- This topic has 665 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by
scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 1, 2011 at 9:26 AM #683569April 1, 2011 at 10:19 AM #682433
SD Realtor
ParticipantI think it is an illustration of success from the perspective of the banks and govt. They implemented a plan using taxpayer money that consisted of a slower methodical manner in which to liquidate highly depreciated assets without totally cratering the bubbled market they created. The plan is by no means complete however it seems to be chugging along just fine. What you are seeing is simply the next phase of it. It is not that hard at all to get delinquent homeowners out of homes. If you look at the chronology, if someone has been in a home a year or two without paying, taking an extra couple of months to get them out is a piece of cake.
Sorry folks, no tsunami.
April 1, 2011 at 10:19 AM #682487SD Realtor
ParticipantI think it is an illustration of success from the perspective of the banks and govt. They implemented a plan using taxpayer money that consisted of a slower methodical manner in which to liquidate highly depreciated assets without totally cratering the bubbled market they created. The plan is by no means complete however it seems to be chugging along just fine. What you are seeing is simply the next phase of it. It is not that hard at all to get delinquent homeowners out of homes. If you look at the chronology, if someone has been in a home a year or two without paying, taking an extra couple of months to get them out is a piece of cake.
Sorry folks, no tsunami.
April 1, 2011 at 10:19 AM #683108SD Realtor
ParticipantI think it is an illustration of success from the perspective of the banks and govt. They implemented a plan using taxpayer money that consisted of a slower methodical manner in which to liquidate highly depreciated assets without totally cratering the bubbled market they created. The plan is by no means complete however it seems to be chugging along just fine. What you are seeing is simply the next phase of it. It is not that hard at all to get delinquent homeowners out of homes. If you look at the chronology, if someone has been in a home a year or two without paying, taking an extra couple of months to get them out is a piece of cake.
Sorry folks, no tsunami.
April 1, 2011 at 10:19 AM #683251SD Realtor
ParticipantI think it is an illustration of success from the perspective of the banks and govt. They implemented a plan using taxpayer money that consisted of a slower methodical manner in which to liquidate highly depreciated assets without totally cratering the bubbled market they created. The plan is by no means complete however it seems to be chugging along just fine. What you are seeing is simply the next phase of it. It is not that hard at all to get delinquent homeowners out of homes. If you look at the chronology, if someone has been in a home a year or two without paying, taking an extra couple of months to get them out is a piece of cake.
Sorry folks, no tsunami.
April 1, 2011 at 10:19 AM #683605SD Realtor
ParticipantI think it is an illustration of success from the perspective of the banks and govt. They implemented a plan using taxpayer money that consisted of a slower methodical manner in which to liquidate highly depreciated assets without totally cratering the bubbled market they created. The plan is by no means complete however it seems to be chugging along just fine. What you are seeing is simply the next phase of it. It is not that hard at all to get delinquent homeowners out of homes. If you look at the chronology, if someone has been in a home a year or two without paying, taking an extra couple of months to get them out is a piece of cake.
Sorry folks, no tsunami.
April 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM #682443bearishgurl
Participant[quote=outtamojo]Seems to me that unless the banks offer a carrot, getting the borrowers out who have been delinquent/hung on for this long will mean a lot of work for Sheriffs,lawyers, and handymen before these homes ever come to market.[/quote]
In my part of the county, B of A has hired contract RE brokers to do a move-out inspection on defaulted borrowers (who may or may not have qualified for a mod). They are given 7 calendar days to clean and vacate and if all personal effects and trash is removed and the floors are “broomswept,” they have a check waiting in hand for $3,000 for “relocation expenses.” These are properties subject to imminent foreclosure or have just been foreclosed upon, with title transferring back to bene.
If the delinquent trustor refuses to cooperate, they evict them using the Sheriff’s Dept. It’s all spelled out in the “Relocation Assistance Agreement and Release of All Claims” that the borrower signs a week in advance of the inspection date.
Edit: I want to clarify this post by stating that in the small number of cases I’ve worked with, B of A is certain that ownership will revert back to them upon trustee’s sale. They have in the past refused to lower the opening bids sufficiently as to entice a third party to bid on the property at the steps. Therefore, they revert back to bene by operation of law.
April 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM #682497bearishgurl
Participant[quote=outtamojo]Seems to me that unless the banks offer a carrot, getting the borrowers out who have been delinquent/hung on for this long will mean a lot of work for Sheriffs,lawyers, and handymen before these homes ever come to market.[/quote]
In my part of the county, B of A has hired contract RE brokers to do a move-out inspection on defaulted borrowers (who may or may not have qualified for a mod). They are given 7 calendar days to clean and vacate and if all personal effects and trash is removed and the floors are “broomswept,” they have a check waiting in hand for $3,000 for “relocation expenses.” These are properties subject to imminent foreclosure or have just been foreclosed upon, with title transferring back to bene.
