- This topic has 185 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 26, 2010 at 3:31 PM #519536February 26, 2010 at 4:43 PM #518664
sdcellar
ParticipantNo really, they all suck. This has nothing to do with the little bitch slap Obama gave McCain yesterday.
They all work on the behalf of special interests and there’s too much money passing hands. The closest it comes to benefiting the “people” might be that it makes the people they might be working for richer.
Yes, I suppose a rapist is proportionally better than a murderer, but they’re both disgusting vile people.
(and I’m not saying politicians equate with anything like that, even though many of them might border on being criminally unethical.)
February 26, 2010 at 4:43 PM #518806ParticipantNo really, they all suck. This has nothing to do with the little bitch slap Obama gave McCain yesterday.
They all work on the behalf of special interests and there’s too much money passing hands. The closest it comes to benefiting the “people” might be that it makes the people they might be working for richer.
Yes, I suppose a rapist is proportionally better than a murderer, but they’re both disgusting vile people.
(and I’m not saying politicians equate with anything like that, even though many of them might border on being criminally unethical.)
February 26, 2010 at 4:43 PM #519238ParticipantNo really, they all suck. This has nothing to do with the little bitch slap Obama gave McCain yesterday.
They all work on the behalf of special interests and there’s too much money passing hands. The closest it comes to benefiting the “people” might be that it makes the people they might be working for richer.
Yes, I suppose a rapist is proportionally better than a murderer, but they’re both disgusting vile people.
(and I’m not saying politicians equate with anything like that, even though many of them might border on being criminally unethical.)
February 26, 2010 at 4:43 PM #519332ParticipantNo really, they all suck. This has nothing to do with the little bitch slap Obama gave McCain yesterday.
They all work on the behalf of special interests and there’s too much money passing hands. The closest it comes to benefiting the “people” might be that it makes the people they might be working for richer.
Yes, I suppose a rapist is proportionally better than a murderer, but they’re both disgusting vile people.
(and I’m not saying politicians equate with anything like that, even though many of them might border on being criminally unethical.)
February 26, 2010 at 4:43 PM #519586ParticipantNo really, they all suck. This has nothing to do with the little bitch slap Obama gave McCain yesterday.
They all work on the behalf of special interests and there’s too much money passing hands. The closest it comes to benefiting the “people” might be that it makes the people they might be working for richer.
Yes, I suppose a rapist is proportionally better than a murderer, but they’re both disgusting vile people.
(and I’m not saying politicians equate with anything like that, even though many of them might border on being criminally unethical.)
February 26, 2010 at 5:09 PM #518674Participant[quote=briansd1]It’s too easy to say that everyone is to blame so let’s start fresh. Something children would say.[/quote]Oh, and I didn’t say we should start fresh. You might have inferred that, but all I said was things need to change. It is naive to think there’s some way to do a do-over.
We could start with major lobby and fundraising reform. Something to keep all this BS out of bills too.
That said, I don’t want to send this down a political discussion rat hole, so how about not replying to me even if I’m totally wrong. I just wanted to explain myself.
February 26, 2010 at 5:09 PM #518816Participant[quote=briansd1]It’s too easy to say that everyone is to blame so let’s start fresh. Something children would say.[/quote]Oh, and I didn’t say we should start fresh. You might have inferred that, but all I said was things need to change. It is naive to think there’s some way to do a do-over.
We could start with major lobby and fundraising reform. Something to keep all this BS out of bills too.
That said, I don’t want to send this down a political discussion rat hole, so how about not replying to me even if I’m totally wrong. I just wanted to explain myself.
February 26, 2010 at 5:09 PM #519248Participant[quote=briansd1]It’s too easy to say that everyone is to blame so let’s start fresh. Something children would say.[/quote]Oh, and I didn’t say we should start fresh. You might have inferred that, but all I said was things need to change. It is naive to think there’s some way to do a do-over.
We could start with major lobby and fundraising reform. Something to keep all this BS out of bills too.
That said, I don’t want to send this down a political discussion rat hole, so how about not replying to me even if I’m totally wrong. I just wanted to explain myself.
February 26, 2010 at 5:09 PM #519342Participant[quote=briansd1]It’s too easy to say that everyone is to blame so let’s start fresh. Something children would say.[/quote]Oh, and I didn’t say we should start fresh. You might have inferred that, but all I said was things need to change. It is naive to think there’s some way to do a do-over.
We could start with major lobby and fundraising reform. Something to keep all this BS out of bills too.
That said, I don’t want to send this down a political discussion rat hole, so how about not replying to me even if I’m totally wrong. I just wanted to explain myself.
February 26, 2010 at 5:09 PM #519596Participant[quote=briansd1]It’s too easy to say that everyone is to blame so let’s start fresh. Something children would say.[/quote]Oh, and I didn’t say we should start fresh. You might have inferred that, but all I said was things need to change. It is naive to think there’s some way to do a do-over.
We could start with major lobby and fundraising reform. Something to keep all this BS out of bills too.
That said, I don’t want to send this down a political discussion rat hole, so how about not replying to me even if I’m totally wrong. I just wanted to explain myself.
February 26, 2010 at 7:52 PM #518729Anonymous
Guest“Substantial downside risk remains”
Schiller is a bright guy, but I’d bet the farm that “nothing happening” isn’t included in his highly polarized list of possibilities.
SD Realtor: Love the way you stress that this is a non-partisan mess. Much respect.
February 26, 2010 at 7:52 PM #518871Guest“Substantial downside risk remains”
Schiller is a bright guy, but I’d bet the farm that “nothing happening” isn’t included in his highly polarized list of possibilities.
SD Realtor: Love the way you stress that this is a non-partisan mess. Much respect.
February 26, 2010 at 7:52 PM #519303Guest“Substantial downside risk remains”
Schiller is a bright guy, but I’d bet the farm that “nothing happening” isn’t included in his highly polarized list of possibilities.
SD Realtor: Love the way you stress that this is a non-partisan mess. Much respect.
February 26, 2010 at 7:52 PM #519397Guest“Substantial downside risk remains”
Schiller is a bright guy, but I’d bet the farm that “nothing happening” isn’t included in his highly polarized list of possibilities.
SD Realtor: Love the way you stress that this is a non-partisan mess. Much respect.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.