Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Short Sale Experiences
- This topic has 150 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 24, 2008 at 12:35 AM #245976July 24, 2008 at 12:44 AM #245765
Eugene
ParticipantI don’t know exactly why the previous escrow crashed, but I don’t think it was because of Recon. I’ll ask. There’s something interesting going on – I know that the house has been lowered on 5/24 and it already managed to fall out of escrow. It suggests lightning-quick turnaround time by your standards. It was scheduled for foreclosure today, the bank has postponed the auction by one month.
July 24, 2008 at 12:44 AM #245915Eugene
ParticipantI don’t know exactly why the previous escrow crashed, but I don’t think it was because of Recon. I’ll ask. There’s something interesting going on – I know that the house has been lowered on 5/24 and it already managed to fall out of escrow. It suggests lightning-quick turnaround time by your standards. It was scheduled for foreclosure today, the bank has postponed the auction by one month.
July 24, 2008 at 12:44 AM #245923Eugene
ParticipantI don’t know exactly why the previous escrow crashed, but I don’t think it was because of Recon. I’ll ask. There’s something interesting going on – I know that the house has been lowered on 5/24 and it already managed to fall out of escrow. It suggests lightning-quick turnaround time by your standards. It was scheduled for foreclosure today, the bank has postponed the auction by one month.
July 24, 2008 at 12:44 AM #245979Eugene
ParticipantI don’t know exactly why the previous escrow crashed, but I don’t think it was because of Recon. I’ll ask. There’s something interesting going on – I know that the house has been lowered on 5/24 and it already managed to fall out of escrow. It suggests lightning-quick turnaround time by your standards. It was scheduled for foreclosure today, the bank has postponed the auction by one month.
July 24, 2008 at 12:44 AM #245985Eugene
ParticipantI don’t know exactly why the previous escrow crashed, but I don’t think it was because of Recon. I’ll ask. There’s something interesting going on – I know that the house has been lowered on 5/24 and it already managed to fall out of escrow. It suggests lightning-quick turnaround time by your standards. It was scheduled for foreclosure today, the bank has postponed the auction by one month.
July 24, 2008 at 12:50 AM #245771Aecetia
ParticipantThat explains it all. Thank God for football. Most of the shows stink. It will be a nice diversion while we wait for the second half of the mortgage melt down.
July 24, 2008 at 12:50 AM #245920Aecetia
ParticipantThat explains it all. Thank God for football. Most of the shows stink. It will be a nice diversion while we wait for the second half of the mortgage melt down.
July 24, 2008 at 12:50 AM #245928Aecetia
ParticipantThat explains it all. Thank God for football. Most of the shows stink. It will be a nice diversion while we wait for the second half of the mortgage melt down.
July 24, 2008 at 12:50 AM #245984Aecetia
ParticipantThat explains it all. Thank God for football. Most of the shows stink. It will be a nice diversion while we wait for the second half of the mortgage melt down.
July 24, 2008 at 12:50 AM #245990Aecetia
ParticipantThat explains it all. Thank God for football. Most of the shows stink. It will be a nice diversion while we wait for the second half of the mortgage melt down.
July 24, 2008 at 2:21 AM #245791ucodegen
ParticipantAnother situation that people need to watch out for is the way in which a lender releases the lien. In some cases the lender will accept the short sale AND release the owner from the deficiency and in other cases the lender will accept the short sale BUT they will ask the owner to sign a new note that is basically unsecured but does obligate the owner to repay the deficiency.
I am a little surprised that this is happening. If the mortgage is not a first, then it is recourse.. which means that banks can go after the previous owner on a deficiency judgement. The banks only have to either threaten to push for or push for foreclosure to break the logjam.
They might also be able to take the approach of a version of reduced deficiency for keys..
July 24, 2008 at 2:21 AM #245940ucodegen
ParticipantAnother situation that people need to watch out for is the way in which a lender releases the lien. In some cases the lender will accept the short sale AND release the owner from the deficiency and in other cases the lender will accept the short sale BUT they will ask the owner to sign a new note that is basically unsecured but does obligate the owner to repay the deficiency.
I am a little surprised that this is happening. If the mortgage is not a first, then it is recourse.. which means that banks can go after the previous owner on a deficiency judgement. The banks only have to either threaten to push for or push for foreclosure to break the logjam.
They might also be able to take the approach of a version of reduced deficiency for keys..
July 24, 2008 at 2:21 AM #245949ucodegen
ParticipantAnother situation that people need to watch out for is the way in which a lender releases the lien. In some cases the lender will accept the short sale AND release the owner from the deficiency and in other cases the lender will accept the short sale BUT they will ask the owner to sign a new note that is basically unsecured but does obligate the owner to repay the deficiency.
I am a little surprised that this is happening. If the mortgage is not a first, then it is recourse.. which means that banks can go after the previous owner on a deficiency judgement. The banks only have to either threaten to push for or push for foreclosure to break the logjam.
They might also be able to take the approach of a version of reduced deficiency for keys..
July 24, 2008 at 2:21 AM #246003ucodegen
ParticipantAnother situation that people need to watch out for is the way in which a lender releases the lien. In some cases the lender will accept the short sale AND release the owner from the deficiency and in other cases the lender will accept the short sale BUT they will ask the owner to sign a new note that is basically unsecured but does obligate the owner to repay the deficiency.
I am a little surprised that this is happening. If the mortgage is not a first, then it is recourse.. which means that banks can go after the previous owner on a deficiency judgement. The banks only have to either threaten to push for or push for foreclosure to break the logjam.
They might also be able to take the approach of a version of reduced deficiency for keys..
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.