Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › SEC limiting short sale of Fannie/Freddie + Tempers flare at IndyMac Bank
- This topic has 80 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by ucodegen.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 15, 2008 at 1:24 PM #13303July 15, 2008 at 1:30 PM #239722CoronitaParticipant
I’m seriously wondering what’s next. Is the government going to start encouraging banks to cook the books so to speak to save the economy? I’m just wondering if Gov will start hinting that “we won’t be examining your books as closely as before, just make the problem gradually go away and don’t make it so obvious that you’re cooking the book”.
Desperate times calls for desperate measures. And if you think about this, although Fannie/Freddie are trashed, the point I’m trying to make is that for a gov to come in and basically try to regulate their respective security by limiting shorting and “preventing” erosion further to me is alarming. It’s not a level playing field and free market now is it?
July 15, 2008 at 1:30 PM #239923CoronitaParticipantI’m seriously wondering what’s next. Is the government going to start encouraging banks to cook the books so to speak to save the economy? I’m just wondering if Gov will start hinting that “we won’t be examining your books as closely as before, just make the problem gradually go away and don’t make it so obvious that you’re cooking the book”.
Desperate times calls for desperate measures. And if you think about this, although Fannie/Freddie are trashed, the point I’m trying to make is that for a gov to come in and basically try to regulate their respective security by limiting shorting and “preventing” erosion further to me is alarming. It’s not a level playing field and free market now is it?
July 15, 2008 at 1:30 PM #239921CoronitaParticipantI’m seriously wondering what’s next. Is the government going to start encouraging banks to cook the books so to speak to save the economy? I’m just wondering if Gov will start hinting that “we won’t be examining your books as closely as before, just make the problem gradually go away and don’t make it so obvious that you’re cooking the book”.
Desperate times calls for desperate measures. And if you think about this, although Fannie/Freddie are trashed, the point I’m trying to make is that for a gov to come in and basically try to regulate their respective security by limiting shorting and “preventing” erosion further to me is alarming. It’s not a level playing field and free market now is it?
July 15, 2008 at 1:30 PM #239859CoronitaParticipantI’m seriously wondering what’s next. Is the government going to start encouraging banks to cook the books so to speak to save the economy? I’m just wondering if Gov will start hinting that “we won’t be examining your books as closely as before, just make the problem gradually go away and don’t make it so obvious that you’re cooking the book”.
Desperate times calls for desperate measures. And if you think about this, although Fannie/Freddie are trashed, the point I’m trying to make is that for a gov to come in and basically try to regulate their respective security by limiting shorting and “preventing” erosion further to me is alarming. It’s not a level playing field and free market now is it?
July 15, 2008 at 1:30 PM #239863CoronitaParticipantI’m seriously wondering what’s next. Is the government going to start encouraging banks to cook the books so to speak to save the economy? I’m just wondering if Gov will start hinting that “we won’t be examining your books as closely as before, just make the problem gradually go away and don’t make it so obvious that you’re cooking the book”.
Desperate times calls for desperate measures. And if you think about this, although Fannie/Freddie are trashed, the point I’m trying to make is that for a gov to come in and basically try to regulate their respective security by limiting shorting and “preventing” erosion further to me is alarming. It’s not a level playing field and free market now is it?
July 15, 2008 at 1:33 PM #239935AnonymousGuestApparently companies have been cooking there books for a long time. But there is so much cooking you can do until real cash runs out.
July 15, 2008 at 1:33 PM #239938AnonymousGuestApparently companies have been cooking there books for a long time. But there is so much cooking you can do until real cash runs out.
July 15, 2008 at 1:33 PM #239879AnonymousGuestApparently companies have been cooking there books for a long time. But there is so much cooking you can do until real cash runs out.
July 15, 2008 at 1:33 PM #239873AnonymousGuestApparently companies have been cooking there books for a long time. But there is so much cooking you can do until real cash runs out.
July 15, 2008 at 1:33 PM #239735AnonymousGuestApparently companies have been cooking there books for a long time. But there is so much cooking you can do until real cash runs out.
July 15, 2008 at 2:10 PM #239958bsrsharmaParticipantI think SEC limit on Naked Shorting is good for stability in these uncertain times. Remember, they are not stopping regular (i.e. covered or borrowed) shorting; only highly speculative uncovered shorting that can destabilize the system by setting up negative feedback loops.
As for the Rioting in L.A., it is so ridiculous. You would think such things happen in a 3rd world country. How anyone with reasonable intelligence wouldn’t know how to do a bank transfer on internet puzzles me. Also, the media have been shouting about IndyMac’s threadbare finances for at least a few weeks. Why did the more loaded depositors not transfer funds earlier? Overall, a poor portrayal of citizenry.
July 15, 2008 at 2:10 PM #239896bsrsharmaParticipantI think SEC limit on Naked Shorting is good for stability in these uncertain times. Remember, they are not stopping regular (i.e. covered or borrowed) shorting; only highly speculative uncovered shorting that can destabilize the system by setting up negative feedback loops.
As for the Rioting in L.A., it is so ridiculous. You would think such things happen in a 3rd world country. How anyone with reasonable intelligence wouldn’t know how to do a bank transfer on internet puzzles me. Also, the media have been shouting about IndyMac’s threadbare finances for at least a few weeks. Why did the more loaded depositors not transfer funds earlier? Overall, a poor portrayal of citizenry.
July 15, 2008 at 2:10 PM #239900bsrsharmaParticipantI think SEC limit on Naked Shorting is good for stability in these uncertain times. Remember, they are not stopping regular (i.e. covered or borrowed) shorting; only highly speculative uncovered shorting that can destabilize the system by setting up negative feedback loops.
As for the Rioting in L.A., it is so ridiculous. You would think such things happen in a 3rd world country. How anyone with reasonable intelligence wouldn’t know how to do a bank transfer on internet puzzles me. Also, the media have been shouting about IndyMac’s threadbare finances for at least a few weeks. Why did the more loaded depositors not transfer funds earlier? Overall, a poor portrayal of citizenry.
July 15, 2008 at 2:10 PM #239956bsrsharmaParticipantI think SEC limit on Naked Shorting is good for stability in these uncertain times. Remember, they are not stopping regular (i.e. covered or borrowed) shorting; only highly speculative uncovered shorting that can destabilize the system by setting up negative feedback loops.
As for the Rioting in L.A., it is so ridiculous. You would think such things happen in a 3rd world country. How anyone with reasonable intelligence wouldn’t know how to do a bank transfer on internet puzzles me. Also, the media have been shouting about IndyMac’s threadbare finances for at least a few weeks. Why did the more loaded depositors not transfer funds earlier? Overall, a poor portrayal of citizenry.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.