- This topic has 145 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 13, 2009 at 9:59 AM #483112November 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM #482293briansd1Guest
jpinpb, chemically, sugar is sugar so HFCS is not any worse than cane sugar. It’s just very cheap to produce so it’s cheap and easy to put into everything, at minute incremental cost.
Sugar is addictive in that humans crave sugar and salt. So if you’re a food vendor, you want to give what people want else they’ll complain that your food is “bland” and “bad” and you’ll lose sales. It’s a catch 22. Vendors try to outdo each other in “taste” so you end up with food that is ever more sugary and salty.
The food at restaurants is just as bad. Plenty of sugar, salt and MSG (in the sauces).
It’s best to make everything from scratch and not add processed stuff.
Eating “plain” food is actually healthiest. I’ve got my 80yo dad trained to eat no salt/sugar. He spent two weeks back east visiting relatives and his blood pressure jumped 10 points.
There is no raw sugar of any kind at my house.
If the government would stop subsidizing agribusiness, HFCS would not be so cheap. The danger is not HFCS itself but the cheap availability and abuse of it.
It’s the curse of wealth and plenty…. (BTW, did you know that people who suddenly get rich tend to die quickly? That’s because they have the money to gorge themselves).
November 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM #482462briansd1Guestjpinpb, chemically, sugar is sugar so HFCS is not any worse than cane sugar. It’s just very cheap to produce so it’s cheap and easy to put into everything, at minute incremental cost.
Sugar is addictive in that humans crave sugar and salt. So if you’re a food vendor, you want to give what people want else they’ll complain that your food is “bland” and “bad” and you’ll lose sales. It’s a catch 22. Vendors try to outdo each other in “taste” so you end up with food that is ever more sugary and salty.
The food at restaurants is just as bad. Plenty of sugar, salt and MSG (in the sauces).
It’s best to make everything from scratch and not add processed stuff.
Eating “plain” food is actually healthiest. I’ve got my 80yo dad trained to eat no salt/sugar. He spent two weeks back east visiting relatives and his blood pressure jumped 10 points.
There is no raw sugar of any kind at my house.
If the government would stop subsidizing agribusiness, HFCS would not be so cheap. The danger is not HFCS itself but the cheap availability and abuse of it.
It’s the curse of wealth and plenty…. (BTW, did you know that people who suddenly get rich tend to die quickly? That’s because they have the money to gorge themselves).
November 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM #482832briansd1Guestjpinpb, chemically, sugar is sugar so HFCS is not any worse than cane sugar. It’s just very cheap to produce so it’s cheap and easy to put into everything, at minute incremental cost.
Sugar is addictive in that humans crave sugar and salt. So if you’re a food vendor, you want to give what people want else they’ll complain that your food is “bland” and “bad” and you’ll lose sales. It’s a catch 22. Vendors try to outdo each other in “taste” so you end up with food that is ever more sugary and salty.
The food at restaurants is just as bad. Plenty of sugar, salt and MSG (in the sauces).
It’s best to make everything from scratch and not add processed stuff.
Eating “plain” food is actually healthiest. I’ve got my 80yo dad trained to eat no salt/sugar. He spent two weeks back east visiting relatives and his blood pressure jumped 10 points.
There is no raw sugar of any kind at my house.
If the government would stop subsidizing agribusiness, HFCS would not be so cheap. The danger is not HFCS itself but the cheap availability and abuse of it.
It’s the curse of wealth and plenty…. (BTW, did you know that people who suddenly get rich tend to die quickly? That’s because they have the money to gorge themselves).
November 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM #482911briansd1Guestjpinpb, chemically, sugar is sugar so HFCS is not any worse than cane sugar. It’s just very cheap to produce so it’s cheap and easy to put into everything, at minute incremental cost.
Sugar is addictive in that humans crave sugar and salt. So if you’re a food vendor, you want to give what people want else they’ll complain that your food is “bland” and “bad” and you’ll lose sales. It’s a catch 22. Vendors try to outdo each other in “taste” so you end up with food that is ever more sugary and salty.
The food at restaurants is just as bad. Plenty of sugar, salt and MSG (in the sauces).
It’s best to make everything from scratch and not add processed stuff.
Eating “plain” food is actually healthiest. I’ve got my 80yo dad trained to eat no salt/sugar. He spent two weeks back east visiting relatives and his blood pressure jumped 10 points.
There is no raw sugar of any kind at my house.
If the government would stop subsidizing agribusiness, HFCS would not be so cheap. The danger is not HFCS itself but the cheap availability and abuse of it.
It’s the curse of wealth and plenty…. (BTW, did you know that people who suddenly get rich tend to die quickly? That’s because they have the money to gorge themselves).
November 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM #483137briansd1Guestjpinpb, chemically, sugar is sugar so HFCS is not any worse than cane sugar. It’s just very cheap to produce so it’s cheap and easy to put into everything, at minute incremental cost.
Sugar is addictive in that humans crave sugar and salt. So if you’re a food vendor, you want to give what people want else they’ll complain that your food is “bland” and “bad” and you’ll lose sales. It’s a catch 22. Vendors try to outdo each other in “taste” so you end up with food that is ever more sugary and salty.
The food at restaurants is just as bad. Plenty of sugar, salt and MSG (in the sauces).
It’s best to make everything from scratch and not add processed stuff.
Eating “plain” food is actually healthiest. I’ve got my 80yo dad trained to eat no salt/sugar. He spent two weeks back east visiting relatives and his blood pressure jumped 10 points.
