sfexporter : Your $250/sqft homes in Carmel Valley

[Coronita]

[quote=sfexporter]Hey FLU,

Sorry for not being precise on CV homes. I was hoping for the ones in CV school district. The ones you posted are in Poway school district which in my opinion is not the same as the ones in your neighbor or in Carriage Run area. Nice try.

sfexporter[/quote]

I believe this one that was auctioned of below 700 is though….. Agreed though, you won’t find 250/sqft in CVSD (yet)

http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com/2008/10/another-successful-flip.html

[jpinpb]

FLU – There is some weird story going on with 13104 Chambord. Behind the scenes/under the table before it even went to the courthouse.

What I can’t figure out is how the hell did it sell on the steps for 690k? I’m pretty certain the loan on first was more than 690k.

[jpinpb]

FLU – There is some weird story going on with 13104 Chambord. Behind the scenes/under the table before it even went to the courthouse.

What I can’t figure out is how the hell did it sell on the steps for 690k? I’m pretty certain the loan on first was more than 690k.

[jpinpb]

FLU – There is some weird story going on with 13104 Chambord. Behind the scenes/under the table before it even went to the courthouse.

What I can’t figure out is how the hell did it sell on the steps for 690k? I’m pretty certain the loan on first was more than 690k.

[jpinpb]

FLU – There is some weird story going on with 13104 Chambord. Behind the scenes/under the table before it even went to the courthouse.

What I can’t figure out is how the hell did it sell on the steps for 690k? I’m pretty certain the loan on first was more than 690k.

[jpinpb]

FLU – There is some weird story going on with 13104 Chambord. Behind the scenes/under the table before it even went to the courthouse.

What I can’t figure out is how the hell did it sell on the steps for 690k? I’m pretty certain the loan on first was more than 690k.

[SD Realtor]

Sorry guys there is nothing wierd going on with Chambord. I know both the investor who bought it at the trustee sale for 690k and I represented the buyers who bought it from him.

They got a good deal and the investor made out very nicely as well. The first loan was not for more then 690k it was for 650k and the second was for 300k.

[SD Realtor]

Sorry guys there is nothing wierd going on with Chambord. I know both the investor who bought it at the trustee sale for 690k and I represented the buyers who bought it from him.

They got a good deal and the investor made out very nicely as well. The first loan was not for more then 690k it was for 650k and the second was for 300k.

[SD Realtor]

Sorry guys there is nothing wierd going on with Chambord. I know both the investor who bought it at the trustee sale for 690k and I represented the buyers who bought it from him.

They got a good deal and the investor made out very nicely as well. The first loan was not for more then 690k it was for 650k and the second was for 300k.

[SD Realtor]

Sorry guys there is nothing wierd going on with Chambord. I know both the investor who bought it at the trustee sale for 690k and I represented the buyers who bought it from him.

They got a good deal and the investor made out very nicely as well. The first loan was not for more then 690k it was for 650k and the second was for 300k.

[SD Realtor]

Sorry guys there is nothing wierd going on with Chambord. I know both the investor who bought it at the trustee sale for 690k and I represented the buyers who bought it from him.

They got a good deal and the investor made out very nicely as well. The first loan was not for more then 690k it was for 650k and the second was for 300k.

[jpinpb]

SDR – I meant something weird BEFORE it went to the courthouse steps, not after. Sorry if I was not clear. I know there was something shady in the purchases and sales beforehand and no surprise it went to the courthouse steps.

What did surprise me is it selling for 690k b/c I thought the loan was greater than 690k. Thanks for clearing that up. Now it makes sense.

edit:

Because of the nature of the transactions BEFORE the courthouse steps sale, I am suspicious of who bought it, as well. Clearly picked it up on the cheap and sold immediately for a very nice profit.

I thought the first was greater than 690. My mistake. I figured there was a second for 20%. That’s usually the norm, right? So, naturally I find it odd that the second is greater than 20%. Wonder why.

Makes me think since the owners planned on defaulting, they took a greater second to facilitate another “investor” to purchase on the first for less.

Sorry for going on. I was pretty upset when I learned about what happened before the courthouse steps. They intentionally did not pay, after they sold it to each other for a profit.

It was all questionable. Buy from builder in December, sell to girlfriend in February for 100k more, girlfriend defaults and goes back to bank. It was all orchestrated and done very well.

