Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Riverside County 2008-2009 Assessed Value
- This topic has 40 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 18, 2008 at 10:53 PM #242685July 19, 2008 at 1:07 AM #242808temeculaguyParticipant
Temeku, how much of the taxes in morgan are not based on value? I’m looking at some and trying to figure my potential tax bill. I remember when they first opened the first tract they quoted me 2.4%, then at peak they said 1.7 or 1.8, which is because the price was double so the percentage is irrlevent because of some of the non value tax items there.
I saw one come up today, sold in 2005 for 575, assessed at 589 in 2007 and the tax bill was $9250.
It’s listed for 309k, I know that if I bought it for half the assessed my tax bill wont be half of the 9250 because a couple grand of that bill is per lot not value based but how much? Realtors use percentages but in these drastic value changes those are irrelevent.The lot back yard was never done and it’s kinda too big of a lot for me (which is why I am posting it) but what are your thoughts on this one and or this tract.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Temecula/44913-Silver-Rose-St-92592/home/6570566
also what is the hoa for morgan?
July 19, 2008 at 1:07 AM #242802temeculaguyParticipantTemeku, how much of the taxes in morgan are not based on value? I’m looking at some and trying to figure my potential tax bill. I remember when they first opened the first tract they quoted me 2.4%, then at peak they said 1.7 or 1.8, which is because the price was double so the percentage is irrlevent because of some of the non value tax items there.
I saw one come up today, sold in 2005 for 575, assessed at 589 in 2007 and the tax bill was $9250.
It’s listed for 309k, I know that if I bought it for half the assessed my tax bill wont be half of the 9250 because a couple grand of that bill is per lot not value based but how much? Realtors use percentages but in these drastic value changes those are irrelevent.The lot back yard was never done and it’s kinda too big of a lot for me (which is why I am posting it) but what are your thoughts on this one and or this tract.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Temecula/44913-Silver-Rose-St-92592/home/6570566
also what is the hoa for morgan?
July 19, 2008 at 1:07 AM #242746temeculaguyParticipantTemeku, how much of the taxes in morgan are not based on value? I’m looking at some and trying to figure my potential tax bill. I remember when they first opened the first tract they quoted me 2.4%, then at peak they said 1.7 or 1.8, which is because the price was double so the percentage is irrlevent because of some of the non value tax items there.
I saw one come up today, sold in 2005 for 575, assessed at 589 in 2007 and the tax bill was $9250.
It’s listed for 309k, I know that if I bought it for half the assessed my tax bill wont be half of the 9250 because a couple grand of that bill is per lot not value based but how much? Realtors use percentages but in these drastic value changes those are irrelevent.The lot back yard was never done and it’s kinda too big of a lot for me (which is why I am posting it) but what are your thoughts on this one and or this tract.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Temecula/44913-Silver-Rose-St-92592/home/6570566
also what is the hoa for morgan?
July 19, 2008 at 1:07 AM #242738temeculaguyParticipantTemeku, how much of the taxes in morgan are not based on value? I’m looking at some and trying to figure my potential tax bill. I remember when they first opened the first tract they quoted me 2.4%, then at peak they said 1.7 or 1.8, which is because the price was double so the percentage is irrlevent because of some of the non value tax items there.
I saw one come up today, sold in 2005 for 575, assessed at 589 in 2007 and the tax bill was $9250.
It’s listed for 309k, I know that if I bought it for half the assessed my tax bill wont be half of the 9250 because a couple grand of that bill is per lot not value based but how much? Realtors use percentages but in these drastic value changes those are irrelevent.The lot back yard was never done and it’s kinda too big of a lot for me (which is why I am posting it) but what are your thoughts on this one and or this tract.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Temecula/44913-Silver-Rose-St-92592/home/6570566
also what is the hoa for morgan?
July 19, 2008 at 1:07 AM #242600temeculaguyParticipantTemeku, how much of the taxes in morgan are not based on value? I’m looking at some and trying to figure my potential tax bill. I remember when they first opened the first tract they quoted me 2.4%, then at peak they said 1.7 or 1.8, which is because the price was double so the percentage is irrlevent because of some of the non value tax items there.
I saw one come up today, sold in 2005 for 575, assessed at 589 in 2007 and the tax bill was $9250.
