- This topic has 480 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 16, 2009 at 3:05 PM #382765April 16, 2009 at 3:09 PM #382136ScarlettParticipant
Thanks, SD T!
This is amazing! How the NODs went up and foreclosures sales went down!That means one thing: within a year, many those NODs (should be most, but we’ll see) *SHOULD* become foreclosures….
[quote=SD Transplant][img_assist|nid=10845|title=CA Foreclosures Stats|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=68][/quote]
April 16, 2009 at 3:09 PM #382406ScarlettParticipantThanks, SD T!
This is amazing! How the NODs went up and foreclosures sales went down!That means one thing: within a year, many those NODs (should be most, but we’ll see) *SHOULD* become foreclosures….
[quote=SD Transplant][img_assist|nid=10845|title=CA Foreclosures Stats|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=68][/quote]
April 16, 2009 at 3:09 PM #382597ScarlettParticipantThanks, SD T!
This is amazing! How the NODs went up and foreclosures sales went down!That means one thing: within a year, many those NODs (should be most, but we’ll see) *SHOULD* become foreclosures….
[quote=SD Transplant][img_assist|nid=10845|title=CA Foreclosures Stats|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=68][/quote]
April 16, 2009 at 3:09 PM #382644ScarlettParticipantThanks, SD T!
This is amazing! How the NODs went up and foreclosures sales went down!That means one thing: within a year, many those NODs (should be most, but we’ll see) *SHOULD* become foreclosures….
[quote=SD Transplant][img_assist|nid=10845|title=CA Foreclosures Stats|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=68][/quote]
April 16, 2009 at 3:09 PM #382775ScarlettParticipantThanks, SD T!
This is amazing! How the NODs went up and foreclosures sales went down!That means one thing: within a year, many those NODs (should be most, but we’ll see) *SHOULD* become foreclosures….
[quote=SD Transplant][img_assist|nid=10845|title=CA Foreclosures Stats|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=68][/quote]
April 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM #382176blahblahblahParticipantWe’re going to end up with Potemkin villages just like the old USSR! Lots of empty homes so the banks can keep up appearances and pretend that they’re all worth $600K. I love it…
April 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM #382446blahblahblahParticipantWe’re going to end up with Potemkin villages just like the old USSR! Lots of empty homes so the banks can keep up appearances and pretend that they’re all worth $600K. I love it…
April 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM #382636blahblahblahParticipantWe’re going to end up with Potemkin villages just like the old USSR! Lots of empty homes so the banks can keep up appearances and pretend that they’re all worth $600K. I love it…
April 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM #382683blahblahblahParticipantWe’re going to end up with Potemkin villages just like the old USSR! Lots of empty homes so the banks can keep up appearances and pretend that they’re all worth $600K. I love it…
April 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM #382815blahblahblahParticipantWe’re going to end up with Potemkin villages just like the old USSR! Lots of empty homes so the banks can keep up appearances and pretend that they’re all worth $600K. I love it…
April 16, 2009 at 3:55 PM #382201ibjamesParticipantif that is the case, we are a resourceful bunch here, how about we identify the ones that have sat the longest, and move in!
April 16, 2009 at 3:55 PM #382471ibjamesParticipantif that is the case, we are a resourceful bunch here, how about we identify the ones that have sat the longest, and move in!
April 16, 2009 at 3:55 PM #382661ibjamesParticipantif that is the case, we are a resourceful bunch here, how about we identify the ones that have sat the longest, and move in!
April 16, 2009 at 3:55 PM #382708ibjamesParticipantif that is the case, we are a resourceful bunch here, how about we identify the ones that have sat the longest, and move in!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.