Closing

[joec]

Good call. The good thing is that when you come to resale this new home, potential buyers will also do a check so you would probably get a lower value if there a lot of folks on the list there next to the property…

Even though there are these folks in EVERY neighborhood, there is a matter of how many per population. As I mentioned in the Skyranch thread, we didn’t consider that area after looking at the numbers compared to other areas.

[jstoesz]

Outstanding. I had no idea you could do this. That is what I have been wondering. The website has just enough to freak you out (the pictures) but little to no detail on the circumstances. Sometimes these people were peeing in public or slept with their 17 year old girl friend when they were in college. It is so hard to know.

[jstoesz]

Outstanding. I had no idea you could do this. That is what I have been wondering. The website has just enough to freak you out (the pictures) but little to no detail on the circumstances. Sometimes these people were peeing in public or slept with their 17 year old girl friend when they were in college. It is so hard to know.

[jstoesz]

Outstanding. I had no idea you could do this. That is what I have been wondering. The website has just enough to freak you out (the pictures) but little to no detail on the circumstances. Sometimes these people were peeing in public or slept with their 17 year old girl friend when they were in college. It is so hard to know.

[jstoesz]

Outstanding. I had no idea you could do this. That is what I have been wondering. The website has just enough to freak you out (the pictures) but little to no detail on the circumstances. Sometimes these people were peeing in public or slept with their 17 year old girl friend when they were in college. It is so hard to know.

[jstoesz]

Outstanding. I had no idea you could do this. That is what I have been wondering. The website has just enough to freak you out (the pictures) but little to no detail on the circumstances. Sometimes these people were peeing in public or slept with their 17 year old girl friend when they were in college. It is so hard to know.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]. . . So basically, I don’t know. Oh, and the whole John Gardner thing didn’t help at all.[/quote]

jstoesz, I think Gardner was discussed on an earlier thread this year. Gardner was classified as a “sexually violent predator,” within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 6600 et. seq. Most of these individuals cannot be rehabilitated and so are institutionalized for life or released under VERY strict supervision.

What CAR was dealing with here are garden-variety sex registrants who are required to register for life annually and/or every time they move.

The two should not be compared with one another.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]. . . So basically, I don’t know. Oh, and the whole John Gardner thing didn’t help at all.[/quote]

jstoesz, I think Gardner was discussed on an earlier thread this year. Gardner was classified as a “sexually violent predator,” within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 6600 et. seq. Most of these individuals cannot be rehabilitated and so are institutionalized for life or released under VERY strict supervision.

What CAR was dealing with here are garden-variety sex registrants who are required to register for life annually and/or every time they move.

The two should not be compared with one another.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]. . . So basically, I don’t know. Oh, and the whole John Gardner thing didn’t help at all.[/quote]

jstoesz, I think Gardner was discussed on an earlier thread this year. Gardner was classified as a “sexually violent predator,” within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 6600 et. seq. Most of these individuals cannot be rehabilitated and so are institutionalized for life or released under VERY strict supervision.

What CAR was dealing with here are garden-variety sex registrants who are required to register for life annually and/or every time they move.

The two should not be compared with one another.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]. . . So basically, I don’t know. Oh, and the whole John Gardner thing didn’t help at all.[/quote]

jstoesz, I think Gardner was discussed on an earlier thread this year. Gardner was classified as a “sexually violent predator,” within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 6600 et. seq. Most of these individuals cannot be rehabilitated and so are institutionalized for life or released under VERY strict supervision.

What CAR was dealing with here are garden-variety sex registrants who are required to register for life annually and/or every time they move.

The two should not be compared with one another.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]. . . So basically, I don’t know. Oh, and the whole John Gardner thing didn’t help at all.[/quote]

jstoesz, I think Gardner was discussed on an earlier thread this year. Gardner was classified as a “sexually violent predator,” within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 6600 et. seq. Most of these individuals cannot be rehabilitated and so are institutionalized for life or released under VERY strict supervision.

What CAR was dealing with here are garden-variety sex registrants who are required to register for life annually and/or every time they move.

The two should not be compared with one another.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]Outstanding. I had no idea you could do this. That is what I have been wondering. The website has just enough to freak you out (the pictures) but little to no detail on the circumstances. Sometimes these people were peeing in public or slept with their 17 year old girl friend when they were in college. It is so hard to know.[/quote]

Some were falsely accused (and successfully convicted) of lewd and lascivious conduct under Penal Code section 288 by (possibly “coached”) family members or neighbors who were minors in an era where there was no DNA technology to prove their guilt or innocence.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]Outstanding. I had no idea you could do this. That is what I have been wondering. The website has just enough to freak you out (the pictures) but little to no detail on the circumstances. Sometimes these people were peeing in public or slept with their 17 year old girl friend when they were in college. It is so hard to know.[/quote]

Some were falsely accused (and successfully convicted) of lewd and lascivious conduct under Penal Code section 288 by (possibly “coached”) family members or neighbors who were minors in an era where there was no DNA technology to prove their guilt or innocence.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]Outstanding. I had no idea you could do this. That is what I have been wondering. The website has just enough to freak you out (the pictures) but little to no detail on the circumstances. Sometimes these people were peeing in public or slept with their 17 year old girl friend when they were in college. It is so hard to know.[/quote]

Some were falsely accused (and successfully convicted) of lewd and lascivious conduct under Penal Code section 288 by (possibly “coached”) family members or neighbors who were minors in an era where there was no DNA technology to prove their guilt or innocence.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=jstoesz]Outstanding. I had no idea you could do this. That is what I have been wondering. The website has just enough to freak you out (the pictures) but little to no detail on the circumstances. Sometimes these people were peeing in public or slept with their 17 year old girl friend when they were in college. It is so hard to know.[/quote]

Some were falsely accused (and successfully convicted) of lewd and lascivious conduct under Penal Code section 288 by (possibly “coached”) family members or neighbors who were minors in an era where there was no DNA technology to prove their guilt or innocence.

[Author]

Posts