Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Taxes!
- This topic has 278 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 7, 2011 at 8:18 PM #18851June 7, 2011 at 9:25 PM #701553anParticipant
I vote for consumption tax too.
June 7, 2011 at 9:25 PM #701652anParticipantI vote for consumption tax too.
June 7, 2011 at 9:25 PM #702246anParticipantI vote for consumption tax too.
June 7, 2011 at 9:25 PM #702394anParticipantI vote for consumption tax too.
June 7, 2011 at 9:25 PM #702756anParticipantI vote for consumption tax too.
June 7, 2011 at 10:24 PM #701558StaunchLibertarianParticipantI’d be in favor of a 35% federal tax on house purchases. That would help the housing market correct right quick.
June 7, 2011 at 10:24 PM #701657StaunchLibertarianParticipantI’d be in favor of a 35% federal tax on house purchases. That would help the housing market correct right quick.
June 7, 2011 at 10:24 PM #702251StaunchLibertarianParticipantI’d be in favor of a 35% federal tax on house purchases. That would help the housing market correct right quick.
June 7, 2011 at 10:24 PM #702399StaunchLibertarianParticipantI’d be in favor of a 35% federal tax on house purchases. That would help the housing market correct right quick.
June 7, 2011 at 10:24 PM #702761StaunchLibertarianParticipantI’d be in favor of a 35% federal tax on house purchases. That would help the housing market correct right quick.
June 7, 2011 at 11:05 PM #701573CA renterParticipantWe should not discourage work or labor through a graduated income tax…we should tax people based on the luxuries that money provides.
It is simply unjust tax labor more than other forms of income. It picks favorites among revenue sources.
—————-You’re right, we should not discourage work and labor. The problem is that those with the highest incomes rarely work or labor. Most of their income is passive/investment income.
IMHO, we need to discourage gambling and encourage work. That’s why I would lower the rate on **earned** income, and tax investment income at a much higher rate, with steeply progressive rates.
I would not support a consumption tax, because it’s too regressive. Most poor people spend almost all of their income on basic necessities, while the rich can invest theirs. It would be totally immoral and unethical to tax gamblers at 0-15%, while taxing poor people at the maximum rate (if consumption tax is the highest tax).
June 7, 2011 at 11:05 PM #701672CA renterParticipantWe should not discourage work or labor through a graduated income tax…we should tax people based on the luxuries that money provides.
It is simply unjust tax labor more than other forms of income. It picks favorites among revenue sources.
—————-You’re right, we should not discourage work and labor. The problem is that those with the highest incomes rarely work or labor. Most of their income is passive/investment income.
IMHO, we need to discourage gambling and encourage work. That’s why I would lower the rate on **earned** income, and tax investment income at a much higher rate, with steeply progressive rates.
I would not support a consumption tax, because it’s too regressive. Most poor people spend almost all of their income on basic necessities, while the rich can invest theirs. It would be totally immoral and unethical to tax gamblers at 0-15%, while taxing poor people at the maximum rate (if consumption tax is the highest tax).
June 7, 2011 at 11:05 PM #702266CA renterParticipantWe should not discourage work or labor through a graduated income tax…we should tax people based on the luxuries that money provides.
It is simply unjust tax labor more than other forms of income. It picks favorites among revenue sources.
—————-You’re right, we should not discourage work and labor. The problem is that those with the highest incomes rarely work or labor. Most of their income is passive/investment income.
IMHO, we need to discourage gambling and encourage work. That’s why I would lower the rate on **earned** income, and tax investment income at a much higher rate, with steeply progressive rates.
I would not support a consumption tax, because it’s too regressive. Most poor people spend almost all of their income on basic necessities, while the rich can invest theirs. It would be totally immoral and unethical to tax gamblers at 0-15%, while taxing poor people at the maximum rate (if consumption tax is the highest tax).
June 7, 2011 at 11:05 PM #702414CA renterParticipantWe should not discourage work or labor through a graduated income tax…we should tax people based on the luxuries that money provides.
It is simply unjust tax labor more than other forms of income. It picks favorites among revenue sources.
—————-You’re right, we should not discourage work and labor. The problem is that those with the highest incomes rarely work or labor. Most of their income is passive/investment income.
IMHO, we need to discourage gambling and encourage work. That’s why I would lower the rate on **earned** income, and tax investment income at a much higher rate, with steeply progressive rates.
I would not support a consumption tax, because it’s too regressive. Most poor people spend almost all of their income on basic necessities, while the rich can invest theirs. It would be totally immoral and unethical to tax gamblers at 0-15%, while taxing poor people at the maximum rate (if consumption tax is the highest tax).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.