- This topic has 372 replies, 34 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by joec.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 23, 2009 at 1:00 PM #334640January 23, 2009 at 1:41 PM #334149ice9Participant
[quote=eclipxe][quote=eclipxe][quote=patientlywaiting]I would much rather live in Oceanside than Temecula if lower cost of housing is the consideration. The weather and location are better, especially for a single semi-retired person.
[/quote]I wouldn’t.
So there.
(Sorry tg, too tired to defend properly. My deepest apologies)[/quote]
Ok, sorry I have to give it a try.
Temecula is a good choice. 2500 sq ft, new construction $100 sqft. Boom.
Access to good hiking and trails, lot’s of outdoor space, nature – yes. You will love it.
You will not be able to experience a lot of things without a private car, but this city is a dream to bike in. Bike lanes and trails through a lot of the city. There is a trail that goes through Murrieta, by CHS high school, Harveston, by the mall and out to Winchester. It is next to a ravine and a nice, well paved ride. You can get to any type of service you need in a few minutes by bike along this trail, without having to deal with the bike lanes on the road (which aren’t bad).
A cab will suffice to get to further locations (Old Town, etc). Living in central or northern Temecula is best if cycling access is desired.
A rental car to the beach a couple of times a month or to go to SD or LA is a fair option. I’m also a software guy that works at home in Temecula and I rarely drive. Like you said – Amazon is our friend. Vons delivers (they even take the bags in for you).
I think I understand exactly the kind of lifestyle you desire and I’m here to say Temecula fits that. Peaceful, quiet, nature but with enough access to the beach and cities to keep you sane. The folks suggesting Hillcrest, Mission Hills or Downtown don’t really “get it”.[/quote]
Thanks for this information!
If you were female, I’d ask you to marry me.
January 23, 2009 at 1:41 PM #334483ice9Participant[quote=eclipxe][quote=eclipxe][quote=patientlywaiting]I would much rather live in Oceanside than Temecula if lower cost of housing is the consideration. The weather and location are better, especially for a single semi-retired person.
[/quote]I wouldn’t.
So there.
(Sorry tg, too tired to defend properly. My deepest apologies)[/quote]
Ok, sorry I have to give it a try.
Temecula is a good choice. 2500 sq ft, new construction $100 sqft. Boom.
Access to good hiking and trails, lot’s of outdoor space, nature – yes. You will love it.
You will not be able to experience a lot of things without a private car, but this city is a dream to bike in. Bike lanes and trails through a lot of the city. There is a trail that goes through Murrieta, by CHS high school, Harveston, by the mall and out to Winchester. It is next to a ravine and a nice, well paved ride. You can get to any type of service you need in a few minutes by bike along this trail, without having to deal with the bike lanes on the road (which aren’t bad).
A cab will suffice to get to further locations (Old Town, etc). Living in central or northern Temecula is best if cycling access is desired.
A rental car to the beach a couple of times a month or to go to SD or LA is a fair option. I’m also a software guy that works at home in Temecula and I rarely drive. Like you said – Amazon is our friend. Vons delivers (they even take the bags in for you).
I think I understand exactly the kind of lifestyle you desire and I’m here to say Temecula fits that. Peaceful, quiet, nature but with enough access to the beach and cities to keep you sane. The folks suggesting Hillcrest, Mission Hills or Downtown don’t really “get it”.[/quote]
Thanks for this information!
If you were female, I’d ask you to marry me.
January 23, 2009 at 1:41 PM #334566ice9Participant[quote=eclipxe][quote=eclipxe][quote=patientlywaiting]I would much rather live in Oceanside than Temecula if lower cost of housing is the consideration. The weather and location are better, especially for a single semi-retired person.
[/quote]I wouldn’t.
So there.
(Sorry tg, too tired to defend properly. My deepest apologies)[/quote]
Ok, sorry I have to give it a try.
Temecula is a good choice. 2500 sq ft, new construction $100 sqft. Boom.