It’s listed for 309k, I know that if I bought it for half the assessed my tax bill wont be half of the 9250 because a couple grand of that bill is per lot not value based but how much? Realtors use percentages but in these drastic value changes those are irrelevent.The lot back yard was never done and it’s kinda too big of a lot for me (which is why I am posting it) but what are your thoughts on this one and or this tract.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Temecula/44913-Silver-Rose-St-92592/home/6570566
also what is the hoa for morgan?
July 19, 2008 at 5:45 AM #242763pizzamanParticipantTG, If I understand your question you may be able to find your answer at the County property tax website here https://taxpayments.co.riverside.ca.us/Search.aspx . (Note – It appears as though it is unavailable until August 1 because of end of year processing). Armed with the assessment number included in the listing you can retrieve a breakdown of the current taxes. I believe that the only amount that recalculates is the 1% general obligation which is the first line item, the rest are known fixed amounts. I have tried to analyze some potential purchases in Murrieta and have included one below. If my numbers are right although the tax amount in dollars is reduced in my example by roughly 1/3 the actual tax rate as a percentage will increase from 1.35 to 1.55. I did some others in newer areas that had higher mello-roos payments and the percentages got well into the 2’s
btw, Does anyone know why the 1% Tax Limit Per Prop 13 actually is 1.08%,its that way on all of the ones I review.CURRENT @ 686,000
1% TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13……..$7,399.12 1.08%
FLD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER……$4.08 0.00%
CSA 152-MURRIETA STORMWATER……..$10.00 0.00%
MURRIETA CSD…………………..$45.44 0.01%
MURRIETA PARKS & REC……………$45.00 0.01%
MURRIETA FIRE PROTECTION………..$40.00 0.01%
MURRIETA L&L 5………………..$101.48 0.01%
MURRIETA CO WATER CFD 99-1……$1,588.32 0.23%
MCWD WATER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.00%
MCWD SEWER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.00%
TOTAL TAX $/%……………….$9,275.44 1.35%PURCHASE @ 400,000
1% TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13……..$4,320.00 1.08%
FLD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER……$4.08 0.00%
CSA 152-MURRIETA STORMWATER……..$10.00 0.00%
MURRIETA CSD…………………..$45.44 0.01%
MURRIETA PARKS & REC……………$45.00 0.01%
MURRIETA FIRE PROTECTION………..$40.00 0.01%
MURRIETA L&L 5………………..$101.48 0.03%
MURRIETA CO WATER CFD 99-1……$1,588.32 0.40%
MCWD WATER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.01%
MCWD SEWER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.01%
TOTAL TAX $/%……………….$6,196.32 1.55%July 19, 2008 at 5:45 AM #242771pizzamanParticipantTG, If I understand your question you may be able to find your answer at the County property tax website here https://taxpayments.co.riverside.ca.us/Search.aspx . (Note – It appears as though it is unavailable until August 1 because of end of year processing). Armed with the assessment number included in the listing you can retrieve a breakdown of the current taxes. I believe that the only amount that recalculates is the 1% general obligation which is the first line item, the rest are known fixed amounts. I have tried to analyze some potential purchases in Murrieta and have included one below. If my numbers are right although the tax amount in dollars is reduced in my example by roughly 1/3 the actual tax rate as a percentage will increase from 1.35 to 1.55. I did some others in newer areas that had higher mello-roos payments and the percentages got well into the 2’s
btw, Does anyone know why the 1% Tax Limit Per Prop 13 actually is 1.08%,its that way on all of the ones I review.CURRENT @ 686,000
1% TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13……..$7,399.12 1.08%
FLD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER……$4.08 0.00%
CSA 152-MURRIETA STORMWATER……..$10.00 0.00%
MURRIETA CSD…………………..$45.44 0.01%
MURRIETA PARKS & REC……………$45.00 0.01%
MURRIETA FIRE PROTECTION………..$40.00 0.01%
MURRIETA L&L 5………………..$101.48 0.01%
MURRIETA CO WATER CFD 99-1……$1,588.32 0.23%
MCWD WATER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.00%
MCWD SEWER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.00%
TOTAL TAX $/%……………….$9,275.44 1.35%PURCHASE @ 400,000
1% TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13……..$4,320.00 1.08%
FLD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER……$4.08 0.00%
CSA 152-MURRIETA STORMWATER……..$10.00 0.00%
MURRIETA CSD…………………..$45.44 0.01%
MURRIETA PARKS & REC……………$45.00 0.01%
