- This topic has 50 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by 8bitnintendo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 31, 2010 at 1:29 PM #534427March 31, 2010 at 2:00 PM #534432ArrayaParticipant
Bubbles are not some new socio-psychological phenomena. They have been going on for centuries and are very well understood. The reasons are in evolutionary psychology and culture. So it should be no surprise that so many people made stupid gambles. What is stupid is that we keep creating the conditions that allow them to happen given our understanding of the phenomena.
March 31, 2010 at 2:00 PM #533752ArrayaParticipantBubbles are not some new socio-psychological phenomena. They have been going on for centuries and are very well understood. The reasons are in evolutionary psychology and culture. So it should be no surprise that so many people made stupid gambles. What is stupid is that we keep creating the conditions that allow them to happen given our understanding of the phenomena.
March 31, 2010 at 2:00 PM #534694ArrayaParticipantBubbles are not some new socio-psychological phenomena. They have been going on for centuries and are very well understood. The reasons are in evolutionary psychology and culture. So it should be no surprise that so many people made stupid gambles. What is stupid is that we keep creating the conditions that allow them to happen given our understanding of the phenomena.
March 31, 2010 at 2:00 PM #533881ArrayaParticipantBubbles are not some new socio-psychological phenomena. They have been going on for centuries and are very well understood. The reasons are in evolutionary psychology and culture. So it should be no surprise that so many people made stupid gambles. What is stupid is that we keep creating the conditions that allow them to happen given our understanding of the phenomena.
March 31, 2010 at 2:00 PM #534334ArrayaParticipantBubbles are not some new socio-psychological phenomena. They have been going on for centuries and are very well understood. The reasons are in evolutionary psychology and culture. So it should be no surprise that so many people made stupid gambles. What is stupid is that we keep creating the conditions that allow them to happen given our understanding of the phenomena.
March 31, 2010 at 11:12 PM #534459masayakoParticipantI wouldn’t call him stupid, just greedy.
He tried to take advantage of the housing market with his capital a bit too aggressive. He played with fire & got burned. Oh well. A dime in a dozen nowadays.
March 31, 2010 at 11:12 PM #534557masayakoParticipantI wouldn’t call him stupid, just greedy.
He tried to take advantage of the housing market with his capital a bit too aggressive. He played with fire & got burned. Oh well. A dime in a dozen nowadays.
March 31, 2010 at 11:12 PM #533875masayakoParticipantI wouldn’t call him stupid, just greedy.
He tried to take advantage of the housing market with his capital a bit too aggressive. He played with fire & got burned. Oh well. A dime in a dozen nowadays.
March 31, 2010 at 11:12 PM #534004masayakoParticipantI wouldn’t call him stupid, just greedy.
He tried to take advantage of the housing market with his capital a bit too aggressive. He played with fire & got burned. Oh well. A dime in a dozen nowadays.
March 31, 2010 at 11:12 PM #534821masayakoParticipantI wouldn’t call him stupid, just greedy.
He tried to take advantage of the housing market with his capital a bit too aggressive. He played with fire & got burned. Oh well. A dime in a dozen nowadays.
April 1, 2010 at 10:31 AM #534143sdduuuudeParticipantIn my book, the definition of “smart” is “doesn’t do stupid things.”
April 1, 2010 at 10:31 AM #534697sdduuuudeParticipantIn my book, the definition of “smart” is “doesn’t do stupid things.”
April 1, 2010 at 10:31 AM #534962sdduuuudeParticipantIn my book, the definition of “smart” is “doesn’t do stupid things.”
April 1, 2010 at 10:31 AM #534600sdduuuudeParticipantIn my book, the definition of “smart” is “doesn’t do stupid things.”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.