Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Skyranch in Santee
- This topic has 2,185 replies, 41 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 4 months ago by
gzz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 13, 2010 at 7:54 AM #564760June 13, 2010 at 11:19 AM #563812
sdrealtor
ParticipantBrian
I would change that from most to some. Most of the buyers I run into have very, very, very specific areas they are looking at. Not that its immune to anything but I know for a fact that there are a few hundred people registered to receive automatic feeds of every home listed in my master planned community. Many of these people live in the general area for many years and aspire to a specific home/location in here. Another example is BearishGurl who said she has about 4 specific homes in Fleetridge on her radar.The simple truth is the RE market here is anything but simple. You could find examples of whatever you want to prove in terms of buying behavior, selling behavior, relative values or anything else you wanted to try to prove.
June 13, 2010 at 11:19 AM #563908sdrealtor
ParticipantBrian
I would change that from most to some. Most of the buyers I run into have very, very, very specific areas they are looking at. Not that its immune to anything but I know for a fact that there are a few hundred people registered to receive automatic feeds of every home listed in my master planned community. Many of these people live in the general area for many years and aspire to a specific home/location in here. Another example is BearishGurl who said she has about 4 specific homes in Fleetridge on her radar.The simple truth is the RE market here is anything but simple. You could find examples of whatever you want to prove in terms of buying behavior, selling behavior, relative values or anything else you wanted to try to prove.
June 13, 2010 at 11:19 AM #564409sdrealtor
ParticipantBrian
I would change that from most to some. Most of the buyers I run into have very, very, very specific areas they are looking at. Not that its immune to anything but I know for a fact that there are a few hundred people registered to receive automatic feeds of every home listed in my master planned community. Many of these people live in the general area for many years and aspire to a specific home/location in here. Another example is BearishGurl who said she has about 4 specific homes in Fleetridge on her radar.The simple truth is the RE market here is anything but simple. You could find examples of whatever you want to prove in terms of buying behavior, selling behavior, relative values or anything else you wanted to try to prove.
June 13, 2010 at 11:19 AM #564515sdrealtor
ParticipantBrian
I would change that from most to some. Most of the buyers I run into have very, very, very specific areas they are looking at. Not that its immune to anything but I know for a fact that there are a few hundred people registered to receive automatic feeds of every home listed in my master planned community. Many of these people live in the general area for many years and aspire to a specific home/location in here. Another example is BearishGurl who said she has about 4 specific homes in Fleetridge on her radar.The simple truth is the RE market here is anything but simple. You could find examples of whatever you want to prove in terms of buying behavior, selling behavior, relative values or anything else you wanted to try to prove.
June 13, 2010 at 11:19 AM #564795sdrealtor
ParticipantBrian
I would change that from most to some. Most of the buyers I run into have very, very, very specific areas they are looking at. Not that its immune to anything but I know for a fact that there are a few hundred people registered to receive automatic feeds of every home listed in my master planned community. Many of these people live in the general area for many years and aspire to a specific home/location in here. Another example is BearishGurl who said she has about 4 specific homes in Fleetridge on her radar.The simple truth is the RE market here is anything but simple. You could find examples of whatever you want to prove in terms of buying behavior, selling behavior, relative values or anything else you wanted to try to prove.
June 13, 2010 at 11:40 AM #563959an
Participantflu, those houses with one acre in Sky Rranch do not have a full useable acre. I’d guess its around 1/3-1/2 acre of useable land and the rest is slope. Those houses alsso have wider foot print than your average tract homes. The side yard are also wider(which means more concrete than sod). The actual back yard space is around the same size as a 2000sq-ft single story on 1/4 acre in Solana Beach.
June 13, 2010 at 11:40 AM #564054an
Participantflu, those houses with one acre in Sky Rranch do not have a full useable acre. I’d guess its around 1/3-1/2 acre of useable land and the rest is slope. Those houses alsso have wider foot print than your average tract homes. The side yard are also wider(which means more concrete than sod). The actual back yard space is around the same size as a 2000sq-ft single story on 1/4 acre in Solana Beach.
June 13, 2010 at 11:40 AM #564556an
Participantflu, those houses with one acre in Sky Rranch do not have a full useable acre. I’d guess its around 1/3-1/2 acre of useable land and the rest is slope. Those houses alsso have wider foot print than your average tract homes. The side yard are also wider(which means more concrete than sod). The actual back yard space is around the same size as a 2000sq-ft single story on 1/4 acre in Solana Beach.