MURRIETA FIRE PROTECTION………..$40.00 0.01%
MURRIETA L&L 5………………..$101.48 0.03%
MURRIETA CO WATER CFD 99-1……$1,588.32 0.40%
MCWD WATER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.01%
MCWD SEWER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.01%
TOTAL TAX $/%……………….$6,196.32 1.55%July 19, 2008 at 5:45 AM #242834pizzamanParticipantTG, If I understand your question you may be able to find your answer at the County property tax website here https://taxpayments.co.riverside.ca.us/Search.aspx . (Note – It appears as though it is unavailable until August 1 because of end of year processing). Armed with the assessment number included in the listing you can retrieve a breakdown of the current taxes. I believe that the only amount that recalculates is the 1% general obligation which is the first line item, the rest are known fixed amounts. I have tried to analyze some potential purchases in Murrieta and have included one below. If my numbers are right although the tax amount in dollars is reduced in my example by roughly 1/3 the actual tax rate as a percentage will increase from 1.35 to 1.55. I did some others in newer areas that had higher mello-roos payments and the percentages got well into the 2’s
btw, Does anyone know why the 1% Tax Limit Per Prop 13 actually is 1.08%,its that way on all of the ones I review.CURRENT @ 686,000
1% TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13……..$7,399.12 1.08%
FLD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER……$4.08 0.00%
CSA 152-MURRIETA STORMWATER……..$10.00 0.00%
MURRIETA CSD…………………..$45.44 0.01%
MURRIETA PARKS & REC……………$45.00 0.01%
MURRIETA FIRE PROTECTION………..$40.00 0.01%
MURRIETA L&L 5………………..$101.48 0.01%
MURRIETA CO WATER CFD 99-1……$1,588.32 0.23%
MCWD WATER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.00%
MCWD SEWER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.00%
TOTAL TAX $/%……………….$9,275.44 1.35%PURCHASE @ 400,000
1% TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13……..$4,320.00 1.08%
FLD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER……$4.08 0.00%
CSA 152-MURRIETA STORMWATER……..$10.00 0.00%
MURRIETA CSD…………………..$45.44 0.01%
MURRIETA PARKS & REC……………$45.00 0.01%
MURRIETA FIRE PROTECTION………..$40.00 0.01%
MURRIETA L&L 5………………..$101.48 0.03%
MURRIETA CO WATER CFD 99-1……$1,588.32 0.40%
MCWD WATER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.01%
MCWD SEWER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.01%
TOTAL TAX $/%……………….$6,196.32 1.55%July 19, 2008 at 5:45 AM #242625pizzamanParticipantTG, If I understand your question you may be able to find your answer at the County property tax website here https://taxpayments.co.riverside.ca.us/Search.aspx . (Note – It appears as though it is unavailable until August 1 because of end of year processing). Armed with the assessment number included in the listing you can retrieve a breakdown of the current taxes. I believe that the only amount that recalculates is the 1% general obligation which is the first line item, the rest are known fixed amounts. I have tried to analyze some potential purchases in Murrieta and have included one below. If my numbers are right although the tax amount in dollars is reduced in my example by roughly 1/3 the actual tax rate as a percentage will increase from 1.35 to 1.55. I did some others in newer areas that had higher mello-roos payments and the percentages got well into the 2’s
btw, Does anyone know why the 1% Tax Limit Per Prop 13 actually is 1.08%,its that way on all of the ones I review.CURRENT @ 686,000
1% TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13……..$7,399.12 1.08%
FLD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER……$4.08 0.00%
CSA 152-MURRIETA STORMWATER……..$10.00 0.00%
MURRIETA CSD…………………..$45.44 0.01%
MURRIETA PARKS & REC……………$45.00 0.01%
MURRIETA FIRE PROTECTION………..$40.00 0.01%
MURRIETA L&L 5………………..$101.48 0.01%
MURRIETA CO WATER CFD 99-1……$1,588.32 0.23%
MCWD WATER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.00%
MCWD SEWER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.00%
TOTAL TAX $/%……………….$9,275.44 1.35%PURCHASE @ 400,000
1% TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13……..$4,320.00 1.08%
FLD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER……$4.08 0.00%
CSA 152-MURRIETA STORMWATER……..$10.00 0.00%
MURRIETA CSD…………………..$45.44 0.01%
MURRIETA PARKS & REC……………$45.00 0.01%
MURRIETA FIRE PROTECTION………..$40.00 0.01%
MURRIETA L&L 5………………..$101.48 0.03%
MURRIETA CO WATER CFD 99-1……$1,588.32 0.40%
MCWD WATER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.01%
MCWD SEWER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.01%
