- This topic has 50 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by 8bitnintendo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 31, 2010 at 12:46 PM #534309March 31, 2010 at 1:02 PM #533866briansd1Guest
I’ve read that most “normal” people look at life this way:
They look at the present; they live day-to-day and they are influenced by their peers and the immediate environment. (Everyone is buying a house so I can too).
They think about the long term which is too far to predict. It’s too abstract so it’s an emotional thing that can’t be acted upon. (When I’m old the house will be paid for so therefore I’m making the right decision to buy).
But they cannot look at the medium term. The medium term is important because our life span is limited.
March 31, 2010 at 1:02 PM #534417briansd1GuestI’ve read that most “normal” people look at life this way:
They look at the present; they live day-to-day and they are influenced by their peers and the immediate environment. (Everyone is buying a house so I can too).
They think about the long term which is too far to predict. It’s too abstract so it’s an emotional thing that can’t be acted upon. (When I’m old the house will be paid for so therefore I’m making the right decision to buy).
But they cannot look at the medium term. The medium term is important because our life span is limited.
March 31, 2010 at 1:02 PM #534679briansd1GuestI’ve read that most “normal” people look at life this way:
They look at the present; they live day-to-day and they are influenced by their peers and the immediate environment. (Everyone is buying a house so I can too).
They think about the long term which is too far to predict. It’s too abstract so it’s an emotional thing that can’t be acted upon. (When I’m old the house will be paid for so therefore I’m making the right decision to buy).
But they cannot look at the medium term. The medium term is important because our life span is limited.
March 31, 2010 at 1:02 PM #533738briansd1GuestI’ve read that most “normal” people look at life this way:
They look at the present; they live day-to-day and they are influenced by their peers and the immediate environment. (Everyone is buying a house so I can too).
They think about the long term which is too far to predict. It’s too abstract so it’s an emotional thing that can’t be acted upon. (When I’m old the house will be paid for so therefore I’m making the right decision to buy).
But they cannot look at the medium term. The medium term is important because our life span is limited.
March 31, 2010 at 1:02 PM #534319briansd1GuestI’ve read that most “normal” people look at life this way:
They look at the present; they live day-to-day and they are influenced by their peers and the immediate environment. (Everyone is buying a house so I can too).
They think about the long term which is too far to predict. It’s too abstract so it’s an emotional thing that can’t be acted upon. (When I’m old the house will be paid for so therefore I’m making the right decision to buy).
But they cannot look at the medium term. The medium term is important because our life span is limited.
March 31, 2010 at 1:12 PM #534324AnonymousGuestHow long was he able to live in the $700K house without making payments? As others have pointed out, he actually did a very smart thing by mortgaging the entire $700K amount. No need to gamble your own money when you can gamble taxpayer money.
Doe he still have the $100K he pocketed from the sale of his original house, or did he blow that on something?
March 31, 2010 at 1:12 PM #534422AnonymousGuestHow long was he able to live in the $700K house without making payments? As others have pointed out, he actually did a very smart thing by mortgaging the entire $700K amount. No need to gamble your own money when you can gamble taxpayer money.
Doe he still have the $100K he pocketed from the sale of his original house, or did he blow that on something?
March 31, 2010 at 1:12 PM #534684AnonymousGuestHow long was he able to live in the $700K house without making payments? As others have pointed out, he actually did a very smart thing by mortgaging the entire $700K amount. No need to gamble your own money when you can gamble taxpayer money.
Doe he still have the $100K he pocketed from the sale of his original house, or did he blow that on something?
March 31, 2010 at 1:12 PM #533743AnonymousGuestHow long was he able to live in the $700K house without making payments? As others have pointed out, he actually did a very smart thing by mortgaging the entire $700K amount. No need to gamble your own money when you can gamble taxpayer money.
Doe he still have the $100K he pocketed from the sale of his original house, or did he blow that on something?
March 31, 2010 at 1:12 PM #533870AnonymousGuestHow long was he able to live in the $700K house without making payments? As others have pointed out, he actually did a very smart thing by mortgaging the entire $700K amount. No need to gamble your own money when you can gamble taxpayer money.
Doe he still have the $100K he pocketed from the sale of his original house, or did he blow that on something?
March 31, 2010 at 1:29 PM #534689briansd1GuestI agree with iForget.
The $100k investment is separate from the purchase of the new house.
I would look at:
1/ how long he lived in the $700k house.
2/ how much in total he paid out of pocket to live in that $700k house.
3/ how much that same house would have rented for the same period of time.
4/ Assign a value to the ruined credit rating.
5/ Assign a value to the emotional distress.
6/ Assign a value to the pride and happiness of living in that new house.
7/ Add up everything and see if he’s still positive.
March 31, 2010 at 1:29 PM #534329briansd1GuestI agree with iForget.
The $100k investment is separate from the purchase of the new house.
I would look at:
1/ how long he lived in the $700k house.
2/ how much in total he paid out of pocket to live in that $700k house.
3/ how much that same house would have rented for the same period of time.
4/ Assign a value to the ruined credit rating.
5/ Assign a value to the emotional distress.
6/ Assign a value to the pride and happiness of living in that new house.
7/ Add up everything and see if he’s still positive.
March 31, 2010 at 1:29 PM #533748briansd1GuestI agree with iForget.
The $100k investment is separate from the purchase of the new house.
I would look at:
1/ how long he lived in the $700k house.
2/ how much in total he paid out of pocket to live in that $700k house.
3/ how much that same house would have rented for the same period of time.
4/ Assign a value to the ruined credit rating.
5/ Assign a value to the emotional distress.
6/ Assign a value to the pride and happiness of living in that new house.
7/ Add up everything and see if he’s still positive.
March 31, 2010 at 1:29 PM #533876briansd1GuestI agree with iForget.
The $100k investment is separate from the purchase of the new house.
I would look at:
1/ how long he lived in the $700k house.
2/ how much in total he paid out of pocket to live in that $700k house.
3/ how much that same house would have rented for the same period of time.
4/ Assign a value to the ruined credit rating.
5/ Assign a value to the emotional distress.
6/ Assign a value to the pride and happiness of living in that new house.
7/ Add up everything and see if he’s still positive.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.