Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Scripps Ranch…
- This topic has 165 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by
donaldduckmoore.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 15, 2009 at 1:21 PM #400401May 15, 2009 at 1:39 PM #399737
strawberryfields
Participant[quote=DataAgent]”Ten years ago, it was possible to find a starter home here with prices in several developments under $300k.”
Can you show an example of a 3000 sq ft home that sold for under $300K in Scripps Ranch in 1999?
[/quote]Yikes – I didn’t mean 3000 sq ft homes selling for that. I meant starter homes – older homes on streets like Tribuna, Ironwood, etc.; smaller but newer homes along Scripps Trl and the streets that move off it – La Vita, Rue Des Amis, Weatherwood, etc.
May 15, 2009 at 1:39 PM #399987Participant[quote=DataAgent]”Ten years ago, it was possible to find a starter home here with prices in several developments under $300k.”
Can you show an example of a 3000 sq ft home that sold for under $300K in Scripps Ranch in 1999?
[/quote]Yikes – I didn’t mean 3000 sq ft homes selling for that. I meant starter homes – older homes on streets like Tribuna, Ironwood, etc.; smaller but newer homes along Scripps Trl and the streets that move off it – La Vita, Rue Des Amis, Weatherwood, etc.
May 15, 2009 at 1:39 PM #400216Participant[quote=DataAgent]”Ten years ago, it was possible to find a starter home here with prices in several developments under $300k.”
Can you show an example of a 3000 sq ft home that sold for under $300K in Scripps Ranch in 1999?
[/quote]Yikes – I didn’t mean 3000 sq ft homes selling for that. I meant starter homes – older homes on streets like Tribuna, Ironwood, etc.; smaller but newer homes along Scripps Trl and the streets that move off it – La Vita, Rue Des Amis, Weatherwood, etc.
May 15, 2009 at 1:39 PM #400274Participant[quote=DataAgent]”Ten years ago, it was possible to find a starter home here with prices in several developments under $300k.”
Can you show an example of a 3000 sq ft home that sold for under $300K in Scripps Ranch in 1999?
[/quote]Yikes – I didn’t mean 3000 sq ft homes selling for that. I meant starter homes – older homes on streets like Tribuna, Ironwood, etc.; smaller but newer homes along Scripps Trl and the streets that move off it – La Vita, Rue Des Amis, Weatherwood, etc.
May 15, 2009 at 1:39 PM #400422Participant[quote=DataAgent]”Ten years ago, it was possible to find a starter home here with prices in several developments under $300k.”
Can you show an example of a 3000 sq ft home that sold for under $300K in Scripps Ranch in 1999?
[/quote]Yikes – I didn’t mean 3000 sq ft homes selling for that. I meant starter homes – older homes on streets like Tribuna, Ironwood, etc.; smaller but newer homes along Scripps Trl and the streets that move off it – La Vita, Rue Des Amis, Weatherwood, etc.
May 15, 2009 at 2:10 PM #399747ybitz
Participant[quote=DataAgent]”Ten years ago, it was possible to find a starter home here with prices in several developments under $300k.”
Can you show an example of a 3000 sq ft home that sold for under $300K in Scripps Ranch in 1999?
[/quote]A 3000 sq ft house is a “starter home”?
you can easily find a “starter home” in scripps ranch in 1999 for under 300k. For example:
11368 Red Cedar Way, detached SFH, 3 beds, 2.0 baths, 1,384 sq ft, sold on 01/22/1999 for $194,000. A little small, but it’s good for a starter. That’s just from 10 minutes of zillow browsing. I’m sure you can find many larger houses for under 300k in 1999.
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/charts/16820588_zpid,5years_chartDuration/
This one is on the market right now:
11959 Handrich
5 beds, 3.5 baths, 3,217 sq ft, Sold on 12/01/1999 for $300,000! Now it’s listed for $799k.This home’s value went up 2.6 times in just under 10 years. How can this price be sustainable, when people’s income did not go up 2.6 times in the last 10 years (even adjusting for inflation)? Shouldn’t the value of a home track local income? Based on the numbers, I think Scripps Ranch has a lot to fall still.
May 15, 2009 at 2:10 PM #399996Participant[quote=DataAgent]”Ten years ago, it was possible to find a starter home here with prices in several developments under $300k.”
Can you show an example of a 3000 sq ft home that sold for under $300K in Scripps Ranch in 1999?
[/quote]A 3000 sq ft house is a “starter home”?
you can easily find a “starter home” in scripps ranch in 1999 for under 300k. For example:
11368 Red Cedar Way, detached SFH, 3 beds, 2.0 baths, 1,384 sq ft, sold on 01/22/1999 for $194,000. A little small, but it’s good for a starter. That’s just from 10 minutes of zillow browsing. I’m sure you can find many larger houses for under 300k in 1999.
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/charts/16820588_zpid,5years_chartDuration/
This one is on the market right now:
11959 Handrich
5 beds, 3.5 baths, 3,217 sq ft, Sold on 12/01/1999 for $300,000! Now it’s listed for $799k.This home’s value went up 2.6 times in just under 10 years. How can this price be sustainable, when people’s income did not go up 2.6 times in the last 10 years (even adjusting for inflation)? Shouldn’t the value of a home track local income? Based on the numbers, I think Scripps Ranch has a lot to fall still.
