- This topic has 665 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 4, 2011 at 12:40 PM #684426April 4, 2011 at 12:48 PM #683254bearishgurlParticipant
Scarlett, a little OT now, but if you were interested in purchasing in custom areas or areas more than 30 years old, the “rules” (that an “educated purchaser”) would follow are different :=}
All of your posts heretofore have indicated that you want a tract home <=30 years old.
April 4, 2011 at 12:48 PM #683307bearishgurlParticipantScarlett, a little OT now, but if you were interested in purchasing in custom areas or areas more than 30 years old, the “rules” (that an “educated purchaser”) would follow are different :=}
All of your posts heretofore have indicated that you want a tract home <=30 years old.
April 4, 2011 at 12:48 PM #683935bearishgurlParticipantScarlett, a little OT now, but if you were interested in purchasing in custom areas or areas more than 30 years old, the “rules” (that an “educated purchaser”) would follow are different :=}
All of your posts heretofore have indicated that you want a tract home <=30 years old.
April 4, 2011 at 12:48 PM #684076bearishgurlParticipantScarlett, a little OT now, but if you were interested in purchasing in custom areas or areas more than 30 years old, the “rules” (that an “educated purchaser”) would follow are different :=}
All of your posts heretofore have indicated that you want a tract home <=30 years old.
April 4, 2011 at 12:48 PM #684431bearishgurlParticipantScarlett, a little OT now, but if you were interested in purchasing in custom areas or areas more than 30 years old, the “rules” (that an “educated purchaser”) would follow are different :=}
All of your posts heretofore have indicated that you want a tract home <=30 years old.
April 4, 2011 at 1:10 PM #683269ScarlettParticipantThose are very good points, BG; thanks.
My reluctance to buy NOW has nothing to do with the shadow inventory. I’d feel more comfortable with some more reserves in addition to the downpayment. So we are weighing the risk of somewhat stretching ourselves now for a few years against the risk of possible significantly higher rates (without much price decline) in the future, when we’d have save more.
April 4, 2011 at 1:10 PM #683322ScarlettParticipantThose are very good points, BG; thanks.
My reluctance to buy NOW has nothing to do with the shadow inventory. I’d feel more comfortable with some more reserves in addition to the downpayment. So we are weighing the risk of somewhat stretching ourselves now for a few years against the risk of possible significantly higher rates (without much price decline) in the future, when we’d have save more.
April 4, 2011 at 1:10 PM #683950ScarlettParticipantThose are very good points, BG; thanks.
My reluctance to buy NOW has nothing to do with the shadow inventory. I’d feel more comfortable with some more reserves in addition to the downpayment. So we are weighing the risk of somewhat stretching ourselves now for a few years against the risk of possible significantly higher rates (without much price decline) in the future, when we’d have save more.
April 4, 2011 at 1:10 PM #684092ScarlettParticipantThose are very good points, BG; thanks.
My reluctance to buy NOW has nothing to do with the shadow inventory. I’d feel more comfortable with some more reserves in addition to the downpayment. So we are weighing the risk of somewhat stretching ourselves now for a few years against the risk of possible significantly higher rates (without much price decline) in the future, when we’d have save more.
April 4, 2011 at 1:10 PM #684446ScarlettParticipantThose are very good points, BG; thanks.
My reluctance to buy NOW has nothing to do with the shadow inventory. I’d feel more comfortable with some more reserves in addition to the downpayment. So we are weighing the risk of somewhat stretching ourselves now for a few years against the risk of possible significantly higher rates (without much price decline) in the future, when we’d have save more.
April 4, 2011 at 1:12 PM #683274ScarlettParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]Scarlett, a little OT now, but if you were interested in purchasing in custom areas or areas more than 30 years old, the “rules” (that an “educated purchaser”) would follow are different :=}
All of your posts heretofore have indicated that you want a tract home <=30 years old.[/quote] How would those be different? Just curious - because the points you mentioned seem pretty universal. In general, that's what we'd prefer, yes, but if something really good comes up in older PQ (70s) or in UC, we would consider it.
April 4, 2011 at 1:12 PM #683327ScarlettParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]Scarlett, a little OT now, but if you were interested in purchasing in custom areas or areas more than 30 years old, the “rules” (that an “educated purchaser”) would follow are different :=}
All of your posts heretofore have indicated that you want a tract home <=30 years old.[/quote] How would those be different? Just curious - because the points you mentioned seem pretty universal. In general, that's what we'd prefer, yes, but if something really good comes up in older PQ (70s) or in UC, we would consider it.
April 4, 2011 at 1:12 PM #683955ScarlettParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]Scarlett, a little OT now, but if you were interested in purchasing in custom areas or areas more than 30 years old, the “rules” (that an “educated purchaser”) would follow are different :=}
All of your posts heretofore have indicated that you want a tract home <=30 years old.[/quote] How would those be different? Just curious - because the points you mentioned seem pretty universal. In general, that's what we'd prefer, yes, but if something really good comes up in older PQ (70s) or in UC, we would consider it.
April 4, 2011 at 1:12 PM #684097ScarlettParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]Scarlett, a little OT now, but if you were interested in purchasing in custom areas or areas more than 30 years old, the “rules” (that an “educated purchaser”) would follow are different :=}
All of your posts heretofore have indicated that you want a tract home <=30 years old.[/quote] How would those be different? Just curious - because the points you mentioned seem pretty universal. In general, that's what we'd prefer, yes, but if something really good comes up in older PQ (70s) or in UC, we would consider it.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.