Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › sdr/SDR, how can this not be fraud???
- This topic has 310 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 3, 2009 at 3:19 PM #425531July 3, 2009 at 4:45 PM #424817sdrealtorParticipant
ditto SD R,
I dont see much in the way of fraud attempts either. Mostly greedy agents.sdr
July 3, 2009 at 4:45 PM #425050sdrealtorParticipantditto SD R,
I dont see much in the way of fraud attempts either. Mostly greedy agents.sdr
July 3, 2009 at 4:45 PM #425334sdrealtorParticipantditto SD R,
I dont see much in the way of fraud attempts either. Mostly greedy agents.sdr
July 3, 2009 at 4:45 PM #425404sdrealtorParticipantditto SD R,
I dont see much in the way of fraud attempts either. Mostly greedy agents.sdr
July 3, 2009 at 4:45 PM #425566sdrealtorParticipantditto SD R,
I dont see much in the way of fraud attempts either. Mostly greedy agents.sdr
July 3, 2009 at 5:04 PM #424832AnonymousGuest[quote=patientrenter]I am getting tired of people saying that it’s fine because it’s legal, and screw the ethics.[/quote]
There does seem to be more of this than ever.
So how do we fix it? I’m not in favor of making more laws — more litigation is not a good thing either. Plus the laws that do exist aren’t being enforced anyway.
Perhaps there should be a professional organization that has a Code of Ethics? The organization would not tolerate members that do not abide by the code. Let’s create such an organization, give it a clever name (perhaps a pun!), and trademark the name, so that the public would know that anyone working in this named profession is ethical. That would fix it, right?
July 3, 2009 at 5:04 PM #425065AnonymousGuest[quote=patientrenter]I am getting tired of people saying that it’s fine because it’s legal, and screw the ethics.[/quote]
There does seem to be more of this than ever.
So how do we fix it? I’m not in favor of making more laws — more litigation is not a good thing either. Plus the laws that do exist aren’t being enforced anyway.
Perhaps there should be a professional organization that has a Code of Ethics? The organization would not tolerate members that do not abide by the code. Let’s create such an organization, give it a clever name (perhaps a pun!), and trademark the name, so that the public would know that anyone working in this named profession is ethical. That would fix it, right?
July 3, 2009 at 5:04 PM #425349AnonymousGuest[quote=patientrenter]I am getting tired of people saying that it’s fine because it’s legal, and screw the ethics.[/quote]
There does seem to be more of this than ever.
So how do we fix it? I’m not in favor of making more laws — more litigation is not a good thing either. Plus the laws that do exist aren’t being enforced anyway.
Perhaps there should be a professional organization that has a Code of Ethics? The organization would not tolerate members that do not abide by the code. Let’s create such an organization, give it a clever name (perhaps a pun!), and trademark the name, so that the public would know that anyone working in this named profession is ethical. That would fix it, right?
July 3, 2009 at 5:04 PM #425419AnonymousGuest[quote=patientrenter]I am getting tired of people saying that it’s fine because it’s legal, and screw the ethics.[/quote]
There does seem to be more of this than ever.
So how do we fix it? I’m not in favor of making more laws — more litigation is not a good thing either. Plus the laws that do exist aren’t being enforced anyway.
Perhaps there should be a professional organization that has a Code of Ethics? The organization would not tolerate members that do not abide by the code. Let’s create such an organization, give it a clever name (perhaps a pun!), and trademark the name, so that the public would know that anyone working in this named profession is ethical. That would fix it, right?
July 3, 2009 at 5:04 PM #425581AnonymousGuest[quote=patientrenter]I am getting tired of people saying that it’s fine because it’s legal, and screw the ethics.[/quote]
There does seem to be more of this than ever.
So how do we fix it? I’m not in favor of making more laws — more litigation is not a good thing either. Plus the laws that do exist aren’t being enforced anyway.
Perhaps there should be a professional organization that has a Code of Ethics? The organization would not tolerate members that do not abide by the code. Let’s create such an organization, give it a clever name (perhaps a pun!), and trademark the name, so that the public would know that anyone working in this named profession is ethical. That would fix it, right?
July 3, 2009 at 6:38 PM #424842CA renterParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]ditto SD R,
I dont see much in the way of fraud attempts either. Mostly greedy agents.sdr[/quote]
If the listing agent is claiming that it’s the “highest and best” offer to the bank, yet is failing to market the property or even accept any market-based offers, I call that fraud.
They are defrauding the banks — which just so happen to be propped up by the taxpayers right now, and that makes it more egregious than ever.
Sorry, sdr, but it does not require a rocket scientist to determine what the “highest and best” offer is.
A bank is just as capable of determining market-based pricing, if not more capable. They did just fine with their appraisals before the growth of the mortgage brokerage industry. I’d like to see more accountability in the process.
July 3, 2009 at 6:38 PM #425075CA renterParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]ditto SD R,
I dont see much in the way of fraud attempts either. Mostly greedy agents.sdr[/quote]
If the listing agent is claiming that it’s the “highest and best” offer to the bank, yet is failing to market the property or even accept any market-based offers, I call that fraud.
They are defrauding the banks — which just so happen to be propped up by the taxpayers right now, and that makes it more egregious than ever.
Sorry, sdr, but it does not require a rocket scientist to determine what the “highest and best” offer is.
A bank is just as capable of determining market-based pricing, if not more capable. They did just fine with their appraisals before the growth of the mortgage brokerage industry. I’d like to see more accountability in the process.
July 3, 2009 at 6:38 PM #425359CA renterParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]ditto SD R,
I dont see much in the way of fraud attempts either. Mostly greedy agents.sdr[/quote]
If the listing agent is claiming that it’s the “highest and best” offer to the bank, yet is failing to market the property or even accept any market-based offers, I call that fraud.
They are defrauding the banks — which just so happen to be propped up by the taxpayers right now, and that makes it more egregious than ever.
Sorry, sdr, but it does not require a rocket scientist to determine what the “highest and best” offer is.
A bank is just as capable of determining market-based pricing, if not more capable. They did just fine with their appraisals before the growth of the mortgage brokerage industry. I’d like to see more accountability in the process.
July 3, 2009 at 6:38 PM #425429CA renterParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]ditto SD R,
I dont see much in the way of fraud attempts either. Mostly greedy agents.sdr[/quote]
If the listing agent is claiming that it’s the “highest and best” offer to the bank, yet is failing to market the property or even accept any market-based offers, I call that fraud.
They are defrauding the banks — which just so happen to be propped up by the taxpayers right now, and that makes it more egregious than ever.
Sorry, sdr, but it does not require a rocket scientist to determine what the “highest and best” offer is.
A bank is just as capable of determining market-based pricing, if not more capable. They did just fine with their appraisals before the growth of the mortgage brokerage industry. I’d like to see more accountability in the process.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.