- This topic has 1,340 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by
Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 30, 2010 at 4:57 PM #534340March 30, 2010 at 5:03 PM #533408
briansd1
Guest[quote=SD Realtor]
There is no “new administration”. Republicans and democrats are all controlled by Wall Street. The current administration has a spokesman who is very good at what he does. If you noticed Wall Street seems to be very happy with him. [/quote]Gotta keep the capitalists happy. 😉 They control the money which we all need them to lend us to survive and buy real estate.
If anything at all about the “new administration” that isn’t new, I like the new spokesman better than the old one — superbly well-spoken, finely educated, better looking, athletically superior, etc…
March 30, 2010 at 5:03 PM #533538Guest[quote=SD Realtor]
There is no “new administration”. Republicans and democrats are all controlled by Wall Street. The current administration has a spokesman who is very good at what he does. If you noticed Wall Street seems to be very happy with him. [/quote]Gotta keep the capitalists happy. 😉 They control the money which we all need them to lend us to survive and buy real estate.
If anything at all about the “new administration” that isn’t new, I like the new spokesman better than the old one — superbly well-spoken, finely educated, better looking, athletically superior, etc…
March 30, 2010 at 5:03 PM #533986Guest[quote=SD Realtor]
There is no “new administration”. Republicans and democrats are all controlled by Wall Street. The current administration has a spokesman who is very good at what he does. If you noticed Wall Street seems to be very happy with him. [/quote]Gotta keep the capitalists happy. 😉 They control the money which we all need them to lend us to survive and buy real estate.
If anything at all about the “new administration” that isn’t new, I like the new spokesman better than the old one — superbly well-spoken, finely educated, better looking, athletically superior, etc…
March 30, 2010 at 5:03 PM #534083Guest[quote=SD Realtor]
There is no “new administration”. Republicans and democrats are all controlled by Wall Street. The current administration has a spokesman who is very good at what he does. If you noticed Wall Street seems to be very happy with him. [/quote]Gotta keep the capitalists happy. 😉 They control the money which we all need them to lend us to survive and buy real estate.
If anything at all about the “new administration” that isn’t new, I like the new spokesman better than the old one — superbly well-spoken, finely educated, better looking, athletically superior, etc…
March 30, 2010 at 5:03 PM #534346Guest[quote=SD Realtor]
There is no “new administration”. Republicans and democrats are all controlled by Wall Street. The current administration has a spokesman who is very good at what he does. If you noticed Wall Street seems to be very happy with him. [/quote]Gotta keep the capitalists happy. 😉 They control the money which we all need them to lend us to survive and buy real estate.
If anything at all about the “new administration” that isn’t new, I like the new spokesman better than the old one — superbly well-spoken, finely educated, better looking, athletically superior, etc…
March 30, 2010 at 5:10 PM #533413Guest[quote=SD Realtor]CAR sometimes I think you and I are the only people in the world who think that the world would not have spun off the edge of the universe if the bailouts did not happen.[/quote]
The world would still be fine.
But America would have been hit hard because all economic activity is based on credit.
Less developed, cash-based economies would have suffered some ripples but we would have experienced a tsunami.
How many people, or businesses do you know that can live one week without access to credit?
March 30, 2010 at 5:10 PM #533542Guest[quote=SD Realtor]CAR sometimes I think you and I are the only people in the world who think that the world would not have spun off the edge of the universe if the bailouts did not happen.[/quote]
The world would still be fine.
But America would have been hit hard because all economic activity is based on credit.
Less developed, cash-based economies would have suffered some ripples but we would have experienced a tsunami.
How many people, or businesses do you know that can live one week without access to credit?
March 30, 2010 at 5:10 PM #533991Guest[quote=SD Realtor]CAR sometimes I think you and I are the only people in the world who think that the world would not have spun off the edge of the universe if the bailouts did not happen.[/quote]
The world would still be fine.
But America would have been hit hard because all economic activity is based on credit.
Less developed, cash-based economies would have suffered some ripples but we would have experienced a tsunami.
How many people, or businesses do you know that can live one week without access to credit?
March 30, 2010 at 5:10 PM #534086Guest[quote=SD Realtor]CAR sometimes I think you and I are the only people in the world who think that the world would not have spun off the edge of the universe if the bailouts did not happen.[/quote]
The world would still be fine.
But America would have been hit hard because all economic activity is based on credit.
Less developed, cash-based economies would have suffered some ripples but we would have experienced a tsunami.
How many people, or businesses do you know that can live one week without access to credit?
March 30, 2010 at 5:10 PM #534351Guest[quote=SD Realtor]CAR sometimes I think you and I are the only people in the world who think that the world would not have spun off the edge of the universe if the bailouts did not happen.[/quote]
The world would still be fine.
But America would have been hit hard because all economic activity is based on credit.
Less developed, cash-based economies would have suffered some ripples but we would have experienced a tsunami.
How many people, or businesses do you know that can live one week without access to credit?
March 30, 2010 at 5:14 PM #533423Arraya
ParticipantActually, you could blow up every bank in the world along with wall street put the dow at zero and the world would be fine. It does not change the natural order of things one bit.
March 30, 2010 at 5:14 PM #533552ParticipantActually, you could blow up every bank in the world along with wall street put the dow at zero and the world would be fine. It does not change the natural order of things one bit.
March 30, 2010 at 5:14 PM #534001ParticipantActually, you could blow up every bank in the world along with wall street put the dow at zero and the world would be fine. It does not change the natural order of things one bit.
March 30, 2010 at 5:14 PM #534096ParticipantActually, you could blow up every bank in the world along with wall street put the dow at zero and the world would be fine. It does not change the natural order of things one bit.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