May 15, 2009 at 2:10 PM #400226Participant[quote=DataAgent]”Ten years ago, it was possible to find a starter home here with prices in several developments under $300k.”
Can you show an example of a 3000 sq ft home that sold for under $300K in Scripps Ranch in 1999?
[/quote]A 3000 sq ft house is a “starter home”?
you can easily find a “starter home” in scripps ranch in 1999 for under 300k. For example:
11368 Red Cedar Way, detached SFH, 3 beds, 2.0 baths, 1,384 sq ft, sold on 01/22/1999 for $194,000. A little small, but it’s good for a starter. That’s just from 10 minutes of zillow browsing. I’m sure you can find many larger houses for under 300k in 1999.
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/charts/16820588_zpid,5years_chartDuration/
This one is on the market right now:
11959 Handrich
5 beds, 3.5 baths, 3,217 sq ft, Sold on 12/01/1999 for $300,000! Now it’s listed for $799k.This home’s value went up 2.6 times in just under 10 years. How can this price be sustainable, when people’s income did not go up 2.6 times in the last 10 years (even adjusting for inflation)? Shouldn’t the value of a home track local income? Based on the numbers, I think Scripps Ranch has a lot to fall still.
May 15, 2009 at 2:10 PM #400284Participant[quote=DataAgent]”Ten years ago, it was possible to find a starter home here with prices in several developments under $300k.”
Can you show an example of a 3000 sq ft home that sold for under $300K in Scripps Ranch in 1999?
[/quote]A 3000 sq ft house is a “starter home”?
you can easily find a “starter home” in scripps ranch in 1999 for under 300k. For example:
11368 Red Cedar Way, detached SFH, 3 beds, 2.0 baths, 1,384 sq ft, sold on 01/22/1999 for $194,000. A little small, but it’s good for a starter. That’s just from 10 minutes of zillow browsing. I’m sure you can find many larger houses for under 300k in 1999.
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/charts/16820588_zpid,5years_chartDuration/
This one is on the market right now:
11959 Handrich
5 beds, 3.5 baths, 3,217 sq ft, Sold on 12/01/1999 for $300,000! Now it’s listed for $799k.This home’s value went up 2.6 times in just under 10 years. How can this price be sustainable, when people’s income did not go up 2.6 times in the last 10 years (even adjusting for inflation)? Shouldn’t the value of a home track local income? Based on the numbers, I think Scripps Ranch has a lot to fall still.
May 15, 2009 at 2:10 PM #400432Participant[quote=DataAgent]”Ten years ago, it was possible to find a starter home here with prices in several developments under $300k.”
Can you show an example of a 3000 sq ft home that sold for under $300K in Scripps Ranch in 1999?
[/quote]A 3000 sq ft house is a “starter home”?
you can easily find a “starter home” in scripps ranch in 1999 for under 300k. For example:
11368 Red Cedar Way, detached SFH, 3 beds, 2.0 baths, 1,384 sq ft, sold on 01/22/1999 for $194,000. A little small, but it’s good for a starter. That’s just from 10 minutes of zillow browsing. I’m sure you can find many larger houses for under 300k in 1999.
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/charts/16820588_zpid,5years_chartDuration/
This one is on the market right now:
11959 Handrich
5 beds, 3.5 baths, 3,217 sq ft, Sold on 12/01/1999 for $300,000! Now it’s listed for $799k.This home’s value went up 2.6 times in just under 10 years. How can this price be sustainable, when people’s income did not go up 2.6 times in the last 10 years (even adjusting for inflation)? Shouldn’t the value of a home track local income? Based on the numbers, I think Scripps Ranch has a lot to fall still.
May 15, 2009 at 2:13 PM #399757DataAgent
ParticipantHere’s the Scripps Ranch $300K ‘starter home’ of 1999: http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-080051698-11353_Swan_Canyon_San_Diego_Ca_92131
It’s 10 years later and now priced at $549K. That’s about a 6% annual appreciation rate. You’ll want at least that appreciation rate (probably more) when you sell the place 10 years from now.
With some good negotiating skills and a little patience, you may get the price down to low $500Ks.
May 15, 2009 at 2:13 PM #400006ParticipantHere’s the Scripps Ranch $300K ‘starter home’ of 1999: http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-080051698-11353_Swan_Canyon_San_Diego_Ca_92131
It’s 10 years later and now priced at $549K. That’s about a 6% annual appreciation rate. You’ll want at least that appreciation rate (probably more) when you sell the place 10 years from now.
With some good negotiating skills and a little patience, you may get the price down to low $500Ks.
May 15, 2009 at 2:13 PM #400236ParticipantHere’s the Scripps Ranch $300K ‘starter home’ of 1999: http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-080051698-11353_Swan_Canyon_San_Diego_Ca_92131
It’s 10 years later and now priced at $549K. That’s about a 6% annual appreciation rate. You’ll want at least that appreciation rate (probably more) when you sell the place 10 years from now.
With some good negotiating skills and a little patience, you may get the price down to low $500Ks.
May 15, 2009 at 2:13 PM #400294ParticipantHere’s the Scripps Ranch $300K ‘starter home’ of 1999: http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-080051698-11353_Swan_Canyon_San_Diego_Ca_92131
It’s 10 years later and now priced at $549K. That’s about a 6% annual appreciation rate. You’ll want at least that appreciation rate (probably more) when you sell the place 10 years from now.
With some good negotiating skills and a little patience, you may get the price down to low $500Ks.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.