Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Safe(r) banks
- This topic has 150 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 15, 2008 at 8:55 AM #287916October 15, 2008 at 8:02 PM #287808patientrenterParticipant
I would be cautious about depositing large amounts into banks guaranteed by small countries with a big banking industry. Why? Because the potential shortfall the small country’s govt has to make up if a lot of the banks topple could be more than their citizens are prepared to actually pay.
It’s all very well for a govt to say that it guarantees everything, but if things go really bad and the bill is for 5 years of the country’s income, it ain’t all going to get paid. People aren’t going to go from big screen TVs and vacations in the Galapagos to pulling roots from the ground for dinner to keep their banks’ creditors whole.
October 15, 2008 at 8:02 PM #288109patientrenterParticipantI would be cautious about depositing large amounts into banks guaranteed by small countries with a big banking industry. Why? Because the potential shortfall the small country’s govt has to make up if a lot of the banks topple could be more than their citizens are prepared to actually pay.
It’s all very well for a govt to say that it guarantees everything, but if things go really bad and the bill is for 5 years of the country’s income, it ain’t all going to get paid. People aren’t going to go from big screen TVs and vacations in the Galapagos to pulling roots from the ground for dinner to keep their banks’ creditors whole.
October 15, 2008 at 8:02 PM #288125patientrenterParticipantI would be cautious about depositing large amounts into banks guaranteed by small countries with a big banking industry. Why? Because the potential shortfall the small country’s govt has to make up if a lot of the banks topple could be more than their citizens are prepared to actually pay.
It’s all very well for a govt to say that it guarantees everything, but if things go really bad and the bill is for 5 years of the country’s income, it ain’t all going to get paid. People aren’t going to go from big screen TVs and vacations in the Galapagos to pulling roots from the ground for dinner to keep their banks’ creditors whole.
October 15, 2008 at 8:02 PM #288152patientrenterParticipantI would be cautious about depositing large amounts into banks guaranteed by small countries with a big banking industry. Why? Because the potential shortfall the small country’s govt has to make up if a lot of the banks topple could be more than their citizens are prepared to actually pay.
It’s all very well for a govt to say that it guarantees everything, but if things go really bad and the bill is for 5 years of the country’s income, it ain’t all going to get paid. People aren’t going to go from big screen TVs and vacations in the Galapagos to pulling roots from the ground for dinner to keep their banks’ creditors whole.
October 15, 2008 at 8:02 PM #288156patientrenterParticipantI would be cautious about depositing large amounts into banks guaranteed by small countries with a big banking industry. Why? Because the potential shortfall the small country’s govt has to make up if a lot of the banks topple could be more than their citizens are prepared to actually pay.
It’s all very well for a govt to say that it guarantees everything, but if things go really bad and the bill is for 5 years of the country’s income, it ain’t all going to get paid. People aren’t going to go from big screen TVs and vacations in the Galapagos to pulling roots from the ground for dinner to keep their banks’ creditors whole.
October 19, 2008 at 6:52 PM #28988634f3f3fParticipantPatientrenter, I assume you are referring to Iceland. For US citizens, they may feel safer with keeping everything in their own back yard, but many foreign residents, expats, migrant workers etc, may prefer to spread the risk by using resources more familiar to them. While a bank in Timbuktu might seem bizarre to some, it might have appeal to others who see banks collapsing everywhere around them in the US. However, since the virus has drifted across the oceans, you might ask is anywhere safe? Is a government guarantee any safer than the FDIC, which is equally ill-equipped for a major collapse? I guess the answer is you stick with what you know.
October 19, 2008 at 6:52 PM #29019434f3f3fParticipantPatientrenter, I assume you are referring to Iceland. For US citizens, they may feel safer with keeping everything in their own back yard, but many foreign residents, expats, migrant workers etc, may prefer to spread the risk by using resources more familiar to them. While a bank in Timbuktu might seem bizarre to some, it might have appeal to others who see banks collapsing everywhere around them in the US. However, since the virus has drifted across the oceans, you might ask is anywhere safe? Is a government guarantee any safer than the FDIC, which is equally ill-equipped for a major collapse? I guess the answer is you stick with what you know.
October 19, 2008 at 6:52 PM #29020034f3f3fParticipantPatientrenter, I assume you are referring to Iceland. For US citizens, they may feel safer with keeping everything in their own back yard, but many foreign residents, expats, migrant workers etc, may prefer to spread the risk by using resources more familiar to them. While a bank in Timbuktu might seem bizarre to some, it might have appeal to others who see banks collapsing everywhere around them in the US. However, since the virus has drifted across the oceans, you might ask is anywhere safe? Is a government guarantee any safer than the FDIC, which is equally ill-equipped for a major collapse? I guess the answer is you stick with what you know.
October 19, 2008 at 6:52 PM #29023334f3f3fParticipantPatientrenter, I assume you are referring to Iceland. For US citizens, they may feel safer with keeping everything in their own back yard, but many foreign residents, expats, migrant workers etc, may prefer to spread the risk by using resources more familiar to them. While a bank in Timbuktu might seem bizarre to some, it might have appeal to others who see banks collapsing everywhere around them in the US. However, since the virus has drifted across the oceans, you might ask is anywhere safe? Is a government guarantee any safer than the FDIC, which is equally ill-equipped for a major collapse? I guess the answer is you stick with what you know.
October 19, 2008 at 6:52 PM #29023734f3f3fParticipantPatientrenter, I assume you are referring to Iceland. For US citizens, they may feel safer with keeping everything in their own back yard, but many foreign residents, expats, migrant workers etc, may prefer to spread the risk by using resources more familiar to them. While a bank in Timbuktu might seem bizarre to some, it might have appeal to others who see banks collapsing everywhere around them in the US. However, since the virus has drifted across the oceans, you might ask is anywhere safe? Is a government guarantee any safer than the FDIC, which is equally ill-equipped for a major collapse? I guess the answer is you stick with what you know.
November 9, 2010 at 9:01 PM #628599AnonymousGuesthi thanks for the info. you can find all US bank locations, addresses, telephone numbers and more details here. Check out the below link
November 9, 2010 at 9:01 PM #628677AnonymousGuesthi thanks for the info. you can find all US bank locations, addresses, telephone numbers and more details here. Check out the below link
November 9, 2010 at 9:01 PM #629250AnonymousGuesthi thanks for the info. you can find all US bank locations, addresses, telephone numbers and more details here. Check out the below link
November 9, 2010 at 9:01 PM #629377AnonymousGuesthi thanks for the info. you can find all US bank locations, addresses, telephone numbers and more details here. Check out the below link
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.