June 13, 2010 at 11:40 AM #564659an
Participantflu, those houses with one acre in Sky Rranch do not have a full useable acre. I’d guess its around 1/3-1/2 acre of useable land and the rest is slope. Those houses alsso have wider foot print than your average tract homes. The side yard are also wider(which means more concrete than sod). The actual back yard space is around the same size as a 2000sq-ft single story on 1/4 acre in Solana Beach.
June 13, 2010 at 11:40 AM #564942an
Participantflu, those houses with one acre in Sky Rranch do not have a full useable acre. I’d guess its around 1/3-1/2 acre of useable land and the rest is slope. Those houses alsso have wider foot print than your average tract homes. The side yard are also wider(which means more concrete than sod). The actual back yard space is around the same size as a 2000sq-ft single story on 1/4 acre in Solana Beach.
June 13, 2010 at 12:23 PM #563991Coronita
Participant[quote=AN]flu, those houses with one acre in Sky Rranch do not have a full useable acre. I’d guess its around 1/3-1/2 acre of useable land and the rest is slope. Those houses alsso have wider foot print than your average tract homes. The side yard are also wider(which means more concrete than sod). The actual back yard space is around the same size as a 2000sq-ft single story on 1/4 acre in Solana Beach.[/quote]
Well, I have visited Santee but never visited the actual model homes (no interest)..So I’ll have to take your word for it that the 1 acre is not useable on those homes..But then this sort of contradicts SRO’s selling points about these homes.. Because one of those selling points was it’s situated on a 1 acre land. I’m not sure I understand what is the point of 1 acre of land, if most of it is slopes that’s not usable…It just doesn’t seem like it would be different from say a DH/Saratoga home that sits on a canyon for which the hills/slopes is controlled by HOA/city… In both cases, the land isn’t usable…In fact, I’d prefer if that’s the case, the land belongs to the HOA/city so that they can deal with the maintenance of it…Seems like it would be a maintenance headache, clearing brush, dealing with wildlife,etc that the homeowner has to deal with. I guess since technically the land belongs to the home, you *could* turn it into usual land…But then we’re not talking about something that is cheap to do (maybe another 100k+)…and definitely not something that is turnkey once you move in…which again, if someone were to spend money to do this, I would say probably puts that home out of the league of where it belongs…
Again, I don’t get it. I assume 1 acre means 1 acre of land that I could say raise a horse on. (not that I would). And also, not trying to slam Santee. I’m not suggesting it’s a dump or anything. It just seems like all the arguments for why this is a “great” deal just feels like it has so many holes. $800k is not a stellar deal of any sort in Santee. Not saying you can’t find buyers, but it doesn’t seem like it would be the norm…
I’d say places parts of Mira Mesa are a much better place to be frankly, with the total package of cost/location/convenience.
June 13, 2010 at 12:23 PM #564087Coronita
Participant[quote=AN]flu, those houses with one acre in Sky Rranch do not have a full useable acre. I’d guess its around 1/3-1/2 acre of useable land and the rest is slope. Those houses alsso have wider foot print than your average tract homes. The side yard are also wider(which means more concrete than sod). The actual back yard space is around the same size as a 2000sq-ft single story on 1/4 acre in Solana Beach.[/quote]
Well, I have visited Santee but never visited the actual model homes (no interest)..So I’ll have to take your word for it that the 1 acre is not useable on those homes..But then this sort of contradicts SRO’s selling points about these homes.. Because one of those selling points was it’s situated on a 1 acre land. I’m not sure I understand what is the point of 1 acre of land, if most of it is slopes that’s not usable…It just doesn’t seem like it would be different from say a DH/Saratoga home that sits on a canyon for which the hills/slopes is controlled by HOA/city… In both cases, the land isn’t usable…In fact, I’d prefer if that’s the case, the land belongs to the HOA/city so that they can deal with the maintenance of it…Seems like it would be a maintenance headache, clearing brush, dealing with wildlife,etc that the homeowner has to deal with. I guess since technically the land belongs to the home, you *could* turn it into usual land…But then we’re not talking about something that is cheap to do (maybe another 100k+)…and definitely not something that is turnkey once you move in…which again, if someone were to spend money to do this, I would say probably puts that home out of the league of where it belongs…
Again, I don’t get it. I assume 1 acre means 1 acre of land that I could say raise a horse on. (not that I would). And also, not trying to slam Santee. I’m not suggesting it’s a dump or anything. It just seems like all the arguments for why this is a “great” deal just feels like it has so many holes. $800k is not a stellar deal of any sort in Santee. Not saying you can’t find buyers, but it doesn’t seem like it would be the norm…
I’d say places parts of Mira Mesa are a much better place to be frankly, with the total package of cost/location/convenience.
