- This topic has 530 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 20, 2010 at 7:10 AM #553134May 20, 2010 at 11:18 AM #552242CardiffBaseballParticipant
I definitely agree with your take on the GOP. Now with the Ron Paul/Rand Paul folks, it makes me wonder if the Tea Party folks (to which I am not one) might cleanse the GOP of the pandering that the party has become.
Sean Vanity carries the torch…
Just curious as he’s basically considered a RINO by the hard-core right, plus he as a spotty past, but where did you come down on Newt in the 90s? I haven’t listened to him or given him much thought recently but I seem to recall him being an excellent orator, extremely fast on his feet, and a tough guy to debate. Now that he’s threatening to run, I wonder how he’ll do.
If he somehow won I can’t imagine he’ll have the mass downer effect on pubbies that Dole and McCain did, but he still has a lot of enemies with the party.
May 20, 2010 at 11:18 AM #552349CardiffBaseballParticipantI definitely agree with your take on the GOP. Now with the Ron Paul/Rand Paul folks, it makes me wonder if the Tea Party folks (to which I am not one) might cleanse the GOP of the pandering that the party has become.
Sean Vanity carries the torch…
Just curious as he’s basically considered a RINO by the hard-core right, plus he as a spotty past, but where did you come down on Newt in the 90s? I haven’t listened to him or given him much thought recently but I seem to recall him being an excellent orator, extremely fast on his feet, and a tough guy to debate. Now that he’s threatening to run, I wonder how he’ll do.
If he somehow won I can’t imagine he’ll have the mass downer effect on pubbies that Dole and McCain did, but he still has a lot of enemies with the party.
May 20, 2010 at 11:18 AM #552836CardiffBaseballParticipantI definitely agree with your take on the GOP. Now with the Ron Paul/Rand Paul folks, it makes me wonder if the Tea Party folks (to which I am not one) might cleanse the GOP of the pandering that the party has become.
Sean Vanity carries the torch…
Just curious as he’s basically considered a RINO by the hard-core right, plus he as a spotty past, but where did you come down on Newt in the 90s? I haven’t listened to him or given him much thought recently but I seem to recall him being an excellent orator, extremely fast on his feet, and a tough guy to debate. Now that he’s threatening to run, I wonder how he’ll do.
If he somehow won I can’t imagine he’ll have the mass downer effect on pubbies that Dole and McCain did, but he still has a lot of enemies with the party.
May 20, 2010 at 11:18 AM #552934CardiffBaseballParticipantI definitely agree with your take on the GOP. Now with the Ron Paul/Rand Paul folks, it makes me wonder if the Tea Party folks (to which I am not one) might cleanse the GOP of the pandering that the party has become.
Sean Vanity carries the torch…
Just curious as he’s basically considered a RINO by the hard-core right, plus he as a spotty past, but where did you come down on Newt in the 90s? I haven’t listened to him or given him much thought recently but I seem to recall him being an excellent orator, extremely fast on his feet, and a tough guy to debate. Now that he’s threatening to run, I wonder how he’ll do.
If he somehow won I can’t imagine he’ll have the mass downer effect on pubbies that Dole and McCain did, but he still has a lot of enemies with the party.
May 20, 2010 at 11:18 AM #553214CardiffBaseballParticipantI definitely agree with your take on the GOP. Now with the Ron Paul/Rand Paul folks, it makes me wonder if the Tea Party folks (to which I am not one) might cleanse the GOP of the pandering that the party has become.
Sean Vanity carries the torch…
Just curious as he’s basically considered a RINO by the hard-core right, plus he as a spotty past, but where did you come down on Newt in the 90s? I haven’t listened to him or given him much thought recently but I seem to recall him being an excellent orator, extremely fast on his feet, and a tough guy to debate. Now that he’s threatening to run, I wonder how he’ll do.
If he somehow won I can’t imagine he’ll have the mass downer effect on pubbies that Dole and McCain did, but he still has a lot of enemies with the party.
May 20, 2010 at 1:35 PM #552307Allan from FallbrookParticipantCardiff: I liked Newt back in the 1990s, and for largely the same reason that I liked Clinton: He was a policy wonk.
You mention smart and fast on his feet (although Clinton ate his lunch on more than one occasion) and he was definitely both. He also had an innate understanding of politics and how to get things done.
Those elements are largely missing from the GOP, which now just settles for naysaying everything, while not offering any meaningful alternatives or good policy-driven responses.
The key element behind the GOP not only taking power with Reagan, but holding it all of those years, was solid, well-thought and -crafted policy positions. Whether talking about the Soviets and the Cold War, or the economy, or just the state of the union, the GOP had the message down and knew how to sell it.
Now its just bile and vitriolic spew and this retrenchment into religious self-righteousness and railing against everything that doesn’t meet the Beck/Hannity/Limbaugh/Palin sniff test.
God, I miss old Ronnie Ray-Gun.
May 20, 2010 at 1:35 PM #552414Allan from FallbrookParticipantCardiff: I liked Newt back in the 1990s, and for largely the same reason that I liked Clinton: He was a policy wonk.
You mention smart and fast on his feet (although Clinton ate his lunch on more than one occasion) and he was definitely both. He also had an innate understanding of politics and how to get things done.