If the delinquent trustor refuses to cooperate, they evict them using the Sheriff’s Dept. It’s all spelled out in the “Relocation Assistance Agreement and Release of All Claims” that the borrower signs a week in advance of the inspection date.
Edit: I want to clarify this post by stating that in the small number of cases I’ve worked with, B of A is certain that ownership will revert back to them upon trustee’s sale. They have in the past refused to lower the opening bids sufficiently as to entice a third party to bid on the property at the steps. Therefore, they revert back to bene by operation of law.
April 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM #683118bearishgurl
Participant[quote=outtamojo]Seems to me that unless the banks offer a carrot, getting the borrowers out who have been delinquent/hung on for this long will mean a lot of work for Sheriffs,lawyers, and handymen before these homes ever come to market.[/quote]
In my part of the county, B of A has hired contract RE brokers to do a move-out inspection on defaulted borrowers (who may or may not have qualified for a mod). They are given 7 calendar days to clean and vacate and if all personal effects and trash is removed and the floors are “broomswept,” they have a check waiting in hand for $3,000 for “relocation expenses.” These are properties subject to imminent foreclosure or have just been foreclosed upon, with title transferring back to bene.
If the delinquent trustor refuses to cooperate, they evict them using the Sheriff’s Dept. It’s all spelled out in the “Relocation Assistance Agreement and Release of All Claims” that the borrower signs a week in advance of the inspection date.
Edit: I want to clarify this post by stating that in the small number of cases I’ve worked with, B of A is certain that ownership will revert back to them upon trustee’s sale. They have in the past refused to lower the opening bids sufficiently as to entice a third party to bid on the property at the steps. Therefore, they revert back to bene by operation of law.
April 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM #683261bearishgurl
Participant[quote=outtamojo]Seems to me that unless the banks offer a carrot, getting the borrowers out who have been delinquent/hung on for this long will mean a lot of work for Sheriffs,lawyers, and handymen before these homes ever come to market.[/quote]
In my part of the county, B of A has hired contract RE brokers to do a move-out inspection on defaulted borrowers (who may or may not have qualified for a mod). They are given 7 calendar days to clean and vacate and if all personal effects and trash is removed and the floors are “broomswept,” they have a check waiting in hand for $3,000 for “relocation expenses.” These are properties subject to imminent foreclosure or have just been foreclosed upon, with title transferring back to bene.
If the delinquent trustor refuses to cooperate, they evict them using the Sheriff’s Dept. It’s all spelled out in the “Relocation Assistance Agreement and Release of All Claims” that the borrower signs a week in advance of the inspection date.
Edit: I want to clarify this post by stating that in the small number of cases I’ve worked with, B of A is certain that ownership will revert back to them upon trustee’s sale. They have in the past refused to lower the opening bids sufficiently as to entice a third party to bid on the property at the steps. Therefore, they revert back to bene by operation of law.
April 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM #683615bearishgurl
Participant[quote=outtamojo]Seems to me that unless the banks offer a carrot, getting the borrowers out who have been delinquent/hung on for this long will mean a lot of work for Sheriffs,lawyers, and handymen before these homes ever come to market.[/quote]
In my part of the county, B of A has hired contract RE brokers to do a move-out inspection on defaulted borrowers (who may or may not have qualified for a mod). They are given 7 calendar days to clean and vacate and if all personal effects and trash is removed and the floors are “broomswept,” they have a check waiting in hand for $3,000 for “relocation expenses.” These are properties subject to imminent foreclosure or have just been foreclosed upon, with title transferring back to bene.
If the delinquent trustor refuses to cooperate, they evict them using the Sheriff’s Dept. It’s all spelled out in the “Relocation Assistance Agreement and Release of All Claims” that the borrower signs a week in advance of the inspection date.
Edit: I want to clarify this post by stating that in the small number of cases I’ve worked with, B of A is certain that ownership will revert back to them upon trustee’s sale. They have in the past refused to lower the opening bids sufficiently as to entice a third party to bid on the property at the steps. Therefore, they revert back to bene by operation of law.
April 1, 2011 at 11:02 AM #682448Scarlett
ParticipantNo tsunami, but maybe a smaller wave? There must be quite a bit of shadow inventory, releasing all that by next year should at least create a larger inventory?
April 1, 2011 at 11:02 AM #682502Scarlett
ParticipantNo tsunami, but maybe a smaller wave? There must be quite a bit of shadow inventory, releasing all that by next year should at least create a larger inventory?
April 1, 2011 at 11:02 AM #683124Scarlett
ParticipantNo tsunami, but maybe a smaller wave? There must be quite a bit of shadow inventory, releasing all that by next year should at least create a larger inventory?
April 1, 2011 at 11:02 AM #683266Scarlett
ParticipantNo tsunami, but maybe a smaller wave? There must be quite a bit of shadow inventory, releasing all that by next year should at least create a larger inventory?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
