Tea Party – Housing Manifesto

[briansd1]

Rand Paul’s win weakens Mitch McConnell. It’s a positive for Democrats.

As concho said, Paul doesn’t exactly speak to values voters who are more aligned with Limbaugh and Palin.

[CardiffBaseball]

[quote=briansd1]Rand Paul’s win weakens Mitch McConnell. It’s a positive for Democrats.

As concho said, Paul doesn’t exactly speak to values voters who are more aligned with Limbaugh and Palin.[/quote]

So we can assume you find the typical Ron Paul type backers of no significant threat?

[CardiffBaseball]

[quote=briansd1]Rand Paul’s win weakens Mitch McConnell. It’s a positive for Democrats.

As concho said, Paul doesn’t exactly speak to values voters who are more aligned with Limbaugh and Palin.[/quote]

So we can assume you find the typical Ron Paul type backers of no significant threat?

[CardiffBaseball]

[quote=briansd1]Rand Paul’s win weakens Mitch McConnell. It’s a positive for Democrats.

As concho said, Paul doesn’t exactly speak to values voters who are more aligned with Limbaugh and Palin.[/quote]

So we can assume you find the typical Ron Paul type backers of no significant threat?

[CardiffBaseball]

[quote=briansd1]Rand Paul’s win weakens Mitch McConnell. It’s a positive for Democrats.

As concho said, Paul doesn’t exactly speak to values voters who are more aligned with Limbaugh and Palin.[/quote]

So we can assume you find the typical Ron Paul type backers of no significant threat?

[CardiffBaseball]

[quote=briansd1]Rand Paul’s win weakens Mitch McConnell. It’s a positive for Democrats.

As concho said, Paul doesn’t exactly speak to values voters who are more aligned with Limbaugh and Palin.[/quote]

So we can assume you find the typical Ron Paul type backers of no significant threat?

[briansd1]

[quote=CardiffBaseball]
So we can assume you find the typical Ron Paul type backers of no significant threat?[/quote]

Not sure about the Tea Party backers; but I don’t mind Ron and Rand Paul at all. They are fiscal conservatives and we could use more of them.

I know bleeding heart liberals who support Ron Paul. I could easily support a fiscal conservative who’s also a social libertarian.

I just find the social conservatives just as wicked (or worse) as the people they condemn.

This is a good article on what happened to the Republican class of 1994 who wrote the Contract on America:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/18/AR2010051803985.html

[briansd1]

[quote=CardiffBaseball]
So we can assume you find the typical Ron Paul type backers of no significant threat?[/quote]

Not sure about the Tea Party backers; but I don’t mind Ron and Rand Paul at all. They are fiscal conservatives and we could use more of them.

I know bleeding heart liberals who support Ron Paul. I could easily support a fiscal conservative who’s also a social libertarian.

I just find the social conservatives just as wicked (or worse) as the people they condemn.

This is a good article on what happened to the Republican class of 1994 who wrote the Contract on America:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/18/AR2010051803985.html

[briansd1]

[quote=CardiffBaseball]
So we can assume you find the typical Ron Paul type backers of no significant threat?[/quote]

Not sure about the Tea Party backers; but I don’t mind Ron and Rand Paul at all. They are fiscal conservatives and we could use more of them.

I know bleeding heart liberals who support Ron Paul. I could easily support a fiscal conservative who’s also a social libertarian.

I just find the social conservatives just as wicked (or worse) as the people they condemn.

This is a good article on what happened to the Republican class of 1994 who wrote the Contract on America:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/18/AR2010051803985.html

[briansd1]

[quote=CardiffBaseball]
So we can assume you find the typical Ron Paul type backers of no significant threat?[/quote]

Not sure about the Tea Party backers; but I don’t mind Ron and Rand Paul at all. They are fiscal conservatives and we could use more of them.

I know bleeding heart liberals who support Ron Paul. I could easily support a fiscal conservative who’s also a social libertarian.

I just find the social conservatives just as wicked (or worse) as the people they condemn.

This is a good article on what happened to the Republican class of 1994 who wrote the Contract on America:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/18/AR2010051803985.html

[briansd1]

[quote=CardiffBaseball]
So we can assume you find the typical Ron Paul type backers of no significant threat?[/quote]

Not sure about the Tea Party backers; but I don’t mind Ron and Rand Paul at all. They are fiscal conservatives and we could use more of them.

I know bleeding heart liberals who support Ron Paul. I could easily support a fiscal conservative who’s also a social libertarian.

I just find the social conservatives just as wicked (or worse) as the people they condemn.

This is a good article on what happened to the Republican class of 1994 who wrote the Contract on America:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/18/AR2010051803985.html

[scaredyclassic]

kinda funny. i am so able to repress my sexuality. these guysa re so normal i guess.

i’d have no problem wtih the sleeping around thing. too tired.

[scaredyclassic]

kinda funny. i am so able to repress my sexuality. these guysa re so normal i guess.

i’d have no problem wtih the sleeping around thing. too tired.

[scaredyclassic]

kinda funny. i am so able to repress my sexuality. these guysa re so normal i guess.

i’d have no problem wtih the sleeping around thing. too tired.

[scaredyclassic]

kinda funny. i am so able to repress my sexuality. these guysa re so normal i guess.

i’d have no problem wtih the sleeping around thing. too tired.

[Author]

Posts