Tea Party – Housing Manifesto

[CA renter]

One more, then I promise to stop. 😉

Why was the failure of Lehman Brothers hearalded as the *cause* of the financial crisis, when it was really the result of the financial crisis?

It’s like they are trying to convince the masses that the govt should bail out all large financial institutions, and that if we did this, everything would be okay (“we can never let the failure of a large financial firm happen again!”).

Instead, we should be focused on regulations that prevent these risks from being taken, even if that means financial firms would be far, far less profitable. The banking/financial system should exist to allow productive businesses to transact with one another; they should not exist for the enrichment of the banking system itself, IMHO.

[briansd1]

[quote=CA renter]
The two-party system is the tool used by the elite to keep the masses divided and confused. It’s best if we ignore labels and flag-waving pomp and circumstance. Always, always follow the money. That is what every single worker in the U.S. needs to focus on. [/quote]

[quote=CA renter]One more, then I promise to stop. 😉

Why was the failure of Lehman Brothers hearalded as the *cause* of the financial crisis, when it was really the result of the financial crisis?

It’s like they are trying to convince the masses that the govt should bail out all large financial institutions, and that if we did this, everything would be okay (“we can never let the failure of a large financial firm happen again!”).

Instead, we should be focused on regulations that prevent these risks from being taken, even if that means financial firms would be far, far less profitable. The banking/financial system should exist to allow productive businesses to transact with one another; they should not exist for the enrichment of the banking system itself, IMHO.[/quote]

I absolutely agree with you.

Democrats or Republicans will always serve the establishment and preserve continuity. You will never have overnight change. It’s the direction of the change that is important.

Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.

The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.

[briansd1]

[quote=CA renter]
The two-party system is the tool used by the elite to keep the masses divided and confused. It’s best if we ignore labels and flag-waving pomp and circumstance. Always, always follow the money. That is what every single worker in the U.S. needs to focus on. [/quote]

[quote=CA renter]One more, then I promise to stop. 😉

Why was the failure of Lehman Brothers hearalded as the *cause* of the financial crisis, when it was really the result of the financial crisis?

It’s like they are trying to convince the masses that the govt should bail out all large financial institutions, and that if we did this, everything would be okay (“we can never let the failure of a large financial firm happen again!”).

Instead, we should be focused on regulations that prevent these risks from being taken, even if that means financial firms would be far, far less profitable. The banking/financial system should exist to allow productive businesses to transact with one another; they should not exist for the enrichment of the banking system itself, IMHO.[/quote]

I absolutely agree with you.

Democrats or Republicans will always serve the establishment and preserve continuity. You will never have overnight change. It’s the direction of the change that is important.

Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.

The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.

[briansd1]

[quote=CA renter]
The two-party system is the tool used by the elite to keep the masses divided and confused. It’s best if we ignore labels and flag-waving pomp and circumstance. Always, always follow the money. That is what every single worker in the U.S. needs to focus on. [/quote]

[quote=CA renter]One more, then I promise to stop. 😉

Why was the failure of Lehman Brothers hearalded as the *cause* of the financial crisis, when it was really the result of the financial crisis?

It’s like they are trying to convince the masses that the govt should bail out all large financial institutions, and that if we did this, everything would be okay (“we can never let the failure of a large financial firm happen again!”).

Instead, we should be focused on regulations that prevent these risks from being taken, even if that means financial firms would be far, far less profitable. The banking/financial system should exist to allow productive businesses to transact with one another; they should not exist for the enrichment of the banking system itself, IMHO.[/quote]

I absolutely agree with you.

Democrats or Republicans will always serve the establishment and preserve continuity. You will never have overnight change. It’s the direction of the change that is important.

Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.

The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.

[briansd1]

[quote=CA renter]
The two-party system is the tool used by the elite to keep the masses divided and confused. It’s best if we ignore labels and flag-waving pomp and circumstance. Always, always follow the money. That is what every single worker in the U.S. needs to focus on. [/quote]

[quote=CA renter]One more, then I promise to stop. 😉

Why was the failure of Lehman Brothers hearalded as the *cause* of the financial crisis, when it was really the result of the financial crisis?

It’s like they are trying to convince the masses that the govt should bail out all large financial institutions, and that if we did this, everything would be okay (“we can never let the failure of a large financial firm happen again!”).

Instead, we should be focused on regulations that prevent these risks from being taken, even if that means financial firms would be far, far less profitable. The banking/financial system should exist to allow productive businesses to transact with one another; they should not exist for the enrichment of the banking system itself, IMHO.[/quote]

I absolutely agree with you.

