Schwarzenegger backs state services to immigrants

[Aecetia]

The business may save money, but the taxpayers pay in the long run because of the higher taxes, higher cost of health care, etc. Stores that have a high loss due to shop lifters pass the cost onto the consumers. The insured pay for the uninsured drivers, health care, etc. There really is no free lunch and it is about time government figured that out. Many retirees will find States who will not tax them into poverty one way or the other. The boomers are not about to adjust their life style to pay for someone else. Arnold should quit running his mouth bring out the Conan sword and really use it to cut the programs he has threatened to cut. Let’s see what happens to the State then. He is turning out to be all bark and no bite.

[afx114]

Fuck the Conan sword, Arnold needs to bust out his glowsticks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkbB-X9654s

[afx114]

Fuck the Conan sword, Arnold needs to bust out his glowsticks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkbB-X9654s

[afx114]

Fuck the Conan sword, Arnold needs to bust out his glowsticks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkbB-X9654s

[afx114]

Fuck the Conan sword, Arnold needs to bust out his glowsticks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkbB-X9654s

[afx114]

Fuck the Conan sword, Arnold needs to bust out his glowsticks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkbB-X9654s

[SD Realtor]

I think that it does not really matter what is cut and what is not. Whether it is welfare benefits, services to people who are not legal citizens of this country, cuts to education, municipal services, or anything else. The bottom line is that a solution is needed and that solution will be a combo of increased taxes and reduced services.

I understand those who support continuation of welfare support and benes for illegals. My only question is where do you guys propose the cuts be made then? Or is the solution to not make cuts and raise taxes only?

I recall someone had made a recommendation one time about a simple 20 percent reduction across the board. Not a bad idea.

It is the only way for the state to move forward. Sadly I believe the cuts will be modest and the state will continue a policy of defecit spending because obama will either produce loans or gaurantee the loans needed. As bad as arnold is, and he is horrible, the state senate is just as responsible. The 15 percent flat tax proposal by arnold was pretty nice as well.

Look out new york, cali is gunning for that number 1 ranking.

[SD Realtor]

I think that it does not really matter what is cut and what is not. Whether it is welfare benefits, services to people who are not legal citizens of this country, cuts to education, municipal services, or anything else. The bottom line is that a solution is needed and that solution will be a combo of increased taxes and reduced services.

I understand those who support continuation of welfare support and benes for illegals. My only question is where do you guys propose the cuts be made then? Or is the solution to not make cuts and raise taxes only?

I recall someone had made a recommendation one time about a simple 20 percent reduction across the board. Not a bad idea.

It is the only way for the state to move forward. Sadly I believe the cuts will be modest and the state will continue a policy of defecit spending because obama will either produce loans or gaurantee the loans needed. As bad as arnold is, and he is horrible, the state senate is just as responsible. The 15 percent flat tax proposal by arnold was pretty nice as well.

Look out new york, cali is gunning for that number 1 ranking.

[SD Realtor]

I think that it does not really matter what is cut and what is not. Whether it is welfare benefits, services to people who are not legal citizens of this country, cuts to education, municipal services, or anything else. The bottom line is that a solution is needed and that solution will be a combo of increased taxes and reduced services.

I understand those who support continuation of welfare support and benes for illegals. My only question is where do you guys propose the cuts be made then? Or is the solution to not make cuts and raise taxes only?

I recall someone had made a recommendation one time about a simple 20 percent reduction across the board. Not a bad idea.

It is the only way for the state to move forward. Sadly I believe the cuts will be modest and the state will continue a policy of defecit spending because obama will either produce loans or gaurantee the loans needed. As bad as arnold is, and he is horrible, the state senate is just as responsible. The 15 percent flat tax proposal by arnold was pretty nice as well.

Look out new york, cali is gunning for that number 1 ranking.

[SD Realtor]

I think that it does not really matter what is cut and what is not. Whether it is welfare benefits, services to people who are not legal citizens of this country, cuts to education, municipal services, or anything else. The bottom line is that a solution is needed and that solution will be a combo of increased taxes and reduced services.

I understand those who support continuation of welfare support and benes for illegals. My only question is where do you guys propose the cuts be made then? Or is the solution to not make cuts and raise taxes only?

I recall someone had made a recommendation one time about a simple 20 percent reduction across the board. Not a bad idea.

It is the only way for the state to move forward. Sadly I believe the cuts will be modest and the state will continue a policy of defecit spending because obama will either produce loans or gaurantee the loans needed. As bad as arnold is, and he is horrible, the state senate is just as responsible. The 15 percent flat tax proposal by arnold was pretty nice as well.

Look out new york, cali is gunning for that number 1 ranking.

[SD Realtor]

I think that it does not really matter what is cut and what is not. Whether it is welfare benefits, services to people who are not legal citizens of this country, cuts to education, municipal services, or anything else. The bottom line is that a solution is needed and that solution will be a combo of increased taxes and reduced services.

I understand those who support continuation of welfare support and benes for illegals. My only question is where do you guys propose the cuts be made then? Or is the solution to not make cuts and raise taxes only?

I recall someone had made a recommendation one time about a simple 20 percent reduction across the board. Not a bad idea.

It is the only way for the state to move forward. Sadly I believe the cuts will be modest and the state will continue a policy of defecit spending because obama will either produce loans or gaurantee the loans needed. As bad as arnold is, and he is horrible, the state senate is just as responsible. The 15 percent flat tax proposal by arnold was pretty nice as well.

Look out new york, cali is gunning for that number 1 ranking.

[BKlawyer]

“Flat tax of 15% sounds OK”!!!??? My max now as an individual is 9.3%. http://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/catxrate_exmpt07.shtml
Sure! I’ll line up for the slaughter. . .

[BKlawyer]

“Flat tax of 15% sounds OK”!!!??? My max now as an individual is 9.3%. http://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/catxrate_exmpt07.shtml
Sure! I’ll line up for the slaughter. . .

[BKlawyer]

“Flat tax of 15% sounds OK”!!!??? My max now as an individual is 9.3%. http://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/catxrate_exmpt07.shtml
Sure! I’ll line up for the slaughter. . .

[BKlawyer]

“Flat tax of 15% sounds OK”!!!??? My max now as an individual is 9.3%. http://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/catxrate_exmpt07.shtml
Sure! I’ll line up for the slaughter. . .

[Author]

Posts