Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Short Sale Experiences
- This topic has 150 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 24, 2008 at 2:21 AM #246011July 24, 2008 at 7:23 AM #245832sdrealtorParticipant
IN a dual agency situation, a lender on a short sale will typically reduce the commission. The market average these days seems to be 5% (2.5% each) when the listing and selling agent are different. When the listing agent represents both, the lender typically only pays them 4%.
The big advantage to using the listing agent is that they have control. More often than not, al ender only wants to review one offer at a time. Usually the buyer for that offer is long gone by the time the approval comes through. With an approved price, the listing agent can select which offer gets submitted next.
July 24, 2008 at 7:23 AM #245980sdrealtorParticipantIN a dual agency situation, a lender on a short sale will typically reduce the commission. The market average these days seems to be 5% (2.5% each) when the listing and selling agent are different. When the listing agent represents both, the lender typically only pays them 4%.
The big advantage to using the listing agent is that they have control. More often than not, al ender only wants to review one offer at a time. Usually the buyer for that offer is long gone by the time the approval comes through. With an approved price, the listing agent can select which offer gets submitted next.
July 24, 2008 at 7:23 AM #245987sdrealtorParticipantIN a dual agency situation, a lender on a short sale will typically reduce the commission. The market average these days seems to be 5% (2.5% each) when the listing and selling agent are different. When the listing agent represents both, the lender typically only pays them 4%.
The big advantage to using the listing agent is that they have control. More often than not, al ender only wants to review one offer at a time. Usually the buyer for that offer is long gone by the time the approval comes through. With an approved price, the listing agent can select which offer gets submitted next.
July 24, 2008 at 7:23 AM #246043sdrealtorParticipantIN a dual agency situation, a lender on a short sale will typically reduce the commission. The market average these days seems to be 5% (2.5% each) when the listing and selling agent are different. When the listing agent represents both, the lender typically only pays them 4%.
The big advantage to using the listing agent is that they have control. More often than not, al ender only wants to review one offer at a time. Usually the buyer for that offer is long gone by the time the approval comes through. With an approved price, the listing agent can select which offer gets submitted next.
July 24, 2008 at 7:23 AM #246051sdrealtorParticipantIN a dual agency situation, a lender on a short sale will typically reduce the commission. The market average these days seems to be 5% (2.5% each) when the listing and selling agent are different. When the listing agent represents both, the lender typically only pays them 4%.
The big advantage to using the listing agent is that they have control. More often than not, al ender only wants to review one offer at a time. Usually the buyer for that offer is long gone by the time the approval comes through. With an approved price, the listing agent can select which offer gets submitted next.
July 24, 2008 at 9:00 AM #245914SD RealtorParticipantuco with respect to the recourse/non recourse statement that is true. However more often then not, the properties I have been dealing with have been refinanced or ATMd to death.
July 24, 2008 at 9:00 AM #246060SD RealtorParticipantuco with respect to the recourse/non recourse statement that is true. However more often then not, the properties I have been dealing with have been refinanced or ATMd to death.
July 24, 2008 at 9:00 AM #246069SD RealtorParticipantuco with respect to the recourse/non recourse statement that is true. However more often then not, the properties I have been dealing with have been refinanced or ATMd to death.
July 24, 2008 at 9:00 AM #246124SD RealtorParticipantuco with respect to the recourse/non recourse statement that is true. However more often then not, the properties I have been dealing with have been refinanced or ATMd to death.
July 24, 2008 at 9:00 AM #246130SD RealtorParticipantuco with respect to the recourse/non recourse statement that is true. However more often then not, the properties I have been dealing with have been refinanced or ATMd to death.
July 24, 2008 at 9:14 AM #245942peterbParticipantI wonder how much of this incredibly long transaction time is really the lenders being swamped as opposed to them not wanting to sell the properties too quickly and get too many losses on the books in any given quarter?
July 24, 2008 at 9:14 AM #246091peterbParticipantI wonder how much of this incredibly long transaction time is really the lenders being swamped as opposed to them not wanting to sell the properties too quickly and get too many losses on the books in any given quarter?
July 24, 2008 at 9:14 AM #246097peterbParticipantI wonder how much of this incredibly long transaction time is really the lenders being swamped as opposed to them not wanting to sell the properties too quickly and get too many losses on the books in any given quarter?
July 24, 2008 at 9:14 AM #246154peterbParticipantI wonder how much of this incredibly long transaction time is really the lenders being swamped as opposed to them not wanting to sell the properties too quickly and get too many losses on the books in any given quarter?
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.