Democrats or Republicans will always serve the establishment and preserve continuity. You will never have overnight change. It’s the direction of the change that is important.

Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.

The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.

[briansd1]

[quote=CA renter]
The two-party system is the tool used by the elite to keep the masses divided and confused. It’s best if we ignore labels and flag-waving pomp and circumstance. Always, always follow the money. That is what every single worker in the U.S. needs to focus on. [/quote]

[quote=CA renter]One more, then I promise to stop. 😉

Why was the failure of Lehman Brothers hearalded as the *cause* of the financial crisis, when it was really the result of the financial crisis?

It’s like they are trying to convince the masses that the govt should bail out all large financial institutions, and that if we did this, everything would be okay (“we can never let the failure of a large financial firm happen again!”).

Instead, we should be focused on regulations that prevent these risks from being taken, even if that means financial firms would be far, far less profitable. The banking/financial system should exist to allow productive businesses to transact with one another; they should not exist for the enrichment of the banking system itself, IMHO.[/quote]

I absolutely agree with you.

Democrats or Republicans will always serve the establishment and preserve continuity. You will never have overnight change. It’s the direction of the change that is important.

Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.

The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.

[CA renter]

[quote=briansd1]
Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.

The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.[/quote]

IMHO, the Democrats have been just as guilty of creating these “extremist” groups. They work together to serve their collective agenda. The sooner we all see that, the better.

[CA renter]

[quote=briansd1]
Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.

The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.[/quote]

IMHO, the Democrats have been just as guilty of creating these “extremist” groups. They work together to serve their collective agenda. The sooner we all see that, the better.

[CA renter]

[quote=briansd1]
Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.

The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.[/quote]

IMHO, the Democrats have been just as guilty of creating these “extremist” groups. They work together to serve their collective agenda. The sooner we all see that, the better.

[CA renter]

[quote=briansd1]
Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.

The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.[/quote]

IMHO, the Democrats have been just as guilty of creating these “extremist” groups. They work together to serve their collective agenda. The sooner we all see that, the better.

[CA renter]

[quote=briansd1]
Right now the Tea Party is comprised of extremists and the Republican party is turning to extremist tactics to win elections. That’s very troubling to me.

The fact that Tea Partyers are motivated by the likes of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tells me that these people are really an ignorant bunch.[/quote]

IMHO, the Democrats have been just as guilty of creating these “extremist” groups. They work together to serve their collective agenda. The sooner we all see that, the better.

[Arraya]

Tea With Frankenstein: Please, No Masturbation
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/18-2

What’s worse, Obama’s stupidity is a gift that will keep on giving for a long time. By means of his actions in the White House so far, he has nearly guaranteed that he cannot recover in the coming years, no matter what. He has done one of the few things that more or less assures his presidency of being finished. The right will never let up on him, even if he were to adopt their agenda wholesale. And let’s be clear about this – he more or less already has. If you lay out the positions of the Obama administration on everything from civil liberties to gay rights to economic policy to national ‘defense’ and more, there’s hardly a damn shred of difference between his positions and George W. Bush’s. It’s a ludicrous lie to call this milquetoast regressive in a Democratic suit a liberal, let alone a socialist. And we’ve only just begun with Bad Barry, folks. After he gets his ass royally kicked in November, Obama will lurch even further to the right. But that will engender even greater scorn from the sickos living over there under their slime-infested rocks, as well as endless congressional investigations of bogus administration scandals, likely including an impeachment. Or did you miss the 1990s entirely, Barack?

snip

And now here is where it starts to get really scary. Imagine us in 2014, the same distance into a Republican government (on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue) that we are today into a Democratic one. Except that there are two big differences. The first is that the public has had four more years – four years! – of decline, demoralization and economic terrorism under their belts by this time, with no solutions remotely in sight. What is their likely disposition? They will be turning on Republicans and showing their canines in a way that makes 2010 look like a friendly game of Scrabble by comparison.

The second difference will be in the nature of those inhabiting a government which at that point will be firmly backed up against the wall. About the only positive thing I can say regarding Democrats is that they have some limitations on what they are willing to do out of self-interest. Not much, but some. Not so the animals of the GOP, least of all the tea party sociopathic freaks. These people are not going to go down lightly. These people will be faced with a choice between humiliation and destruction on the one hand, and generating a diversionary, and probably jingoistic feel-good, catastrophe on the other. They would not be the first failing government in history to choose the annihilation of others in order to sustain a bit longer the unsustainable. They would not even be the first to take out tens of millions in such a quest. Scary only begins to describe where this is all going.