Sure would like to know who the parties of “13104 Chambord trust” are. Probably many people pitching in to buy on the cheap and flip for profit. Nothing wrong, of course w/that. But if the original owners are involved somehow, well, I’m suspicious and leave it at that.

[jpinpb]

SDR – I meant something weird BEFORE it went to the courthouse steps, not after. Sorry if I was not clear. I know there was something shady in the purchases and sales beforehand and no surprise it went to the courthouse steps.

What did surprise me is it selling for 690k b/c I thought the loan was greater than 690k. Thanks for clearing that up. Now it makes sense.

edit:

Because of the nature of the transactions BEFORE the courthouse steps sale, I am suspicious of who bought it, as well. Clearly picked it up on the cheap and sold immediately for a very nice profit.

I thought the first was greater than 690. My mistake. I figured there was a second for 20%. That’s usually the norm, right? So, naturally I find it odd that the second is greater than 20%. Wonder why.

Makes me think since the owners planned on defaulting, they took a greater second to facilitate another “investor” to purchase on the first for less.

Sorry for going on. I was pretty upset when I learned about what happened before the courthouse steps. They intentionally did not pay, after they sold it to each other for a profit.

It was all questionable. Buy from builder in December, sell to girlfriend in February for 100k more, girlfriend defaults and goes back to bank. It was all orchestrated and done very well.

Sure would like to know who the parties of “13104 Chambord trust” are. Probably many people pitching in to buy on the cheap and flip for profit. Nothing wrong, of course w/that. But if the original owners are involved somehow, well, I’m suspicious and leave it at that.

[jpinpb]

SDR – I meant something weird BEFORE it went to the courthouse steps, not after. Sorry if I was not clear. I know there was something shady in the purchases and sales beforehand and no surprise it went to the courthouse steps.

What did surprise me is it selling for 690k b/c I thought the loan was greater than 690k. Thanks for clearing that up. Now it makes sense.

edit:

Because of the nature of the transactions BEFORE the courthouse steps sale, I am suspicious of who bought it, as well. Clearly picked it up on the cheap and sold immediately for a very nice profit.

I thought the first was greater than 690. My mistake. I figured there was a second for 20%. That’s usually the norm, right? So, naturally I find it odd that the second is greater than 20%. Wonder why.

Makes me think since the owners planned on defaulting, they took a greater second to facilitate another “investor” to purchase on the first for less.

Sorry for going on. I was pretty upset when I learned about what happened before the courthouse steps. They intentionally did not pay, after they sold it to each other for a profit.

It was all questionable. Buy from builder in December, sell to girlfriend in February for 100k more, girlfriend defaults and goes back to bank. It was all orchestrated and done very well.

Sure would like to know who the parties of “13104 Chambord trust” are. Probably many people pitching in to buy on the cheap and flip for profit. Nothing wrong, of course w/that. But if the original owners are involved somehow, well, I’m suspicious and leave it at that.

[jpinpb]

SDR – I meant something weird BEFORE it went to the courthouse steps, not after. Sorry if I was not clear. I know there was something shady in the purchases and sales beforehand and no surprise it went to the courthouse steps.

What did surprise me is it selling for 690k b/c I thought the loan was greater than 690k. Thanks for clearing that up. Now it makes sense.

edit:

Because of the nature of the transactions BEFORE the courthouse steps sale, I am suspicious of who bought it, as well. Clearly picked it up on the cheap and sold immediately for a very nice profit.

I thought the first was greater than 690. My mistake. I figured there was a second for 20%. That’s usually the norm, right? So, naturally I find it odd that the second is greater than 20%. Wonder why.

Makes me think since the owners planned on defaulting, they took a greater second to facilitate another “investor” to purchase on the first for less.

Sorry for going on. I was pretty upset when I learned about what happened before the courthouse steps. They intentionally did not pay, after they sold it to each other for a profit.

It was all questionable. Buy from builder in December, sell to girlfriend in February for 100k more, girlfriend defaults and goes back to bank. It was all orchestrated and done very well.

Sure would like to know who the parties of “13104 Chambord trust” are. Probably many people pitching in to buy on the cheap and flip for profit. Nothing wrong, of course w/that. But if the original owners are involved somehow, well, I’m suspicious and leave it at that.

[Author]

Posts