Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › short sale tale
- This topic has 95 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 15, 2009 at 9:53 AM #431001July 15, 2009 at 11:54 AM #431365AnonymousGuest
I turn to think the underline reason of the seemingly stupid decisions is the result of the recent accounting rule change, which allows banks to use non-realistic valuation for the assets they hold. Banks pushed congress for the change and achieved their intended consequences, i.e. they can now hold bad assets as they were good assets. As such, they would rather hold onto those assets, so their books look better than they are actually are. Short sale will realize the loss and their books will look worse. Same for the pace of foreclosures, they have no urgency to get the loans off the books, instead they like them to stay in, so they do not have to look for new capitals.
July 15, 2009 at 11:54 AM #431204AnonymousGuestI turn to think the underline reason of the seemingly stupid decisions is the result of the recent accounting rule change, which allows banks to use non-realistic valuation for the assets they hold. Banks pushed congress for the change and achieved their intended consequences, i.e. they can now hold bad assets as they were good assets. As such, they would rather hold onto those assets, so their books look better than they are actually are. Short sale will realize the loss and their books will look worse. Same for the pace of foreclosures, they have no urgency to get the loans off the books, instead they like them to stay in, so they do not have to look for new capitals.
July 15, 2009 at 11:54 AM #431134AnonymousGuestI turn to think the underline reason of the seemingly stupid decisions is the result of the recent accounting rule change, which allows banks to use non-realistic valuation for the assets they hold. Banks pushed congress for the change and achieved their intended consequences, i.e. they can now hold bad assets as they were good assets. As such, they would rather hold onto those assets, so their books look better than they are actually are. Short sale will realize the loss and their books will look worse. Same for the pace of foreclosures, they have no urgency to get the loans off the books, instead they like them to stay in, so they do not have to look for new capitals.
July 15, 2009 at 11:54 AM #430624AnonymousGuestI turn to think the underline reason of the seemingly stupid decisions is the result of the recent accounting rule change, which allows banks to use non-realistic valuation for the assets they hold. Banks pushed congress for the change and achieved their intended consequences, i.e. they can now hold bad assets as they were good assets. As such, they would rather hold onto those assets, so their books look better than they are actually are. Short sale will realize the loss and their books will look worse. Same for the pace of foreclosures, they have no urgency to get the loans off the books, instead they like them to stay in, so they do not have to look for new capitals.
July 15, 2009 at 11:54 AM #430841AnonymousGuestI turn to think the underline reason of the seemingly stupid decisions is the result of the recent accounting rule change, which allows banks to use non-realistic valuation for the assets they hold. Banks pushed congress for the change and achieved their intended consequences, i.e. they can now hold bad assets as they were good assets. As such, they would rather hold onto those assets, so their books look better than they are actually are. Short sale will realize the loss and their books will look worse. Same for the pace of foreclosures, they have no urgency to get the loans off the books, instead they like them to stay in, so they do not have to look for new capitals.
July 15, 2009 at 12:10 PM #431149UCGalParticipantIt doesn’t surprise me that banks aren’t acting in their own best interest… they didn’t on the way up, either.
May I ask an impertinant question? If the home had kept its value would you be staying in the home? Are you going through foreclosure because the home lost value, even though you still have the means to pay the mortgage you obtained?
I have friends who are pursueing a short sale – but in their case they lost one of the two household jobs. They are going back to renting a smaller place to live within their downsized budget. It sounds, from your tale, that they may stand a better chance of getting the short sale approved since they have a documented “distress” with the job loss.
July 15, 2009 at 12:10 PM #430639UCGalParticipantIt doesn’t surprise me that banks aren’t acting in their own best interest… they didn’t on the way up, either.
May I ask an impertinant question? If the home had kept its value would you be staying in the home? Are you going through foreclosure because the home lost value, even though you still have the means to pay the mortgage you obtained?
I have friends who are pursueing a short sale – but in their case they lost one of the two household jobs. They are going back to renting a smaller place to live within their downsized budget. It sounds, from your tale, that they may stand a better chance of getting the short sale approved since they have a documented “distress” with the job loss.
July 15, 2009 at 12:10 PM #430855UCGalParticipantIt doesn’t surprise me that banks aren’t acting in their own best interest… they didn’t on the way up, either.
May I ask an impertinant question? If the home had kept its value would you be staying in the home? Are you going through foreclosure because the home lost value, even though you still have the means to pay the mortgage you obtained?
I have friends who are pursueing a short sale – but in their case they lost one of the two household jobs. They are going back to renting a smaller place to live within their downsized budget. It sounds, from your tale, that they may stand a better chance of getting the short sale approved since they have a documented “distress” with the job loss.
July 15, 2009 at 12:10 PM #431219UCGalParticipantIt doesn’t surprise me that banks aren’t acting in their own best interest… they didn’t on the way up, either.
May I ask an impertinant question? If the home had kept its value would you be staying in the home? Are you going through foreclosure because the home lost value, even though you still have the means to pay the mortgage you obtained?
I have friends who are pursueing a short sale – but in their case they lost one of the two household jobs. They are going back to renting a smaller place to live within their downsized budget. It sounds, from your tale, that they may stand a better chance of getting the short sale approved since they have a documented “distress” with the job loss.
July 15, 2009 at 12:10 PM #431380UCGalParticipantIt doesn’t surprise me that banks aren’t acting in their own best interest… they didn’t on the way up, either.
May I ask an impertinant question? If the home had kept its value would you be staying in the home? Are you going through foreclosure because the home lost value, even though you still have the means to pay the mortgage you obtained?
I have friends who are pursueing a short sale – but in their case they lost one of the two household jobs. They are going back to renting a smaller place to live within their downsized budget. It sounds, from your tale, that they may stand a better chance of getting the short sale approved since they have a documented “distress” with the job loss.
July 15, 2009 at 12:34 PM #430895RealityParticipantBe a man and pay your obligations.
July 15, 2009 at 12:34 PM #431189RealityParticipantBe a man and pay your obligations.
July 15, 2009 at 12:34 PM #431259RealityParticipantBe a man and pay your obligations.
July 15, 2009 at 12:34 PM #431418RealityParticipantBe a man and pay your obligations.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.