to take out tens of millions in such a quest. Scary only begins to describe where this is all going.
People often scoff at me when I tell them that I think Sarah Palin is likely to be the next American president. Or they think I wax a bit apocalyptic when I start talking about outcomes that smell all too much like Germany in the 1930s. So let me review the bidding in summary form to explain why we should be very afraid. Jump in anywhere you see a chink in the chain of logic.
snip
Far, far more is at stake here than one failed president’s second term, or the careers of a bunch of party hacks and media retreads.
The truth is, we stand now on the edge of a precipice. And it is a very long way down to the bottom.
This is the latest liberal party line–“We suck ass, but we arent psychotic.”[/quote]
Arraya, based on your latest post, which party, Democratic or Republican is preferable, if you had to choose one of the two?
September 20, 2010 at 8:30 AM #607503briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya]Tea With Frankenstein: Please, No Masturbation
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/18-2What’s worse, Obama’s stupidity is a gift that will keep on giving for a long time. By means of his actions in the White House so far, he has nearly guaranteed that he cannot recover in the coming years, no matter what. He has done one of the few things that more or less assures his presidency of being finished. The right will never let up on him, even if he were to adopt their agenda wholesale. And let’s be clear about this – he more or less already has. If you lay out the positions of the Obama administration on everything from civil liberties to gay rights to economic policy to national ‘defense’ and more, there’s hardly a damn shred of difference between his positions and George W. Bush’s. It’s a ludicrous lie to call this milquetoast regressive in a Democratic suit a liberal, let alone a socialist. And we’ve only just begun with Bad Barry, folks. After he gets his ass royally kicked in November, Obama will lurch even further to the right. But that will engender even greater scorn from the sickos living over there under their slime-infested rocks, as well as endless congressional investigations of bogus administration scandals, likely including an impeachment. Or did you miss the 1990s entirely, Barack?
snip
And now here is where it starts to get really scary. Imagine us in 2014, the same distance into a Republican government (on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue) that we are today into a Democratic one. Except that there are two big differences. The first is that the public has had four more years – four years! – of decline, demoralization and economic terrorism under their belts by this time, with no solutions remotely in sight. What is their likely disposition? They will be turning on Republicans and showing their canines in a way that makes 2010 look like a friendly game of Scrabble by comparison.
The second difference will be in the nature of those inhabiting a government which at that point will be firmly backed up against the wall. About the only positive thing I can say regarding Democrats is that they have some limitations on what they are willing to do out of self-interest. Not much, but some. Not so the animals of the GOP, least of all the tea party sociopathic freaks. These people are not going to go down lightly. These people will be faced with a choice between humiliation and destruction on the one hand, and generating a diversionary, and probably jingoistic feel-good, catastrophe on the other. They would not be the first failing government in history to choose the annihilation of others in order to sustain a bit longer the unsustainable. They would not even be the first to take out tens of millions in such a quest. Scary only begins to describe where this is all going.
People often scoff at me when I tell them that I think Sarah Palin is likely to be the next American president. Or they think I wax a bit apocalyptic when I start talking about outcomes that smell all too much like Germany in the 1930s. So let me review the bidding in summary form to explain why we should be very afraid. Jump in anywhere you see a chink in the chain of logic.
snip
Far, far more is at stake here than one failed president’s second term, or the careers of a bunch of party hacks and media retreads.
The truth is, we stand now on the edge of a precipice. And it is a very long way down to the bottom.
This is the latest liberal party line–“We suck ass, but we arent psychotic.”[/quote]
Arraya, based on your latest post, which party, Democratic or Republican is preferable, if you had to choose one of the two?
September 20, 2010 at 8:30 AM #607821briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya]Tea With Frankenstein: Please, No Masturbation
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/18-2What’s worse, Obama’s stupidity is a gift that will keep on giving for a long time. By means of his actions in the White House so far, he has nearly guaranteed that he cannot recover in the coming years, no matter what. He has done one of the few things that more or less assures his presidency of being finished. The right will never let up on him, even if he were to adopt their agenda wholesale. And let’s be clear about this – he more or less already has. If you lay out the positions of the Obama administration on everything from civil liberties to gay rights to economic policy to national ‘defense’ and more, there’s hardly a damn shred of difference between his positions and George W. Bush’s. It’s a ludicrous lie to call this milquetoast regressive in a Democratic suit a liberal, let alone a socialist. And we’ve only just begun with Bad Barry, folks. After he gets his ass royally kicked in November, Obama will lurch even further to the right. But that will engender even greater scorn from the sickos living over there under their slime-infested rocks, as well as endless congressional investigations of bogus administration scandals, likely including an impeachment. Or did you miss the 1990s entirely, Barack?
snip
And now here is where it starts to get really scary. Imagine us in 2014, the same distance into a Republican government (on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue) that we are today into a Democratic one. Except that there are two big differences. The first is that the public has had four more years – four years! – of decline, demoralization and economic terrorism under their belts by this time, with no solutions remotely in sight. What is their likely disposition? They will be turning on Republicans and showing their canines in a way that makes 2010 look like a friendly game of Scrabble by comparison.
The second difference will be in the nature of those inhabiting a government which at that point will be firmly backed up against the wall. About the only positive thing I can say regarding Democrats is that they have some limitations on what they are willing to do out of self-interest. Not much, but some. Not so the animals of the GOP, least of all the tea party sociopathic freaks. These people are not going to go down lightly. These people will be faced with a choice between humiliation and destruction on the one hand, and generating a diversionary, and probably jingoistic feel-good, catastrophe on the other. They would not be the first failing government in history to choose the annihilation of others in order to sustain a bit longer the unsustainable. They would not even be the first to take out tens of millions in such a quest. Scary only begins to describe where this is all going.
People often scoff at me when I tell them that I think Sarah Palin is likely to be the next American president. Or they think I wax a bit apocalyptic when I start talking about outcomes that smell all too much like Germany in the 1930s. So let me review the bidding in summary form to explain why we should be very afraid. Jump in anywhere you see a chink in the chain of logic.
snip
Far, far more is at stake here than one failed president’s second term, or the careers of a bunch of party hacks and media retreads.
The truth is, we stand now on the edge of a precipice. And it is a very long way down to the bottom.
This is the latest liberal party line–“We suck ass, but we arent psychotic.”[/quote]
Arraya, based on your latest post, which party, Democratic or Republican is preferable, if you had to choose one of the two?
September 20, 2010 at 9:41 AM #606773ArrayaParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Arraya, based on your latest post, which party, Democratic or Republican is preferable, if you had to choose one of the two?[/quote]
It’s like asking if I want full blown AIDs or Ebola.
September 20, 2010 at 9:41 AM #606861ArrayaParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Arraya, based on your latest post, which party, Democratic or Republican is preferable, if you had to choose one of the two?[/quote]
It’s like asking if I want full blown AIDs or Ebola.
September 20, 2010 at 9:41 AM #607416ArrayaParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Arraya, based on your latest post, which party, Democratic or Republican is preferable, if you had to choose one of the two?[/quote]
It’s like asking if I want full blown AIDs or Ebola.
September 20, 2010 at 9:41 AM #607523ArrayaParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Arraya, based on your latest post, which party, Democratic or Republican is preferable, if you had to choose one of the two?[/quote]
It’s like asking if I want full blown AIDs or Ebola.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.