Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Tax Implications of “Walking Away”?
- This topic has 80 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 2, 2008 at 11:29 AM #232510July 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM #232396DotherightthingParticipant
Wow! Deadbeat huh? Thanks for the advice. I will admit that I am a 29 year old who bought my first home in Nov. 04′ at the risk of being priced out of the market. I moved to San Diego in 2001 and saw a lot of people making a ton of money in real estate. At the time it seemed like a no brainer to get into the market. Was 400k more than I wanted to spend on a house? Yes. Could I afford a loan that required 20% down and a higher fixed rate? Absolutely not. I am not pointing fingers saying that it is anyone’s fault but my own. I admit I made a mistake. However, I also want to do what is best for my family. Continuing to pay on the loan until it completely wipes out my savings and I have to foreclose anyways doesn’t seem like the best idea. But again thanks for the advice.
July 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM #232518DotherightthingParticipantWow! Deadbeat huh? Thanks for the advice. I will admit that I am a 29 year old who bought my first home in Nov. 04′ at the risk of being priced out of the market. I moved to San Diego in 2001 and saw a lot of people making a ton of money in real estate. At the time it seemed like a no brainer to get into the market. Was 400k more than I wanted to spend on a house? Yes. Could I afford a loan that required 20% down and a higher fixed rate? Absolutely not. I am not pointing fingers saying that it is anyone’s fault but my own. I admit I made a mistake. However, I also want to do what is best for my family. Continuing to pay on the loan until it completely wipes out my savings and I have to foreclose anyways doesn’t seem like the best idea. But again thanks for the advice.
July 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM #232530DotherightthingParticipantWow! Deadbeat huh? Thanks for the advice. I will admit that I am a 29 year old who bought my first home in Nov. 04′ at the risk of being priced out of the market. I moved to San Diego in 2001 and saw a lot of people making a ton of money in real estate. At the time it seemed like a no brainer to get into the market. Was 400k more than I wanted to spend on a house? Yes. Could I afford a loan that required 20% down and a higher fixed rate? Absolutely not. I am not pointing fingers saying that it is anyone’s fault but my own. I admit I made a mistake. However, I also want to do what is best for my family. Continuing to pay on the loan until it completely wipes out my savings and I have to foreclose anyways doesn’t seem like the best idea. But again thanks for the advice.
July 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM #232567DotherightthingParticipantWow! Deadbeat huh? Thanks for the advice. I will admit that I am a 29 year old who bought my first home in Nov. 04′ at the risk of being priced out of the market. I moved to San Diego in 2001 and saw a lot of people making a ton of money in real estate. At the time it seemed like a no brainer to get into the market. Was 400k more than I wanted to spend on a house? Yes. Could I afford a loan that required 20% down and a higher fixed rate? Absolutely not. I am not pointing fingers saying that it is anyone’s fault but my own. I admit I made a mistake. However, I also want to do what is best for my family. Continuing to pay on the loan until it completely wipes out my savings and I have to foreclose anyways doesn’t seem like the best idea. But again thanks for the advice.
July 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM #232579DotherightthingParticipantWow! Deadbeat huh? Thanks for the advice. I will admit that I am a 29 year old who bought my first home in Nov. 04′ at the risk of being priced out of the market. I moved to San Diego in 2001 and saw a lot of people making a ton of money in real estate. At the time it seemed like a no brainer to get into the market. Was 400k more than I wanted to spend on a house? Yes. Could I afford a loan that required 20% down and a higher fixed rate? Absolutely not. I am not pointing fingers saying that it is anyone’s fault but my own. I admit I made a mistake. However, I also want to do what is best for my family. Continuing to pay on the loan until it completely wipes out my savings and I have to foreclose anyways doesn’t seem like the best idea. But again thanks for the advice.
July 2, 2008 at 2:11 PM #232565peterbParticipantIf the Fed can bail-out Wall Street, then you should feel free to do the most effecient and effective thing for your personal finances.
I dont think the Fed’s going to bail you out anytime soon.
I dont know why people feel the need to judge undividuals after the way big business behaves.July 2, 2008 at 2:11 PM #232625peterbParticipantIf the Fed can bail-out Wall Street, then you should feel free to do the most effecient and effective thing for your personal finances.
I dont think the Fed’s going to bail you out anytime soon.
I dont know why people feel the need to judge undividuals after the way big business behaves.July 2, 2008 at 2:11 PM #232615peterbParticipantIf the Fed can bail-out Wall Street, then you should feel free to do the most effecient and effective thing for your personal finances.
I dont think the Fed’s going to bail you out anytime soon.
I dont know why people feel the need to judge undividuals after the way big business behaves.July 2, 2008 at 2:11 PM #232574peterbParticipantIf the Fed can bail-out Wall Street, then you should feel free to do the most effecient and effective thing for your personal finances.