TOTAL TAX $/%……………….$6,196.32 1.55%July 19, 2008 at 5:45 AM #242828pizzamanParticipantTG, If I understand your question you may be able to find your answer at the County property tax website here https://taxpayments.co.riverside.ca.us/Search.aspx . (Note – It appears as though it is unavailable until August 1 because of end of year processing). Armed with the assessment number included in the listing you can retrieve a breakdown of the current taxes. I believe that the only amount that recalculates is the 1% general obligation which is the first line item, the rest are known fixed amounts. I have tried to analyze some potential purchases in Murrieta and have included one below. If my numbers are right although the tax amount in dollars is reduced in my example by roughly 1/3 the actual tax rate as a percentage will increase from 1.35 to 1.55. I did some others in newer areas that had higher mello-roos payments and the percentages got well into the 2’s
btw, Does anyone know why the 1% Tax Limit Per Prop 13 actually is 1.08%,its that way on all of the ones I review.CURRENT @ 686,000
1% TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13……..$7,399.12 1.08%
FLD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER……$4.08 0.00%
CSA 152-MURRIETA STORMWATER……..$10.00 0.00%
MURRIETA CSD…………………..$45.44 0.01%
MURRIETA PARKS & REC……………$45.00 0.01%
MURRIETA FIRE PROTECTION………..$40.00 0.01%
MURRIETA L&L 5………………..$101.48 0.01%
MURRIETA CO WATER CFD 99-1……$1,588.32 0.23%
MCWD WATER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.00%
MCWD SEWER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.00%
TOTAL TAX $/%……………….$9,275.44 1.35%PURCHASE @ 400,000
1% TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13……..$4,320.00 1.08%
FLD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER……$4.08 0.00%
CSA 152-MURRIETA STORMWATER……..$10.00 0.00%
MURRIETA CSD…………………..$45.44 0.01%
MURRIETA PARKS & REC……………$45.00 0.01%
MURRIETA FIRE PROTECTION………..$40.00 0.01%
MURRIETA L&L 5………………..$101.48 0.03%
MURRIETA CO WATER CFD 99-1……$1,588.32 0.40%
MCWD WATER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.01%
MCWD SEWER STANDBY……………..$21.00 0.01%
TOTAL TAX $/%……………….$6,196.32 1.55%July 19, 2008 at 8:20 AM #242654EconProfParticipantPizzaman: The old 1% rule under Proposition 13 has been eroding for a long time due to voter-approved measures, such as bonded debt, that allows the government entities to push the real figure up. I always assume 1.15%, excluding Mello Roos when making projections. But wow, it looks like they’ve really blown the lid off in your example.
I think we will soon see some court challenges to county tax assessors that are too slow to lower assessments to get more in line with reality. Government officials have an incentive to pretend values are holding up.July 19, 2008 at 8:20 AM #242864EconProfParticipantPizzaman: The old 1% rule under Proposition 13 has been eroding for a long time due to voter-approved measures, such as bonded debt, that allows the government entities to push the real figure up. I always assume 1.15%, excluding Mello Roos when making projections. But wow, it looks like they’ve really blown the lid off in your example.
I think we will soon see some court challenges to county tax assessors that are too slow to lower assessments to get more in line with reality. Government officials have an incentive to pretend values are holding up.July 19, 2008 at 8:20 AM #242858EconProfParticipantPizzaman: The old 1% rule under Proposition 13 has been eroding for a long time due to voter-approved measures, such as bonded debt, that allows the government entities to push the real figure up. I always assume 1.15%, excluding Mello Roos when making projections. But wow, it looks like they’ve really blown the lid off in your example.
I think we will soon see some court challenges to county tax assessors that are too slow to lower assessments to get more in line with reality. Government officials have an incentive to pretend values are holding up.July 19, 2008 at 8:20 AM #242801EconProfParticipantPizzaman: The old 1% rule under Proposition 13 has been eroding for a long time due to voter-approved measures, such as bonded debt, that allows the government entities to push the real figure up. I always assume 1.15%, excluding Mello Roos when making projections. But wow, it looks like they’ve really blown the lid off in your example.
I think we will soon see some court challenges to county tax assessors that are too slow to lower assessments to get more in line with reality. Government officials have an incentive to pretend values are holding up. -
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.