People often scoff at me when I tell them that I think Sarah Palin is likely to be the next American president. Or they think I wax a bit apocalyptic when I start talking about outcomes that smell all too much like Germany in the 1930s. So let me review the bidding in summary form to explain why we should be very afraid. Jump in anywhere you see a chink in the chain of logic.

snip

Far, far more is at stake here than one failed president’s second term, or the careers of a bunch of party hacks and media retreads.

The truth is, we stand now on the edge of a precipice. And it is a very long way down to the bottom.

This is the latest liberal party line–“We suck ass, but we arent psychotic.”

[Arraya]

Tea With Frankenstein: Please, No Masturbation
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/18-2

What’s worse, Obama’s stupidity is a gift that will keep on giving for a long time. By means of his actions in the White House so far, he has nearly guaranteed that he cannot recover in the coming years, no matter what. He has done one of the few things that more or less assures his presidency of being finished. The right will never let up on him, even if he were to adopt their agenda wholesale. And let’s be clear about this – he more or less already has. If you lay out the positions of the Obama administration on everything from civil liberties to gay rights to economic policy to national ‘defense’ and more, there’s hardly a damn shred of difference between his positions and George W. Bush’s. It’s a ludicrous lie to call this milquetoast regressive in a Democratic suit a liberal, let alone a socialist. And we’ve only just begun with Bad Barry, folks. After he gets his ass royally kicked in November, Obama will lurch even further to the right. But that will engender even greater scorn from the sickos living over there under their slime-infested rocks, as well as endless congressional investigations of bogus administration scandals, likely including an impeachment. Or did you miss the 1990s entirely, Barack?

snip

And now here is where it starts to get really scary. Imagine us in 2014, the same distance into a Republican government (on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue) that we are today into a Democratic one. Except that there are two big differences. The first is that the public has had four more years – four years! – of decline, demoralization and economic terrorism under their belts by this time, with no solutions remotely in sight. What is their likely disposition? They will be turning on Republicans and showing their canines in a way that makes 2010 look like a friendly game of Scrabble by comparison.

The second difference will be in the nature of those inhabiting a government which at that point will be firmly backed up against the wall. About the only positive thing I can say regarding Democrats is that they have some limitations on what they are willing to do out of self-interest. Not much, but some. Not so the animals of the GOP, least of all the tea party sociopathic freaks. These people are not going to go down lightly. These people will be faced with a choice between humiliation and destruction on the one hand, and generating a diversionary, and probably jingoistic feel-good, catastrophe on the other. They would not be the first failing government in history to choose the annihilation of others in order to sustain a bit longer the unsustainable. They would not even be the first to take out tens of millions in such a quest. Scary only begins to describe where this is all going.

People often scoff at me when I tell them that I think Sarah Palin is likely to be the next American president. Or they think I wax a bit apocalyptic when I start talking about outcomes that smell all too much like Germany in the 1930s. So let me review the bidding in summary form to explain why we should be very afraid. Jump in anywhere you see a chink in the chain of logic.

snip

Far, far more is at stake here than one failed president’s second term, or the careers of a bunch of party hacks and media retreads.

The truth is, we stand now on the edge of a precipice. And it is a very long way down to the bottom.

This is the latest liberal party line–“We suck ass, but we arent psychotic.”

[Arraya]

Tea With Frankenstein: Please, No Masturbation
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/18-2

What’s worse, Obama’s stupidity is a gift that will keep on giving for a long time. By means of his actions in the White House so far, he has nearly guaranteed that he cannot recover in the coming years, no matter what. He has done one of the few things that more or less assures his presidency of being finished. The right will never let up on him, even if he were to adopt their agenda wholesale. And let’s be clear about this – he more or less already has. If you lay out the positions of the Obama administration on everything from civil liberties to gay rights to economic policy to national ‘defense’ and more, there’s hardly a damn shred of difference between his positions and George W. Bush’s. It’s a ludicrous lie to call this milquetoast regressive in a Democratic suit a liberal, let alone a socialist. And we’ve only just begun with Bad Barry, folks. After he gets his ass royally kicked in November, Obama will lurch even further to the right. But that will engender even greater scorn from the sickos living over there under their slime-infested rocks, as well as endless congressional investigations of bogus administration scandals, likely including an impeachment. Or did you miss the 1990s entirely, Barack?

snip

And now here is where it starts to get really scary. Imagine us in 2014, the same distance into a Republican government (on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue) that we are today into a Democratic one. Except that there are two big differences. The first is that the public has had four more years – four years! – of decline, demoralization and economic terrorism under their belts by this time, with no solutions remotely in sight. What is their likely disposition? They will be turning on Republicans and showing their canines in a way that makes 2010 look like a friendly game of Scrabble by comparison.