I dont think the Fed’s going to bail you out anytime soon.
I dont know why people feel the need to judge undividuals after the way big business behaves.July 2, 2008 at 2:11 PM #232441peterbParticipantIf the Fed can bail-out Wall Street, then you should feel free to do the most effecient and effective thing for your personal finances.
I dont think the Fed’s going to bail you out anytime soon.
I dont know why people feel the need to judge undividuals after the way big business behaves.July 3, 2008 at 10:15 AM #232836jonnycsdParticipantI think you are very “easy going” and carefree when it comes to speculating with other people’s money but you are very prudent when it come to saving yours.
The whole idea of a capitalist system is that people who make poor capital investment decisions with THIER money do not get to keep it – rather capital accures to others who make good decisions and flees those who make poor ones. The lenders who abdicated thier responsibilities and MISALLOCATED thier capital into BAD LOANS should loose it to people who can be better shepards.
Dotherightthing – it is not your responsibility that some idiot lender made the decisions they did with THIER money. You should act within the boundaries of the law to maximize your outcome. It is a business question, not a moral question. If you doubt that it is all about business, ask yourself how many days reprieve on foreclosure and eviction that any lender would give to people whith hardship if it was going to cost them money? NOT ONE DAY. They would (and DO!) boot the bewlidered elderly coupe onto the street. They would (and DO!) have the sherrif remove cyring children and pile the toys and clothes on the curb.
Ironman’s idealism has no bearing on the reality of this industry. It is ruthless and you should play savy hardball.
July 3, 2008 at 10:15 AM #232825jonnycsdParticipantI think you are very “easy going” and carefree when it comes to speculating with other people’s money but you are very prudent when it come to saving yours.
The whole idea of a capitalist system is that people who make poor capital investment decisions with THIER money do not get to keep it – rather capital accures to others who make good decisions and flees those who make poor ones. The lenders who abdicated thier responsibilities and MISALLOCATED thier capital into BAD LOANS should loose it to people who can be better shepards.
Dotherightthing – it is not your responsibility that some idiot lender made the decisions they did with THIER money. You should act within the boundaries of the law to maximize your outcome. It is a business question, not a moral question. If you doubt that it is all about business, ask yourself how many days reprieve on foreclosure and eviction that any lender would give to people whith hardship if it was going to cost them money? NOT ONE DAY. They would (and DO!) boot the bewlidered elderly coupe onto the street. They would (and DO!) have the sherrif remove cyring children and pile the toys and clothes on the curb.
Ironman’s idealism has no bearing on the reality of this industry. It is ruthless and you should play savy hardball.
July 3, 2008 at 10:15 AM #232786jonnycsdParticipantI think you are very “easy going” and carefree when it comes to speculating with other people’s money but you are very prudent when it come to saving yours.
The whole idea of a capitalist system is that people who make poor capital investment decisions with THIER money do not get to keep it – rather capital accures to others who make good decisions and flees those who make poor ones. The lenders who abdicated thier responsibilities and MISALLOCATED thier capital into BAD LOANS should loose it to people who can be better shepards.
Dotherightthing – it is not your responsibility that some idiot lender made the decisions they did with THIER money. You should act within the boundaries of the law to maximize your outcome. It is a business question, not a moral question. If you doubt that it is all about business, ask yourself how many days reprieve on foreclosure and eviction that any lender would give to people whith hardship if it was going to cost them money? NOT ONE DAY. They would (and DO!) boot the bewlidered elderly coupe onto the street. They would (and DO!) have the sherrif remove cyring children and pile the toys and clothes on the curb.
Ironman’s idealism has no bearing on the reality of this industry. It is ruthless and you should play savy hardball.
July 3, 2008 at 10:15 AM #232774jonnycsdParticipantI think you are very “easy going” and carefree when it comes to speculating with other people’s money but you are very prudent when it come to saving yours.
The whole idea of a capitalist system is that people who make poor capital investment decisions with THIER money do not get to keep it – rather capital accures to others who make good decisions and flees those who make poor ones. The lenders who abdicated thier responsibilities and MISALLOCATED thier capital into BAD LOANS should loose it to people who can be better shepards.
Dotherightthing – it is not your responsibility that some idiot lender made the decisions they did with THIER money. You should act within the boundaries of the law to maximize your outcome. It is a business question, not a moral question. If you doubt that it is all about business, ask yourself how many days reprieve on foreclosure and eviction that any lender would give to people whith hardship if it was going to cost them money? NOT ONE DAY. They would (and DO!) boot the bewlidered elderly coupe onto the street. They would (and DO!) have the sherrif remove cyring children and pile the toys and clothes on the curb.
Ironman’s idealism has no bearing on the reality of this industry. It is ruthless and you should play savy hardball.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.