- This topic has 460 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 29, 2009 at 5:07 PM #422631June 29, 2009 at 5:07 PM #421903
paramount
ParticipantI concur with a lot of the observations in the original posting. In terms of employment, there are no guarantees in life, you could always loose your job.
On the other hand I think a lot of people buying today are like those who bought in 1931/32….
June 29, 2009 at 5:07 PM #422132paramount
ParticipantI concur with a lot of the observations in the original posting. In terms of employment, there are no guarantees in life, you could always loose your job.
On the other hand I think a lot of people buying today are like those who bought in 1931/32….
June 29, 2009 at 5:07 PM #422405paramount
ParticipantI concur with a lot of the observations in the original posting. In terms of employment, there are no guarantees in life, you could always loose your job.
On the other hand I think a lot of people buying today are like those who bought in 1931/32….
June 29, 2009 at 5:07 PM #422474paramount
ParticipantI concur with a lot of the observations in the original posting. In terms of employment, there are no guarantees in life, you could always loose your job.
On the other hand I think a lot of people buying today are like those who bought in 1931/32….
June 29, 2009 at 5:07 PM #422636paramount
ParticipantI concur with a lot of the observations in the original posting. In terms of employment, there are no guarantees in life, you could always loose your job.
On the other hand I think a lot of people buying today are like those who bought in 1931/32….
June 29, 2009 at 5:11 PM #421913an
Participant[quote=flu]Never underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
[/quote]
Totally agree. BTW, there are plenty of positive cash flow properties, just not in north county. South bay has some good options. If you want to go farther, Fresno have some starter homes for $60-80k and can be rented for about $850-1000. PITI would be around $320-420 w/ 30% down ($18-24k). That’s profit of $400-700/month. It’s in the “ghetto” area though, but it’s out there.[quote=paramount]On the other hand I think a lot of people buying today are like those who bought in 1931/32….[/quote]
You mean in 70-80 years, they’ll be filthy rich from their property investments?June 29, 2009 at 5:11 PM #422142an
Participant[quote=flu]Never underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
[/quote]
Totally agree. BTW, there are plenty of positive cash flow properties, just not in north county. South bay has some good options. If you want to go farther, Fresno have some starter homes for $60-80k and can be rented for about $850-1000. PITI would be around $320-420 w/ 30% down ($18-24k). That’s profit of $400-700/month. It’s in the “ghetto” area though, but it’s out there.[quote=paramount]On the other hand I think a lot of people buying today are like those who bought in 1931/32….[/quote]
You mean in 70-80 years, they’ll be filthy rich from their property investments?June 29, 2009 at 5:11 PM #422415an
Participant[quote=flu]Never underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
[/quote]
Totally agree. BTW, there are plenty of positive cash flow properties, just not in north county. South bay has some good options. If you want to go farther, Fresno have some starter homes for $60-80k and can be rented for about $850-1000. PITI would be around $320-420 w/ 30% down ($18-24k). That’s profit of $400-700/month. It’s in the “ghetto” area though, but it’s out there.[quote=paramount]On the other hand I think a lot of people buying today are like those who bought in 1931/32….[/quote]
You mean in 70-80 years, they’ll be filthy rich from their property investments?June 29, 2009 at 5:11 PM #422484an
Participant[quote=flu]Never underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
[/quote]
Totally agree. BTW, there are plenty of positive cash flow properties, just not in north county. South bay has some good options. If you want to go farther, Fresno have some starter homes for $60-80k and can be rented for about $850-1000. PITI would be around $320-420 w/ 30% down ($18-24k). That’s profit of $400-700/month. It’s in the “ghetto” area though, but it’s out there.[quote=paramount]On the other hand I think a lot of people buying today are like those who bought in 1931/32….[/quote]
You mean in 70-80 years, they’ll be filthy rich from their property investments?June 29, 2009 at 5:11 PM #422646an
Participant[quote=flu]Never underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
[/quote]
Totally agree. BTW, there are plenty of positive cash flow properties, just not in north county. South bay has some good options. If you want to go farther, Fresno have some starter homes for $60-80k and can be rented for about $850-1000. PITI would be around $320-420 w/ 30% down ($18-24k). That’s profit of $400-700/month. It’s in the “ghetto” area though, but it’s out there.[quote=paramount]On the other hand I think a lot of people buying today are like those who bought in 1931/32….[/quote]
You mean in 70-80 years, they’ll be filthy rich from their property investments?June 29, 2009 at 5:19 PM #421923Coronita
Participant[quote=AN][quote=flu]Never underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
[/quote]
Totally agree. BTW, there are plenty of positive cash flow properties, just not in north county. South bay has some good options. If you want to go farther, Fresno have some starter homes for $60-80k and can be rented for about $850-1000. PITI would be around $320-420 w/ 30% down ($18-24k). That’s profit of $400-700/month. It’s in the “ghetto” area though, but it’s out there.[/quote]I’m not looking wholeheartedly. Dealing with tenants are the last thing I’m thinking about right now…Though, eventually I will get off my lazy union arse. Folks mentioned Vista and Escondido have some opportunities.
