Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Taxes!
- This topic has 278 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 7, 2011 at 8:18 PM #18851June 7, 2011 at 9:25 PM #701553
an
ParticipantI vote for consumption tax too.
June 7, 2011 at 9:25 PM #701652an
ParticipantI vote for consumption tax too.
June 7, 2011 at 9:25 PM #702246an
ParticipantI vote for consumption tax too.
June 7, 2011 at 9:25 PM #702394an
ParticipantI vote for consumption tax too.
June 7, 2011 at 9:25 PM #702756an
ParticipantI vote for consumption tax too.
June 7, 2011 at 10:24 PM #701558StaunchLibertarian
ParticipantI’d be in favor of a 35% federal tax on house purchases. That would help the housing market correct right quick.
June 7, 2011 at 10:24 PM #701657StaunchLibertarian
ParticipantI’d be in favor of a 35% federal tax on house purchases. That would help the housing market correct right quick.
June 7, 2011 at 10:24 PM #702251StaunchLibertarian
ParticipantI’d be in favor of a 35% federal tax on house purchases. That would help the housing market correct right quick.
June 7, 2011 at 10:24 PM #702399StaunchLibertarian
ParticipantI’d be in favor of a 35% federal tax on house purchases. That would help the housing market correct right quick.
June 7, 2011 at 10:24 PM #702761StaunchLibertarian
ParticipantI’d be in favor of a 35% federal tax on house purchases. That would help the housing market correct right quick.
June 7, 2011 at 11:05 PM #701573CA renter
ParticipantWe should not discourage work or labor through a graduated income tax…we should tax people based on the luxuries that money provides.
It is simply unjust tax labor more than other forms of income. It picks favorites among revenue sources.
—————-You’re right, we should not discourage work and labor. The problem is that those with the highest incomes rarely work or labor. Most of their income is passive/investment income.
IMHO, we need to discourage gambling and encourage work. That’s why I would lower the rate on **earned** income, and tax investment income at a much higher rate, with steeply progressive rates.
I would not support a consumption tax, because it’s too regressive. Most poor people spend almost all of their income on basic necessities, while the rich can invest theirs. It would be totally immoral and unethical to tax gamblers at 0-15%, while taxing poor people at the maximum rate (if consumption tax is the highest tax).
June 7, 2011 at 11:05 PM #701672CA renter
ParticipantWe should not discourage work or labor through a graduated income tax…we should tax people based on the luxuries that money provides.
It is simply unjust tax labor more than other forms of income. It picks favorites among revenue sources.
—————-You’re right, we should not discourage work and labor. The problem is that those with the highest incomes rarely work or labor. Most of their income is passive/investment income.
IMHO, we need to discourage gambling and encourage work. That’s why I would lower the rate on **earned** income, and tax investment income at a much higher rate, with steeply progressive rates.
I would not support a consumption tax, because it’s too regressive. Most poor people spend almost all of their income on basic necessities, while the rich can invest theirs. It would be totally immoral and unethical to tax gamblers at 0-15%, while taxing poor people at the maximum rate (if consumption tax is the highest tax).
June 7, 2011 at 11:05 PM #702266CA renter
ParticipantWe should not discourage work or labor through a graduated income tax…we should tax people based on the luxuries that money provides.
It is simply unjust tax labor more than other forms of income. It picks favorites among revenue sources.
—————-You’re right, we should not discourage work and labor. The problem is that those with the highest incomes rarely work or labor. Most of their income is passive/investment income.
IMHO, we need to discourage gambling and encourage work. That’s why I would lower the rate on **earned** income, and tax investment income at a much higher rate, with steeply progressive rates.
I would not support a consumption tax, because it’s too regressive. Most poor people spend almost all of their income on basic necessities, while the rich can invest theirs. It would be totally immoral and unethical to tax gamblers at 0-15%, while taxing poor people at the maximum rate (if consumption tax is the highest tax).
June 7, 2011 at 11:05 PM #702414CA renter
ParticipantWe should not discourage work or labor through a graduated income tax…we should tax people based on the luxuries that money provides.
It is simply unjust tax labor more than other forms of income. It picks favorites among revenue sources.
—————-You’re right, we should not discourage work and labor. The problem is that those with the highest incomes rarely work or labor. Most of their income is passive/investment income.
IMHO, we need to discourage gambling and encourage work. That’s why I would lower the rate on **earned** income, and tax investment income at a much higher rate, with steeply progressive rates.
I would not support a consumption tax, because it’s too regressive. Most poor people spend almost all of their income on basic necessities, while the rich can invest theirs. It would be totally immoral and unethical to tax gamblers at 0-15%, while taxing poor people at the maximum rate (if consumption tax is the highest tax).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.