Access to good hiking and trails, lot’s of outdoor space, nature – yes. You will love it.
You will not be able to experience a lot of things without a private car, but this city is a dream to bike in. Bike lanes and trails through a lot of the city. There is a trail that goes through Murrieta, by CHS high school, Harveston, by the mall and out to Winchester. It is next to a ravine and a nice, well paved ride. You can get to any type of service you need in a few minutes by bike along this trail, without having to deal with the bike lanes on the road (which aren’t bad).
A cab will suffice to get to further locations (Old Town, etc). Living in central or northern Temecula is best if cycling access is desired.
A rental car to the beach a couple of times a month or to go to SD or LA is a fair option. I’m also a software guy that works at home in Temecula and I rarely drive. Like you said – Amazon is our friend. Vons delivers (they even take the bags in for you).
I think I understand exactly the kind of lifestyle you desire and I’m here to say Temecula fits that. Peaceful, quiet, nature but with enough access to the beach and cities to keep you sane. The folks suggesting Hillcrest, Mission Hills or Downtown don’t really “get it”.[/quote]
Thanks for this information!
If you were female, I’d ask you to marry me.
January 23, 2009 at 1:41 PM #334593ice9Participant[quote=eclipxe][quote=eclipxe][quote=patientlywaiting]I would much rather live in Oceanside than Temecula if lower cost of housing is the consideration. The weather and location are better, especially for a single semi-retired person.
[/quote]I wouldn’t.
So there.
(Sorry tg, too tired to defend properly. My deepest apologies)[/quote]
Ok, sorry I have to give it a try.
Temecula is a good choice. 2500 sq ft, new construction $100 sqft. Boom.
Access to good hiking and trails, lot’s of outdoor space, nature – yes. You will love it.
You will not be able to experience a lot of things without a private car, but this city is a dream to bike in. Bike lanes and trails through a lot of the city. There is a trail that goes through Murrieta, by CHS high school, Harveston, by the mall and out to Winchester. It is next to a ravine and a nice, well paved ride. You can get to any type of service you need in a few minutes by bike along this trail, without having to deal with the bike lanes on the road (which aren’t bad).
A cab will suffice to get to further locations (Old Town, etc). Living in central or northern Temecula is best if cycling access is desired.
A rental car to the beach a couple of times a month or to go to SD or LA is a fair option. I’m also a software guy that works at home in Temecula and I rarely drive. Like you said – Amazon is our friend. Vons delivers (they even take the bags in for you).
I think I understand exactly the kind of lifestyle you desire and I’m here to say Temecula fits that. Peaceful, quiet, nature but with enough access to the beach and cities to keep you sane. The folks suggesting Hillcrest, Mission Hills or Downtown don’t really “get it”.[/quote]
Thanks for this information!
If you were female, I’d ask you to marry me.
January 23, 2009 at 1:41 PM #334678ice9Participant[quote=eclipxe][quote=eclipxe][quote=patientlywaiting]I would much rather live in Oceanside than Temecula if lower cost of housing is the consideration. The weather and location are better, especially for a single semi-retired person.
[/quote]I wouldn’t.
So there.
(Sorry tg, too tired to defend properly. My deepest apologies)[/quote]
Ok, sorry I have to give it a try.
Temecula is a good choice. 2500 sq ft, new construction $100 sqft. Boom.
Access to good hiking and trails, lot’s of outdoor space, nature – yes. You will love it.
You will not be able to experience a lot of things without a private car, but this city is a dream to bike in. Bike lanes and trails through a lot of the city. There is a trail that goes through Murrieta, by CHS high school, Harveston, by the mall and out to Winchester. It is next to a ravine and a nice, well paved ride. You can get to any type of service you need in a few minutes by bike along this trail, without having to deal with the bike lanes on the road (which aren’t bad).
A cab will suffice to get to further locations (Old Town, etc). Living in central or northern Temecula is best if cycling access is desired.