Those elements are largely missing from the GOP, which now just settles for naysaying everything, while not offering any meaningful alternatives or good policy-driven responses.
The key element behind the GOP not only taking power with Reagan, but holding it all of those years, was solid, well-thought and -crafted policy positions. Whether talking about the Soviets and the Cold War, or the economy, or just the state of the union, the GOP had the message down and knew how to sell it.
Now its just bile and vitriolic spew and this retrenchment into religious self-righteousness and railing against everything that doesn’t meet the Beck/Hannity/Limbaugh/Palin sniff test.
God, I miss old Ronnie Ray-Gun.
May 20, 2010 at 1:35 PM #552901Allan from FallbrookParticipantCardiff: I liked Newt back in the 1990s, and for largely the same reason that I liked Clinton: He was a policy wonk.
You mention smart and fast on his feet (although Clinton ate his lunch on more than one occasion) and he was definitely both. He also had an innate understanding of politics and how to get things done.
Those elements are largely missing from the GOP, which now just settles for naysaying everything, while not offering any meaningful alternatives or good policy-driven responses.
The key element behind the GOP not only taking power with Reagan, but holding it all of those years, was solid, well-thought and -crafted policy positions. Whether talking about the Soviets and the Cold War, or the economy, or just the state of the union, the GOP had the message down and knew how to sell it.
Now its just bile and vitriolic spew and this retrenchment into religious self-righteousness and railing against everything that doesn’t meet the Beck/Hannity/Limbaugh/Palin sniff test.
God, I miss old Ronnie Ray-Gun.
May 20, 2010 at 1:35 PM #552999Allan from FallbrookParticipantCardiff: I liked Newt back in the 1990s, and for largely the same reason that I liked Clinton: He was a policy wonk.
You mention smart and fast on his feet (although Clinton ate his lunch on more than one occasion) and he was definitely both. He also had an innate understanding of politics and how to get things done.
Those elements are largely missing from the GOP, which now just settles for naysaying everything, while not offering any meaningful alternatives or good policy-driven responses.
The key element behind the GOP not only taking power with Reagan, but holding it all of those years, was solid, well-thought and -crafted policy positions. Whether talking about the Soviets and the Cold War, or the economy, or just the state of the union, the GOP had the message down and knew how to sell it.
Now its just bile and vitriolic spew and this retrenchment into religious self-righteousness and railing against everything that doesn’t meet the Beck/Hannity/Limbaugh/Palin sniff test.
God, I miss old Ronnie Ray-Gun.
May 20, 2010 at 1:35 PM #553279Allan from FallbrookParticipantCardiff: I liked Newt back in the 1990s, and for largely the same reason that I liked Clinton: He was a policy wonk.
You mention smart and fast on his feet (although Clinton ate his lunch on more than one occasion) and he was definitely both. He also had an innate understanding of politics and how to get things done.
Those elements are largely missing from the GOP, which now just settles for naysaying everything, while not offering any meaningful alternatives or good policy-driven responses.
The key element behind the GOP not only taking power with Reagan, but holding it all of those years, was solid, well-thought and -crafted policy positions. Whether talking about the Soviets and the Cold War, or the economy, or just the state of the union, the GOP had the message down and knew how to sell it.
Now its just bile and vitriolic spew and this retrenchment into religious self-righteousness and railing against everything that doesn’t meet the Beck/Hannity/Limbaugh/Palin sniff test.
God, I miss old Ronnie Ray-Gun.
May 20, 2010 at 4:24 PM #552422UCGalParticipantOn the subject of Newt (gingrich – not newtosandiego)
He’s getting some flack for some comments he’s been making recently. Even Chris Wallace was taken aback by his recent comparisons of Obama to Nazi Germany.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/37573.html
I will agree he’s a great policy wonk. I don’t agree with his policies, but he’s intelligent.
(I heard about this on MSNBC… not Keith Olbermann – but Joe Scarborough.)
May 20, 2010 at 4:24 PM #552529UCGalParticipantOn the subject of Newt (gingrich – not newtosandiego)
He’s getting some flack for some comments he’s been making recently. Even Chris Wallace was taken aback by his recent comparisons of Obama to Nazi Germany.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/37573.html
I will agree he’s a great policy wonk. I don’t agree with his policies, but he’s intelligent.
(I heard about this on MSNBC… not Keith Olbermann – but Joe Scarborough.)
May 20, 2010 at 4:24 PM #553016UCGalParticipantOn the subject of Newt (gingrich – not newtosandiego)
He’s getting some flack for some comments he’s been making recently. Even Chris Wallace was taken aback by his recent comparisons of Obama to Nazi Germany.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/37573.html
I will agree he’s a great policy wonk. I don’t agree with his policies, but he’s intelligent.
(I heard about this on MSNBC… not Keith Olbermann – but Joe Scarborough.)
May 20, 2010 at 4:24 PM #553115UCGalParticipantOn the subject of Newt (gingrich – not newtosandiego)
He’s getting some flack for some comments he’s been making recently. Even Chris Wallace was taken aback by his recent comparisons of Obama to Nazi Germany.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/37573.html
I will agree he’s a great policy wonk. I don’t agree with his policies, but he’s intelligent.
(I heard about this on MSNBC… not Keith Olbermann – but Joe Scarborough.)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.