- This topic has 60 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by
Yvsunshine.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 8, 2009 at 12:31 PM #412985June 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM #412325
UCGal
Participant[quote=davelj]Someone knowledgeable about such things told me the following recently:
If you sue someone in small claims court and win (either the judge rules in your favor or the defendant is a no-show), and the defendant doesn’t pay you, then they will not be able to re-register their car in the state of California until the claim is satisfied.
While I love the idea (and HOA’s should be pursuing this against deadbeats who leave upaid dues and foreclosed properties behind), I want further corroboration that this is the case. Anyone know?[/quote]
I can confirm that used to be true for judgements that were the result of traffic incidents. (I had an uninsured driver hit me back in the 80’s and sued for damage to my motorcycle.) I had to file my small claims judgement with the DMV.
However, the DMV wasn’t very good at matching their list against name changes – she changed her name back to her maiden name and voila – she was back in business.
June 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM #412560UCGal
Participant[quote=davelj]Someone knowledgeable about such things told me the following recently:
If you sue someone in small claims court and win (either the judge rules in your favor or the defendant is a no-show), and the defendant doesn’t pay you, then they will not be able to re-register their car in the state of California until the claim is satisfied.
While I love the idea (and HOA’s should be pursuing this against deadbeats who leave upaid dues and foreclosed properties behind), I want further corroboration that this is the case. Anyone know?[/quote]
I can confirm that used to be true for judgements that were the result of traffic incidents. (I had an uninsured driver hit me back in the 80’s and sued for damage to my motorcycle.) I had to file my small claims judgement with the DMV.
However, the DMV wasn’t very good at matching their list against name changes – she changed her name back to her maiden name and voila – she was back in business.
June 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM #412806UCGal
Participant[quote=davelj]Someone knowledgeable about such things told me the following recently:
If you sue someone in small claims court and win (either the judge rules in your favor or the defendant is a no-show), and the defendant doesn’t pay you, then they will not be able to re-register their car in the state of California until the claim is satisfied.
While I love the idea (and HOA’s should be pursuing this against deadbeats who leave upaid dues and foreclosed properties behind), I want further corroboration that this is the case. Anyone know?[/quote]
I can confirm that used to be true for judgements that were the result of traffic incidents. (I had an uninsured driver hit me back in the 80’s and sued for damage to my motorcycle.) I had to file my small claims judgement with the DMV.
However, the DMV wasn’t very good at matching their list against name changes – she changed her name back to her maiden name and voila – she was back in business.
June 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM #412872UCGal
Participant[quote=davelj]Someone knowledgeable about such things told me the following recently:
If you sue someone in small claims court and win (either the judge rules in your favor or the defendant is a no-show), and the defendant doesn’t pay you, then they will not be able to re-register their car in the state of California until the claim is satisfied.
While I love the idea (and HOA’s should be pursuing this against deadbeats who leave upaid dues and foreclosed properties behind), I want further corroboration that this is the case. Anyone know?[/quote]
I can confirm that used to be true for judgements that were the result of traffic incidents. (I had an uninsured driver hit me back in the 80’s and sued for damage to my motorcycle.) I had to file my small claims judgement with the DMV.
However, the DMV wasn’t very good at matching their list against name changes – she changed her name back to her maiden name and voila – she was back in business.
June 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM #413024UCGal
Participant[quote=davelj]Someone knowledgeable about such things told me the following recently:
If you sue someone in small claims court and win (either the judge rules in your favor or the defendant is a no-show), and the defendant doesn’t pay you, then they will not be able to re-register their car in the state of California until the claim is satisfied.
While I love the idea (and HOA’s should be pursuing this against deadbeats who leave upaid dues and foreclosed properties behind), I want further corroboration that this is the case. Anyone know?[/quote]
I can confirm that used to be true for judgements that were the result of traffic incidents. (I had an uninsured driver hit me back in the 80’s and sued for damage to my motorcycle.) I had to file my small claims judgement with the DMV.
However, the DMV wasn’t very good at matching their list against name changes – she changed her name back to her maiden name and voila – she was back in business.
June 8, 2009 at 1:47 PM #412345DWCAP
ParticipantSo she took $1000, and you dont agree with the charges cause you didnt cause any damage? Or you want to see the reciepts cause you dont think the cost should have been that high? These are two different things. Did you take any pictures of the place before you left? Do you have a copy of the move in inspection, to prove damages are not your fault?
June 8, 2009 at 1:47 PM #412580DWCAP
ParticipantSo she took $1000, and you dont agree with the charges cause you didnt cause any damage? Or you want to see the reciepts cause you dont think the cost should have been that high? These are two different things. Did you take any pictures of the place before you left? Do you have a copy of the move in inspection, to prove damages are not your fault?
June 8, 2009 at 1:47 PM #412826DWCAP
ParticipantSo she took $1000, and you dont agree with the charges cause you didnt cause any damage? Or you want to see the reciepts cause you dont think the cost should have been that high? These are two different things. Did you take any pictures of the place before you left? Do you have a copy of the move in inspection, to prove damages are not your fault?
June 8, 2009 at 1:47 PM #412892DWCAP
ParticipantSo she took $1000, and you dont agree with the charges cause you didnt cause any damage? Or you want to see the reciepts cause you dont think the cost should have been that high? These are two different things. Did you take any pictures of the place before you left? Do you have a copy of the move in inspection, to prove damages are not your fault?
June 8, 2009 at 1:47 PM #413042DWCAP
ParticipantSo she took $1000, and you dont agree with the charges cause you didnt cause any damage? Or you want to see the reciepts cause you dont think the cost should have been that high? These are two different things. Did you take any pictures of the place before you left? Do you have a copy of the move in inspection, to prove damages are not your fault?
June 8, 2009 at 3:32 PM #412389davelj
Participant[quote=UCGal]
I can confirm that used to be true for judgements that were the result of traffic incidents. (I had an uninsured driver hit me back in the 80’s and sued for damage to my motorcycle.) I had to file my small claims judgement with the DMV.
[/quote]That actually makes more sense than the information I got from my source. I’ll check into it and post when I get a reliable answer. Although, it sure would make getting claims settled easier if, essentially, you couldn’t drive until you settled the claim.
June 8, 2009 at 3:32 PM #412625davelj
Participant[quote=UCGal]
I can confirm that used to be true for judgements that were the result of traffic incidents. (I had an uninsured driver hit me back in the 80’s and sued for damage to my motorcycle.) I had to file my small claims judgement with the DMV.
[/quote]That actually makes more sense than the information I got from my source. I’ll check into it and post when I get a reliable answer. Although, it sure would make getting claims settled easier if, essentially, you couldn’t drive until you settled the claim.
June 8, 2009 at 3:32 PM #412870davelj
Participant[quote=UCGal]
I can confirm that used to be true for judgements that were the result of traffic incidents. (I had an uninsured driver hit me back in the 80’s and sued for damage to my motorcycle.) I had to file my small claims judgement with the DMV.
[/quote]That actually makes more sense than the information I got from my source. I’ll check into it and post when I get a reliable answer. Although, it sure would make getting claims settled easier if, essentially, you couldn’t drive until you settled the claim.
June 8, 2009 at 3:32 PM #412937davelj
Participant[quote=UCGal]
I can confirm that used to be true for judgements that were the result of traffic incidents. (I had an uninsured driver hit me back in the 80’s and sued for damage to my motorcycle.) I had to file my small claims judgement with the DMV.
[/quote]That actually makes more sense than the information I got from my source. I’ll check into it and post when I get a reliable answer. Although, it sure would make getting claims settled easier if, essentially, you couldn’t drive until you settled the claim.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