June 13, 2010 at 12:23 PM #564587Coronita
Participant[quote=AN]flu, those houses with one acre in Sky Rranch do not have a full useable acre. I’d guess its around 1/3-1/2 acre of useable land and the rest is slope. Those houses alsso have wider foot print than your average tract homes. The side yard are also wider(which means more concrete than sod). The actual back yard space is around the same size as a 2000sq-ft single story on 1/4 acre in Solana Beach.[/quote]
Well, I have visited Santee but never visited the actual model homes (no interest)..So I’ll have to take your word for it that the 1 acre is not useable on those homes..But then this sort of contradicts SRO’s selling points about these homes.. Because one of those selling points was it’s situated on a 1 acre land. I’m not sure I understand what is the point of 1 acre of land, if most of it is slopes that’s not usable…It just doesn’t seem like it would be different from say a DH/Saratoga home that sits on a canyon for which the hills/slopes is controlled by HOA/city… In both cases, the land isn’t usable…In fact, I’d prefer if that’s the case, the land belongs to the HOA/city so that they can deal with the maintenance of it…Seems like it would be a maintenance headache, clearing brush, dealing with wildlife,etc that the homeowner has to deal with. I guess since technically the land belongs to the home, you *could* turn it into usual land…But then we’re not talking about something that is cheap to do (maybe another 100k+)…and definitely not something that is turnkey once you move in…which again, if someone were to spend money to do this, I would say probably puts that home out of the league of where it belongs…
Again, I don’t get it. I assume 1 acre means 1 acre of land that I could say raise a horse on. (not that I would). And also, not trying to slam Santee. I’m not suggesting it’s a dump or anything. It just seems like all the arguments for why this is a “great” deal just feels like it has so many holes. $800k is not a stellar deal of any sort in Santee. Not saying you can’t find buyers, but it doesn’t seem like it would be the norm…
I’d say places parts of Mira Mesa are a much better place to be frankly, with the total package of cost/location/convenience.
June 13, 2010 at 12:23 PM #564690Coronita
Participant[quote=AN]flu, those houses with one acre in Sky Rranch do not have a full useable acre. I’d guess its around 1/3-1/2 acre of useable land and the rest is slope. Those houses alsso have wider foot print than your average tract homes. The side yard are also wider(which means more concrete than sod). The actual back yard space is around the same size as a 2000sq-ft single story on 1/4 acre in Solana Beach.[/quote]
Well, I have visited Santee but never visited the actual model homes (no interest)..So I’ll have to take your word for it that the 1 acre is not useable on those homes..But then this sort of contradicts SRO’s selling points about these homes.. Because one of those selling points was it’s situated on a 1 acre land. I’m not sure I understand what is the point of 1 acre of land, if most of it is slopes that’s not usable…It just doesn’t seem like it would be different from say a DH/Saratoga home that sits on a canyon for which the hills/slopes is controlled by HOA/city… In both cases, the land isn’t usable…In fact, I’d prefer if that’s the case, the land belongs to the HOA/city so that they can deal with the maintenance of it…Seems like it would be a maintenance headache, clearing brush, dealing with wildlife,etc that the homeowner has to deal with. I guess since technically the land belongs to the home, you *could* turn it into usual land…But then we’re not talking about something that is cheap to do (maybe another 100k+)…and definitely not something that is turnkey once you move in…which again, if someone were to spend money to do this, I would say probably puts that home out of the league of where it belongs…
Again, I don’t get it. I assume 1 acre means 1 acre of land that I could say raise a horse on. (not that I would). And also, not trying to slam Santee. I’m not suggesting it’s a dump or anything. It just seems like all the arguments for why this is a “great” deal just feels like it has so many holes. $800k is not a stellar deal of any sort in Santee. Not saying you can’t find buyers, but it doesn’t seem like it would be the norm…
I’d say places parts of Mira Mesa are a much better place to be frankly, with the total package of cost/location/convenience.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.
