- This topic has 460 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 29, 2009 at 4:45 PM #422611June 29, 2009 at 4:48 PM #421883
patientrenter
ParticipantI ain’t buying until prices for decent places in decent areas that I’d be happy to live in get closer to 1996 prices plus wage inflation. Right now these prices are still double to triple the adjusted 1996 level.
June 29, 2009 at 4:48 PM #422112ParticipantI ain’t buying until prices for decent places in decent areas that I’d be happy to live in get closer to 1996 prices plus wage inflation. Right now these prices are still double to triple the adjusted 1996 level.
June 29, 2009 at 4:48 PM #422385ParticipantI ain’t buying until prices for decent places in decent areas that I’d be happy to live in get closer to 1996 prices plus wage inflation. Right now these prices are still double to triple the adjusted 1996 level.
June 29, 2009 at 4:48 PM #422454ParticipantI ain’t buying until prices for decent places in decent areas that I’d be happy to live in get closer to 1996 prices plus wage inflation. Right now these prices are still double to triple the adjusted 1996 level.
June 29, 2009 at 4:48 PM #422616ParticipantI ain’t buying until prices for decent places in decent areas that I’d be happy to live in get closer to 1996 prices plus wage inflation. Right now these prices are still double to triple the adjusted 1996 level.
June 29, 2009 at 4:58 PM #421888
CoronitaParticipantNever underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
June 29, 2009 at 4:58 PM #422117CoronitaParticipantNever underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
June 29, 2009 at 4:58 PM #422390CoronitaParticipantNever underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
June 29, 2009 at 4:58 PM #422459CoronitaParticipantNever underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
June 29, 2009 at 4:58 PM #422621CoronitaParticipantNever underestimate the financial state of your peers. Not everyone is financially “ruined” as the media would like to portray, though it’s much more convenient to think so.
(Still in search of positive cash flow properties)
June 29, 2009 at 5:07 PM #421898Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participant[quote=patientrenter]I ain’t buying until prices for decent places in decent areas that I’d be happy to live in get closer to 1996 prices plus wage inflation. Right now these prices are still double to triple the adjusted 1996 level.[/quote]
Depends on the Area I think, in T.V. (which is a good enough area for me anyways) I think they are way below 1996 plus wage inflation (minimum wage does not count, there have never been a lot of minimum wage earners buying homes — 2003-6 being the exception).
And I still say although the area may not be at the absolute bottom, it’s close enough that it won’t matter in ten years (except bragging rights).
Sure if Carlsbad starts selling 3000+sqf homes for 400K, I will turn my T.V. home into a rental and move but I feel I am covered (happy with my T.V. home) if it does not get that low.
It takes all of about 45-50 minutes to get to the beach I like (in OC) on the few hot day’s I want to be outside and I have never had an electric bill over $125 dollars and I am not stingy with the AC during the summer.
But to each their own.
June 29, 2009 at 5:07 PM #422127Participant[quote=patientrenter]I ain’t buying until prices for decent places in decent areas that I’d be happy to live in get closer to 1996 prices plus wage inflation. Right now these prices are still double to triple the adjusted 1996 level.[/quote]
Depends on the Area I think, in T.V. (which is a good enough area for me anyways) I think they are way below 1996 plus wage inflation (minimum wage does not count, there have never been a lot of minimum wage earners buying homes — 2003-6 being the exception).
And I still say although the area may not be at the absolute bottom, it’s close enough that it won’t matter in ten years (except bragging rights).
Sure if Carlsbad starts selling 3000+sqf homes for 400K, I will turn my T.V. home into a rental and move but I feel I am covered (happy with my T.V. home) if it does not get that low.
It takes all of about 45-50 minutes to get to the beach I like (in OC) on the few hot day’s I want to be outside and I have never had an electric bill over $125 dollars and I am not stingy with the AC during the summer.
But to each their own.
June 29, 2009 at 5:07 PM #422400Participant[quote=patientrenter]I ain’t buying until prices for decent places in decent areas that I’d be happy to live in get closer to 1996 prices plus wage inflation. Right now these prices are still double to triple the adjusted 1996 level.[/quote]
Depends on the Area I think, in T.V. (which is a good enough area for me anyways) I think they are way below 1996 plus wage inflation (minimum wage does not count, there have never been a lot of minimum wage earners buying homes — 2003-6 being the exception).
And I still say although the area may not be at the absolute bottom, it’s close enough that it won’t matter in ten years (except bragging rights).
Sure if Carlsbad starts selling 3000+sqf homes for 400K, I will turn my T.V. home into a rental and move but I feel I am covered (happy with my T.V. home) if it does not get that low.
It takes all of about 45-50 minutes to get to the beach I like (in OC) on the few hot day’s I want to be outside and I have never had an electric bill over $125 dollars and I am not stingy with the AC during the summer.
But to each their own.
June 29, 2009 at 5:07 PM #422469Participant[quote=patientrenter]I ain’t buying until prices for decent places in decent areas that I’d be happy to live in get closer to 1996 prices plus wage inflation. Right now these prices are still double to triple the adjusted 1996 level.[/quote]
Depends on the Area I think, in T.V. (which is a good enough area for me anyways) I think they are way below 1996 plus wage inflation (minimum wage does not count, there have never been a lot of minimum wage earners buying homes — 2003-6 being the exception).
And I still say although the area may not be at the absolute bottom, it’s close enough that it won’t matter in ten years (except bragging rights).
Sure if Carlsbad starts selling 3000+sqf homes for 400K, I will turn my T.V. home into a rental and move but I feel I am covered (happy with my T.V. home) if it does not get that low.
It takes all of about 45-50 minutes to get to the beach I like (in OC) on the few hot day’s I want to be outside and I have never had an electric bill over $125 dollars and I am not stingy with the AC during the summer.
But to each their own.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
