Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › SOLD! $3099 per square foot in Pacific Beach
- This topic has 70 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by nostradamus.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 20, 2008 at 6:07 PM #208628May 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM #208776poway_sellerParticipant
The headline was sheerly meant to shock into getting some of you to read it, which it obvioulsy has. The $3099 per square feet was nothing more than the simple math… Just showing there is still madness in the market, and not every buyer is a rational one, who reads the Bubble Primer and is waiting until 2010. Nothing less and nothing more.
May 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM #208691poway_sellerParticipantThe headline was sheerly meant to shock into getting some of you to read it, which it obvioulsy has. The $3099 per square feet was nothing more than the simple math… Just showing there is still madness in the market, and not every buyer is a rational one, who reads the Bubble Primer and is waiting until 2010. Nothing less and nothing more.
May 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM #208721poway_sellerParticipantThe headline was sheerly meant to shock into getting some of you to read it, which it obvioulsy has. The $3099 per square feet was nothing more than the simple math… Just showing there is still madness in the market, and not every buyer is a rational one, who reads the Bubble Primer and is waiting until 2010. Nothing less and nothing more.
May 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM #208633poway_sellerParticipantThe headline was sheerly meant to shock into getting some of you to read it, which it obvioulsy has. The $3099 per square feet was nothing more than the simple math… Just showing there is still madness in the market, and not every buyer is a rational one, who reads the Bubble Primer and is waiting until 2010. Nothing less and nothing more.
May 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM #208744poway_sellerParticipantThe headline was sheerly meant to shock into getting some of you to read it, which it obvioulsy has. The $3099 per square feet was nothing more than the simple math… Just showing there is still madness in the market, and not every buyer is a rational one, who reads the Bubble Primer and is waiting until 2010. Nothing less and nothing more.
May 20, 2008 at 6:13 PM #208748(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI don’t think this is the original powayseller of California Housing Forecast. She went by the pseudonym “powayseller”. This person is using the pseudonym “poway_seller”.
Regardless of who posted this information, I don’t see what is so inflammatory about the original post or what all the fuss is about. It could mean that the person is tired of waiting to see prices come down on the coast. It could be making the point that price per square foot is not always a good metric. It could also be a RE bull. Any of these points could have been made by the OP, but they weren’t.
Looks like simply the facts to me.May 20, 2008 at 6:13 PM #208726(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI don’t think this is the original powayseller of California Housing Forecast. She went by the pseudonym “powayseller”. This person is using the pseudonym “poway_seller”.
Regardless of who posted this information, I don’t see what is so inflammatory about the original post or what all the fuss is about. It could mean that the person is tired of waiting to see prices come down on the coast. It could be making the point that price per square foot is not always a good metric. It could also be a RE bull. Any of these points could have been made by the OP, but they weren’t.
Looks like simply the facts to me.May 20, 2008 at 6:13 PM #208695(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI don’t think this is the original powayseller of California Housing Forecast. She went by the pseudonym “powayseller”. This person is using the pseudonym “poway_seller”.
Regardless of who posted this information, I don’t see what is so inflammatory about the original post or what all the fuss is about. It could mean that the person is tired of waiting to see prices come down on the coast. It could be making the point that price per square foot is not always a good metric. It could also be a RE bull. Any of these points could have been made by the OP, but they weren’t.
Looks like simply the facts to me.May 20, 2008 at 6:13 PM #208781(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI don’t think this is the original powayseller of California Housing Forecast. She went by the pseudonym “powayseller”. This person is using the pseudonym “poway_seller”.
Regardless of who posted this information, I don’t see what is so inflammatory about the original post or what all the fuss is about. It could mean that the person is tired of waiting to see prices come down on the coast. It could be making the point that price per square foot is not always a good metric. It could also be a RE bull. Any of these points could have been made by the OP, but they weren’t.
Looks like simply the facts to me.May 20, 2008 at 6:13 PM #208638(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI don’t think this is the original powayseller of California Housing Forecast. She went by the pseudonym “powayseller”. This person is using the pseudonym “poway_seller”.
Regardless of who posted this information, I don’t see what is so inflammatory about the original post or what all the fuss is about. It could mean that the person is tired of waiting to see prices come down on the coast. It could be making the point that price per square foot is not always a good metric. It could also be a RE bull. Any of these points could have been made by the OP, but they weren’t.
Looks like simply the facts to me.May 20, 2008 at 6:38 PM #208653La Jolla RenterParticipantOh, thanks for the clarification.
So if I want to feel popular with a post that gets read, I should pick out an anomaly in the market and hype it in the headline like it is the “new” trend.
No thanks, I don’t want to look like a piss ant idiot.
Your headline is moronic because you make your point using the sqft of a house, that should have been stated as sqft for dirt on a multi zoned lot.
Maybe you can get a job freelancing for DataQuick.
May 20, 2008 at 6:38 PM #208764La Jolla RenterParticipantOh, thanks for the clarification.
So if I want to feel popular with a post that gets read, I should pick out an anomaly in the market and hype it in the headline like it is the “new” trend.
No thanks, I don’t want to look like a piss ant idiot.
Your headline is moronic because you make your point using the sqft of a house, that should have been stated as sqft for dirt on a multi zoned lot.
Maybe you can get a job freelancing for DataQuick.
May 20, 2008 at 6:38 PM #208796La Jolla RenterParticipantOh, thanks for the clarification.
So if I want to feel popular with a post that gets read, I should pick out an anomaly in the market and hype it in the headline like it is the “new” trend.
No thanks, I don’t want to look like a piss ant idiot.
Your headline is moronic because you make your point using the sqft of a house, that should have been stated as sqft for dirt on a multi zoned lot.
Maybe you can get a job freelancing for DataQuick.
May 20, 2008 at 6:38 PM #208740La Jolla RenterParticipantOh, thanks for the clarification.
So if I want to feel popular with a post that gets read, I should pick out an anomaly in the market and hype it in the headline like it is the “new” trend.
No thanks, I don’t want to look like a piss ant idiot.
Your headline is moronic because you make your point using the sqft of a house, that should have been stated as sqft for dirt on a multi zoned lot.
Maybe you can get a job freelancing for DataQuick.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.