Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Should we panic?
- This topic has 70 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by faterikcartman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 14, 2010 at 2:32 PM #604673September 14, 2010 at 2:55 PM #605751sdrealtorParticipant
Eugene
You cant go by a $/sf for a house that small in an area like this where the land is worth a large portion of the total value. That same lot could easily have a 3000 sq ft home on it which would pull the $/sf down under $250.September 14, 2010 at 2:55 PM #605434sdrealtorParticipantEugene
You cant go by a $/sf for a house that small in an area like this where the land is worth a large portion of the total value. That same lot could easily have a 3000 sq ft home on it which would pull the $/sf down under $250.September 14, 2010 at 2:55 PM #605327sdrealtorParticipantEugene
You cant go by a $/sf for a house that small in an area like this where the land is worth a large portion of the total value. That same lot could easily have a 3000 sq ft home on it which would pull the $/sf down under $250.September 14, 2010 at 2:55 PM #604688sdrealtorParticipantEugene
You cant go by a $/sf for a house that small in an area like this where the land is worth a large portion of the total value. That same lot could easily have a 3000 sq ft home on it which would pull the $/sf down under $250.September 14, 2010 at 2:55 PM #604777sdrealtorParticipantEugene
You cant go by a $/sf for a house that small in an area like this where the land is worth a large portion of the total value. That same lot could easily have a 3000 sq ft home on it which would pull the $/sf down under $250.September 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM #605439EugeneParticipant[quote]That same lot could easily have a 3000 sq ft home on it which would pull the $/sf down under $250.[/quote]
It could, but it doesn’t. And no one is going to spend $500k to buy this house and then $400-500k to replace it with a 3000 sq ft house that is worth, as you say, under 750k. So I fail to see the relevance.
Houses of similar size and quality were selling two years ago in 92129 (arguably a better area) for high 300’s and low 400’s.
September 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM #605756EugeneParticipant[quote]That same lot could easily have a 3000 sq ft home on it which would pull the $/sf down under $250.[/quote]
It could, but it doesn’t. And no one is going to spend $500k to buy this house and then $400-500k to replace it with a 3000 sq ft house that is worth, as you say, under 750k. So I fail to see the relevance.
Houses of similar size and quality were selling two years ago in 92129 (arguably a better area) for high 300’s and low 400’s.
September 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM #605332EugeneParticipant[quote]That same lot could easily have a 3000 sq ft home on it which would pull the $/sf down under $250.[/quote]
It could, but it doesn’t. And no one is going to spend $500k to buy this house and then $400-500k to replace it with a 3000 sq ft house that is worth, as you say, under 750k. So I fail to see the relevance.
Houses of similar size and quality were selling two years ago in 92129 (arguably a better area) for high 300’s and low 400’s.
September 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM #604693EugeneParticipant[quote]That same lot could easily have a 3000 sq ft home on it which would pull the $/sf down under $250.[/quote]
It could, but it doesn’t. And no one is going to spend $500k to buy this house and then $400-500k to replace it with a 3000 sq ft house that is worth, as you say, under 750k. So I fail to see the relevance.
Houses of similar size and quality were selling two years ago in 92129 (arguably a better area) for high 300’s and low 400’s.
September 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM #604782EugeneParticipant[quote]That same lot could easily have a 3000 sq ft home on it which would pull the $/sf down under $250.[/quote]
It could, but it doesn’t. And no one is going to spend $500k to buy this house and then $400-500k to replace it with a 3000 sq ft house that is worth, as you say, under 750k. So I fail to see the relevance.
Houses of similar size and quality were selling two years ago in 92129 (arguably a better area) for high 300’s and low 400’s.
September 14, 2010 at 3:28 PM #604728sdrealtorParticipantEugene
The point is $/sf comparisons are only valid when you are comparing the same size house. A 10×10 tent (100 sf) on a lot like that would sell for lot value and the $/sf would be over $3000/sf.I sold some of those houses in PQ a year and 2 years ago. The ones this size were far inferior quality as was the area. The subject house feeds into one of the top elementary schools in the county, is 2 miles to the beach and located in a much more upscale area.
I short sold one of the lowest comps in the PQ area over a year ago. It was a complete dump of house with 960 sq ft and it sold for $360K. It needed a major amount of work and didnt have nearly as nice a lot as well as some ambient freeway noise from the 15.
September 14, 2010 at 3:28 PM #605791sdrealtorParticipantEugene
The point is $/sf comparisons are only valid when you are comparing the same size house. A 10×10 tent (100 sf) on a lot like that would sell for lot value and the $/sf would be over $3000/sf.I sold some of those houses in PQ a year and 2 years ago. The ones this size were far inferior quality as was the area. The subject house feeds into one of the top elementary schools in the county, is 2 miles to the beach and located in a much more upscale area.
I short sold one of the lowest comps in the PQ area over a year ago. It was a complete dump of house with 960 sq ft and it sold for $360K. It needed a major amount of work and didnt have nearly as nice a lot as well as some ambient freeway noise from the 15.
September 14, 2010 at 3:28 PM #604817sdrealtorParticipantEugene
The point is $/sf comparisons are only valid when you are comparing the same size house. A 10×10 tent (100 sf) on a lot like that would sell for lot value and the $/sf would be over $3000/sf.I sold some of those houses in PQ a year and 2 years ago. The ones this size were far inferior quality as was the area. The subject house feeds into one of the top elementary schools in the county, is 2 miles to the beach and located in a much more upscale area.
I short sold one of the lowest comps in the PQ area over a year ago. It was a complete dump of house with 960 sq ft and it sold for $360K. It needed a major amount of work and didnt have nearly as nice a lot as well as some ambient freeway noise from the 15.
September 14, 2010 at 3:28 PM #605367sdrealtorParticipantEugene
The point is $/sf comparisons are only valid when you are comparing the same size house. A 10×10 tent (100 sf) on a lot like that would sell for lot value and the $/sf would be over $3000/sf.I sold some of those houses in PQ a year and 2 years ago. The ones this size were far inferior quality as was the area. The subject house feeds into one of the top elementary schools in the county, is 2 miles to the beach and located in a much more upscale area.
I short sold one of the lowest comps in the PQ area over a year ago. It was a complete dump of house with 960 sq ft and it sold for $360K. It needed a major amount of work and didnt have nearly as nice a lot as well as some ambient freeway noise from the 15.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.