A rental car to the beach a couple of times a month or to go to SD or LA is a fair option. I’m also a software guy that works at home in Temecula and I rarely drive. Like you said – Amazon is our friend. Vons delivers (they even take the bags in for you).
I think I understand exactly the kind of lifestyle you desire and I’m here to say Temecula fits that. Peaceful, quiet, nature but with enough access to the beach and cities to keep you sane. The folks suggesting Hillcrest, Mission Hills or Downtown don’t really “get it”.[/quote]
Thanks for this information!
If you were female, I’d ask you to marry me.
January 23, 2009 at 1:59 PM #334169Allan from FallbrookParticipantIce9: I live in Fallbrook, right below Temecula, and do nearly all of my major shopping there.
A couple of things that are also worth mentioning about Temecula: Fairly high income/standard of living (above the US average), same with education and a very diverse workforce. I bring this up, because it appears Temecula is well sited (geographically and demographically) for a comeback, once things start to turn around, economically speaking.
While I love the community I live in, I would definitely consider living in Temecula, if I didn’t live here.
January 23, 2009 at 1:59 PM #334502Allan from FallbrookParticipantIce9: I live in Fallbrook, right below Temecula, and do nearly all of my major shopping there.
A couple of things that are also worth mentioning about Temecula: Fairly high income/standard of living (above the US average), same with education and a very diverse workforce. I bring this up, because it appears Temecula is well sited (geographically and demographically) for a comeback, once things start to turn around, economically speaking.
While I love the community I live in, I would definitely consider living in Temecula, if I didn’t live here.
January 23, 2009 at 1:59 PM #334586Allan from FallbrookParticipantIce9: I live in Fallbrook, right below Temecula, and do nearly all of my major shopping there.
A couple of things that are also worth mentioning about Temecula: Fairly high income/standard of living (above the US average), same with education and a very diverse workforce. I bring this up, because it appears Temecula is well sited (geographically and demographically) for a comeback, once things start to turn around, economically speaking.
While I love the community I live in, I would definitely consider living in Temecula, if I didn’t live here.
January 23, 2009 at 1:59 PM #334613Allan from FallbrookParticipantIce9: I live in Fallbrook, right below Temecula, and do nearly all of my major shopping there.
A couple of things that are also worth mentioning about Temecula: Fairly high income/standard of living (above the US average), same with education and a very diverse workforce. I bring this up, because it appears Temecula is well sited (geographically and demographically) for a comeback, once things start to turn around, economically speaking.
While I love the community I live in, I would definitely consider living in Temecula, if I didn’t live here.
January 23, 2009 at 1:59 PM #334698Allan from FallbrookParticipantIce9: I live in Fallbrook, right below Temecula, and do nearly all of my major shopping there.
A couple of things that are also worth mentioning about Temecula: Fairly high income/standard of living (above the US average), same with education and a very diverse workforce. I bring this up, because it appears Temecula is well sited (geographically and demographically) for a comeback, once things start to turn around, economically speaking.
While I love the community I live in, I would definitely consider living in Temecula, if I didn’t live here.
January 23, 2009 at 4:40 PM #334271AKParticipantIt’s been a while since I’ve had close acquaintance with the video/computer gaming industry, but from what I remember it’s a tough way to make a living. I’m sure you earned every cent of your stash.
Here are some of my thoughts. This is no slam on Temecula, which is a nice town with some of my favorite restaurants. My thoughts reflect California and suburbia in general …
1. No car: Based on my experience in various parts of CA, you’ll be considered a freak or worse and you’ll draw unwanted attention from your neighbors and from law enforcement. Seriously, try being a single male walking around a suburb any time of day or night, especially if you fit some ethnic profile or another.
Most areas aren’t pedestrian-friendly. Where bike lanes and bikeways exist they tend to be for recreational purposes and are all but useless for functional transportation, though others have mentioned a few bike-friendly developments.
