Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Skyranch in Santee
- This topic has 2,185 replies, 41 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 4 months ago by gzz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 3, 2010 at 8:00 AM #521029March 3, 2010 at 10:45 AM #520150AnonymousGuest
you can actually see the correctional facility from sky ranch lol. 600K is way hagh for santee there are some smaller developments there that are going for 500-600k that have no HOA’s. But I guess if you must spend 600K I would say go to sky ranch. BTW its also in the fire line so insurance would also be higher.
March 3, 2010 at 10:45 AM #520292AnonymousGuestyou can actually see the correctional facility from sky ranch lol. 600K is way hagh for santee there are some smaller developments there that are going for 500-600k that have no HOA’s. But I guess if you must spend 600K I would say go to sky ranch. BTW its also in the fire line so insurance would also be higher.
March 3, 2010 at 10:45 AM #520725AnonymousGuestyou can actually see the correctional facility from sky ranch lol. 600K is way hagh for santee there are some smaller developments there that are going for 500-600k that have no HOA’s. But I guess if you must spend 600K I would say go to sky ranch. BTW its also in the fire line so insurance would also be higher.
March 3, 2010 at 10:45 AM #520817AnonymousGuestyou can actually see the correctional facility from sky ranch lol. 600K is way hagh for santee there are some smaller developments there that are going for 500-600k that have no HOA’s. But I guess if you must spend 600K I would say go to sky ranch. BTW its also in the fire line so insurance would also be higher.
March 3, 2010 at 10:45 AM #521074AnonymousGuestyou can actually see the correctional facility from sky ranch lol. 600K is way hagh for santee there are some smaller developments there that are going for 500-600k that have no HOA’s. But I guess if you must spend 600K I would say go to sky ranch. BTW its also in the fire line so insurance would also be higher.
March 3, 2010 at 11:10 AM #520165DWCAPParticipantShould a new house really command a big premium over an ~10 year old house? Serious question. I just dont really understand the facanation with ‘brand new’. There have been tons of reports in the media of problems with ‘new’ houses, remember the whole chinese dry-wall thing? And the community usually has little character or anything yet, as trees are 10 days post homedepot and the grass usually could just be rolled up and resodded somewhere else. You dont get to know your neighbors before they move in, and all so often alot of the infrastructure doesnt exist yet.
I have only been in 1 new development, and it wasnt in SD, so I have little frame of reference on this and could be wrong. But you will have to fix any defects and repaint etc etc when you try to sell anyways, cause when you sell it aint new anymore, so I dont really know what the big deal is.
Anyone care to enlighten me?
March 3, 2010 at 11:10 AM #520307DWCAPParticipantShould a new house really command a big premium over an ~10 year old house? Serious question. I just dont really understand the facanation with ‘brand new’. There have been tons of reports in the media of problems with ‘new’ houses, remember the whole chinese dry-wall thing? And the community usually has little character or anything yet, as trees are 10 days post homedepot and the grass usually could just be rolled up and resodded somewhere else. You dont get to know your neighbors before they move in, and all so often alot of the infrastructure doesnt exist yet.
I have only been in 1 new development, and it wasnt in SD, so I have little frame of reference on this and could be wrong. But you will have to fix any defects and repaint etc etc when you try to sell anyways, cause when you sell it aint new anymore, so I dont really know what the big deal is.
Anyone care to enlighten me?
March 3, 2010 at 11:10 AM #520740DWCAPParticipantShould a new house really command a big premium over an ~10 year old house? Serious question. I just dont really understand the facanation with ‘brand new’. There have been tons of reports in the media of problems with ‘new’ houses, remember the whole chinese dry-wall thing? And the community usually has little character or anything yet, as trees are 10 days post homedepot and the grass usually could just be rolled up and resodded somewhere else. You dont get to know your neighbors before they move in, and all so often alot of the infrastructure doesnt exist yet.
I have only been in 1 new development, and it wasnt in SD, so I have little frame of reference on this and could be wrong. But you will have to fix any defects and repaint etc etc when you try to sell anyways, cause when you sell it aint new anymore, so I dont really know what the big deal is.
Anyone care to enlighten me?
March 3, 2010 at 11:10 AM #520832DWCAPParticipantShould a new house really command a big premium over an ~10 year old house? Serious question. I just dont really understand the facanation with ‘brand new’. There have been tons of reports in the media of problems with ‘new’ houses, remember the whole chinese dry-wall thing? And the community usually has little character or anything yet, as trees are 10 days post homedepot and the grass usually could just be rolled up and resodded somewhere else. You dont get to know your neighbors before they move in, and all so often alot of the infrastructure doesnt exist yet.
I have only been in 1 new development, and it wasnt in SD, so I have little frame of reference on this and could be wrong. But you will have to fix any defects and repaint etc etc when you try to sell anyways, cause when you sell it aint new anymore, so I dont really know what the big deal is.
Anyone care to enlighten me?
March 3, 2010 at 11:10 AM #521089DWCAPParticipantShould a new house really command a big premium over an ~10 year old house? Serious question. I just dont really understand the facanation with ‘brand new’. There have been tons of reports in the media of problems with ‘new’ houses, remember the whole chinese dry-wall thing? And the community usually has little character or anything yet, as trees are 10 days post homedepot and the grass usually could just be rolled up and resodded somewhere else. You dont get to know your neighbors before they move in, and all so often alot of the infrastructure doesnt exist yet.
I have only been in 1 new development, and it wasnt in SD, so I have little frame of reference on this and could be wrong. But you will have to fix any defects and repaint etc etc when you try to sell anyways, cause when you sell it aint new anymore, so I dont really know what the big deal is.
Anyone care to enlighten me?
March 3, 2010 at 11:49 AM #520185anParticipantDWCAp, I think it all comes down to supply/demand. If more people want new, then new will always command higher price. I personally don’t like most of the houses built after 2000. I’m partial w/ double door entry and high ceilings in the living room area. Houses built between 1980-2000 (especially houses built between 1990-2000) just feel less cramp than the houses built after 2000 at the same sq-ft. However, I do like the big kitchen of the newer house and 10-12′ ceilings vs 8-9′ ceilings.
March 3, 2010 at 11:49 AM #520327anParticipantDWCAp, I think it all comes down to supply/demand. If more people want new, then new will always command higher price. I personally don’t like most of the houses built after 2000. I’m partial w/ double door entry and high ceilings in the living room area. Houses built between 1980-2000 (especially houses built between 1990-2000) just feel less cramp than the houses built after 2000 at the same sq-ft. However, I do like the big kitchen of the newer house and 10-12′ ceilings vs 8-9′ ceilings.
March 3, 2010 at 11:49 AM #520760anParticipantDWCAp, I think it all comes down to supply/demand. If more people want new, then new will always command higher price. I personally don’t like most of the houses built after 2000. I’m partial w/ double door entry and high ceilings in the living room area. Houses built between 1980-2000 (especially houses built between 1990-2000) just feel less cramp than the houses built after 2000 at the same sq-ft. However, I do like the big kitchen of the newer house and 10-12′ ceilings vs 8-9′ ceilings.
March 3, 2010 at 11:49 AM #520852anParticipantDWCAp, I think it all comes down to supply/demand. If more people want new, then new will always command higher price. I personally don’t like most of the houses built after 2000. I’m partial w/ double door entry and high ceilings in the living room area. Houses built between 1980-2000 (especially houses built between 1990-2000) just feel less cramp than the houses built after 2000 at the same sq-ft. However, I do like the big kitchen of the newer house and 10-12′ ceilings vs 8-9′ ceilings.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.