There is no raw sugar of any kind at my house.
If the government would stop subsidizing agribusiness, HFCS would not be so cheap. The danger is not HFCS itself but the cheap availability and abuse of it.
It’s the curse of wealth and plenty…. (BTW, did you know that people who suddenly get rich tend to die quickly? That’s because they have the money to gorge themselves).
November 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM #482559jpinpbParticipantYes, from the video he explained the composition and the process through the liver and so I understand sugar and HFCS is the same. I guess that HFCS is used more b/c it is so cheap. Back in the day, the cost of sugar limited how much you would use.
And I agree, the government subsidzing the corn industry doesn’t give much incentive to change any of this, which is probably why the FDA considers HFCS as GRAS. A lot of money would be lost otherwise.
November 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM #482729jpinpbParticipantYes, from the video he explained the composition and the process through the liver and so I understand sugar and HFCS is the same. I guess that HFCS is used more b/c it is so cheap. Back in the day, the cost of sugar limited how much you would use.
And I agree, the government subsidzing the corn industry doesn’t give much incentive to change any of this, which is probably why the FDA considers HFCS as GRAS. A lot of money would be lost otherwise.
November 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM #483096jpinpbParticipantYes, from the video he explained the composition and the process through the liver and so I understand sugar and HFCS is the same. I guess that HFCS is used more b/c it is so cheap. Back in the day, the cost of sugar limited how much you would use.
And I agree, the government subsidzing the corn industry doesn’t give much incentive to change any of this, which is probably why the FDA considers HFCS as GRAS. A lot of money would be lost otherwise.
November 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM #483178jpinpbParticipantYes, from the video he explained the composition and the process through the liver and so I understand sugar and HFCS is the same. I guess that HFCS is used more b/c it is so cheap. Back in the day, the cost of sugar limited how much you would use.
And I agree, the government subsidzing the corn industry doesn’t give much incentive to change any of this, which is probably why the FDA considers HFCS as GRAS. A lot of money would be lost otherwise.
November 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM #483403jpinpbParticipantYes, from the video he explained the composition and the process through the liver and so I understand sugar and HFCS is the same. I guess that HFCS is used more b/c it is so cheap. Back in the day, the cost of sugar limited how much you would use.
And I agree, the government subsidzing the corn industry doesn’t give much incentive to change any of this, which is probably why the FDA considers HFCS as GRAS. A lot of money would be lost otherwise.
November 14, 2009 at 3:22 PM #482943NotCrankyParticipantOn this topic, Since my kids are getting a little older and have started getting out more with people outside of our normal circles it has been a constant struggle to ward off junk food poisoning by other parents. I guess that’s over dramatic but junk food, candy and soft drinks like “minute made coolers” and Capri Sun just come up by the ton in their little social worlds.
At two soccer games today the kids were issued no less than 6 “treats” each. Of course often times the parents feel like they have to give my 2 year old bags full of shit so he won’t feel left out. Add birthday parties almost every weekend, end of season parties , holiday festivals ect. and it’s way out of control if we didn’t take most of it away and were not working with my kids on “no thanks” which is very hard.
Sugar may be bad, but the willful excess is nuts.I really think that’s the problem.
November 14, 2009 at 3:22 PM #483110NotCrankyParticipantOn this topic, Since my kids are getting a little older and have started getting out more with people outside of our normal circles it has been a constant struggle to ward off junk food poisoning by other parents. I guess that’s over dramatic but junk food, candy and soft drinks like “minute made coolers” and Capri Sun just come up by the ton in their little social worlds.
At two soccer games today the kids were issued no less than 6 “treats” each. Of course often times the parents feel like they have to give my 2 year old bags full of shit so he won’t feel left out. Add birthday parties almost every weekend, end of season parties , holiday festivals ect. and it’s way out of control if we didn’t take most of it away and were not working with my kids on “no thanks” which is very hard.
Sugar may be bad, but the willful excess is nuts.I really think that’s the problem.
November 14, 2009 at 3:22 PM #483483NotCrankyParticipantOn this topic, Since my kids are getting a little older and have started getting out more with people outside of our normal circles it has been a constant struggle to ward off junk food poisoning by other parents. I guess that’s over dramatic but junk food, candy and soft drinks like “minute made coolers” and Capri Sun just come up by the ton in their little social worlds.
At two soccer games today the kids were issued no less than 6 “treats” each. Of course often times the parents feel like they have to give my 2 year old bags full of shit so he won’t feel left out. Add birthday parties almost every weekend, end of season parties , holiday festivals ect. and it’s way out of control if we didn’t take most of it away and were not working with my kids on “no thanks” which is very hard.
Sugar may be bad, but the willful excess is nuts.I really think that’s the problem.
November 14, 2009 at 3:22 PM #483563NotCrankyParticipantOn this topic, Since my kids are getting a little older and have started getting out more with people outside of our normal circles it has been a constant struggle to ward off junk food poisoning by other parents. I guess that’s over dramatic but junk food, candy and soft drinks like “minute made coolers” and Capri Sun just come up by the ton in their little social worlds.
At two soccer games today the kids were issued no less than 6 “treats” each. Of course often times the parents feel like they have to give my 2 year old bags full of shit so he won’t feel left out. Add birthday parties almost every weekend, end of season parties , holiday festivals ect. and it’s way out of control if we didn’t take most of it away and were not working with my kids on “no thanks” which is very hard.
Sugar may be bad, but the willful excess is nuts.I really think that’s the problem.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.