2. Utility bills: Expect to pay dearly for electricity.
3. Outdoor recreation: Look for an area with good air quality. Around here that means coastal areas.
4. Insurance: CA is a lousy place to get an individual policy.
5. FIOS: You lucky so-and-sos.
If you can live with a smaller house (also cheaper to heat and cool) you might be happier with something along the SR-78 corridor. There you’ll have better access to public transportation and recreational opportunities.
January 23, 2009 at 4:40 PM #334604AKParticipantIt’s been a while since I’ve had close acquaintance with the video/computer gaming industry, but from what I remember it’s a tough way to make a living. I’m sure you earned every cent of your stash.
Here are some of my thoughts. This is no slam on Temecula, which is a nice town with some of my favorite restaurants. My thoughts reflect California and suburbia in general …
1. No car: Based on my experience in various parts of CA, you’ll be considered a freak or worse and you’ll draw unwanted attention from your neighbors and from law enforcement. Seriously, try being a single male walking around a suburb any time of day or night, especially if you fit some ethnic profile or another.
Most areas aren’t pedestrian-friendly. Where bike lanes and bikeways exist they tend to be for recreational purposes and are all but useless for functional transportation, though others have mentioned a few bike-friendly developments.
2. Utility bills: Expect to pay dearly for electricity.
3. Outdoor recreation: Look for an area with good air quality. Around here that means coastal areas.
4. Insurance: CA is a lousy place to get an individual policy.
5. FIOS: You lucky so-and-sos.
If you can live with a smaller house (also cheaper to heat and cool) you might be happier with something along the SR-78 corridor. There you’ll have better access to public transportation and recreational opportunities.
January 23, 2009 at 4:40 PM #334689AKParticipantIt’s been a while since I’ve had close acquaintance with the video/computer gaming industry, but from what I remember it’s a tough way to make a living. I’m sure you earned every cent of your stash.
Here are some of my thoughts. This is no slam on Temecula, which is a nice town with some of my favorite restaurants. My thoughts reflect California and suburbia in general …
1. No car: Based on my experience in various parts of CA, you’ll be considered a freak or worse and you’ll draw unwanted attention from your neighbors and from law enforcement. Seriously, try being a single male walking around a suburb any time of day or night, especially if you fit some ethnic profile or another.
Most areas aren’t pedestrian-friendly. Where bike lanes and bikeways exist they tend to be for recreational purposes and are all but useless for functional transportation, though others have mentioned a few bike-friendly developments.
2. Utility bills: Expect to pay dearly for electricity.
3. Outdoor recreation: Look for an area with good air quality. Around here that means coastal areas.
4. Insurance: CA is a lousy place to get an individual policy.
5. FIOS: You lucky so-and-sos.
If you can live with a smaller house (also cheaper to heat and cool) you might be happier with something along the SR-78 corridor. There you’ll have better access to public transportation and recreational opportunities.
January 23, 2009 at 4:40 PM #334716AKParticipantIt’s been a while since I’ve had close acquaintance with the video/computer gaming industry, but from what I remember it’s a tough way to make a living. I’m sure you earned every cent of your stash.
Here are some of my thoughts. This is no slam on Temecula, which is a nice town with some of my favorite restaurants. My thoughts reflect California and suburbia in general …
1. No car: Based on my experience in various parts of CA, you’ll be considered a freak or worse and you’ll draw unwanted attention from your neighbors and from law enforcement. Seriously, try being a single male walking around a suburb any time of day or night, especially if you fit some ethnic profile or another.
Most areas aren’t pedestrian-friendly. Where bike lanes and bikeways exist they tend to be for recreational purposes and are all but useless for functional transportation, though others have mentioned a few bike-friendly developments.
2. Utility bills: Expect to pay dearly for electricity.
3. Outdoor recreation: Look for an area with good air quality. Around here that means coastal areas.
4. Insurance: CA is a lousy place to get an individual policy.
5. FIOS: You lucky so-and-sos.
If you can live with a smaller house (also cheaper to heat and cool) you might be happier with something along the SR-78 corridor. There you’ll have better access to public transportation and recreational opportunities.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.