The interesting thing that people mentioned before is, if you put down a big down, you’re foregoing interest/dividend on that downpayment…My question is…In this environment, WHAT INTEREST INCOE? ๐ Oh that’s right, I didn’t even know about that 1.5-3% CD rate existed….Lol…
[quote]
You mean in 70-80 years, they’ll be filthy rich from their property investments?
[/quote]The ones with the financial means to hold out, you mean…I agree.Not all of them will. In my book, it’s all relative. Me thinks this is probably not a bad time to speculate (in general) IF you have the means to take your losses with a lump.
June 29, 2009 at 5:19 PM #422152Coronita
Participant[quote=AN][quote=flu]Never underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
[/quote]
Totally agree. BTW, there are plenty of positive cash flow properties, just not in north county. South bay has some good options. If you want to go farther, Fresno have some starter homes for $60-80k and can be rented for about $850-1000. PITI would be around $320-420 w/ 30% down ($18-24k). That’s profit of $400-700/month. It’s in the “ghetto” area though, but it’s out there.[/quote]I’m not looking wholeheartedly. Dealing with tenants are the last thing I’m thinking about right now…Though, eventually I will get off my lazy union arse. Folks mentioned Vista and Escondido have some opportunities.
The interesting thing that people mentioned before is, if you put down a big down, you’re foregoing interest/dividend on that downpayment…My question is…In this environment, WHAT INTEREST INCOE? ๐ Oh that’s right, I didn’t even know about that 1.5-3% CD rate existed….Lol…
[quote]
You mean in 70-80 years, they’ll be filthy rich from their property investments?
[/quote]The ones with the financial means to hold out, you mean…I agree.Not all of them will. In my book, it’s all relative. Me thinks this is probably not a bad time to speculate (in general) IF you have the means to take your losses with a lump.
June 29, 2009 at 5:19 PM #422425Coronita
Participant[quote=AN][quote=flu]Never underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
[/quote]
Totally agree. BTW, there are plenty of positive cash flow properties, just not in north county. South bay has some good options. If you want to go farther, Fresno have some starter homes for $60-80k and can be rented for about $850-1000. PITI would be around $320-420 w/ 30% down ($18-24k). That’s profit of $400-700/month. It’s in the “ghetto” area though, but it’s out there.[/quote]I’m not looking wholeheartedly. Dealing with tenants are the last thing I’m thinking about right now…Though, eventually I will get off my lazy union arse. Folks mentioned Vista and Escondido have some opportunities.
The interesting thing that people mentioned before is, if you put down a big down, you’re foregoing interest/dividend on that downpayment…My question is…In this environment, WHAT INTEREST INCOE? ๐ Oh that’s right, I didn’t even know about that 1.5-3% CD rate existed….Lol…
[quote]
You mean in 70-80 years, they’ll be filthy rich from their property investments?
[/quote]The ones with the financial means to hold out, you mean…I agree.Not all of them will. In my book, it’s all relative. Me thinks this is probably not a bad time to speculate (in general) IF you have the means to take your losses with a lump.
June 29, 2009 at 5:19 PM #422494Coronita
Participant[quote=AN][quote=flu]Never underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
[/quote]
Totally agree. BTW, there are plenty of positive cash flow properties, just not in north county. South bay has some good options. If you want to go farther, Fresno have some starter homes for $60-80k and can be rented for about $850-1000. PITI would be around $320-420 w/ 30% down ($18-24k). That’s profit of $400-700/month. It’s in the “ghetto” area though, but it’s out there.[/quote]I’m not looking wholeheartedly. Dealing with tenants are the last thing I’m thinking about right now…Though, eventually I will get off my lazy union arse. Folks mentioned Vista and Escondido have some opportunities.
The interesting thing that people mentioned before is, if you put down a big down, you’re foregoing interest/dividend on that downpayment…My question is…In this environment, WHAT INTEREST INCOE? ๐ Oh that’s right, I didn’t even know about that 1.5-3% CD rate existed….Lol…
[quote]
You mean in 70-80 years, they’ll be filthy rich from their property investments?
[/quote]The ones with the financial means to hold out, you mean…I agree.Not all of them will. In my book, it’s all relative. Me thinks this is probably not a bad time to speculate (in general) IF you have the means to take your losses with a lump.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
