Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Sellers were plaintiffs in class action lawsuit
- This topic has 70 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by Ricechex.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 15, 2009 at 8:45 PM #457250September 15, 2009 at 8:45 PM #457597jpinpbParticipant
I remember back in the day there was a class action suit brought against a developer for polybutylene piping. There was a settlement. People got money, but some people didn’t remedy the problem.
September 15, 2009 at 8:45 PM #457669jpinpbParticipantI remember back in the day there was a class action suit brought against a developer for polybutylene piping. There was a settlement. People got money, but some people didn’t remedy the problem.
September 15, 2009 at 8:45 PM #457255jpinpbParticipantI remember back in the day there was a class action suit brought against a developer for polybutylene piping. There was a settlement. People got money, but some people didn’t remedy the problem.
September 15, 2009 at 8:45 PM #457060jpinpbParticipantI remember back in the day there was a class action suit brought against a developer for polybutylene piping. There was a settlement. People got money, but some people didn’t remedy the problem.
September 15, 2009 at 8:45 PM #457862jpinpbParticipantI remember back in the day there was a class action suit brought against a developer for polybutylene piping. There was a settlement. People got money, but some people didn’t remedy the problem.
September 15, 2009 at 9:18 PM #457280SK in CVParticipant[quote=infoseeker]Hi SK, thanks for the inputs… the note in the disclosure says that it was settled out of court. So does it mean a deposition might not have happened? Anyways its a good point that you mentioned that we could ask the correspondence between the attorneys and sellers[/quote]
At least 95% of CD cases settle before a trial starts, and most that get that far settle before it goes to a jury. Of the 100’s of cases I’ve been involved with (on the consultant side), maybe 15 to 20% get as far as homeowner depositions, most settle at some stage before that. (I can only recall 2 that got to a verdict, out of probably 300 cases, involving maybe 10,000 homes over the last 10 years.) Also, some settlements include non-disclosure clauses prohibiting the plaintiffs from disclosing settlement terms. If the sellers make that claim, call bullshit. You don’t need to know anything about the settlement terms. You only need to know about the claims, those are not part of standard non-disclosure clauses. As I said, the claims might be bogus or incidental, but at least you can have the opportunity to investigate their veracity.
September 15, 2009 at 9:18 PM #457694SK in CVParticipant[quote=infoseeker]Hi SK, thanks for the inputs… the note in the disclosure says that it was settled out of court. So does it mean a deposition might not have happened? Anyways its a good point that you mentioned that we could ask the correspondence between the attorneys and sellers[/quote]
At least 95% of CD cases settle before a trial starts, and most that get that far settle before it goes to a jury. Of the 100’s of cases I’ve been involved with (on the consultant side), maybe 15 to 20% get as far as homeowner depositions, most settle at some stage before that. (I can only recall 2 that got to a verdict, out of probably 300 cases, involving maybe 10,000 homes over the last 10 years.) Also, some settlements include non-disclosure clauses prohibiting the plaintiffs from disclosing settlement terms. If the sellers make that claim, call bullshit. You don’t need to know anything about the settlement terms. You only need to know about the claims, those are not part of standard non-disclosure clauses. As I said, the claims might be bogus or incidental, but at least you can have the opportunity to investigate their veracity.
September 15, 2009 at 9:18 PM #457085SK in CVParticipant[quote=infoseeker]Hi SK, thanks for the inputs… the note in the disclosure says that it was settled out of court. So does it mean a deposition might not have happened? Anyways its a good point that you mentioned that we could ask the correspondence between the attorneys and sellers[/quote]
At least 95% of CD cases settle before a trial starts, and most that get that far settle before it goes to a jury. Of the 100’s of cases I’ve been involved with (on the consultant side), maybe 15 to 20% get as far as homeowner depositions, most settle at some stage before that. (I can only recall 2 that got to a verdict, out of probably 300 cases, involving maybe 10,000 homes over the last 10 years.) Also, some settlements include non-disclosure clauses prohibiting the plaintiffs from disclosing settlement terms. If the sellers make that claim, call bullshit. You don’t need to know anything about the settlement terms. You only need to know about the claims, those are not part of standard non-disclosure clauses. As I said, the claims might be bogus or incidental, but at least you can have the opportunity to investigate their veracity.
September 15, 2009 at 9:18 PM #457622SK in CVParticipant[quote=infoseeker]Hi SK, thanks for the inputs… the note in the disclosure says that it was settled out of court. So does it mean a deposition might not have happened? Anyways its a good point that you mentioned that we could ask the correspondence between the attorneys and sellers[/quote]
At least 95% of CD cases settle before a trial starts, and most that get that far settle before it goes to a jury. Of the 100’s of cases I’ve been involved with (on the consultant side), maybe 15 to 20% get as far as homeowner depositions, most settle at some stage before that. (I can only recall 2 that got to a verdict, out of probably 300 cases, involving maybe 10,000 homes over the last 10 years.) Also, some settlements include non-disclosure clauses prohibiting the plaintiffs from disclosing settlement terms. If the sellers make that claim, call bullshit. You don’t need to know anything about the settlement terms. You only need to know about the claims, those are not part of standard non-disclosure clauses. As I said, the claims might be bogus or incidental, but at least you can have the opportunity to investigate their veracity.
September 15, 2009 at 9:18 PM #457887SK in CVParticipant[quote=infoseeker]Hi SK, thanks for the inputs… the note in the disclosure says that it was settled out of court. So does it mean a deposition might not have happened? Anyways its a good point that you mentioned that we could ask the correspondence between the attorneys and sellers[/quote]
At least 95% of CD cases settle before a trial starts, and most that get that far settle before it goes to a jury. Of the 100’s of cases I’ve been involved with (on the consultant side), maybe 15 to 20% get as far as homeowner depositions, most settle at some stage before that. (I can only recall 2 that got to a verdict, out of probably 300 cases, involving maybe 10,000 homes over the last 10 years.) Also, some settlements include non-disclosure clauses prohibiting the plaintiffs from disclosing settlement terms. If the sellers make that claim, call bullshit. You don’t need to know anything about the settlement terms. You only need to know about the claims, those are not part of standard non-disclosure clauses. As I said, the claims might be bogus or incidental, but at least you can have the opportunity to investigate their veracity.
September 15, 2009 at 9:21 PM #457632sdduuuudeParticipantTry talking to the neighbors, too. (You should do that anyway to see if you like the neighbors).
They may know the history well and they may also know of other things that are problems in the tract.September 15, 2009 at 9:21 PM #457095sdduuuudeParticipantTry talking to the neighbors, too. (You should do that anyway to see if you like the neighbors).
They may know the history well and they may also know of other things that are problems in the tract.September 15, 2009 at 9:21 PM #457704sdduuuudeParticipantTry talking to the neighbors, too. (You should do that anyway to see if you like the neighbors).
They may know the history well and they may also know of other things that are problems in the tract.September 15, 2009 at 9:21 PM #457290sdduuuudeParticipantTry talking to the neighbors, too. (You should do that anyway to see if you like the neighbors).
They may know the history well and they may also know of other things that are problems in the tract. -
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.