Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Short term bonds
- This topic has 65 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 22, 2010 at 12:32 PM #18316December 22, 2010 at 1:06 PM #643801XBoxBoyParticipant
Depending on how much you want to invest, most short term bonds (3-6 months) are paying less than you can get from FDIC insured savings accounts.
You can get 1.3% from American Express personal savings and 1.10% from DollarSavingsDirect.com.
December 22, 2010 at 1:06 PM #643872XBoxBoyParticipantDepending on how much you want to invest, most short term bonds (3-6 months) are paying less than you can get from FDIC insured savings accounts.
You can get 1.3% from American Express personal savings and 1.10% from DollarSavingsDirect.com.
December 22, 2010 at 1:06 PM #644910XBoxBoyParticipantDepending on how much you want to invest, most short term bonds (3-6 months) are paying less than you can get from FDIC insured savings accounts.
You can get 1.3% from American Express personal savings and 1.10% from DollarSavingsDirect.com.
December 22, 2010 at 1:06 PM #644588XBoxBoyParticipantDepending on how much you want to invest, most short term bonds (3-6 months) are paying less than you can get from FDIC insured savings accounts.
You can get 1.3% from American Express personal savings and 1.10% from DollarSavingsDirect.com.
December 22, 2010 at 1:06 PM #644451XBoxBoyParticipantDepending on how much you want to invest, most short term bonds (3-6 months) are paying less than you can get from FDIC insured savings accounts.
You can get 1.3% from American Express personal savings and 1.10% from DollarSavingsDirect.com.
December 22, 2010 at 1:33 PM #643821moneymakerParticipantI was thinking more like 1-2 years, as most economists can’t project out beyond that.
December 22, 2010 at 1:33 PM #644930moneymakerParticipantI was thinking more like 1-2 years, as most economists can’t project out beyond that.
December 22, 2010 at 1:33 PM #643892moneymakerParticipantI was thinking more like 1-2 years, as most economists can’t project out beyond that.
December 22, 2010 at 1:33 PM #644608moneymakerParticipantI was thinking more like 1-2 years, as most economists can’t project out beyond that.
December 22, 2010 at 1:33 PM #644471moneymakerParticipantI was thinking more like 1-2 years, as most economists can’t project out beyond that.
December 22, 2010 at 3:05 PM #644659EugeneParticipantBonds may not be a good idea right now. Now that the GOP finally revealed their hypocrisy and gave up the austerity/balanced budget rhetoric (just check google trends for “balanced budget” for proof), market suddenly seems to be much more optimistic about growth prospects of the economy. Fed funds futures now forecast a better than 50% chance of a rate hike by November 2011. The only way this hike is going to happen is if the recovery goes into overdrive (we’re talking 8-10% GDP growth in 2011) and unemployment falls below 8% by the end of the year. This should be a good time to be in stocks.
December 22, 2010 at 3:05 PM #644980EugeneParticipantBonds may not be a good idea right now. Now that the GOP finally revealed their hypocrisy and gave up the austerity/balanced budget rhetoric (just check google trends for “balanced budget” for proof), market suddenly seems to be much more optimistic about growth prospects of the economy. Fed funds futures now forecast a better than 50% chance of a rate hike by November 2011. The only way this hike is going to happen is if the recovery goes into overdrive (we’re talking 8-10% GDP growth in 2011) and unemployment falls below 8% by the end of the year. This should be a good time to be in stocks.
December 22, 2010 at 3:05 PM #644521EugeneParticipantBonds may not be a good idea right now. Now that the GOP finally revealed their hypocrisy and gave up the austerity/balanced budget rhetoric (just check google trends for “balanced budget” for proof), market suddenly seems to be much more optimistic about growth prospects of the economy. Fed funds futures now forecast a better than 50% chance of a rate hike by November 2011. The only way this hike is going to happen is if the recovery goes into overdrive (we’re talking 8-10% GDP growth in 2011) and unemployment falls below 8% by the end of the year. This should be a good time to be in stocks.
December 22, 2010 at 3:05 PM #643871EugeneParticipantBonds may not be a good idea right now. Now that the GOP finally revealed their hypocrisy and gave up the austerity/balanced budget rhetoric (just check google trends for “balanced budget” for proof), market suddenly seems to be much more optimistic about growth prospects of the economy. Fed funds futures now forecast a better than 50% chance of a rate hike by November 2011. The only way this hike is going to happen is if the recovery goes into overdrive (we’re talking 8-10% GDP growth in 2011) and unemployment falls below 8% by the end of the year. This should be a good time to be in stocks.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.