- This topic has 120 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 22, 2008 at 8:48 AM #209756May 22, 2008 at 12:23 PM #209801cooperthedogParticipant
Instead of placing a fixed timeframe on buying (wait a year or until winter), why not track the market and wait until prices stabilize or start to track up.
Apply a longer term moving average (MA) to home prices and jump in with that levels out. Using an MA will reduce buying spikes that may be transistory while giving you a better picture of the long term trend of prices. You will not catch the exact bottom, but you will not have to worry (as much) about catching a falling knife. Of course this method is not foolproof, and prices could level out for a substantial amount of time, and then track down again, but combined with the fundamental price ratios its better then guessing.
May 22, 2008 at 12:23 PM #209869cooperthedogParticipantInstead of placing a fixed timeframe on buying (wait a year or until winter), why not track the market and wait until prices stabilize or start to track up.
Apply a longer term moving average (MA) to home prices and jump in with that levels out. Using an MA will reduce buying spikes that may be transistory while giving you a better picture of the long term trend of prices. You will not catch the exact bottom, but you will not have to worry (as much) about catching a falling knife. Of course this method is not foolproof, and prices could level out for a substantial amount of time, and then track down again, but combined with the fundamental price ratios its better then guessing.
May 22, 2008 at 12:23 PM #209898cooperthedogParticipantInstead of placing a fixed timeframe on buying (wait a year or until winter), why not track the market and wait until prices stabilize or start to track up.
Apply a longer term moving average (MA) to home prices and jump in with that levels out. Using an MA will reduce buying spikes that may be transistory while giving you a better picture of the long term trend of prices. You will not catch the exact bottom, but you will not have to worry (as much) about catching a falling knife. Of course this method is not foolproof, and prices could level out for a substantial amount of time, and then track down again, but combined with the fundamental price ratios its better then guessing.
May 22, 2008 at 12:23 PM #209920cooperthedogParticipantInstead of placing a fixed timeframe on buying (wait a year or until winter), why not track the market and wait until prices stabilize or start to track up.
Apply a longer term moving average (MA) to home prices and jump in with that levels out. Using an MA will reduce buying spikes that may be transistory while giving you a better picture of the long term trend of prices. You will not catch the exact bottom, but you will not have to worry (as much) about catching a falling knife. Of course this method is not foolproof, and prices could level out for a substantial amount of time, and then track down again, but combined with the fundamental price ratios its better then guessing.
May 22, 2008 at 12:23 PM #209952cooperthedogParticipantInstead of placing a fixed timeframe on buying (wait a year or until winter), why not track the market and wait until prices stabilize or start to track up.
Apply a longer term moving average (MA) to home prices and jump in with that levels out. Using an MA will reduce buying spikes that may be transistory while giving you a better picture of the long term trend of prices. You will not catch the exact bottom, but you will not have to worry (as much) about catching a falling knife. Of course this method is not foolproof, and prices could level out for a substantial amount of time, and then track down again, but combined with the fundamental price ratios its better then guessing.
May 22, 2008 at 1:08 PM #209590(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI have been one of the biggest re bears out there. I just put in my first offer. Why? After my 20% down and the tax break I would be under my current rent.
Bingo ! What part of the County are you talking about ?
This has always been the threshold I have used. We bought our first house in Clairemont near the bottom of the last cycle by using that very same logic. Except, we didn’t have 20% down. We had 5%. Because of that, buying was slightly more expensive (about $175 per month, equal to our car payment at the time) than renting with 5% down.May 22, 2008 at 1:08 PM #209654(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI have been one of the biggest re bears out there. I just put in my first offer. Why? After my 20% down and the tax break I would be under my current rent.
Bingo ! What part of the County are you talking about ?
This has always been the threshold I have used. We bought our first house in Clairemont near the bottom of the last cycle by using that very same logic. Except, we didn’t have 20% down. We had 5%. Because of that, buying was slightly more expensive (about $175 per month, equal to our car payment at the time) than renting with 5% down.May 22, 2008 at 1:08 PM #209683(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI have been one of the biggest re bears out there. I just put in my first offer. Why? After my 20% down and the tax break I would be under my current rent.
Bingo ! What part of the County are you talking about ?
This has always been the threshold I have used. We bought our first house in Clairemont near the bottom of the last cycle by using that very same logic. Except, we didn’t have 20% down. We had 5%. Because of that, buying was slightly more expensive (about $175 per month, equal to our car payment at the time) than renting with 5% down.May 22, 2008 at 1:08 PM #209702(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI have been one of the biggest re bears out there. I just put in my first offer. Why? After my 20% down and the tax break I would be under my current rent.
Bingo ! What part of the County are you talking about ?
This has always been the threshold I have used. We bought our first house in Clairemont near the bottom of the last cycle by using that very same logic. Except, we didn’t have 20% down. We had 5%. Because of that, buying was slightly more expensive (about $175 per month, equal to our car payment at the time) than renting with 5% down.May 22, 2008 at 1:08 PM #209739(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI have been one of the biggest re bears out there. I just put in my first offer. Why? After my 20% down and the tax break I would be under my current rent.
Bingo ! What part of the County are you talking about ?
This has always been the threshold I have used. We bought our first house in Clairemont near the bottom of the last cycle by using that very same logic. Except, we didn’t have 20% down. We had 5%. Because of that, buying was slightly more expensive (about $175 per month, equal to our car payment at the time) than renting with 5% down.May 22, 2008 at 2:13 PM #209931AecetiaParticipantMarion buy when TG buys.
May 22, 2008 at 2:13 PM #210000AecetiaParticipantMarion buy when TG buys.
May 22, 2008 at 2:13 PM #210029AecetiaParticipantMarion buy when TG buys.
May 22, 2008 at 2:13 PM #210048AecetiaParticipantMarion buy when TG buys.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.