- This topic has 55 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 12 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 21, 2007 at 11:00 PM #10974November 21, 2007 at 11:22 PM #102697kev374Participant
$349/sqft seems really expensive!! Here in South OC now there are many properties listed at $275/sqft
November 21, 2007 at 11:22 PM #102838kev374Participant$349/sqft seems really expensive!! Here in South OC now there are many properties listed at $275/sqft
November 21, 2007 at 11:22 PM #102810kev374Participant$349/sqft seems really expensive!! Here in South OC now there are many properties listed at $275/sqft
November 21, 2007 at 11:22 PM #102786kev374Participant$349/sqft seems really expensive!! Here in South OC now there are many properties listed at $275/sqft
November 21, 2007 at 11:22 PM #102774kev374Participant$349/sqft seems really expensive!! Here in South OC now there are many properties listed at $275/sqft
November 22, 2007 at 1:15 AM #102789EugeneParticipantYear built: 1913?
November 22, 2007 at 1:15 AM #102801EugeneParticipantYear built: 1913?
November 22, 2007 at 1:15 AM #102825EugeneParticipantYear built: 1913?
November 22, 2007 at 1:15 AM #102712EugeneParticipantYear built: 1913?
November 22, 2007 at 1:15 AM #102853EugeneParticipantYear built: 1913?
November 22, 2007 at 5:36 AM #1028684plexownerParticipantInteresting listing – decent location north of Adams for less than $300K – but very tiny and the 1913 build date is probably accurate – listing says ‘As Is’ and ‘future tear down’ which probably means the house is basically a scraper (assume wood issues and outdated electrical and plumbing for starters – wouldn’t be surprised to find foundation issues as well) – the deep, narrow lot limits the options for new construction -‘As Is’ condition of the house most likely eliminates conventional financing as an option
Not a great starter home unless you could do all the work yourself (and thought the work was justified on a ‘future tear down’)
Investment potential: a 2/1 in this location (even a crappy one) probably rents for $1050 pretty easily – 150 times monthly rent would be $157.5K – 100 times rents is $105K – at $279K this property isn’t going to attract investors (although there is probably somebody who thinks they can flip this thing for a profit)
Can someone pull the history on this property please?
November 22, 2007 at 5:36 AM #1028404plexownerParticipantInteresting listing – decent location north of Adams for less than $300K – but very tiny and the 1913 build date is probably accurate – listing says ‘As Is’ and ‘future tear down’ which probably means the house is basically a scraper (assume wood issues and outdated electrical and plumbing for starters – wouldn’t be surprised to find foundation issues as well) – the deep, narrow lot limits the options for new construction -‘As Is’ condition of the house most likely eliminates conventional financing as an option
Not a great starter home unless you could do all the work yourself (and thought the work was justified on a ‘future tear down’)
Investment potential: a 2/1 in this location (even a crappy one) probably rents for $1050 pretty easily – 150 times monthly rent would be $157.5K – 100 times rents is $105K – at $279K this property isn’t going to attract investors (although there is probably somebody who thinks they can flip this thing for a profit)
Can someone pull the history on this property please?
November 22, 2007 at 5:36 AM #1027274plexownerParticipantInteresting listing – decent location north of Adams for less than $300K – but very tiny and the 1913 build date is probably accurate – listing says ‘As Is’ and ‘future tear down’ which probably means the house is basically a scraper (assume wood issues and outdated electrical and plumbing for starters – wouldn’t be surprised to find foundation issues as well) – the deep, narrow lot limits the options for new construction -‘As Is’ condition of the house most likely eliminates conventional financing as an option
Not a great starter home unless you could do all the work yourself (and thought the work was justified on a ‘future tear down’)
Investment potential: a 2/1 in this location (even a crappy one) probably rents for $1050 pretty easily – 150 times monthly rent would be $157.5K – 100 times rents is $105K – at $279K this property isn’t going to attract investors (although there is probably somebody who thinks they can flip this thing for a profit)
Can someone pull the history on this property please?
November 22, 2007 at 5:36 AM #1028044plexownerParticipantInteresting listing – decent location north of Adams for less than $300K – but very tiny and the 1913 build date is probably accurate – listing says ‘As Is’ and ‘future tear down’ which probably means the house is basically a scraper (assume wood issues and outdated electrical and plumbing for starters – wouldn’t be surprised to find foundation issues as well) – the deep, narrow lot limits the options for new construction -‘As Is’ condition of the house most likely eliminates conventional financing as an option
Not a great starter home unless you could do all the work yourself (and thought the work was justified on a ‘future tear down’)
Investment potential: a 2/1 in this location (even a crappy one) probably rents for $1050 pretty easily – 150 times monthly rent would be $157.5K – 100 times rents is $105K – at $279K this property isn’t going to attract investors (although there is probably somebody who thinks they can flip this thing for a profit)
Can someone pull the history on this property please?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.