- This topic has 175 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 11, 2008 at 9:03 AM #237473July 11, 2008 at 9:39 AM #237329Allan from FallbrookParticipant
Peace: Ah, the nostalgia, indeed. And the mis-remembering. I think the whole “President suborning perjury” deal was a little more important than the blowjob itself.
Didn’t the Republicans, and Newt Gingrich specifically, also provide most of the good ideas (“Contract with America”) that Clinton stole and claimed for his own?
Yup, the halcyon days of yore.
July 11, 2008 at 9:39 AM #237462Allan from FallbrookParticipantPeace: Ah, the nostalgia, indeed. And the mis-remembering. I think the whole “President suborning perjury” deal was a little more important than the blowjob itself.
Didn’t the Republicans, and Newt Gingrich specifically, also provide most of the good ideas (“Contract with America”) that Clinton stole and claimed for his own?
Yup, the halcyon days of yore.
July 11, 2008 at 9:39 AM #237471Allan from FallbrookParticipantPeace: Ah, the nostalgia, indeed. And the mis-remembering. I think the whole “President suborning perjury” deal was a little more important than the blowjob itself.
Didn’t the Republicans, and Newt Gingrich specifically, also provide most of the good ideas (“Contract with America”) that Clinton stole and claimed for his own?
Yup, the halcyon days of yore.
July 11, 2008 at 9:39 AM #237519Allan from FallbrookParticipantPeace: Ah, the nostalgia, indeed. And the mis-remembering. I think the whole “President suborning perjury” deal was a little more important than the blowjob itself.
Didn’t the Republicans, and Newt Gingrich specifically, also provide most of the good ideas (“Contract with America”) that Clinton stole and claimed for his own?
Yup, the halcyon days of yore.
July 11, 2008 at 9:39 AM #237531Allan from FallbrookParticipantPeace: Ah, the nostalgia, indeed. And the mis-remembering. I think the whole “President suborning perjury” deal was a little more important than the blowjob itself.
Didn’t the Republicans, and Newt Gingrich specifically, also provide most of the good ideas (“Contract with America”) that Clinton stole and claimed for his own?
Yup, the halcyon days of yore.
July 11, 2008 at 9:46 AM #237334OC BurnsParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Peace: Ah, the nostalgia, indeed. And the mis-remembering. I think the whole “President suborning perjury” deal was a little more important than the blowjob itself.
Didn’t the Republicans, and Newt Gingrich specifically, also provide most of the good ideas (“Contract with America”) that Clinton stole and claimed for his own?
Yup, the halcyon days of yore.
[/quote]Ah yes…when lying, deceitful Presidents were viewed with scorn.
Those were the days.
Now we just look at their party affiliation.
July 11, 2008 at 9:46 AM #237467OC BurnsParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Peace: Ah, the nostalgia, indeed. And the mis-remembering. I think the whole “President suborning perjury” deal was a little more important than the blowjob itself.
Didn’t the Republicans, and Newt Gingrich specifically, also provide most of the good ideas (“Contract with America”) that Clinton stole and claimed for his own?
Yup, the halcyon days of yore.
[/quote]Ah yes…when lying, deceitful Presidents were viewed with scorn.
Those were the days.
Now we just look at their party affiliation.
July 11, 2008 at 9:46 AM #237476OC BurnsParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Peace: Ah, the nostalgia, indeed. And the mis-remembering. I think the whole “President suborning perjury” deal was a little more important than the blowjob itself.
Didn’t the Republicans, and Newt Gingrich specifically, also provide most of the good ideas (“Contract with America”) that Clinton stole and claimed for his own?
Yup, the halcyon days of yore.
[/quote]Ah yes…when lying, deceitful Presidents were viewed with scorn.
Those were the days.
Now we just look at their party affiliation.
July 11, 2008 at 9:46 AM #237524OC BurnsParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Peace: Ah, the nostalgia, indeed. And the mis-remembering. I think the whole “President suborning perjury” deal was a little more important than the blowjob itself.
Didn’t the Republicans, and Newt Gingrich specifically, also provide most of the good ideas (“Contract with America”) that Clinton stole and claimed for his own?
Yup, the halcyon days of yore.
[/quote]Ah yes…when lying, deceitful Presidents were viewed with scorn.
Those were the days.
Now we just look at their party affiliation.
July 11, 2008 at 9:46 AM #237536OC BurnsParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Peace: Ah, the nostalgia, indeed. And the mis-remembering. I think the whole “President suborning perjury” deal was a little more important than the blowjob itself.
Didn’t the Republicans, and Newt Gingrich specifically, also provide most of the good ideas (“Contract with America”) that Clinton stole and claimed for his own?
Yup, the halcyon days of yore.
[/quote]Ah yes…when lying, deceitful Presidents were viewed with scorn.
Those were the days.
Now we just look at their party affiliation.
July 11, 2008 at 10:14 AM #237390Allan from FallbrookParticipantOC: Nope. I didn’t vote for Bush (either time) and find the actions of his Administration, especially regarding torture, rendition, willful destruction of our civil liberties and the woefully bad prosection of the war in Iraq to be reprehensible.
The fact that he is a Republican and Clinton was a Democrat have nothing to do with it.
I was simply speaking to a point made about “the blowjob” and how that really wasn’t the issue at all.
July 11, 2008 at 10:14 AM #237523Allan from FallbrookParticipantOC: Nope. I didn’t vote for Bush (either time) and find the actions of his Administration, especially regarding torture, rendition, willful destruction of our civil liberties and the woefully bad prosection of the war in Iraq to be reprehensible.
The fact that he is a Republican and Clinton was a Democrat have nothing to do with it.
I was simply speaking to a point made about “the blowjob” and how that really wasn’t the issue at all.
July 11, 2008 at 10:14 AM #237532Allan from FallbrookParticipantOC: Nope. I didn’t vote for Bush (either time) and find the actions of his Administration, especially regarding torture, rendition, willful destruction of our civil liberties and the woefully bad prosection of the war in Iraq to be reprehensible.
The fact that he is a Republican and Clinton was a Democrat have nothing to do with it.
I was simply speaking to a point made about “the blowjob” and how that really wasn’t the issue at all.
July 11, 2008 at 10:14 AM #237579Allan from FallbrookParticipantOC: Nope. I didn’t vote for Bush (either time) and find the actions of his Administration, especially regarding torture, rendition, willful destruction of our civil liberties and the woefully bad prosection of the war in Iraq to be reprehensible.
The fact that he is a Republican and Clinton was a Democrat have nothing to do with it.
I was simply speaking to a point made about “the blowjob” and how that really wasn’t the issue at all.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.