- This topic has 480 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 16, 2009 at 3:05 PM #382765April 16, 2009 at 3:09 PM #382136
Scarlett
ParticipantThanks, SD T!
This is amazing! How the NODs went up and foreclosures sales went down!That means one thing: within a year, many those NODs (should be most, but we’ll see) *SHOULD* become foreclosures….
[quote=SD Transplant][img_assist|nid=10845|title=CA Foreclosures Stats|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=68][/quote]
April 16, 2009 at 3:09 PM #382406Scarlett
ParticipantThanks, SD T!
This is amazing! How the NODs went up and foreclosures sales went down!That means one thing: within a year, many those NODs (should be most, but we’ll see) *SHOULD* become foreclosures….
[quote=SD Transplant][img_assist|nid=10845|title=CA Foreclosures Stats|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=68][/quote]
April 16, 2009 at 3:09 PM #382597Scarlett
ParticipantThanks, SD T!
This is amazing! How the NODs went up and foreclosures sales went down!That means one thing: within a year, many those NODs (should be most, but we’ll see) *SHOULD* become foreclosures….
[quote=SD Transplant][img_assist|nid=10845|title=CA Foreclosures Stats|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=68][/quote]
April 16, 2009 at 3:09 PM #382644Scarlett
ParticipantThanks, SD T!
This is amazing! How the NODs went up and foreclosures sales went down!That means one thing: within a year, many those NODs (should be most, but we’ll see) *SHOULD* become foreclosures….
[quote=SD Transplant][img_assist|nid=10845|title=CA Foreclosures Stats|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=68][/quote]
April 16, 2009 at 3:09 PM #382775Scarlett
ParticipantThanks, SD T!
This is amazing! How the NODs went up and foreclosures sales went down!That means one thing: within a year, many those NODs (should be most, but we’ll see) *SHOULD* become foreclosures….
[quote=SD Transplant][img_assist|nid=10845|title=CA Foreclosures Stats|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=68][/quote]
April 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM #382176blahblahblah
ParticipantWe’re going to end up with Potemkin villages just like the old USSR! Lots of empty homes so the banks can keep up appearances and pretend that they’re all worth $600K. I love it…
April 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM #382446blahblahblah
ParticipantWe’re going to end up with Potemkin villages just like the old USSR! Lots of empty homes so the banks can keep up appearances and pretend that they’re all worth $600K. I love it…
April 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM #382636blahblahblah
ParticipantWe’re going to end up with Potemkin villages just like the old USSR! Lots of empty homes so the banks can keep up appearances and pretend that they’re all worth $600K. I love it…
April 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM #382683blahblahblah
ParticipantWe’re going to end up with Potemkin villages just like the old USSR! Lots of empty homes so the banks can keep up appearances and pretend that they’re all worth $600K. I love it…
April 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM #382815blahblahblah
ParticipantWe’re going to end up with Potemkin villages just like the old USSR! Lots of empty homes so the banks can keep up appearances and pretend that they’re all worth $600K. I love it…
April 16, 2009 at 3:55 PM #382201ibjames
Participantif that is the case, we are a resourceful bunch here, how about we identify the ones that have sat the longest, and move in!
April 16, 2009 at 3:55 PM #382471ibjames
Participantif that is the case, we are a resourceful bunch here, how about we identify the ones that have sat the longest, and move in!
April 16, 2009 at 3:55 PM #382661ibjames
Participantif that is the case, we are a resourceful bunch here, how about we identify the ones that have sat the longest, and move in!
April 16, 2009 at 3:55 PM #382708ibjames
Participantif that is the case, we are a resourceful bunch here, how about we identify the ones that have sat the longest, and move in!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.