The second difference will be in the nature of those inhabiting a government which at that point will be firmly backed up against the wall. About the only positive thing I can say regarding Democrats is that they have some limitations on what they are willing to do out of self-interest. Not much, but some. Not so the animals of the GOP, least of all the tea party sociopathic freaks. These people are not going to go down lightly. These people will be faced with a choice between humiliation and destruction on the one hand, and generating a diversionary, and probably jingoistic feel-good, catastrophe on the other. They would not be the first failing government in history to choose the annihilation of others in order to sustain a bit longer the unsustainable. They would not even be the first to take out tens of millions in such a quest. Scary only begins to describe where this is all going.

People often scoff at me when I tell them that I think Sarah Palin is likely to be the next American president. Or they think I wax a bit apocalyptic when I start talking about outcomes that smell all too much like Germany in the 1930s. So let me review the bidding in summary form to explain why we should be very afraid. Jump in anywhere you see a chink in the chain of logic.

snip

Far, far more is at stake here than one failed president’s second term, or the careers of a bunch of party hacks and media retreads.

The truth is, we stand now on the edge of a precipice. And it is a very long way down to the bottom.

This is the latest liberal party line–“We suck ass, but we arent psychotic.”

[Arraya]

Tea With Frankenstein: Please, No Masturbation
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/18-2

What’s worse, Obama’s stupidity is a gift that will keep on giving for a long time. By means of his actions in the White House so far, he has nearly guaranteed that he cannot recover in the coming years, no matter what. He has done one of the few things that more or less assures his presidency of being finished. The right will never let up on him, even if he were to adopt their agenda wholesale. And let’s be clear about this – he more or less already has. If you lay out the positions of the Obama administration on everything from civil liberties to gay rights to economic policy to national ‘defense’ and more, there’s hardly a damn shred of difference between his positions and George W. Bush’s. It’s a ludicrous lie to call this milquetoast regressive in a Democratic suit a liberal, let alone a socialist. And we’ve only just begun with Bad Barry, folks. After he gets his ass royally kicked in November, Obama will lurch even further to the right. But that will engender even greater scorn from the sickos living over there under their slime-infested rocks, as well as endless congressional investigations of bogus administration scandals, likely including an impeachment. Or did you miss the 1990s entirely, Barack?

snip

And now here is where it starts to get really scary. Imagine us in 2014, the same distance into a Republican government (on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue) that we are today into a Democratic one. Except that there are two big differences. The first is that the public has had four more years – four years! – of decline, demoralization and economic terrorism under their belts by this time, with no solutions remotely in sight. What is their likely disposition? They will be turning on Republicans and showing their canines in a way that makes 2010 look like a friendly game of Scrabble by comparison.

The second difference will be in the nature of those inhabiting a government which at that point will be firmly backed up against the wall. About the only positive thing I can say regarding Democrats is that they have some limitations on what they are willing to do out of self-interest. Not much, but some. Not so the animals of the GOP, least of all the tea party sociopathic freaks. These people are not going to go down lightly. These people will be faced with a choice between humiliation and destruction on the one hand, and generating a diversionary, and probably jingoistic feel-good, catastrophe on the other. They would not be the first failing government in history to choose the annihilation of others in order to sustain a bit longer the unsustainable. They would not even be the first to take out tens of millions in such a quest. Scary only begins to describe where this is all going.

People often scoff at me when I tell them that I think Sarah Palin is likely to be the next American president. Or they think I wax a bit apocalyptic when I start talking about outcomes that smell all too much like Germany in the 1930s. So let me review the bidding in summary form to explain why we should be very afraid. Jump in anywhere you see a chink in the chain of logic.

snip

Far, far more is at stake here than one failed president’s second term, or the careers of a bunch of party hacks and media retreads.

The truth is, we stand now on the edge of a precipice. And it is a very long way down to the bottom.

This is the latest liberal party line–“We suck ass, but we arent psychotic.”

[Author]

Posts